On 04/25/2014 04:13 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 08:02:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>
Thanks for the pointer (I have not built systemd at the moment,
still trying to sort out enough details for me to have a chance of
>>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 08:02:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks for the pointer (I have not built systemd at the moment,
>>> still trying to sort out enough details for me to have a chance of
>>> getting the whole thing working). But your use
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 08:02:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the pointer (I have not built systemd at the moment,
> > still trying to sort out enough details for me to have a chance of
> > getting the whole thing working). But your use of sysctl looks
> > un
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Last night I was trying to figure out how to set the dmesg log level in
systemd. It turns out that it can be done wi
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >>
> >> Last night I was trying to figure out how to set the dmesg log level in
> >> systemd. It turns out that it can be done with sysctl and set:
>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> Last night I was trying to figure out how to set the dmesg log level in
>> systemd. It turns out that it can be done with sysctl and set:
>>
>> kernel.printk = 4 4 1 7
>>
>> where the numbers are console_logleve
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Last night I was trying to figure out how to set the dmesg log level in
> systemd. It turns out that it can be done with sysctl and set:
>
> kernel.printk = 4 4 1 7
>
> where the numbers are console_loglevel, default_message_logl
Ken Moffat wrote:
> There is also a deeper difference - jhalfs was originally a tool for
> builders. As an editor, my preference is to look at a new package
> version on a completed system [ normally, just a DESTDIR ], see what
> options I want to use [ e.g. omit static libs even in LFS, unless
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 03:28:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > Le 21/04/2014 20:49, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> >> Pierre Labastie wrote:
> >>> Le 20/04/2014 23:26, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>
> >> For convenience I also have scripts to mount and unmount virtual file
> >> systems
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 21/04/2014 20:49, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 20/04/2014 23:26, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>> For convenience I also have scripts to mount and unmount virtual file
>> systems and to clean up $LFS prior to the start of a new build. I also
>> have an
Le 21/04/2014 20:49, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Le 20/04/2014 23:26, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> I've no idea what that refers to, but it doesn't matter. I know
>>> that (at least) you and Pierre use jhalfs, and for me that is
>>> unusable (/scratch is an nfs mount on
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 20/04/2014 23:26, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>>
>>
>> I've no idea what that refers to, but it doesn't matter. I know
>> that (at least) you and Pierre use jhalfs, and for me that is
>> unusable (/scratch is an nfs mount on/from my server, I _really_ do
>> not want to try t
Le 20/04/2014 23:26, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>
>
> I've no idea what that refers to, but it doesn't matter. I know
> that (at least) you and Pierre use jhalfs, and for me that is
> unusable (/scratch is an nfs mount on/from my server, I _really_ do
> not want to try to build there - by the same tok
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 06:00:51PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
However there is a method to their madness and
LFSers should be able to pick it up relatively quickly.
>>>Do
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 06:00:51PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> However there is a method to their madness and
> >> LFSers should be able to pick it up relatively quickly.
> >>
> > Don't get me started on w
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> Really, the only thing that's different through the end of Chapter 6 is
>> adding new packages. Skipping systemd and adding eudev is all that is
>> needed to do a straight traditional build
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Really, the only thing that's different through the end of Chapter 6 is
> adding new packages. Skipping systemd and adding eudev is all that is
> needed to do a straight traditional build (with a few packages f
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> My point was that _many_ people who build
> LFS-svn will either copy and paste, or will already have their own
> scripts. As you said (paraphrasing), this is a major change - those
> of us with our own scripts will
Em 20-04-2014 18:26, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> BLFS Trac wrote:
>> My objective is to allow users that do not want to consider or even try
>> systemd to continue to do what they are already doing.
>>
>
> And you appear to be achieving
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> BLFS Trac wrote:
>
> > Comment (by ken@…):
>
> > At the moment I'm still trying to absorb the systemd changes in LFS - my
> > own scripts now build a working LFS with eudev and _current_ LFS
> > bootscripts, and I'm fairly confi
BLFS Trac wrote:
> Comment (by ken@…):
> At the moment I'm still trying to absorb the systemd changes in LFS - my
> own scripts now build a working LFS with eudev and _current_ LFS
> bootscripts, and I'm fairly confident that the systemv-on-systemd build
> will work when I test it. But I
21 matches
Mail list logo
