> Yes, that sounds like it.
>
> Maybe I'll come back to that and give it another try in the future,
> but for the moment other things are far more urgent (in LFS/BLFS,
> reviewing the effect of PTI on building - looking ok so far (the big
> impacts seem to be in networking throughput), preparing
> I do not do systemd. I guess I'll have to some day, but there is a
> learning
> stage I'm reluctant to spend time with.
>
I hate to be the single point of failure but it's been over a year that
I have built everything under LFS-systemd (mostly out of habit and I
learned how to use it) so feel
Le samedi 20 janvier 2018 à 11:01 -0600, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> I have a script that runs every day that updates our listing of
> firmware.
> There are not always updates, but today's updates showed a lot.
>
> The message below only comes to me. Would it be better to mail it to
> one
> of the
Ken,
Are you building with any CFLAGS enabled?
Since many moons ago, I've been testing with a range of CFLAGS
(O2,Os,Og), sometime accounting for my processor (with alfs, I've got
O2 pipe and march=native) but otherwise not and these have been the
cause of non-reproducible failures.
Alain
--
ht
Hello,
Is it normal that BLFS still offer gcc 7.2.0 while LFS is at version
7.3.0?
Al
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hello,
Someone have any clue how to solve this:
In file included from ../../include/c99_math.h:194:0,
from ../../src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_math.h:44,
from ../../src/mesa/main/macros.h:35,
from glsl_types.cpp:25:
/usr/include/c++/7.3.0/cmath:
./configure CFLAGS='-O2' CXXFLAGS='-O2' LDFLAGS=-lLLVM \
Trying a build without LDFLAGS did not fix the issue.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Just to do some more testing, I updated my svn tree for jhalfs-dev, LFS
and BLFS; started a new build of LFS with ALFS and upon building chapter 5
gcc stage 1, I get this error:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -W
Not sure how you managed to get what looks like an old set of
commands.
I modified the ALFS generated script by hand, these settings are my own
but the original setting from an svn checkout of BLFS from yesterday
didn't compile because of missing amdgpu support in llvm (which was in
turn mod
Hello,
FYI, Apache 2.4.30 is slated for release on the 19th of February.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
In my case, I am hitting the same roadblock again, specifically, a g++
extension to the C++ language: include_next.
In file included from ../../gcc/system.h:266:0,
from ../../gcc/genmddeps.c:19:
/usr/include/c++/7.3.0/cstdlib:75:15: fatal error: stdlib.h: No such
file or director
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.30/
Apache 2.4.30 has been tagged a few minutes ago.
Noteworthy in the new version is the backport of mod_md which is a
module configured to do automatic provision and update of let's encrypt
ssl+tls certificate automatically for all vhosts.
doc
> That said, my initial reaction is to put all of these in the 8.2 release
> and do it soon after when we have six months to sort any issues that may
> arise.
On a similar note, I've been trying to contribute for the 8.2 release but have
been having issues
with gcc problems regarding include
Hello,
For a reminder, this is the issue that I was posting at:
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-February/033969.html
After basic investigation, I saw the issue being reported there on gcc bugzilla
marked as WONTFIX:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70129
> Is this affecting you because you have recompiled gcc in BLFS (to
> get extra languages) before you got to mesa ?
>
Yes. I did many tests over the week and tried both mesa, at first, then
building an LFS system (gcc)
with ALFS and by hand.
I don't know if mesa uses -isystem in its build but g
> Ah, so this is all specific to systems where gcc has been rebuilt to
> add extra languages,
maybe, maybe not, which is why I'm trying to reproduce it under a brand new
user account with as few
variables defined as possible under which, I downloaded ALFS trunk via svn
(ditto with LFS and
BLFS)
Hello again,
Probably offtopic but I've been on medical leave for a month (starting out on
2nd of February) and
one of my symptoms have been a total lack of focusing ability, thus the
uncertainty in my report or
any subsequent answer.
:)
Al
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-d
> When does it fail when building with debian? Immediately in chapter 5?, or
> later?
Much later, picture that workflow:
debian 9.3 --> alfs start a build --> boot the LFS + some BLFS (prerequisites
for another round of
alfs) just built --> download alfs by svn, start another build (LFS only
Le dimanche 25 février 2018 à 17:12 -0500, Alain Toussaint a écrit :
> > When does it fail when building with debian? Immediately in chapter 5?, or
> > later?
>
>
> Much later, picture that workflow:
>
> debian 9.3 --> alfs start a build --> boot the LFS
for package alpine-2.21
(http://linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/systemd/basicnet/alpine.html)
apparently, alpine is no longer available at the url referenced below:
Resolving alpine.freeiz.com (alpine.freeiz.com)... 145.14.144.8,
2a02:4780:dead:f265::1
Connecting to alpine.freeiz.com (alpine.fre
> - automate testing: run jhalfs (2) builds on a regular basis, for all or some
> packages in BLFS (including all recommended dependencies). That would at least
> detect (c), (d), and (f) sooner.
I can run jhalfs on a regular basis. Also, regarding new packages releases, I
can monitor these by
r
> As another thought, I suppose a less extreme solution would be to just
> remove the OpenJDK-9.0.4 and JUnit-4.11 pages and write a note that Java
> From Scratch is beyond the scope of the book.
Agreed. I was one of the interested into java from source (for
http://ofbiz.apache.org/ ) but the
Hello,
FYI, apache httpd 2.4.33 has been uploaded to mirrors and announced on their
dev mailing list. That
said, their site hasn't been updated. I'll inquire about the web site on their
mailing list.
Links: http://apache.mirrors.lucidnetworks.net//httpd/
http://apache.mirrors.lucidnetworks.net
Le vendredi 23 mars 2018 à 16:56 +0100, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> On 23/03/2018 16:47, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > FYI, apache httpd 2.4.33 has been uploaded to mirrors and announced on
> > their dev mailing list.
> > That
> > said, their
Furthermore, about the 2.4.32 release there:
On 2018-03-16 08:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We
> can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is
> just an un-announced release.
>
Personally, I prefer this approa
> Thanks again. I'll update the ticket, wait 24 hours too, then update the
> book.
You're welcome :)
It took me some time but I am more acquainted with httd's release process.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsub
> 99 open tickets in the book
> 99 open tickets in the book
> Fix one up and what do you get?
> 108 open tickets in the book
There's a gazillion implicit questions in there but then, the 64 000$ one I'll
ask is that are you
overloaded by that?
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinf
Hello,
I successfully built llvm by hand after trying to do so with ALFS-svn checkout
on the Sunday 1st of
April with both LFS and BLFS checked out on the same date. The ALFS logs for
llvm show this issue:
In file included from
/sources/llvm/llvm-6.0.0.src/build/include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.
Le mercredi 04 avril 2018 à 00:44 +0100, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 05:46:49PM -0400, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I successfully built llvm by hand after trying to do so with ALFS-svn
> > checkout on the Sunday 1st
> > of
> &g
> Resent without the "SPAM" header, sorry for the first one.
I do wonder what would be needed from my end beside SPF and DKIM not to be
labelled spam. I know and
had DMARC for a brief time but it would break up mailing list resend.
> >
> > I really do not see which envar could be set, which co
> > > But I'd like to help debug this problem. Could you please, in a shell
> > > where
> > > building manually works, run:
> > > $ source /envars.conf
> > >
> > > then build manually again, and report if it still works or not?
> > >
> > > Pierre
>
> Yes, I'm on it.
I got the results almost i
> What I now do, is modify the LFS book's chapter on gcc and add all the
> optional languages apart from ADA, as I have not found a package that I
> use that needs it. Then I allow jhalfs to run and install LFS.
At this time, I'm going straight by the book (i.e. gcc built for C/C++).
haven't bu
Le mercredi 04 avril 2018 à 18:04 +0200, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> On 04/04/2018 17:30, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> >
> > > > > But I'd like to help debug this problem. Could you please, in a shell
> > > > > where
> > > > > bu
Hello team,
Just a quick note that this week is filled with 6 to 8 hours of appointments
per day and tomorrow,
I'm going out of town for medical care purpose (I get medical care in two,
sometime three differents
cities) and will be back sometime late Saturday.
My computer will be chugging along
Le mercredi 04 avril 2018 à 18:04 +0200, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> On 04/04/2018 17:30, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> >
> > > > > But I'd like to help debug this problem. Could you please, in a shell
> > > > > where
> > > > > bu
Le samedi 14 avril 2018 à 19:18 +0200, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> On 14/04/2018 18:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > On 04/13/2018 11:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > > Using the new instructions in the book O could not get rustc to build. I
> > > was
> > > getting:
> > >
> > > --- stderr
> > > error: cou
> So: three persons; three different outcomes...
Most likely 4 differents outcome by tomorrow, I'll be getting a 2010 model Mac
Pro, with, I think, a
6 core nehalem as a minimum which will heat the place compiling software under
travis-ci (https://gi
thub.com/travis-ci/travis-ci ) or something
Hello,
I had two build failures compiling shared-mime-info while ALFS was set to use
make -j5. Fixing the
build script to use make -j1 fixes the build.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above info
Le samedi 14 avril 2018 à 22:26 +0200, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> On 14/04/2018 19:18, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > On 14/04/2018 18:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > > On 04/13/2018 11:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > > > Using the new instructions in the book O could not get rustc to build.
> > > > I was
>
> -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_NO_NESTED_ANON_TYPES_FLAG
> -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_NO_NESTED_ANON_TYPES_FLAG - Failed
I do get these failures but the configure & build steps went fine on the stock
build instruction:
CC=gcc CXX=g++ \
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL
> Umm, installed in /root instead of /usr/bin ?
No, I was logged in as root and was using tab completion to find out the
various rust programs.
> I think that so far everyone has had 1.22.1 installed when trying to
> build 1.25.0. In theory, using the previous versions of rust and
> cargo (so
Hello,
Just a quick word that late in this past week, I got the offer from the apache
httpd project that
the layout patch be submitted to them and the layout could be included in the
next release of httpd
which would aleviate the need to provide a patch in the BLFS book.
Would you all be intere
Le dimanche 22 avril 2018 à 21:30 +0200, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> On 22/04/2018 19:35, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just a quick word that late in this past week, I got the offer from the
> > apache httpd project
> > that
> > the layout pa
Le dimanche 22 avril 2018 à 15:50 -0500, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> On 04/22/2018 12:35 PM, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just a quick word that late in this past week, I got the offer from the
> > apache httpd project
> > that
> > the layout pa
On 2018-05-14 02:45, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Has anyone else built xfce using gcc8 yet? I've built it, but it
makes xorg segfault at startup. I've built twm, lxde, openbox,
sawfish, icewm, and fluxbox and they all run OK.
It's possible that I may have missed some dependencies and I can try
rebui
Hello,
Just a quick word to say that I've got an apple computer (mac pro
vintage 2006) who was able to entirely build LFS plus the BLFS bits
that ALFS propose when doing an LFS build with systemd.
This is a first because with my laptop, it would always bomb out at
some point, be it the make-ca s
Hello,
Upon building a new system, I encountered the compilation error described in
BLFS-Support here:
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2018-April/
080075.html
from the explanation here, I modified my ALFS generated build script to use the
ninja build system instead of
> Btw,
> new multilib-patch to come, building m32, mx32 and m64 ...
Hello Thomas,
That patch, is it to build {B}LFS in a multilib configuration including
mx32?
Best regards,
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubsc
Le lundi 13 août 2018 à 23:36 +0200, Thomas Trepl a écrit :
> Am Montag, den 13.08.2018, 08:56 -0400 schrieb Alain Toussaint:
> > > Btw,
> > > new multilib-patch to come, building m32, mx32 and m64 ...
> >
> > Hello Thomas,
> >
> > That patch, is i
> For some of the things I care about, I need to try a server build
> (I build differently for that). Not yet started.
I'm doing one at the moment (LFS-SVN based) for the linodes in which,
it'll be a server build including apache httpd, dovecot, postfix and
tomcat + mod_jk. php + mod_php will be
> I intend to handle all of the java packages.
So do I.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> server/mail/dovecot.xml
taking care of dovecot-2.3.2.1 right now.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Le lundi 27 août 2018 à 12:10 +0200, Thomas Trepl a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2018, 22:36 -0400 schrieb Alain Toussaint:
> > > server/mail/dovecot.xml
> >
> > taking care of dovecot-2.3.2.1 right now.
>
> oh, i just commited some tweaks on dovecot. You may
> Sometimes running ldconfig helps with that.
I tried that many time. still the same issue persist.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Le vendredi 31 août 2018 à 11:42 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a
écrit :
> We now have all packages in BLFS tagged for 8.3, There are still a
> couple of outstanding tickets but they can be put off if they are
> not
> done in the next day.
I can't vouch for dovecot 2.3.2.1 because of my linki
> Note that the kernel option descriptions say
>
>If you are unsure as to whether this is required, answer N.
>
> for CONFIG_BIG_KEYS and CONFIG_KEY_DH_OPERATIONS.
>
>
> Opinions?
There's a tangent to that that some time ago that Linus refused a patch
regarding blk-io scheduling because o
> Actually I prefer gdisk also, but fdisk from LFS can do msdos
> partitions
> as well so I felt gdisk was redundant.
Just my 0.02$ in that regard but for {u}efi, I prefer dealing with
gdisk as opposed to parted but then again, I'm not a new user.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/lis
> > > Caution: On a GeForce GT 710, falkon crash as soon
> > > trying to display an URL, It was needed to implement the
> > > last proprietary Nvidia driver (standard "Nvidia-run"
> > > procedure).
> > > For other (more recent nvidia card) falkon is working fine.
> > >
> >
> > I refuse to t
Le jeudi 15 novembre 2018 à 09:09 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> As reported earlier, I am not able to recompile
> sendmail-8.15.2.
>
> It is not fully proved but I have strong indication
> it is caused by openssl-1.1.[0i,1]
>
> Looking about this, I noticed
> LFS
Hello,
it's been some time that rpcsvc-proto's md5sums doesn't corresponds:
alain [ ~/blfs_root/work ]$ md5sum /sources/rpcsvc-proto-1.4.tar.gz
df1022ccc5d0aff30b8e505735b4a98b /sources/rpcsvc-proto-1.4.tar.gz
in the book, it still refer to an md5sum of:
3b2724bb7d6560ddcb4dbcdb5465de10
Have
Hello,
It might be useful to add CXX=g++ to the configure script of cups:
before:
CC=gcc \
./configure --libdir=/usr/lib\
--with-rcdir=/tmp/cupsinit \
--with-system-groups=lpadmin \
--with-docdir=/usr/share/cups/doc-2.2.8 &&
make
after:
CC=gcc
Hello,
Since the start of the week, I've been building a gnome desktop based
Linux system with all the recommended and optional packages included
via the ALFS build tool and for OpenJDK, the build took 894 minutes
(yes, nearly 15h) only to fail because 7 tests out of the testsuite
failed.
Easy fi
> My hope is to get gnome-online-accounts updated to 3.30.x within the
> next day or two. I'll reply with the revision number once I'm done,
> but
> please try using the 3.30.x series instead.
>
>
> Thank you for the report.
>
Just checked out and there is a 3.31.2 version (of evolution at l
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2018 à 15:53 -0600, Douglas R. Reno a écrit :
> On 11/25/18 3:52 PM, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> > > My hope is to get gnome-online-accounts updated to 3.30.x within
> > > the
> > > next day or two. I'll reply with the revision nu
> 3.30 it is then. After sending the message, I did think about the
> possibility of odd releases being development release while even
> release are stable ones...
I also took the occasion to modify my ALFS setup to install LibreOffice
6.1.3.2 while at it. If LO work fine on my setup, I'll modify
> If specifying CXX=g++ will disable those warnings, that is good.
> But does it, or will cups decide to anyway use clang++ ?
Nope, cups will use g++ when CXX=g++
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
Hello,
just FYI, dconf 0.30 now require a package named bash-completion for
which is found on github:
https://github.com/scop/bash-completion.git
but for which, debian and other distro package it out in tarball form
from this git tree.
I used git clone -b 2.8 https://github.com/scop/bash-comple
Hello,
It seem like bogofilter's source has been updated while keeping the
same version. New md5sum is supposed to be:
94aee3ced558c2a354547083735f2ba7
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above info
> https://github.com/scop/bash-completion/releases/download/2.8/bash-co
> mpletion-2.8.tar.xz
>
> But it did not used to be required. If it is now, it should be easy
> to circumvent.
>
> --DJ
Maybe, but given that I'm the type of "shoot first, ask question later"
at this moment, I installed it
Le lundi 26 novembre 2018 à 12:24 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a
écrit :
> Reference:
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/11246 (git and shipped
> perl
> modules)
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/11295 (Error-0.17027
> (Perl
> module))
>
> I've been looking at these t
> > Doing something like this will help downstream to make their code
> > conform to your expectations and not have developers incorrectly
> > blame
> > poppler for breakage when you need to make changes."
> >
> > -
>
> And the answer:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/issu
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2018 à 15:53 -0600, Douglas R. Reno a écrit :
> On 11/25/18 3:52 PM, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> > > My hope is to get gnome-online-accounts updated to 3.30.x within
> > > the
> > > next day or two. I'll reply with the revision nu
> Anyway, please report if there is any more breakage from poppler.
LibreOffice 6.1.3.2 at the moment. I decided to postpone the build and
look at it later.
The rest should go easy peachy.
Alain
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/fa
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 10:37 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 12/19/2018 10:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > On 12/19/2018 02:55 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On 2018-12-18 15:11 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev:
> > > > I have figured out my original problem with loading the
> > >
> Answering Alain: I haven't looked at iwd yet, but we may need that
> also.
>
> Finally, we may need a new page: "About Wireless"
I agree to both.
For what it's worth, in my builds, I hand craft the svn checkout of lfs
and blfs to, for the former, use the latest long-term kernel (currently
4.
75 matches
Mail list logo
