RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Alberto Monteiro wrote: I begin to understand why Jeroen was singled-out to be the victim-of-the-day. Was he? Admittedly I have only been re-subbed here for a few months, I have not had much time to devote to Brin-L mail but I seem to have missed the singling-out. And his behaviour in the

RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Rich wrote: My worst case scenario involves giant asteroids, gamma ray bursts, all-out nuclear exchanges, plague, famine, brain-eating zombie infestations, leaves on the line, and Steps reforming. Rich GCU And The Universal Adoption Of Imperial Units And the wombats? Ritu GCU You Can't

RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Rich wrote: unsubscribe jeroen-l Me too. Ritu GCU Please ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Rich wrote: unsubscribe jeroen-l Me too. Ritu GCU Please ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
unsubscribe jeroen-l ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: 2) You could start a good discussion with that 100k exposition on the morality of pacifism that you've been owning me. evil grin. chuckle And which one would that be? All I can see in my drafts folder is an unfinished 11k mail on a war that looks nigh inevitable. :) And

RE: Aceing up?

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: PS - Apologies for all those repeated messages guys. My Outlook seems to be acing up. If it were just acing up, we'd only get one message. I'd argue that it was treying up. :-) :P Ritu GCU Acting Up ___

RE: Tintin and Asterix [was: Domain Name BRIN-L.COM For Sale]

2002-12-02 Thread Ritu Ko
Marvin Long, Jr. wrote: Remeber, if it's perpetrated against the hegemonist, colonialist, capitalist pig-dog oppressors, it's not really violence. :-) LOL Y'know, I have *always* wondered how many people wished to say that to Gandhi... Ritu

RE: stereotyping is evil, and why it must be eradicated

2002-11-25 Thread Ritu Ko
William T Goodall wrote: What of people who hold pacifist religous views? Using Osama bin Laden to make a statement about the general characteristics of religion is beyond ludicrous. Is it? Quakers and other pacifist religions are a tiny minority. The 'general characteristics' of

RE: stereotyping is evil, and why it must be eradicated

2002-11-25 Thread Ritu Ko
Ronald Blankenship wrote: Define theocracy. Frex, Christians believe that at some point in the future, Jesus Christ will return to Earth as its ruler. g In which case, wouldn't the belief that the entire Creation is God's doing and, thus, under Her ultimate control be defined as a

RE: stereotyping is evil, and why it must be eradicated

2002-11-25 Thread Ritu Ko
Ronn Blankenship wrote: (I won't quibble with you over the gender of deity at this point. ;-) ) Nothing to quibble about there, sir. It's a simple fact. ;) Btw, I meant to ask, what was the colour of the other half of that cat of yours? Ritu GCU Hanumani-Sindoori?there goes a

RE: stereotyping is evil, and why it must be eradicated

2002-11-25 Thread Ritu Ko
Ronn Blankenship wrote: Btw, I meant to ask, what was the colour of the other half of that cat of yours? Other half? Not sure what you mean: Of course you don't. My bad. :) Your earlier mail had mentioned a half-kali dog. I somehow remembered a cat.. :) Ritu GCU Oops!

RE: religion is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-25 Thread Ritu Ko
The Fool wrote: It's not that those thing you listed aren't true, they are. They could still flare up, but the cold war is over. Did you know that before the british came to india, there was a religious group in india called 'thugs'. the Thugs systematically killed more than an order

RE: US Unilateralism

2002-11-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: Why I can see being opposed to attacking Iraq, I'm rather surprised by your language. Could you specify the exact portions please? 1) Do you think that Iraq is not in material breach of the provisions that ended the Gulf War? My understanding is that Iraq agreed to

RE: US Unilateralism

2002-11-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Robert Seeberger wrote: With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United States has now let the United Nations deliberate for nearly two months (and counting) on its dispute with Iraq? g ..the US has *let* the UN deliberate...? Interesting terminology there,

RE: US Unilateralism

2002-11-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Erik Reuter wrote: On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:21:53AM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote: No more credit than the world gave other countries for not provoking an unnecessary war in an unprecedentedly irrational manner, no. Interesting terminology there, Ritu, but I guess to be expected. sigh Okay

RE: US Unilateralism

2002-11-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Alberto Monteiro wrote: No, it should be one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn. :-) Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian girl would have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse (3), bellybutton piercing (4), necklace (5), wristlaces (6)

RE: US Unilateralism

2002-11-04 Thread Ritu Ko
John D. Giorgis wrote: With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United States has now let the United Nations deliberate for nearly two months (and counting) on its dispute with Iraq? g ..the US has *let* the UN deliberate...? Interesting terminology there, JDG. :)

RE: UN Security Council Reform Re: Just for the record

2002-11-02 Thread Ritu Ko
J. van Baardwijk wrote: Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds? Do you really believe that you are so intellectually superior to others that you can see things coming that trained professionals with years of relevant experience would miss? Puh-lease! Puh-lease! A lot

Happy Diwali

2002-11-02 Thread Ritu Ko
A very happy Diwali to all of you. :) Ritu ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: Happy Diwali

2002-11-02 Thread Ritu Ko
Doug wrote: The same to you! Thank you. :) Could you explain to those of us that are unfamiliar with the holiday what it is all about? Well, Diwali is the biggest festival here in India. It spreads out over two days and all the festivities culminate in a puja, feast and fire-works on the

RE: UN Security Council Reform Re: Just for the record

2002-10-31 Thread Ritu Ko
John D. Giorgis wrote: Once this happens, it then becomes possible to envision expanding the UNSC to 25 members or so, with 7-8 of them as permanent members (pending whether the UK joins the EU seat.) How long a time frame are you envisioning here? India is basically a done deal to

RE: Aside Re: UN Security Council Reform Re: Just for the record

2002-10-31 Thread Ritu Ko
Julia Thompson wrote: Ritu GCU Still Sleepy GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go Back To Bed? No, but 10AM is a perfectly acceptable hour to begin a nap. :) Okay. I can survive these 35 minutes just by making sure all the children, dogs and puppies are involved in a *long*,

RE: Question for everyone

2002-10-30 Thread Ritu Ko
J. van Baardwijk wrote: As for what I said, well, personal attacks doesn't ever let anyone 'win' an argument/discussion. So I fail to see what the big deal is. Those personal attacks tend to have quite a lot of effect on the list as a whole -- and not exactly a positive effect...

RE: Question for everyone

2002-10-30 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: Of course, all this is strictly imho. Well, not to be argumentative, but I think it is impho. Okay, I'll bite... P - Personal? Ritu ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: test

2002-10-29 Thread Ritu Ko
Jim Sharkey wrote: BUT I'm really absolutely totally completely sick and tired of people telling me what an 'ignorant fool', 'arrogant basterd' or 'fucking son of a bitch' etc my husband is. Well, that's just plain messed up. The folks that have the temerity to insult your

RE: Question for everyone

2002-10-28 Thread Ritu Ko
J. van Baardwijk wrote: If you do not want all this to happen again in the future, then you will have to convince the person causing it in the first place (Giorgis) to start behaving in such a way that all this will not happen again. I don't understand. Why should anyone *have*

RE: Question for everyone

2002-10-27 Thread Ritu Ko
J. van Baardwijk wrote: No one seems to care but you. If that is true, then I might just as well restore the previous content of the Main Page of Brin-L.com, as it appearently is quite accurate -- you know, the version that says that things like flame wars and personal attacks are

RE: Getting silly Re: brin: war

2002-10-22 Thread Ritu Ko
Deborah Harrell wrote: Sinus washing with saline salution is a useful (but admittedly disgusting! :P) technique for removing infected mucus (aka green gunk), but I recommend it only to those who are truly _miserable_ with severe sinusitis. The key is to 'snork' not sniff the solution; salt

RE: Question for everyone

2002-10-20 Thread Ritu Ko
J. van Baardwijk wrote: It's not that we're pretending that the mountain (others's difficult behavior) isn't there, as you suggest. So, I am not suggesting that people are pretending that the mountain does not exist; I am suggesting that people are not going to try to move the

RE: Question for everyone

2002-10-19 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: I'd like to ask a question about general rules of politeness. From what I've seen in a number of places, people are suppose to publically divulge the contents of private emails only with the explict permission of the sender. Well, personally, I feel that anything

RE: free speech vs religion

2002-10-12 Thread Ritu Ko
Adam C. Lipscomb wrote: BOMBAY, India (AP) - Five people were killed Friday in Hindu-Muslim rioting and police gunfire after riots broke out during a general strike to protest the Rev. Jerry Falwell calling the founder of Islam a terrorist. Forty-seven others were injured. Why the

RE: free speech vs religion

2002-10-12 Thread Ritu Ko
I wrote: LOL Well, that wouldn't solve anything now...they just Add 'want' here, please. :) to kill *each other*. Who cares that the original remark was made by an American Reverend! Ritu GSV These Indians Are Crazy Obelix class Ritu Gcu Crazy Indian

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-10 Thread Ritu Ko
Deborah Harrell wrote: Nope, I have no idea how you feel about living under the BJP government. My initial response had the 'no' highlit, but I decided that was a bit too much. G chuckle Sometimes I feel as if I carry a neon sign over my head, proclaiming my opinion of BJP et al.

RE: brin: education

2002-10-10 Thread Ritu Ko
Dr. Brin wrote: There is another explanation for those poor test comparisons. Many other countries encourage rote memorization of facts. We consider that to be a gross and evil use of students' minds. In USschools, the emphasis is on process and on class discussions and on encouraging

RE: brin: education

2002-10-10 Thread Ritu Ko
Julia Thompson wrote: But the reinforcement of this quality by the educational system probably didn't hurt. :) Oh, I agree. Besides, I'd imagine that it'd be far less frustrating. It *does* get annoying when certain values are introduced to you in glowing terms but putting them in practice

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-09 Thread Ritu Ko
Deborah Harrell wrote: Nope, I have no idea how you feel about living under the BJP government. g Well, my emotions and reactions vary. The first reaction, of course, was disbelief that people were idiotic enough to vote them in. That lingered for quite a while, and cosily snuggled up to

RE: Surnames [was: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack]

2002-10-07 Thread Ritu Ko
Alberto Monteiro wrote: Nope. But I am not really that astute. Most Indians can take a look at that name and tell you about the caste of Gautam's father [and hence, Gautam's]. There are studies here in Brazil showing some correlation between surnames and skin colour. For

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-07 Thread Ritu Ko
Julia Thompson wrote: Actually, I think it would be the caste of Gautam's *grandfather*. :) The way it was explained to me how surnames go in India (and you can correct me if I'm wrong) is that your surname is your father's given name. The naming convention are different in different

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-06 Thread Ritu Ko
Erik Reuter wrote: Are USA strategists aware that the more arrogance the USA exhibits, the stronger will be the Iraqi people's support for Saddam? Are you saying that dropping leaflets saying that if they fire on US planes, they will be fired upon, is arrongant? Well, if I were an

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-06 Thread Ritu Ko
Erik Reuter wrote: Well, if I were an Iraqi and came across leaflets saying that..'arrogance' would be one of the nicer words to cross my mind. Really? Would you care to explain? Certainly. :) Consider the present conditions, the USA's drive to remove Saddam. Irrespective of whether

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-06 Thread Ritu Ko
The Fool wrote: Both have used chemical weapon on their 'native' populations. I will get to it. Sometime. Oh, this I've not heard about and am interested. Could you refer some sites or sources please? Ritu ___

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-06 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: Indeed, for Americans, Europe's and its failure to respond to Hitler has been a paradigm example of what not to do for over 50 years of foreign policy. I cannot imagine you picking a worse example to use. It doesn't falsify your arguement, but it is not a good case

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-06 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: I'm not arguing that the war reparations were not a bad idea...but that they were essentially dropped and were thus meaningless. In a sense, the difference between WWI and WWII was that the winners ran the losing country for the benefit of the losers for a number of

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-06 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan Minette wrote: Well, I won't argue against your examples, but I am thinking of a much more decisive win than that. All of Germany and Japan were under the control of the winners of WWII. Pakistan wasn't after those two wars. No, Pakistan was not completely under Indian control but

RE: U.S. drops leaflets warning Iraq of counterattack

2002-10-06 Thread Ritu Ko
Dan M. wrote: If that outside help is coming from Uncle Sam, I'd say that my concerns are reasonably valid. You know, I'd just love to see Ritu and Gautam get into a debate on this. chuckle I have to say I agree. But like you siad, he is busy. :) (I think I told you, Ritu, that

Re: Attack Iraq, Alone If We Must

2002-09-28 Thread Ritu Ko
The Fool wrote: And yes I will eventually stop being lazy and finish my reply to that ko person. Up to 240k. I'm not gonna send it to the list. I will send it to those who ask. And probably in parts. As soon as I stop feeling lazy and actually finish it. I don't have any web