Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:16 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > The South of the United States no longer casts votes on racial issues, but > does c

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:12 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:18 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > > Its certainly not as simple as saying that

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:50 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry Let me retry to line up the #s. >

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 7:44 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > At 06:34 PM 1/11/2004 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In a message dated 1/10/2004

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 7:24 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > At 03:31 PM 1/14/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrot

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "Kevin Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:53 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > He probably isn't racist. How nice of you to say that. > > And the next time you are

Re: The GOP Problem With Women

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:00 PM Subject: Re: The GOP Problem With Women > At 06:54 PM 1/14/2004 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote: > >That makes sense. To what extent do you

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > At 05:50 PM 1/14/2004 -0600 Dan Mine

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > At 05:50 PM 1/14/2004 -0600 Dan Mine

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 7:35 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 11:55 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:15 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > At 08:16 PM 1/15/2004 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote: > >I'll also state for the record

One bit of ecconomic data

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 11:04 PM Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry > The recession still would have happened

Re: One bit of ecconomic data

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 4:50 AM Subject: Re: One bit of ecconomic data > On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:35:26PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: &g

Re: One more bit of ecconomic data

OK, first analysis of income by 20% grouping and top 5%. RR + GB^2Clinton 1st 20% 7.6% 15.9% 2nd 20% 8.9% 15.5% 3rd 20% 11.2% 14.6% 4th 20% 14.0% 15.8% 5th 20% 24.8% 28.8% top 5%

Re: Wining with Dan

I'm resending this Dan M. - Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Wining with Dan > > - Original Message - >

Re: Scouted: Nuclear waste court woes

> "Opponents of a planned nuclear waste dump in Nevada > argued in court Wednesday the U.S. government has > failed to ensure that the public will be protected > when radiation from the entombed waste reaches its > peak hundreds of thousands of years from now. > Attorneys for Nevada and an enviro

Re: Scouted: Home test kit for second-hand smoke exposure

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 6:07 PM Subject: Re: Scouted: Home test kit for second-hand smoke exposure > > - Original Message - > From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL

Re: Wining with Dan

- Original Message - From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:32 PM Subject: Wining with Dan > As was mentioned here recently, Dan Minette's wife gave him a trip to > Napa for his 50th. Cindy and I met them there yesterday and ha

Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

-- > It is not at all clear to me what the spirit of a law that provides an > exception for offshore subsidiaries is supposed to be. I guess that it > could be sorted out in Court, but Clinton seemed strangely uninterested in > pursuing these cases - isn't that just as reprehensible in your mind

Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 4:52 AM Subject: Re: Doing Business With The Enemy > Could you explain what a "nuclear bomb trigger" consists of? Does this > mean something like

Re: Dewpoint questions

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "BRIN-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 5:57 AM Subject: Dewpoint questions > Any amateur meteorologists here? I noticed an odd phenomenon in my home > recently, and I can't come up with any ideas to

Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:47 AM Subject: Re: Doing Business With The Enemy > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:48:52AM -0600, Dan Minett

Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 7:58 PM Subject: RE: Doing Business With The Enemy > --- "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did he? When did he do that? > > > >

Re: Frat boys? (was Re: Br!n: LotR and Conservatives)

- Original Message - From: "Jim Sharkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Frat boys? (was Re: Br!n: LotR and Conservatives) > > Davd Brin wrote contemptuously of: > >Frat boys. > > What's wrong with being a frat boy? Isn't brot

Re: christianism is evil, why it must be eradicated

- Original Message - From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 7:42 PM Subject: Re: christianism is evil, why it must be eradicated > Many moons ago, I wrote: > > &

Re: SCOUTED: Houston

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 10:41 PM Subject: Re: SCOUTED: Houston > "Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > > > > Thought Some Of The Texans Here Might Want To Weigh In Maru > > >

Re: SCOUTED: Houston

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 11:13 PM Subject: Re: SCOUTED: Houston > At 10:59 PM 1/31/04, Dan Minette wrote: > > > >

Re: vatican head astronomer - lecture

- Original Message - From: "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 7:22 PM Subject: vatican head astronomer - lecture http://kuow.org/Full_Program_Story.asp?NewsPage_Action=Find('ID','4972') George Coyne, the

Re: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

- Original Message - From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 7:24 PM Subject: Fwd: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean > > > On , Julia Thompson wrote: > > > >> Maybe the US government should be inv

Re: Scouted: Nuclear waste court woes

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:58 PM Subject: Re: Scouted: Nuclear waste court woes > > > I've looked up the total risk, and after 200 years > > it approaches that of > >

Re: [L3] Re: Scouted: Nuclear waste court woes

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:03 PM Subject: [L3] Re: Scouted: Nuclear waste court woes > Even mining tailings are considered hazardous: "NRC > regulations require that a

Re: and we thought we had too much snow...

- Original Message - From: "Jim Sharkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 8:15 PM Subject: RE: and we thought we had too much snow... > > Gary Nunn wrote: > >Some interesting pictures of Newfoundland and their snow... or > >more accurately, som

Re: gud ol Repgnatcan suthrn edukasion

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:40 AM Subject: Re: gud ol Repgnatcan suthrn edukasion > At 06:47 PM 2/2/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote: > >As Ronn already posted another article

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: "Damon Agretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 6:22 PM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > Have you also thought that the concept of Original Sin > is an alle

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 2:58 AM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > At 01:54 AM 2/4/04, Jan Coffey wrote: > >--- In [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 7:38 PM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > In a message dated 2/4/2004 1:10:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > If you are

Re: Oil reserves revision: another one!

- Original Message - From: "Dan M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:24 PM Subject: Re: Oil reserves revision: another one! > > - Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:23 PM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > I see where you are coming from. But it all comes down to ones own concept > of evil no

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 4:42 PM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > As I've said, Judaism teaches God can't forgive sins against people - only > the person sinned against ca

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:59 PM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > > - Ori

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:34 PM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > > But, what about God forgiving David? > > > > God can forgive sins against God, not against someone else.

Re: Good and evil (was Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "ThePassion of the Christ")

- Original Message - From: "David Hobby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:24 PM Subject: Re: Good and evil (was Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "ThePassion of the Christ") > "John D. Giorgis" wrote: > > > > At 07:51 AM 2

Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:31 PM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > At 12:22 PM 2/5/2004 -0600 Reggie Bautista wrote: > > Gibson

Re: gud ol Repgnatcan suthrn edukasion

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 6:33 AM Subject: Re: gud ol Repgnatcan suthrn edukasion > At 10:52 AM 2/3/2004 +0100 Sonja van Baardwijk wrote: > >The Fool wrote: > > > >>As o

Re: Good and evil (was Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "ThePassion of the Christ")

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:11 PM Subject: Re: Good and evil (was Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "ThePassion of the Christ") > > The argument that everyone doesn't see thin

What is truth?

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" > > > > >From: "Dan Minet

Re: Good and evil (was Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "ThePassion ofthe Christ")

- Original Message - From: "David Hobby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:23 PM Subject: Re: Good and evil (was Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "ThePassion ofthe Christ") > > Sorry, maybe I jumped into this discussion witho

Re: Professionals, Educated being Decimated in Iraq

- Original Message - From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "xBrin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 2:40 PM Subject: Professionals, Educated being Decimated in Iraq > < i=5062&en=f2848e5

Re: Professionals, Educated being Decimated in Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:13 PM Subject: Re: Professionals, Educated being Decimated in Iraq > Dan wrote: > > > So, you've demonstrated that some rather despicable p

Re: What is truth?

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:25 PM Subject: RE: What is truth? > > >From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discus

Re: What is truth?

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 12:13 PM Subject: Re: What is truth? > > > > >From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To:

Re: Professionals, Educated being Decimated in Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 11:45 PM Subject: Re: Professionals, Educated being Decimated in Iraq > Dan wrote: > > > > I guess it was the post-script about the evils of t

Voodoo ecconomics

> See http://tinyurl.com/2vn5n for a recent discussion by Brad > DeLong on the budget deficits. I read that, and the difference between Brad's and John's position on this topic illustrates why economics is not a science to me. John acknowledges that Brad is a respected economist. Brad states tha

Re: Voodoo Economics

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 6:51 PM Subject: Re: Voodoo Economics > > 1) Why do you assume that if he saw contrary evidence, > he would have corrected himself? There was

Re: Voodoo Economics

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 7:34 PM Subject: Re: Voodoo Economics > --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: Voodoo Economics

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 8:23 PM Subject: Re: Voodoo Economics > 1) Why do you assume that if he saw contrary evidence, > he would have corrected himself? There was plenty of > contrary evidence available in 1

Is my father-in-law Jewish?

Recurring discussions on Marx and anti-Semitism have raised some questions for me. My father-in-law's mother's family was Jewish, back in the 1800s. They converted to Christianity in that century before emmigrating to the US. Other parts of the family did not convert, and remained in Germany unti

Are ad honomin attacks ever justified?

There's a good general rule about attacking the idea put forth by someone, not the person. But, I've noticed that we all make exceptions to that rule. I was musing on when those exceptions are justified, and when they are not. Let me ask a number of questions: If a preacher regularly preaches a

Re: Is my father-in-law Jewish?

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 4:01 PM Subject: Re: Is my father-in-law Jewish? > > > > There is a saying in Christianity that no one has faith like a convert. > > People who use to be X, but are now Y are often

Re: Is my father-in-law Jewish?

- Original Message - From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:15 PM Subject: Re: Is my father-in-law Jewish? > > On 12 Feb 2004, at 10:44 pm, Dan Minette wr

Re: Is my father-in-law Jewish?

> > > Then there is the question of what it means to be anti-semetic. There > is a teacher here localy who stated: > > "And what are they doing with the Palestinians every day? They're > killing them. They're doing the same thing that was done to them > It's exactly like what Hitler did to the

Re: Anatomy of a rape culture

- Original Message - From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:59 PM Subject: Re: Anatomy of a rape culture > > From: David Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Fool: > > > > Don't use absolutes. Ever. > > > > Al

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

Personally, I favor the idea of gay marriage. From my perspective, it strengthens the concept of marriage by extending it. By accepting, one broadens the acknowledgement of the lifetime commitment made by two people (yea I know the commitment is often broken). Different types of families are aff

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 12:52 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > If my questions were "sharp castigation", then his statement was a lot > more than an "expressio

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:15 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:11:26PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:27 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:32:45PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 3:55 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > At 03:43 PM 2/15/04, Erik Reuter wrote: > >On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 03:23:57PM -0600, Julia Th

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 4:13 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > Yawn. You try it, I've got better things to do. Than getting along with the people you love? Wh

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 4:50 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > At 03:21 PM 2/15/2004 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote: > >And I wonder how it would compare for the

Re: Political Baiting  Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 4:59 PM Subject: Re: Political Baiting Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > > For whatever it is worth, it is a common meme among conservatives that > > liberals consider themselves to be

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 5:18 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > Done with it? I certainly didn't _start_ it. But > more characteristic? Certainly. That so

Re: In one error and out the otter

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 9:22 PM Subject: Re: In one error and out the otter > No, but if you'd included a coupon, I might have been able to use it at > Quizno's, so it w

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 10:08 PM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > Robert wrote: > > > > On a tangent, it seems Frisco is undergoing an *orgy* of marriage ATM

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Bryon Daly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 12:31 AM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > >From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 04:32:36PM -06

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:20 AM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > (In its fundamentals, science is a form of transcultural communication > in which you use forms of argument that c

Re: Politics and Motivations

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:51 AM Subject: Re: Politics and Motivations > --- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I respect your opinion, and understand that t

Definition of a Christian Fundamentalist

I'm going to be doing some analysis using numbers, but I want to be sure that there isn't an arguement on what a Christian fundamentalist is. I'd say that a Christian fundamentalist is one who, when asked: Which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? The Bi

Re: education bias

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: Re: education bias coasts? > > Well, I'm thinking of good schools not on the east coast or west coast, > and Rice is certainly a

Re: Definition of a Christian Fundamentalist

- Original Message - From: "iaamoac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 4:05 PM Subject: Re: Definition of a Christian Fundamentalist > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Dan Minette"

Re: Definition of a Christian Fundamentalist

- Original Message - From: "Trent Shipley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:29 PM Subject: Re: Definition of a Christian Fundamentalist ? How can you not be a literalist and pick one over two? > > > > Dan M. > > One coul

Re: Definition of a Christian Fundamentalist

> > Interesting. > > Do you have any background on what appear to be survey results? > > The discrepancy is between 42% agreeing that the Bible is the actual Word of > God and responses of 60% to 64% of respondents beliving that any *specific* > Genesis narrative is literally true. > > The "face v

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

- Original Message - From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:58 PM Subject: Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment I know > gay people, and bi-sexual people, and I can't imagine that Mr. JDG's > extremist vie

Democrats secular?

>More important than any of those is secularism, in my >opinion. The Democratic Party has a remarkable >ability to have leaders who are fairly secular >(Mondale, Dukakis) or actively disdain religion (Dean, >if he wins the nomination). Americans are, on the >whole, quite religious. Lower middle

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:23 PM Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment) > Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a cha

Re: Nature of science [was: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?]

science is a form of transcultural communication >... > > > Your enemy simply ignores you, if you are lucky, which enables > > him to change his mind later, or says you are a fraud. That is > > why `paradigm shifting' ideas consume at least a generati

Re: BRin-L - are we average?

- Original Message - From: "ritu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:09 PM Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment) > Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > One thing you have to remember

Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:33 AM Subject: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage? > I also have to believe that part of the difference is in > the perceived legitimacy of the way

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)

- Original Message - From: "Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:45 PM Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment) > > I may be a deviate, but am definitely no

High School Beauty Contest Sexist?

Our local high school is putting on a beauty constant as a fund raiser. The contest includes several sections: beach wear, talent, formal wear, and Q&A. My question for the list is do you think this is inherently sexist; or could it be OK? Dan M. ___

Re: High School Beauty Contest Sexist?

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 5:09 AM Subject: Re: High School Beauty Contest Sexist? > > ----- Original Message - > Fro

Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:15 AM Subject: RE: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica > > I think what made Nirvana so "great" can be summed up in one word - > INNOVATIVE. Cobain could do a lot wi

Re: High School Beauty Contest Sexist?

- Original Message - From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:06 PM Subject: RE: High School Beauty Contest Sexist? > > > Our local high school is putting on a beauty constant as a > > fund raiser. The con

Re: Scouted: Nuclear waste court woes

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:13 PM Subject: Re: Scouted: Nuclear waste court woes > But we don't _live_ there for years. Here is an > abstract which urges caution in in

Re: A reasonable view.

- Original Message - From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:37 PM Subject: Re: A reasonable view. > > On 21 Feb 2004, at 1:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/20/2004 4:39:26 P

Re: A reasonable view.

- Original Message - From: "Tom Beck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:53 PM Subject: Re: A reasonable view. > Of course, then, they wouldn't be the Nazis, would they? Sure, I was just giving another way to see why Isr

Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 1:07 PM Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica > Many bands and artists had presented their hate and angst and whatever else > they wanted to express, long be

Re: Federal Marriage Amendment

- Original Message - From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 1:59 PM Subject: Re: Federal Marriage Amendment > John said: > > > I stated plainly and simply that I believe that human life begins at > > conce

Re: Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable view.

- Original Message - From: "Jan Coffey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 7:41 PM Subject: Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable view. > & other posts on this topic to boot. > > 1) Your doing it again, and

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >