http://tinyurl.com/43o4j
In a study released this fall, the highway safety agency compared
crash statistics for SUVs and other vehicles that had a
stability-control system with the experience of identical models that
lacked the technology. It found that SUVs with stability control had
63%
So it begins.
This is my favorite part where they begin to alienate all of those that
don't fit into their cookie cutter idea of Christianity.
My favorite quotes from the article...
Asked about the millions of Americans who
are not Christian, or have a different
interpretation of
If you watch Nightline this article is almost a summary of a program they
had on last week or so. And yes, the quotes sounded just as sanctimonious
live as they do in the article.
Damon.
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat
If these clowns love Jesus so much, I see nothing wrong with sending
them to meet him immediately.
--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
At 12:58 PM 11/28/2004 -0500 Gary Nunn wrote:
So it begins.
So what begins?More demonization of Christians?
Sometimes I think that for all the talk about religious tolerance, that
some people believe that Christians really shouldn't be permitted to
participate in the political process.
On Nov 28, 2004, at 11:52 AM, JDG wrote:
At 12:58 PM 11/28/2004 -0500 Gary Nunn wrote:
So it begins.
So what begins?More demonization of Christians?
I didn't realize reporting of facts qualified as demonization. Or is it
your argument, instead, that these people are not actually
At 10:37 PM 26/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
snip
The very fact that the 2 species cannot interbreed would probably be
telling...
I have often wondered about this. The differences are far smaller than
between horses and donkeys.
Is there a definite statement out there that chimps and humans can't?
So what begins?More demonization of Christians?
Sometimes I think that for all the talk about religious
tolerance, that some people believe that Christians really
shouldn't be permitted to
participate in the political process.
JDG
One of my points was, that his comments clearly
JDG said:
Sometimes I think that for all the talk about religious tolerance,
that some people believe that Christians really shouldn't be
permitted to participate in the political process.
Isn't George HW Bush on record as implying that about atheists? (If the
particular comment I'm
So what begins?More demonization of Christians?
Sometimes I think that for all the talk about religious tolerance, that
some people believe that Christians really shouldn't be permitted to
participate in the political process.
I would note, John, that these are direct quotes done in front of
Warren said:
If these clowns love Jesus so much, I see nothing wrong with
sending them to meet him immediately.
So do you have a wormhole time machine I don't know about or are you
implying that you believe he really was the Son of God?
Rich
GOU Neca Eos Omnes: Deus Suos Agnoscet
- Original Message -
From: Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: RE: So it begins Evangelicals to Bush: Payback Time
So what begins?More demonization of Christians?
Sometimes I think that
--- Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't George HW Bush on record as implying that
about atheists? (If the
particular comment I'm thinking about has been
debunked, I think it
would be a relief to know it.)
Rich
Actually, Timothy Noah from Slate, who absolutely
hates George Bush,
JDG wrote:
So what begins?More demonization of Christians?
Sometimes I think that for all the talk about religious tolerance, that
some people believe that Christians really shouldn't be permitted to
participate in the political process.
Anyone who works to have the government and the
Gautam said:
Actually, Timothy Noah from Slate, who absolutely
hates George Bush, when asked to find one thing that
he thought good about Bush named Bush's consistent
expressions of tolerance towards atheism. See:
http://www.slate.com/id/2109228
That's interesting, but also the wrong Bush.
On 28 Nov 2004, at 10:51 pm, Richard Baker wrote:
Gautam said:
Actually, Timothy Noah from Slate, who absolutely
hates George Bush, when asked to find one thing that
he thought good about Bush named Bush's consistent
expressions of tolerance towards atheism. See:
http://www.slate.com/id/2109228
At 02:39 PM 11/28/2004 -0500 Damon Agretto wrote:
So what begins?More demonization of Christians?
Sometimes I think that for all the talk about religious tolerance, that
some people believe that Christians really shouldn't be permitted to
participate in the political process.
I would note,
From :Warren Ockrassa
But yeah, it's possible that after a few centuries of careful
adjustment it would be pretty hard to tell us from chimps.
(Interestingly I imagine the scale in reverse would be equally easy to
achieve -- a few centuries of carelessness and we're basically back in
the trees. ;)
On Nov 28, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:
And Warren, that sort of altitude is not going to win you any
arguments, and in fact invalidates any sort of rational argument you
with to present.
Not when I'm not presenting any rational argument, which would be
pointless in dealing with
- Original Message -
From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: So it begins Evangelicals to Bush: Payback Time
At 02:39 PM 11/28/2004 -0500 Damon Agretto wrote:
So what begins?More demonization
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:18:09 +, William T Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/43o4j
In a study released this fall, the highway safety agency compared
crash statistics for SUVs and other vehicles that had a
stability-control system with the experience of identical models
John wrote
giving a dumb answer, we predictably see the dread-invoking
post of so it begins and
talk about payback.Somehow, I don't think we'd be
seeing the same
posts on Brin-L and articles in the MSM about payback to
Big Labor and animal rights activists following a Democrat
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Has anyone here played with the xscreensaver?
I am interested in using the molecule screensaver to create
an animated molecule that can be exported to a file.
I have trouble with two steps:
(a) where are those damned .pdb files?
I think you can find them, as well as a
- Original Message -
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin
Dan said:
But, children are clearly capable of being sex workers. The trade in
child
- Original Message -
From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: So it begins Evangelicals to Bush: Payback Time
On Nov 28, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:
And Warren, that sort of
William T Goodall wrote:
But he also apparently said
I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree
with them.
*lol*
That's cute.
Ritu
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
William T Goodall forwarded:
http://skepdic.com/devadasi.html
Thanks for the link. Jogan Shankar's book looks interesting. Some of the
other links on that page didn't work for me, and so I did a quick google
on the subject. I didn't come across a site which had comprehensive
information but if
I find it striking that when the victims of bigotry start using the same
language as the bigots, we're told shame on you or to ramp back the
rhetoric, as though it's poor form for us to defend ourselves. I don't
even buy the you're no better argument, because I didn't throw the first
punch.
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
I'm unsure, furthermore, how you make the jump from paying
for sex to
treating the sex partner as an object.
I guess it might be a matter of the amount of choice enjoyed by the
women. Do they get to set their own price? Do they get to choose
between
At 10:44 PM 11/28/2004 -0500 Gary Nunn wrote:
As for the question of should religious conservatives be allowed to
participate in the political process, well, yes and no. Should they be
allowed to participate: yes. Should they be allowed to influence the
administration to follow a religious
From: Ritu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, after reading one of the mails in this thread yesterday, I
wouldn't say 'necessarily', but I would still say 'highly likely'. And
the reason would be that that is what most of us tend to do with most
of
the people who provide us with services. [I,
From: JDG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:44 PM 11/28/2004 -0500 Gary Nunn wrote:
As for the question of should religious conservatives be allowed to
participate in the political process, well, yes and no. Should they
be
allowed to participate: yes. Should they be allowed to influence the
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:01:45PM +, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Andrew Paul wrote:
This time they laughed at you if you offered them US dollars. I
have
a friend just back from Lebanon, who had the same experience. It
is
interesting
33 matches
Mail list logo
