Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal

Alexander, Your proposal is much to short. It misses almost all relevant information. Please follow the guideline from our checklist (http://brlcad.org/wiki/Summer_of_Code/Checklist). Especially, have a look at our requirement regarding the application's format (http://brlcad.org/wiki/Summer_of

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2015, at 12:32 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains > wrote: > > Sure, Not named as particle but it is drawn like particle. Here it is > http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/all_shapes/shapes320e.htm. > > If am doing it in wrong w

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On Jun 4, 2015, at 12:32 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains wrote: > Sure, Not named as particle but it is drawn like particle. Here it is > http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/all_shapes/shapes320e.htm. > > If am doing it in wrong way please tell me.:) Now that’s informative! You are definitely doing

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > On May 31, 2015, at 12:47 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains > wrote: > > Yes, I was also trying to make macro of particle by using union etc. But > while I was doing work on POV-Ray I found a per-existing macro which helps > me to expo

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On May 31, 2015, at 12:47 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains wrote: > Yes, I was also trying to make macro of particle by using union etc. But > while I was doing work on POV-Ray I found a per-existing macro which helps me > to export it successfully. A Povray macro? Can you share a snippet showing

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > > On May 28, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Gurwinder Singh Bains > wrote: > > Now, I have almost done with exporting particale primitive. Regular > commits are on my > git account. > > > T

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On May 28, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Gurwinder Singh Bains wrote: > Now, I have almost done with exporting particale primitive. Regular commits > are on my > git account. That’s a very interesting choice of primitive to start with… :) Any reason you didn’t start with a simpler entity like ell/sph

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains < gswithba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Where can I show my converter to BRL-CAD? Currently, its on my github account. >>> Is it ok there or BRL-CAD community will provide me account to put my code? >> >>> requires. >> >> They’re no longer propos

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > On May 22, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains > wrote: > >> Where can I show my converter to BRL-CAD? Currently, its on my github >> account. >> Is it ok there or BRL-CAD community will provide me account to put my code

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On May 22, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains wrote: > Where can I show my converter to BRL-CAD? Currently, its on my github account. > Is it ok there or BRL-CAD community will provide me account to put my code? That’s fine for review, but for submission you should prepare and submit a w

Re: [brlcad-devel] Gsoc Proposal

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Gurwinder Singh Bains wrote: > Hello Izakey and Sean > > I have made changes in my proposal. I have a little conversation with > POV-Ray developers on some primitives. Getting good response from > them. > As I will be working for two different softwares( BRL-CAD a

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (STEP Multiple Protocol Parsing)

I submitted a proposal for the STEP Multiple protocol parsing project about a week ago, hoping I could get a mentor to review it and help me improve it, but till now I have not heard from any one. I would really like to hear from someone about this project. Thanks Konrad On 19 March 2015 at 14

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (X3D importer)

I have submitted a proposal for the X3D importer project. I wish gets reviewed so I could make it better. http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Konrado_DJ/GSoc2015/Proposal/X3D_Importer Thanks Konrad -- Dive into the World of Pa

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (X3D importer)

Hello Sean, Looking at possible options, I think I could resort to using FreeWRL to implement the X3D importer. Is this an acceptable option ?. Thanks Konrad -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The G

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (X3D importer)

On Mar 21, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Djimeli Konrad wrote: > Hello Sean, > > I have been trying to read up different license policy but > I have not yet been able to figure out which could be supported by > BRL-CAD. I have been looking at libx3d and freewrl which are both GNU > Lesser Public

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (X3D importer)

Hello Sean, I have been trying to read up different license policy but I have not yet been able to figure out which could be supported by BRL-CAD. I have been looking at libx3d and freewrl which are both GNU Lesser Public License and also Coin3D which is BSD 3-clause license.I am really

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (X3D importer)

On Mar 20, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Djimeli Konrad wrote: > Your response has given me some light on what path to follow. I have > been revisiting some options and I think white dune would be great for X3D > parsing. It has great support for vrml and x3d including support for nurbs. > Some

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (X3D importer)

Hello Sean, On 20 March 2015 at 05:02, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > Really the only valid reason for implementing a library that is already > readily available would be because they are license incompatible or yours > will be substantially and non-subjectively better in some way. That >

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal (X3D importer)

Hello Konrad, > I am presently working on a proposal for implementing x3d > importer for BRL-CAD. Given that I developed a vrml-g converter I > would like make this an extension of that project by putting both > converter within the-same folder maybe called web3d since they both > share m

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSOC Proposal Help

Thanks Indeepreet!!! Best of luck to you too :-) -Original Message- From: "Inderpreet Singh" Sent: ‎22-‎03-‎2014 13:17 To: "BRL-CAD Developer Mailing List" Subject: Re: [brlcad-devel] GSOC Proposal Help On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Rishabh Sharma wrote: >

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSOC Proposal Help

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Rishabh Sharma wrote: > The link to my proposal is > http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Rishabhsharma/Gsoc_Proposal Awesome! Good Luck! -- Inderpreet Singh Ekoankar Sahai ishwerdas.com facebook.com/okayinder https://kippt.com/okayinder --

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSOC Proposal Help

Thanks for the help Raj! The link to my proposal is http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Rishabhsharma/Gsoc_Proposal On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Raj Reddy wrote: > Hi Rishabh. > > Its good to ask questions on the list. :-) (my first learning in open > source, Although I am new and novice.) > > Cre

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSOC Proposal Help

Hi Rishabh. Its good to ask questions on the list. :-) (my first learning in open source, Although I am new and novice.) Create a user account on brlcad.org Then, Say you wish to create a wiki page as follows http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Krajkreddy/GSOC14/proposal/example Just open the page. Th

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSOC Proposal - URGENT

Hi rishabh. Not a official word (since I am a student also) But I would suggest you to put your proposal on brlcad wiki. Its convenient to read from there. Best, Raj. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Bo

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal

I didn't say I would convert it to GPGPU. I said prepare for converting to gpgpu, What that means is, If there is recursion inside code, convert it to iterative code. If there is, a data structure that doesn't work well on GPU, extract it and replace it with one that works better. This is something

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal

On Mar 16, 2014, at 4:41 PM, gagan wrote: > I have made my proposal[0]. I request you all to review it so that I > could enhance it and after discussion, I will post it to melange's > site. > > [0] http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Gaganjyotsingh/Proposal/LibreCADkickoff Gaganjyot, this looks great t

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal

On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Tose Nikolov wrote: > Here is my google summer of code proposal, please share your toughts. > http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Todor_nikolov/proposal Todor, this looks like a good start, but I hope to see some more detail on what specifically you aim to accomplish. You

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 17 March 2014 02:11, gagan wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I have made my proposal[0]. I request you all to review it so that I >> could enhance it and after discussion, I will post it to melange's >> site. >> >> [0] http://brlcad.org/wiki

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC Proposal

On 17 March 2014 02:11, gagan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have made my proposal[0]. I request you all to review it so that I > could enhance it and after discussion, I will post it to melange's > site. > > [0] http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Gaganjyotsingh/Proposal/LibreCADkickoff Your proposal is

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSOC Proposal-Tentative

On Apr 5, 2012, at 3:33 AM, Jimmie Butler wrote: > Hi, I'm interested in working with BRL-CAD on a GSOC project, any feedback on > my current proposal would be greatly appreciated. > It is located at http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Jimmiebtlr/Proposal. > > I'm still working on a patch. HI Jimmie!