Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-15 Thread Jason Stewart
Hey Boris, On Nov 14, 2007 11:13 AM, Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Sorry for the delay. Please see my comments below. > Hm, I am now wondering why are we migrating to Forrset then? I thought > the idea was to replace the document system with something better and > mor

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Jason, Sorry for the delay. Please see my comments below. Jason Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just for clarification. The Forrest system is mostly a superset of > what stylebook provides. The irritating part is the index file > organization has changed - otherwise it would simply be a

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-07 Thread Jason Stewart
Hi Boris, Just for clarification. The Forrest system is mostly a superset of what stylebook provides. The irritating part is the index file organization has changed - otherwise it would simply be a perl script to change the sb tag names to forrest tag names. On Nov 6, 2007 12:00 PM, Boris Kolpack

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-06 Thread Justin Dearing
On 10/18/07, Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some thought on what would be good to have covered: > > - Building using both cygwin (-mno-cygwin) and msys toolchains. Hello Boris, I'm having trouble getting the mingw version to build from cygwin. I asked a question on the users list. Un

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Jason, Jason Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If Forrest is not the site-creation tool that we want to use, that is > fine. But to suggest that someone shouldn't work on updating the site > because 3.0 isn't ready seems strange. Perhaps i'm missing something. > Would someone be willing to

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread Jason Stewart
Hey, On Nov 5, 2007 10:07 PM, Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2007 10:58:33 AM: > > Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would also like to suggest that we have all the infrastructure > > issues worked out bef

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread James Berry
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:25 AM, Scott Cantor wrote: I would also like to suggest that we have all the infrastructure issues worked out before we commit to migrating to Forrest. This way we won't end up in a situation that Xerces-C++ 3.0.0 is right now with autoconf where the person/people with the

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread Michael Glavassevich
Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2007 10:58:33 AM: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If someone who knows how to do that were to setup the infrastructure > > I'd be happy to fill in the details. > > I would also like to suggest that we have

RE: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread Scott Cantor
> I would also like to suggest that we have all the infrastructure > issues worked out before we commit to migrating to Forrest. This > way we won't end up in a situation that Xerces-C++ 3.0.0 is right > now with autoconf where the person/people with the necessary > expertise is/are unable to commi

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Michael, Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If someone who knows how to do that were to setup the infrastructure > I'd be happy to fill in the details. I would also like to suggest that we have all the infrastructure issues worked out before we commit to migrating to Forrest.

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Justin, Justin Dearing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I see no good deed goes unpunished. Indeed ;-). > Well what would it take to get binaries distributed? Is it simply a matter > of me providing zipped compiled binaries? Or would this require > modifications to an official build server? If

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-05 Thread Justin Dearing
Boris, On 11/5/07, Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The notation is good. There is another problem however. If we add > these platforms to the "Platforms and Binaries" table then we will > have to build precompiled binaries for them (since the page says > that they are available). This

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-04 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Justin, Justin Dearing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I currently added teo 32 bit windows targets: > MinGW-GCC 3.4.x or later > Cygwin-GCC 3.4.x or later The notation is good. There is another problem however. If we add these platforms to the "Platforms and Binaries" table then we will have t

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-03 Thread Michael Glavassevich
Hi Jason, "Jason Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/03/2007 06:54:02 AM: > Yes that is a stylebook URI. > > That whole documentation system is no longer supported by apache (AFAIK). > > We had decided some time ago to switch over to the Forrest system, but > only the Xerces-P project had mi

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-03 Thread Jason Stewart
Hi Justin, On 10/23/07, Justin Dearing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've begun playing with the source and have a few questions. > > 1) The XML Editor I am using > http://xml-copy-editor.sourceforge.net/, does not allot the > documents to validata against the DTD properly unless I change the follo

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-11-02 Thread Justin Dearing
Folks, Question about the build platforms table. I currently added teo 32 bit windows targets: MinGW-GCC 3.4.x or later Cygwin-GCC 3.4.x or later Is that notation good? Can someone testify to building with those envirorments using 64 bit windows? Does the project claim to support those platform

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-10-23 Thread Justin Dearing
I've begun playing with the source and have a few questions. 1) The XML Editor I am using http://xml-copy-editor.sourceforge.net/, does not allot the documents to validata against the DTD properly unless I change the following element from: to: Being XML Copy Editor uses xerces for its xml pars

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-10-18 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Justin, Justin Dearing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Personally I don't mind making changes that will last a couple of months. > Secondly, I think that even if the cygwin and mingw directions were > shortened to "see unix directions" in version 3.0, making that explicitly > clear, and organizi

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-10-17 Thread Justin Dearing
Boris, I understand your concern about an irregular release. I also understand its not just my time but the time of those that have to approve the changes and commit them. So in the end it is up to you. Personally I don't mind making changes that will last a couple of months. Secondly, I think th

Re: Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-10-17 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Justin, Justin Dearing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the powers that be would like me to make these changes and submit a > patch. Thanks for the offer. When I was updating the documentation for 2.8.0, I considered adding a separate section for MinGW, but decided against it because (1) the

Offer to update the build documentation at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/build-winunix.html

2007-10-16 Thread Justin Dearing
Hello, I recently built your library via MSYS. I did this to help Gerald Schmidt remove the msxml dependency from his application XML Copy Editor (http://xml-copy-editor.sourceforge.net/).Gerald has attempted to compile xerces via the Dev-C++ IDE