Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RIP CCIE-Voice :-)
Wilson, I am already a CCIE in RS so I know what to expect when I am taking a CCIE exam. When you skip the UCCX task because you ran out of time and when you score report says : UCCX = 100%, to me it means complete nonsense :) Lots of people have different opinion and point of view :) Cheers Nicolas On 14 Feb 2014, at 12:46, wilson.sam...@bt.com wrote: Nicolas, Any CCIE Lab Exam, cannot be nonsense, no matter how old it may get. It may certainly get outdated, as every technical exam does, however it cannot be nonsense. Regards Wilson Samuel From: Nicolas MICHEL [mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 February 2014 17:04 To: Leslie Meade Cc: Samuel,W,Wilson,JKH3 R; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RIP CCIE-Voice :-) I am happy about that ... Thé exam was complete nonsense Sent from my iPad On 13 févr. 2014, at 22:07, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Snif snif… Leslie Meade .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf ofwilson.sam...@bt.com Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:57 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RIP CCIE-Voice :-) Welcome CCIE Collaboration! (Sorry, the thread became silent) ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RIP CCIE-Voice :-)
I am happy about that ... Thé exam was complete nonsense Sent from my iPad On 13 févr. 2014, at 22:07, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Snif snif… Leslie Meade .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilson.sam...@bt.com Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:57 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RIP CCIE-Voice :-) Welcome CCIE Collaboration! (Sorry, the thread became silent) ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] XML Services
Hi Guys and thanks ! Yeah I can see the XML files from a remote browser and the syntax looks ok to me. What I have really done is the following: Enterprise Parameters : Services Provisioning is set to BOTH URL Directories is set to http://10.10.210.5/test.xml I have NOT deleted the services, I prefer to disable them and to update subscription. Here is what the test.xml file looks like : CiscoIPPhoneMenu MenuItem NameCorporate Directory/Name URLApplication:Cisco/CorporateDirectory/URL /MenuItem MenuItem NamePlaced Calls/Name URLApplication:Cisco/PlacedCalls/URL /MenuItem MenuItem NameReceived Calls/Name URLApplication:Cisco/ReceivedCalls/URL /MenuItem TitleBLABLA TITLE/Title PromptBLABLA PROMPT/Prompt /CiscoIPPhoneMenu Pretty easy and straitghforward right ? then the lobby phone has its Services Provisioning field set to internal After a manual reset for all the phones, Lobby phone has the no services configured text displayed when I ask for services .. so that works right ! The problem is that all the other phones seem to request traffic to the UCCX server but in fact they do NOT. I have sniffed on the CIPC phone that I have on my laptop and I see 0 packets going to UCCX .. I can tell you that I see packets going to UCCX when I type http://10.10.210.5/test.xml in my browser I can see the xml file perfectly . but looks like the CUCM does not tell the phone to use the CCX server for the URL ... I ve done this several time before my 1st attempt without any problem but I am facing issues here and I don't really know why ... is it some kind of vmware snapshot issue ? I even tried to put the CIPC phone on external and I manually typed the URL in its field and still not working :() Thanks guys ! Nicolas PS: Dbreplication is fine :() Le Friday, November 08, 2013 3:25:35 PM, Justin Carney a écrit : First, make sure you restart (or even reset) your phone after making a change to directories. Seeing XML file from a browser is a good start, I'm assuming that's what you mean by can reach the XML file... The syntax looks OK offhand, but I always pull up the default enterprise parameters URL and point a browser there for the sample syntax. If you have a permissions issue then create a new XML file on CCX and save it DIRECTLY in the inetpub folder (ie, don't save on desktop and move to inetpub folder). I always remove the leading/trailing whitespaces in the XML (i see your lines are indented) but I don't believe that actually matters. Try doing that and creating a new file just to test. File name should end with .xml not .txt. There a few things to consider when using both for services provisioning. First, this means phones will use both Internal and External services as the name implies. Internal services are the built-in services when CUCM is installed (missed, received, placed, personal, corp, AND VOICEMAIL) and external are specified by URL. I believe the external services are listed first, then the internal are listed second (please test - it could be the other way around). Like most settings in enterprise/service parameters these apply to all devices, UNLESS a setting is applied at the phone level. If you have the enterprise services URL and also a URL on a phone, the one on the phone is used for external plus any/all of the internal services. In this case the enterprise params url is ignored. This could be useful if you want to maintain 'default' services for all phones but one you can set the URL on just one phone. If you want to change all phones you can set the ent param for all phones and then optionally override that with a different custom URL on one phone. I have seen different strategies on these directory questions. Personally I do not delete the default internal services, instead I just disable them if I don't want to want them there and need to use both For example one of the IPexpert practice labs says disable all services but voicemail on a 'lobby' phone and don't affect other phones. Voicemail can ONLY be an internal service. The solution here it to mimic the full set of default internal services by creating an XML on contact center and put this URL in ent params, setting the global services provisioning to 'both. All internal services except voicmail should be disabled, so all phones will get missed/placed/etc. from the URL and VM from internal. For the one lobby phone simply set the services provisioning to internal (it will ignore the ent param URL since that is external and the phone only looks for internal). The only internal service is voicemail and you have met the requirements for this question. Hope this helps... - Justin On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys I m using this xml for my services, just to check the structure. Unfortunately when I press the service button nothing appears on the screen of my 7961
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] XML Services
Hey guys I m using this xml for my services, just to check the structure. Unfortunately when I press the service button nothing appears on the screen of my 7961 ... I am pretty sure I am doing everything right here. Services provisionning has been set to : BOTH and URL has been configured also. I can reach the XML file on the UCCX but still not working ... Any ideas ? Thanks NIcolas PS : XML file CiscoIPPhoneMenu MenuItem NameMissed Calls/Name URLApplication:Cisco/MissedCalls/URL /MenuItem /CiscoIPPhoneMenu ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB -----8 PASSED
there are 24 Hours in a single day ! So basically he/she can pass 3 CCIE on the same day ! How awesome is that ? :D Le Sunday, September 22, 2013 6:21:16 PM, Marko Milivojevic a écrit : You're incredible. Passed Voice and Wireless on the same day and received no CCIE numbers? Unheard of. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP RS) Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and brevity. :: On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:55, tabitha soans tabi.so...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to all i cleared lab 8 i am very happy thanks to everyone for the helps its so big lab and extremely hard to manage the time thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cuc vm issue with hq user..
admin:run cuc dbquery unitydirdb EXECUTE PROCEDURE
csp_SmtpAddressMigrate('proctorlabs.com','cuc7-pub')
;)
Sent from my iPad
On 26 août 2013, at 14:44, Amit Sharma aryan231...@gmail.com wrote:
guys...when i working on ipx racks...
i am facing issue...
i can access cuc work on it...
when leave vm from pstn or end user to nay cuc user...it goes...correctly..
but on ip phones..it shows no mwi and not vm notification..
and also when i check vm..it says no vm for u...
what is issue and how can i fix it?
i tried 5-10 times with all config...but same results...
for hq, sb all end users...
please help em to fix it...
--
Thanks Regard's
Amit Sharma
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is there anyone working in Proctorlabs in weekends?
Wayne can definitely do something about it I guess. I had very much similar issues last month ... Sent from my iPhone On 1 juil. 2013, at 15:09, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com wrote: It seems nobody cares! It's very disappointing. Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:49:25 -0700 From: karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is there anyone working in Proctorlabs in weekends? To: dwar...@epochuniversal.com; khaled_sah...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com CC: supp...@ipexpert.com; supp...@proctorlabs.com i can not power up most server and sometimes vpn also failed to work. but when u open ticket , suppprt usually our end is good , please check your side. From: Dane Warner dwar...@epochuniversal.com To: khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: support (supp...@ipexpert.com) supp...@ipexpert.com; supp...@proctorlabs.com supp...@proctorlabs.com Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 1:07:41 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is there anyone working in Proctorlabs in weekends? All, I had a very frustrating session this morning. I could not login to the Publisher, even though I could connect with the browser. Didn’t work in IE or Firefox. I could log into the subscriber but saw that there was a configuration already loaded. When I tried to save any changes, just got ‘Connecting’ in the browser, no further. Never could do anything with CallManager. I reverted and loaded two other labs, same issue. It seems the Pod29 was extremely messed up. Saturday’s session loaded a completely different lab from the one I requested. Had to revert and load again, 25 minutes down the drain. Proctorlabs Support, I am requesting two vouchers for the 8 hour session that I couldn’t work on. There are some serious bugs in your lab gear. Regards, Dane Warner, CCVP Sr. Network Engineer Epoch Universal, Inc. (909)226-0755 dwar...@epochuniversal.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of khaled Saholy Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:08 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is there anyone working in Proctorlabs in weekends? Hi All, I don't know what to say or whom to complain to? This's the second day I'm having difficulty in working in my online sessions with Proctorlabs vracks. I contacted supp...@ipexpert.com and supp...@proctorlabs.com and afterhours support but no one answering Yesterday I asked the support if I can extend my current session by booking a new following session but no one answered. I tried booking a new following session hoping it will be linked up automatically but unfortunately it didn't. So after that I had to stop my work after feeling frustrated. Today I booked three consecutive sessions but the same problem happened again but in a different form. I noticed the remaining time is 3 hrs and 40 minutes in the first session and informed the support guys but no one is answering. After finishing my first session, I thought it will be disconnected but the remaining time changed to 24 hours. Okay feeling happy with the new hours but then maybe after about 30 minutes I found my telnet session got disconnected and I can't access them or access the servers and after refreshing my account at Proctorlabs site , I found the pod has changed. So means everything has gone. The sessions were not linked-up as what they told us. I just wonder whom to complain in such cases? BTW,I also schedule sessions in the other competitor company vracks but to say the truth I found their support and response are very good. Not only that but they gave me back my credits and more. Thanks for any help and regards. Khaled Al-Saholy No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3204/6445 - Release Date: 06/27/13 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE/UCCX Integration
Hey Guys. I had some trouble this weekend with my CUE integration with CUCM and I would like to know how to do it correctly while doing it fast ... (no best practices here I know :) ) This is how I see things. -Create CTI RP in the none partition (accessible to anyone) with a CSS that can see CTI ports (let's say CSS_CTI_RP that includes PT_CTI_PORTS) - Create 2 CTI Ports that are in the PT_CTI_PORTS with a CSS that can see directly phones (CSS_INTERNAL that include PT_INTERNAL) -Create a user that has CTI standard enabled and controlled devices : CTI-RP and CTI_Ports -Create a voicemail pilot that is equal to the CTI RP in the none partition -Create a Voicemail profile that include the newly created voicemail pilot for BR2 -Apply Voicemail profile to the phones *reset them* Then on the CUE. -Check the license and upload new license if not OK -Go Offline and restore factory default - Wizard install: Configure CUCM IP/CTI user/ etc etc and imports users . Check if the CTI ports are registered on the CUCM Check if the CTI RP is registered on the CUCM Check by pressing the voicemail button on the phone... My main concern is about the CSS/PT configuration ... Can someone please enlighten me ? That would be awesome ! Thanks Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab
How about to Go Screw Yourselve guys ??? Thanks Nicolas Le Monday, April 29, 2013 7:41:56 AM, Kevin Ronc a écrit : ikizoo we already talking about lab (7) i think you forgot you are using cert you said and not good then i shared with you few questions On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:41 AM, jony jacob jacobjon...@gmail.com mailto:jacobjon...@gmail.com wrote: I am practicing cvl i have all the questions from them and it's perfectly accurate for lab --8 I can see new update coming on 1st may hope we can crack the same like lab --7 My friend all cleared lab 7 last week and had back luck to me i got this new lab ---8 let me know if you are interested to work together email me back please On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Charlie Spencer charliesp...@gmail.com mailto:charliesp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi GOT LAB (8) its really very very very very tuff lab I am surprised to see this lab was not expected now i have no choice to choose r-e-a-(l) labs have no money to give cisco all the time attempt attempt i am fedup now If anyone want to share the cost please email me back I am ready to share everything whatever i have noted ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE CLI/GUI ?
Hey Guys. I have currently struggling with CUE integration / installation and configuration. What would you use in the Lab ? CLI or GUi ? Because in the Workbooks, the GUI is used approx all the times ... Just wanted to have your thoughts Thanks for the help Nicolas ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Material study
Contat a sales guy at ipexpert.com Not sure why I even take the time to answer to this email Nic Le 4/24/2013 8:38 AM, Abdulbasit Muhammad a écrit : Hi, Dear respected sir, Kindly provide me the study material for ccie voice. Best regards. muhammad abdulbasit ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks
I have to agree with Bill ... I ALWAYS send an email to the support to confirm if my session are indeed linked ! Nic Le Wednesday, April 17, 2013 8:01:00 AM, Mohamed Gazzaz a écrit : Hello, I am copying the support team. They will clarify this issue for us. Regards, Mohamed Gazzaz From: ahmad_tam...@hotmail.com Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:45:21 +0300 To: ejzi...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks Is there any specific email for the support ? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.com mailto:ejzi...@gmail.com wrote: I've done it many times just ask them to join your sessions, the support team has always been great about doing it when you give them enough time and if racks are available Edgar On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Bill whl...@gmail.com mailto:whl...@gmail.com wrote: You need to verify as in the past this did not always work. Not sure how the new scheduling works Sent from my iPad On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:27 PM, Mohamed Gazzaz mgaz...@hotmail.com mailto:mgaz...@hotmail.com wrote: The two sessions are linked automatically when you book B2B sessions and your configuration stays. You can ask support for more clarification. Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:43:16 +0300 From: aboaz...@gmail.com mailto:aboaz...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks Dears,, When I reserve a back to back racks sessions , does the pod number changed? does my configuration removed one I go from one time session to the next one Appreciated ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Jason Aarons, CCIE No. 38564 (Voice)
Sooo fucking awesome !! ;) Nic Le 15 mars 2013 à 22:31, Jason Aarons scubajas...@gmail.com a écrit : I hadn’t opened the email since getting it at 11am in the car on my phone driving back from RTP. I didn’t want to ruin my weekend and was procrastinating opening it! I finally opened it at 3pm when I got home and I found out I was awarded #38564 for Voice after 12 months of non-stop work. It wasn’t luck but preparedness. I encourage everyone to accelerate achieving their goals before the expected blueprint change. Many hours I spent doing practice labs at home over and over and over again. Never give up. I gave up on RS on Sept 8, 1999 and regretted it ever since. You got to have that burn inside you. Vik’s Casino Matrix chat about the 7 Habits and Conscious Subjective gave some inspiration as well, and his class was an excellent deep dive. Most importantly I couldn’t have done it without the sponsorship of my manager, and Dimension Data. My wife for putting up with losing our dining room table every night for 9+ months. My kids for losing their daddy for a year. Hearing my daughter tell me how much she missed me(“Daddy, we never do the things we used to”) gave me resolve to get it done. To have spent 9 months distracted from my family and not passing wasn’t an option. If your still working on it, redouble your efforts! Sincerely, Jason Aarons, CCIE No. 38564 (Voice) Consultant Dimension Data PS I suck at taking tests. Photos below of the dining room table turned into a voice lab center! image003.jpg image005.jpg image007.jpg ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection user template time format
Does CUCN has something to do with the display of the phone ? :=) Le 2/28/2013 12:07 PM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) a crit: Hi all If we are instructed to display the phones time in 24 hour format, should we reflect this in the user templates for Cisco Unity? Thanks Jamie Parr Engineer - IT jamp...@cisco.com Phone: +44 20 8824 2641 Mobile: +44 7590622049 Cisco Systems 9-11 New Square Bedfont Lakes Feltham Middlesex TW14 8HA United Kingdom www.cisco.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CM-Gatekeeper -CME and return issue
paste GK config and gatekeep main 10 and we can help .. Le 2/26/2013 8:16 AM, Suresh Bhandari a écrit : Hello Experts, I have CME (site c) and CUCM registered to the GK. I can see in the debug gatek main 10 that CME can send calls to GK, but from GK, the call is not coming into CUCM. To check the problem, I tried to call the CME phones (ext 3XXX - rl-gk -rg-gk - gk-trunk), but it seems that the calls do not reach the GK... The problem is in the second part I believe. One Played with CUCM, and GK, but not get the required results. This is not just once, I get this issue, the third time earlier I had no issues with UCM-GK-CME and vice versa. Can anyone help me sort this out? Thanks -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE
Hi Michael Check that the device pool associated to the trunk got a Call Manager group with both Pub and Sub. Beside of that I don't know Regards PS: Never ask to answer ASAP please :) We are like you and owe nothing but help if we can :) Nic Le Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:43:06 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com a écrit : Greetings All. I'm having an unusual issue with my Gatekeeper which I have not seen before. My gatekeeper is on the mgcp HQ router. When I do show gatekeeper end I only see GK_Trunk_1, the publisher and CME. The Subscriber is missing. I have reset the trunk and gatekeeper many times. Although the database shows 412's and 2's I performed a DB repair all. I have tried everything to get GK_Tunk_2, the subscriber to come up but it won't. Anyone out there experience this issue and did you find a resolution? If so please respond ASAP as my lab is in 9 days and if this happens to me in the lab I'd like to know what I have to do to fix it. Any input appreciated. Thank you. Michael Sears ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Integration and basics
Hey Guys ! Kinda new on this platform I am having trouble to Tshoot this and have not a lot of knowledge regarding the call processing. Does anyone have some nice documents regarding the integration ? Today I had trouble to register my CTI Ports from UCCX to CUCM :() Thanks Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 Lab2 Task 4.4
Anyone ? Le Friday, January 18, 2013 12:00:39 AM, Nicolas MICHEL a écrit : Hi guys, I have a small problem with the GK task in this lab ! Task summary: 1 zone (HQ) where 3 endpoints registers = 2x CUCM (Pub and Sub obviously) + Br2 2 type prefix : 1# = Type prefix registered by CUCM 3# = Type prefix registered by BR2-RTR Zone bandwidth small task. I disagree with the Detailed Solution Guide that says: HQ-RTR Gatekeeper: zone local HQ ipexpert.com zone prefix HQ 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix HQ 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix HQ 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix HQ 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 bandwidth total default 128 no shut BR2-RTR Int loo0 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR h323-gateway voip tech-prefix gateway === I kinda disagree with that since BR2 can also be used for 5... or 1... because zone prefix HQ 1... will defines the prio for CUCM only but Br2 will still use priority 5 so it sill appears in the show gatekeeper gw-type. For me you would have to disable Br2 for these prefix : zone prefix HQ 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix HQ 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR That was my first point regarding the task.. I have another problem with the next task which involve call routing through the gatekeeper. The task says that UCM phones can call UCME and vice and versa by dialing the appropriate extensions (4 digits) The solution guide says to create a simple RG/RL and RP ... Nothing special in the RP nor RL on BR2_RTR dial-peer voice 3000 voip dtmf-relay h245-alpha incoming called-number 3...$ dial-peer voice 15 voip destination-pattern [15]...$ session target ras incoming called . tech-prefix 1# no vad For me the call would fail because if you debug gatek main 10 you will see that the GK will not match a tech prefix (step 1) but will match a zone prefix for HQ (step 2). It will not match a default tech-prefix so the call will fail. For me you need to prefix in the RL with 3#,so the DNIS will be 3#3001 Then the type prefix 3# (step 1) will be matched. The Zone prefix 3001 will be match too (step2) Call will be routed to BR2-RTR that have the best priority for this zone prefix ARQ will be sent by gk-trunk_2 ACF will be sent by the GK to gk-trunk_2 Then call will be received by CME RTR_2 it will NEVER match dial-peer 3000 since the DNIS is 3#3000 the call will match dial-peer voice 15 since the ANI is 1001 and ANI is used for inbound DP with the destination-pattern command) So for me you have to do the following voice translation-rule 15000 rule 1 /^3#/ // voice translation-profile INBOUND_GK_DNIS translated called 15000 dial-peer voice 3000 voip incoming call 3#3... translation-profile inc INBOUND_GK_DNIS dtmf-relay h245-alpha The call will here succeed and will use g729 (default in dial-peer configuration) In the other direction, the call will succeed since it will be prefixed by CME with 1# (command in the DP) Call will be accepted by GK for the same reason as above. CUCM will then use the 4 significants digits in the trunk configuration. What do you guys think ? :) Thanks for letting me know :) Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 Lab2 Task 4.4
Hi guys, I have a small problem with the GK task in this lab ! Task summary: 1 zone (HQ) where 3 endpoints registers = 2x CUCM (Pub and Sub obviously) + Br2 2 type prefix : 1# = Type prefix registered by CUCM 3# = Type prefix registered by BR2-RTR Zone bandwidth small task. I disagree with the Detailed Solution Guide that says: HQ-RTR Gatekeeper: zone local HQ ipexpert.com zone prefix HQ 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix HQ 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix HQ 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix HQ 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 bandwidth total default 128 no shut BR2-RTR Int loo0 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR h323-gateway voip tech-prefix gateway === I kinda disagree with that since BR2 can also be used for 5... or 1... because zone prefix HQ 1... will defines the prio for CUCM only but Br2 will still use priority 5 so it sill appears in the show gatekeeper gw-type. For me you would have to disable Br2 for these prefix : zone prefix HQ 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix HQ 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR That was my first point regarding the task.. I have another problem with the next task which involve call routing through the gatekeeper. The task says that UCM phones can call UCME and vice and versa by dialing the appropriate extensions (4 digits) The solution guide says to create a simple RG/RL and RP ... Nothing special in the RP nor RL on BR2_RTR dial-peer voice 3000 voip dtmf-relay h245-alpha incoming called-number 3...$ dial-peer voice 15 voip destination-pattern [15]...$ session target ras incoming called . tech-prefix 1# no vad For me the call would fail because if you debug gatek main 10 you will see that the GK will not match a tech prefix (step 1) but will match a zone prefix for HQ (step 2). It will not match a default tech-prefix so the call will fail. For me you need to prefix in the RL with 3#,so the DNIS will be 3#3001 Then the type prefix 3# (step 1) will be matched. The Zone prefix 3001 will be match too (step2) Call will be routed to BR2-RTR that have the best priority for this zone prefix ARQ will be sent by gk-trunk_2 ACF will be sent by the GK to gk-trunk_2 Then call will be received by CME RTR_2 it will NEVER match dial-peer 3000 since the DNIS is 3#3000 the call will match dial-peer voice 15 since the ANI is 1001 and ANI is used for inbound DP with the destination-pattern command) So for me you have to do the following voice translation-rule 15000 rule 1 /^3#/ // voice translation-profile INBOUND_GK_DNIS translated called 15000 dial-peer voice 3000 voip incoming call 3#3... translation-profile inc INBOUND_GK_DNIS dtmf-relay h245-alpha The call will here succeed and will use g729 (default in dial-peer configuration) In the other direction, the call will succeed since it will be prefixed by CME with 1# (command in the DP) Call will be accepted by GK for the same reason as above. CUCM will then use the 4 significants digits in the trunk configuration. What do you guys think ? :) Thanks for letting me know :) Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM to Gatekeeper H323-GW vs. VOIP-GW
Voice service voip allow h t h no gateway gateway :) Le Monday, January 14, 2013 2:10:18 AM, Pixar Perfect a écrit : CUCM registers to the GK as a VOIP-GW. How do I make it register as a H323-GW? The requirement on a practice lab demands the CUCM register to the GK as a H323-GW and not VOIP-GW. On a GW,, you could just do the allow h323 to h323 to make it register as H323-GW. But not sure abt CUCM. Any thought? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM to Gatekeeper H323-GW vs. VOIP-GW
Sorry I typed way to fast. For me a CUCM does not register as an H323 GW ! Only a Gateway would do that with the Voice service voip command than we both mentionned ! Sorry about the previous mail ! Nic Le Monday, January 14, 2013 11:02:57 AM, Nicolas MICHEL a écrit : Voice service voip allow h t h no gateway gateway :) Le Monday, January 14, 2013 2:10:18 AM, Pixar Perfect a écrit : CUCM registers to the GK as a VOIP-GW. How do I make it register as a H323-GW? The requirement on a practice lab demands the CUCM register to the GK as a H323-GW and not VOIP-GW. On a GW,, you could just do the allow h323 to h323 to make it register as H323-GW. But not sure abt CUCM. Any thought? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Channel not available :D
Hey Guys ! I feel like I am doomed :D When I am calling 911/9911 from HQ, the calls fails. It makes the PSTN phones ring and then it automagically disconnect the call. ISDN Q931 debugs says that the requested circuit is not available, I have tried isdn bchan ascending and descending order but with NO luck :( The problem is that the incoming calls from the PSTN on both channel (1 and 3 = Fractionnal PRI) are working properly :D If anyone has an idea I would be glad to hear it :D Thanks !! Nic !! HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# *Jan 9 08:58:55.739: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: pak_private_number: Invalid type/plan 0x0 0x0 may be overriden; sw-type 13 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Calling num 2123945002 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x0 0x0, Called num 911 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0081 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '2123945002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Called Party Number i = 0x80, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown *Jan 9 08:58:55.775: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8081 Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 *Jan 9 08:58:55.787: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x8081 Pro HQ-RTR#gress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available *Jan 9 08:58:55.831: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x0081 Cause i = 0x80AC - Requested circuit/channel not available *Jan 9 08:58:55.843: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x8081 *Jan 9 08:58:55.847: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x0081 HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. HQ-RTR(config)#int s0/0/0:23 HQ-RTR(config-if)#isdn bchan as HQ-RTR(config-if)# *Jan 9 08:59:26.131: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: pak_private_number: Invalid type/plan 0x0 0x0 may be overriden; sw-type 13 *Jan 9 08:59:26.131: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Calling num 2123945002 *Jan 9 08:59:26.131: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x0 0x0, Called num 911 *Jan 9 08:59:26.135: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0082 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '2123945002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Called Party Number i = 0x80, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown *Jan 9 08:59:26.171: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8082 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 *Jan 9 08:59:26.179: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x8082 Pro HQ-RTR(config-gress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available *Jan 9 08:59:26.223: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x0082 Cause i = 0x80AC - Requested circuit/channel not available *Jan 9 08:59:26.231: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x8082 *Jan 9 08:59:26.235: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x0082if)# HQ-RTR(config-if)# *Jan 9 08:59:43.227: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0084 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origination address is non-ISDN Display i = 'Emergency Services' Calling Party Number i = 0x0080, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '2123945002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National *Jan 9 08:59:43.251: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8084 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 HQ-RTR(config-if)# *Jan 9 08:59:43.267: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x8084 *Jan 9 08:59:44.191: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x0084 Cause i = 0x8290 - Normal call clearing *Jan 9 08:59:44.195: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x8084 *Jan 9 08:59:44.207: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref =
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 lab 1 - HQ Phone cannot register ? WTH
Hi Everyone, I've changed the DHCP server to be the HQ router. I have changed the range of IP address to be more specific to see a change in the phone address. No luck here, the phone is getting an IP but still refuse to register :D I am having various problem with this POD . Thanks for the help provided ! Nic Le Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:21:23 PM, Derek Wyss a écrit : I have also seen weird issues surrounded DHCP in my home lab in practice. What I would suggest and has seemed to HELP alleviate issues is to issue clear ip dhcp binding * On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Bill whl...@gmail.com mailto:whl...@gmail.com wrote: Does the phone actually get the ip from your config or is it stuck? I have had a phone stuck before at proctor labs and it would not take anything I did to resolve it. That is because some of the phones are not actually attached to the rack device but layer two tunneled to the rack. That means they do not recycle when you bounce them. Try this change your ip range and see if the phone gets a new ip, if so then it is something ou are missing. If not try pinging the phone, does it reply? If so then you might recover it if not then open a ticket and see if you can get another pod or use a softphone for now. You can also hardware VPN into proctor labs and I find that to be the best solution for them to give me more of a true lab experience. Bill On Jan 8, 2013, at 11:32 PM, Piotr Puchalski p256...@gmail.com mailto:p256...@gmail.com wrote: Nic, __ __ I’ve been battling a somewhat similar problem in my own lab (I have all the hardware on my rack with full access) and the problem was that somehow one of the phones was not taking the default gateway set in PUB’s DHCP. I configured a pool locally on the router and it worked then. Next day (and next lab) it worked fine again with CUCM. However now it is still not working. Always make sure you have the default router configured correctly on the phone, that is the first thing. The rest should be a cake. __ __ Peter __ __ *From:*ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nicolas MICHEL *Sent:* Tuesday, January 08, 2013 4:54 PM *To:* William Bell; Steffen Bruening *Cc:* OSL Voice *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 lab 1 - HQ Phone cannot register ? WTH __ __ Hi Guys ! Yeah I have checked fa0/0.10 and it is ok ! I cannot access to the IP phone since it is PL facilities :) DHCP scope has been created/deleted/checked etc etc I had no problem with BR1 or BR2 ... only with the 7962 in HQ .. Weird ! I have the same rack tomorrow for the same lab (VOL2 LAB1) that I need to finish so I will try again :) Many thanks for the help guys :) More to come later and hope to gain experience to finally be able to answer questions here :) Nic Le 08/01/13 18:03, William Bell a écrit : Nic, __ __ On your HQ router, can you check Fa0/0.10? Make sure you have the following config: __ __ *encapsulation dot1q 10 native* __ __ I don't think it is DHCP snooping or you would not receive an IP address. However, you could (and should) Erase the config on the IP phone to ensure it isn't just using an old DHCP config. __ __ I would also check the DHCP scope. Check the server level (where you are likely specifying global Option 150 params) and check the scope itself. Make sure you haven't fat fingered a subnet mask, subnet, begin/end address, or default gateway. When I have had a problem where the phone was getting an address but was not progressing through TFTP and registration it was usually related to a misconfiguration of the DHCP scope in CUCM. __ __ If you have to change the DHCP scope params then remember to restart the DHCP monitor service. It is a finicky beast. __ __ HTH. __ __ -Bill __ __ On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Nicolas MICHEL wrote: Hey guys. I m in trouble with the phone connected to Fa1/0/23 of the 3750 in HQ. Vlan assignement are OK: HQ-3750#sh run int fa1/0/23 Building configuration... Current configuration : 113 bytes ! interface FastEthernet1/0/23 switchport access vlan 10 switchport voice vlan 20 spanning-tree portfast end HQ-3750#sh run int fa1/0/1 Building configuration
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Channel not available :D
Hi Guys, no the HQ is H323 otherwise I would not change the ISDN bchan order in the IOS but rather in the CUCM interface. the ISDN status shows Multi Frame Establish, all is all right. I can have incoming calls to the HQ but not outgoing calls to the Local and LD route pattern. From what I remember, International calls are working great :( Next time I'll debug Q931 with detail enabled Thanks for the help :) Nic Le 1/9/2013 11:41 AM, Bill a écrit : So is you hq a mgcp? If so it looks like you are missing your isdn bind-l3 ccm command Is it h323 or maybe stand alone cme with just a plan pri? If h323 the does it show status in gateways? Does it show unknown unknown instead of unknown and ip? Try to give us more and clearer information because right now all we know is pri, but most likely hq is a gateway for CUCM and we don't know what type. We don't know if this is your lab, rack rental or real world. It is very helpful to have this information to be able to give you help. Bill On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Heath Williams heath...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I had a similar issue on a production network from a cm to cme on net. Look at your dial-peers and also your class codec applied to them. Also try using the ccapi inout and the asn 245 debugs to fault find. Hope this helps. Sent from my iPhone On 09/01/2013, at 8:03 PM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Guys ! I feel like I am doomed :D When I am calling 911/9911 from HQ, the calls fails. It makes the PSTN phones ring and then it automagically disconnect the call. ISDN Q931 debugs says that the requested circuit is not available, I have tried isdn bchan ascending and descending order but with NO luck :( The problem is that the incoming calls from the PSTN on both channel (1 and 3 = Fractionnal PRI) are working properly :D If anyone has an idea I would be glad to hear it :D Thanks !! Nic !! HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# *Jan 9 08:58:55.739: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: pak_private_number: Invalid type/plan 0x0 0x0 may be overriden; sw-type 13 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Calling num 2123945002 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x0 0x0, Called num 911 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0081 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '2123945002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Called Party Number i = 0x80, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown *Jan 9 08:58:55.775: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8081 Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 *Jan 9 08:58:55.787: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x8081 Pro HQ-RTR#gress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available *Jan 9 08:58:55.831: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x0081 Cause i = 0x80AC - Requested circuit/channel not available *Jan 9 08:58:55.843: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x8081 *Jan 9 08:58:55.847: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x0081 HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. HQ-RTR(config)#int s0/0/0:23 HQ-RTR(config-if)#isdn bchan as HQ-RTR(config-if)# *Jan 9 08:59:26.131: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: pak_private_number: Invalid type/plan 0x0 0x0 may be overriden; sw-type 13 *Jan 9 08:59:26.131: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Calling num 2123945002 *Jan 9 08:59:26.131: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x0 0x0, Called num 911 *Jan 9 08:59:26.135: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0082 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '2123945002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Called Party Number i = 0x80, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown *Jan 9 08:59:26.171: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8082 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 *Jan 9 08:59:26.179: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x8082 Pro HQ-RTR(config-gress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available *Jan 9 08:59:26.223: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x0082 Cause i = 0x80AC - Requested circuit/channel not available *Jan 9
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Channel not available :D
Inbound calls are working perfectly :( *Jan 9 08:59:43.227: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0084 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origination address is non-ISDN Display i = 'Emergency Services' Calling Party Number i = 0x0080, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '2123945002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National *Jan 9 08:59:43.251: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8084 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 HQ-RTR(config-if)# *Jan 9 08:59:43.267: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x8084 *Jan 9 08:59:44.191: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x0084 Cause i = 0x8290 - Normal call clearing *Jan 9 08:59:44.195: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x8084 *Jan 9 08:59:44.207: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x0084 HQ-RTR(config-if)# Le Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:50:14 PM, Abel ... a écrit : Try an inbound call from the pstn and run your debugs. Check the channel used in that call. That test is to discard L1/L2 issues. On Jan 9, 2013 6:21 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com mailto:corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: I will say this. This happened to me once using MGCP and could never figure it out. I just assumed something was messed up and could not find an answer in over 2 hours of troubleshooting. If you ever figure it out, please let me know. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nicolas MICHEL Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 12:49 PM To: Bill Cc: OSL Voice Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Channel not available :D Hi Guys, no the HQ is H323 otherwise I would not change the ISDN bchan order in the IOS but rather in the CUCM interface. the ISDN status shows Multi Frame Establish, all is all right. I can have incoming calls to the HQ but not outgoing calls to the Local and LD route pattern. From what I remember, International calls are working great :( Next time I'll debug Q931 with detail enabled Thanks for the help :) Nic Le 1/9/2013 11:41 AM, Bill a écrit : So is you hq a mgcp? If so it looks like you are missing your isdn bind-l3 ccm command Is it h323 or maybe stand alone cme with just a plan pri? If h323 the does it show status in gateways? Does it show unknown unknown instead of unknown and ip? Try to give us more and clearer information because right now all we know is pri, but most likely hq is a gateway for CUCM and we don't know what type. We don't know if this is your lab, rack rental or real world. It is very helpful to have this information to be able to give you help. Bill On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Heath Williams heath...@gmail.com mailto:heath...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I had a similar issue on a production network from a cm to cme on net. Look at your dial-peers and also your class codec applied to them. Also try using the ccapi inout and the asn 245 debugs to fault find. Hope this helps. Sent from my iPhone On 09/01/2013, at 8:03 PM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Guys ! I feel like I am doomed :D When I am calling 911/9911 from HQ, the calls fails. It makes the PSTN phones ring and then it automagically disconnect the call. ISDN Q931 debugs says that the requested circuit is not available, I have tried isdn bchan ascending and descending order but with NO luck :( The problem is that the incoming calls from the PSTN on both channel (1 and 3 = Fractionnal PRI) are working properly :D If anyone has an idea I would be glad to hear it :D Thanks !! Nic !! HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# HQ-RTR# *Jan 9 08:58:55.739: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: pak_private_number: Invalid type/plan 0x0 0x0 may be overriden; sw-type 13 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Calling num 2123945002 *Jan 9 08:58:55.743: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x0 0x0, Called num 911 *Jan 9 08
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 lab 1 - HQ Phone cannot register ? WTH
Hey guys. I m in trouble with the phone connected to Fa1/0/23 of the 3750 in HQ. Vlan assignement are OK: HQ-3750#sh run int fa1/0/23 Building configuration... Current configuration : 113 bytes ! interface FastEthernet1/0/23 switchport access vlan 10 switchport voice vlan 20 spanning-tree portfast end HQ-3750#sh run int fa1/0/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 153 bytes ! interface FastEthernet1/0/1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 10 switchport mode trunk speed 100 duplex full end HQ-3750#sh int trunk PortMode Encapsulation StatusNative vlan Fa1/0/1 on 802.1q trunking 10 PortVlans allowed on trunk Fa1/0/1 1-4094 PortVlans allowed and active in management domain Fa1/0/1 1,10,20,30 PortVlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned Fa1/0/1 1,10,20,30 IP HELPER on the L3 Device is OK interface FastEthernet0/0.20 encapsulation dot1Q 20 ip address 10.10.200.3 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 end IP Phone can get an IP from the PUB (10.10.210.10) HQ-3750#sh cdp neigh fa1/0/23 det - Device ID: SEP0021A086825D Entry address(es): IP address: 10.10.200.50 Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7962, Capabilities: Host Phone Interface: FastEthernet1/0/23, Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1 Holdtime : 178 sec Version : SCCP42.8-4-1S advertisement version: 2 Duplex: full Power drawn: 6.300 Watts Power request id: 33373, Power management id: 1 Power request levels are:6300 0 0 0 0 Management address(es): the DHCP subnet is identical (except the IP range of course :) ) to the others DHCP pool which other phone use and can register to CUCM... I have no idea what is the problem here since it is a very basic problem if anyone has experienced the same on POD 11 of PL ? Many thanks for your help on this ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 lab 1 - HQ Phone cannot register ? WTH
Hi Guys ! Yeah I have checked fa0/0.10 and it is ok ! I cannot access to the IP phone since it is PL facilities :) DHCP scope has been created/deleted/checked etc etc I had no problem with BR1 or BR2 ... only with the 7962 in HQ .. Weird ! I have the same rack tomorrow for the same lab (VOL2 LAB1) that I need to finish so I will try again :) Many thanks for the help guys :) More to come later and hope to gain experience to finally be able to answer questions here :) Nic Le 08/01/13 18:03, William Bell a écrit : Nic, On your HQ router, can you check Fa0/0.10? Make sure you have the following config: *encapsulation dot1q 10 native* I don't think it is DHCP snooping or you would not receive an IP address. However, you could (and should) Erase the config on the IP phone to ensure it isn't just using an old DHCP config. I would also check the DHCP scope. Check the server level (where you are likely specifying global Option 150 params) and check the scope itself. Make sure you haven't fat fingered a subnet mask, subnet, begin/end address, or default gateway. When I have had a problem where the phone was getting an address but was not progressing through TFTP and registration it was usually related to a misconfiguration of the DHCP scope in CUCM. If you have to change the DHCP scope params then remember to restart the DHCP monitor service. It is a finicky beast. HTH. -Bill On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Nicolas MICHEL wrote: Hey guys. I m in trouble with the phone connected to Fa1/0/23 of the 3750 in HQ. Vlan assignement are OK: HQ-3750#sh run int fa1/0/23 Building configuration... Current configuration : 113 bytes ! interface FastEthernet1/0/23 switchport access vlan 10 switchport voice vlan 20 spanning-tree portfast end HQ-3750#sh run int fa1/0/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 153 bytes ! interface FastEthernet1/0/1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 10 switchport mode trunk speed 100 duplex full end HQ-3750#sh int trunk PortMode Encapsulation StatusNative vlan Fa1/0/1 on 802.1q trunking 10 PortVlans allowed on trunk Fa1/0/1 1-4094 PortVlans allowed and active in management domain Fa1/0/1 1,10,20,30 PortVlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned Fa1/0/1 1,10,20,30 IP HELPER on the L3 Device is OK interface FastEthernet0/0.20 encapsulation dot1Q 20 ip address 10.10.200.3 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 end IP Phone can get an IP from the PUB (10.10.210.10) HQ-3750#sh cdp neigh fa1/0/23 det - Device ID: SEP0021A086825D Entry address(es): IP address: 10.10.200.50 Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7962, Capabilities: Host Phone Interface: FastEthernet1/0/23, Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1 Holdtime : 178 sec Version : SCCP42.8-4-1S advertisement version: 2 Duplex: full Power drawn: 6.300 Watts Power request id: 33373, Power management id: 1 Power request levels are:6300 0 0 0 0 Management address(es): the DHCP subnet is identical (except the IP range of course :) ) to the others DHCP pool which other phone use and can register to CUCM... I have no idea what is the problem here since it is a very basic problem if anyone has experienced the same on POD 11 of PL ? Many thanks for your help on this ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 Lab 1
Hi Will and thanks ! Quite annyoing when you are labbing on your own and expect to search for something that do not come ! Bill Lake also adviced to do WR ERase . I ll just do that :) Thanks again ! Nic Le 12/12/2012 6:04 PM, William Bell a écrit : Nic, Are you using the proctor labs rack? I hit something like this when using proctor labs. I don't have the interface in front of me but I believe I had to erase the config on the devices before loading the configs for the specific lab scenario. If I didn't erase the configs, the loading option merely merged configurations. Erasing the configs does a wr erase first and the loading of the lab scenario is good to go. You can check by doing a sho ver and look at the uptime. HTH. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:54 AM, Nicolas MICHEL wrote: Hey Guys ! Finally got some time to focus on the CCIE. I got a little question regarding Lab1 Vol2. Question 1.2: They are asking us to ensure that BR1 Phones that are physically attached are getting IP/TFTP etc from the BR1 Router. My question is that I loaded the config and had nothing to do :( it was already correct . The solution guide show some configuration regarding DHCP Pools and VLAN assignement + SVI down but in my case the config were good as I loaded the rack :( Thanks for the help guys ! Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL2 Lab 1
Hey Guys ! Finally got some time to focus on the CCIE. I got a little question regarding Lab1 Vol2. Question 1.2: They are asking us to ensure that BR1 Phones that are physically attached are getting IP/TFTP etc from the BR1 Router. My question is that I loaded the config and had nothing to do :( it was already correct . The solution guide show some configuration regarding DHCP Pools and VLAN assignement + SVI down but in my case the config were good as I loaded the rack :( Thanks for the help guys ! Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Learn and Motivation Strategy for the second attempt
Good Post Steffen :) Le Wed Nov 14 20:51:54 2012, Craig Hill (crahill) a écrit : I think the best thing you can do is not give up. I failed back in Oct. after I spent a considerable amount of time prepping via the Cisco 360 program. I definitely feel like I put too much time into one training program that didn’t seem close to what I actually experienced. Since I haven’t passed, I can’t really give you advice other than don’t give up. Even if I never achieve the cert, the preparation and study time have improved my voice skill set considerably, and I would wager the same can be said for you as well. Craig *From:*ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Steffen Bruening *Sent:* Wednesday, November 14, 2012 1:14 PM *To:* ccie_voice *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Learn and Motivation Strategy for the second attempt Hi all, I was in Bruessels yesterday and I failed. I was suprised about my score report and about the amount of section were lost points. I only know one definitly mistake, about the other things I could only suppose. It seems that I am just to stupid to read the questions. I was finished with the configuration after 5 1/2 hours and I tested everything twice, solved the issues I found, but unfortunately it was not enough. I booked my second attempt for January, but to be honest I am really frustated and I don't know how should keep my motivation and focus. Sure I will make further remote labs to keep my speed, but what else could I do till my second attempt? So all second/more attempter what have you made during your till your next lab seat? Did you changed or strategy/learning focus or anything else? Regards Steffen ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Probleme with conference Bridge BR1
Hi Guys, Looks like I cannot add a Conference bridge on BR1-RTR (I'm using PL). I have configured the voice-card 0 to share the DSP like this voice-card 0 no dspfarm dsp services dspfarm But when it comes to CFB configuration, the max number of session is 0-0 :D It happened to me before on HQ-RTR but this was because i forgot the voice-card configuration :() BR1-RTR(config)#dspfarm profile 3 conf BR1-RTR(config-dspfarm-profile)#max sess 1 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. BR1-RTR(config-dspfarm-profile)#max sess ? 0-0 Number of sessions assigned to this profile Here is the full configuration : BR1-RTR#sh Oct 26 20:53:05.391: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console BR1-RTR#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 6051 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 20:53:05 UTC Fri Oct 26 2012 ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker warm-reboot boot-end-marker ! logging message-counter syslog ! no aaa new-model network-clock-participate wic 0 network-clock-select 1 T1 0/0/0 ! dot11 syslog ip source-route ! ! ip cef ! ! ip domain name proctorlabs.com no ipv6 cef ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! isdn switch-type primary-ni ! ! ! voice service voip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip sip registrar server ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! voice register global max-dn 1 max-pool 1 ! voice register pool 1 id network 10.10.201.0 mask 255.255.255.0 application sip.app preference 2 incoming called-number codec g711ulaw ! ! voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /617863\(1...\)$/ /\1/ ! voice translation-rule 7 rule 1 /^1...$/ /863\0/ ! voice translation-rule 10 rule 1 /^1...$/ /617863\0/ ! voice translation-rule 1001 rule 1 /^1001$/ /1002/ ! ! voice translation-profile 1001 translate redirect-called 1001 ! voice translation-profile 10digit translate calling 10 ! voice translation-profile 7digit translate calling 7 ! voice translation-profile strip-dnis translate called 1 ! ! voice-card 0 no dspfarm dsp services dspfarm ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! ! controller T1 0/0/0 framing esf linecode b8zs pri-group timeslots 1-3,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 framing esf linecode b8zs channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF no fair-queue frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 1536 ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet1/0 switchport trunk native vlan 130 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 240 ! interface FastEthernet1/1 ! interface FastEthernet1/2 ! interface FastEthernet1/3 ! interface FastEthernet1/4 ! interface FastEthernet1/5 ! interface FastEthernet1/6 ! interface FastEthernet1/7 ! interface FastEthernet1/8 switchport trunk native vlan 130 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 240 ! interface FastEthernet1/9 ! interface FastEthernet1/10 ! interface FastEthernet1/11 ! interface FastEthernet1/12 ! interface FastEthernet1/13 ! interface FastEthernet1/14 ! interface FastEthernet1/15 ! interface Vlan1 no ip address ! interface Vlan130 ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Vlan240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.11 ! router ospf 1 router-id 10.10.101.1 log-adjacency-changes network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 ! no ip forward-protocol nd no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 translation-profile incoming strip-dnis ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager fallback-mgcp ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ccm-manager music-on-hold ! mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0 mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0 ! mgcp profile default ! sccp local Loopback0 sccp ccm 10.10.210.10 identifier 2 version 6.0 sccp ccm 10.10.210.11 identifier 1 version 6.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate ccm 2 priority 2 associate profile 3 register BR1_CFB ! dspfarm profile 3 conference codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 codec g729br8 associate application SCCP shutdown ! dial-peer cor custom name pt-internal
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Probleme with conference Bridge BR1
Same result :( Le Friday, October 26, 2012 6:57:30 PM, Abel ... a écrit : Try it with voice-card 0 with dspfarm also. Then the sessions under the media resource. On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Looks like I cannot add a Conference bridge on BR1-RTR (I'm using PL). I have configured the voice-card 0 to share the DSP like this voice-card 0 no dspfarm dsp services dspfarm But when it comes to CFB configuration, the max number of session is 0-0 :D It happened to me before on HQ-RTR but this was because i forgot the voice-card configuration :() BR1-RTR(config)#dspfarm profile 3 conf BR1-RTR(config-dspfarm-profile)#max sess 1 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. BR1-RTR(config-dspfarm-profile)#max sess ? 0-0 Number of sessions assigned to this profile Here is the full configuration : BR1-RTR#sh Oct 26 20:53:05.391: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console BR1-RTR#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 6051 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 20:53:05 UTC Fri Oct 26 2012 ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker warm-reboot boot-end-marker ! logging message-counter syslog ! no aaa new-model network-clock-participate wic 0 network-clock-select 1 T1 0/0/0 ! dot11 syslog ip source-route ! ! ip cef ! ! ip domain name proctorlabs.com http://proctorlabs.com no ipv6 cef ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! isdn switch-type primary-ni ! ! ! voice service voip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip sip registrar server ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! voice register global max-dn 1 max-pool 1 ! voice register pool 1 id network 10.10.201.0 mask 255.255.255.0 application sip.app preference 2 incoming called-number codec g711ulaw ! ! voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /617863\(1...\)$/ /\1/ ! voice translation-rule 7 rule 1 /^1...$/ /863\0/ ! voice translation-rule 10 rule 1 /^1...$/ /617863\0/ ! voice translation-rule 1001 rule 1 /^1001$/ /1002/ ! ! voice translation-profile 1001 translate redirect-called 1001 ! voice translation-profile 10digit translate calling 10 ! voice translation-profile 7digit translate calling 7 ! voice translation-profile strip-dnis translate called 1 ! ! voice-card 0 no dspfarm dsp services dspfarm ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! ! controller T1 0/0/0 framing esf linecode b8zs pri-group timeslots 1-3,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 framing esf linecode b8zs channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF no fair-queue frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 1536 ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet1/0 switchport trunk native vlan 130 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 240 ! interface FastEthernet1/1 ! interface FastEthernet1/2 ! interface FastEthernet1/3 ! interface FastEthernet1/4 ! interface FastEthernet1/5 ! interface FastEthernet1/6 ! interface FastEthernet1/7 ! interface FastEthernet1/8 switchport trunk native vlan 130 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 240 ! interface FastEthernet1/9 ! interface FastEthernet1/10 ! interface FastEthernet1/11 ! interface FastEthernet1/12 ! interface FastEthernet1/13 ! interface FastEthernet1/14 ! interface FastEthernet1/15 ! interface Vlan1 no ip address ! interface Vlan130 ip
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab updated
Hi. Please leave this mailing list as we are not cheaters and assholes. Thanks Sent from my iPhone On 25 sept. 2012, at 20:29, quiene pereira quiene...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone has today's update of ccievoicelabs workbooks i am planning to buy the same If anyone interested please ping me so that we can purchase together. Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization
Hi Watch IP Expert + dialing lecture from Vik. Best way to understand it From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of virajith Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:28 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization hi guys, I need to understand or have a simple way of understanding + dialing and number localization. Can anyone help me wiht this? Thanks, Vir From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:29:38 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 79, Issue 65 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Chrysostomos Christofi) 2. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Chrysostomos Christofi) 3. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Kevin Spicer) 4. Re: WAN QoS questions (Krishna) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:15:37 + From: Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.net To: Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern Message-ID: f3a446ed84ff9449b29f801927620de783ea9...@exmbxsrv2.lgcom.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi guys Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal numbers?(extensions) I believe no but what is your opinion Scenario: route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XX (local numbers) internal 4 digit DNs which start with 9(extensions) when dialling the internal DNs there is a delay because of inter-digit timeout can this be fixed? They don't want to use access code for PSTN calls Regards -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120920/ba021d2e/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:45:48 + From: Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.net To: Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk Cc: Online Study \(ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com\) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern Message-ID: f3a446ed84ff9449b29f801927620de783ea9...@exmbxsrv2.lgcom.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Hi Kevin The delay is exactly the same Without translation pattern is 5 seconds. With translation pattern is again 5 seconds In the translation I checked also the urgent priority From: kevinspice...@gmail.com [mailto:kevinspice...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Spicer Sent: ??, 20 ??? 2012 3:31 ?? To: Chrysostomos Christofi Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern Try a translation pattern # with a trailing hash discard. On 20 Sep 2012 13:28, Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.netmailto:ch.christ...@logicom.net wrote: Hi guys Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal numbers?(extensions) I believe no but what is your opinion Scenario: route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XX (local numbers) internal 4 digit DNs which start with 9(extensions) when dialling the internal DNs there is a delay because of inter-digit timeout can this be fixed? They don't want to use access code for PSTN calls Regards ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1red=http://www.ipexpert.comisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0 http://www.ipexpert.com http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1red=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipexpert.comisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1red=http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0 http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1red=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PlatinumPlacement.comisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120920/b17fad1a/attachment-0001.html --
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization
Then your gateway does not invoke the Callin party Transformation pattern (Maybe a CSS/PT problem) You should also have a Translation Pattern that strips \+1408 on the phone or on the device pool Nic From: vir...@rediffmail.com [mailto:vir...@rediffmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 2:30 PM To: Nicolas MICHEL Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization hi Nicolas, I followed the video . However here are the steps I followed: 1) add the prefix to the gateway endpoint ( make sure to note the type - say subscriber ) eg. +1408 2) create a specific css and partition for predot numbers 3)add a calling party transformation with predot strip eg . \+1408.XXX 4) go to phone and uncheck the Use DP calling party css and add the calling party css that was created in step 2 Now here is the problem for which I am confused if I call from pstn to ip phone that is from 515 to 2022001 . I see the seven digit caller id ( that is 515 -- which is expected ) however when I go to the phone and check missed calls instead of the number getting stored as +14081515111 it gets stored as just 515. Why does this happen is my config wrong? Please help. Regards, Vir From: Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com Sent: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:45:34 To: 'virajith ' vir...@rediffmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization Hi Watch IP Expert + dialing lecture from Vik. Best way to understand it From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of virajith Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:28 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization hi guys, I need to understand or have a simple way of understanding + dialing and number localization. Can anyone help me wiht this? Thanks, Vir From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:29:38 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 79, Issue 65 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1red=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinestudylist.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccie_voiceisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Chrysostomos Christofi) 2. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Chrysostomos Christofi) 3. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Kevin Spicer) 4. Re: WAN QoS questions (Krishna) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:15:37 + From: Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.net To: Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern Message-ID: f3a446ed84ff9449b29f801927620de783ea9...@exmbxsrv2.lgcom.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi guys Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal numbers?(extensions) I believe no but what is your opinion Scenario: route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XX (local numbers) internal 4 digit DNs which start with 9(extensions) when dialling the internal DNs there is a delay because of inter-digit timeout can this be fixed? They don't want to use access code for PSTN calls Regards -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120920/ba021d2e/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:45:48 + From: Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.net To: Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk Cc: Online Study \(ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com\) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern Message-ID: f3a446ed84ff9449b29f801927620de783ea9...@exmbxsrv2.lgcom.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Hi Kevin The delay is exactly the same Without translation pattern is 5 seconds. With translation pattern is again 5 seconds In the translation I checked also the urgent priority From: kevinspice...@gmail.com [mailto:kevinspice...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Spicer Sent: ??, 20
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization
Your gateway will prefix your incoming PSTN call using the prefix that you configure on the gateway page : This is globalization (on the Incoming calling party number) Then your phone will invoke a Translation pattern that will strip what you do not want on the calling party number That’s it ! From: vir...@rediffmail.com [mailto:vir...@rediffmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 2:42 PM To: Nicolas MICHEL ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: ccie_voice-request Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization hi Nic, Thanks for your response. The calling party transformation pattern is the DP and it has access to the partition of the phone and calling party transformation. The translation pattern \+1408 is only for the outbound calls I thought i.e if one has to dial from the missed calls lists. Am I correct? Thanks, Vir From: Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com Sent: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:04:08 To: vir...@rediffmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization Then your gateway does not invoke the Callin party Transformation pattern (Maybe a CSS/PT problem) You should also have a Translation Pattern that strips \+1408 on the phone or on the device pool Nic From: vir...@rediffmail.com [mailto:vir...@rediffmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 2:30 PM To: Nicolas MICHEL Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization hi Nicolas, I followed the video . However here are the steps I followed: 1) add the prefix to the gateway endpoint ( make sure to note the type - say subscriber ) eg. +1408 2) create a specific css and partition for predot numbers 3)add a calling party transformation with predot strip eg . \+1408.XXX 4) go to phone and uncheck the Use DP calling party css and add the calling party css that was created in step 2 Now here is the problem for which I am confused if I call from pstn to ip phone that is from 515 to 2022001 . I see the seven digit caller id ( that is 515 -- which is expected ) however when I go to the phone and check missed calls instead of the number getting stored as +14081515111 it gets stored as just 515. Why does this happen is my config wrong? Please help. Regards, Vir From: Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com Sent: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:45:34 To: 'virajith ' vir...@rediffmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization Hi Watch IP Expert + dialing lecture from Vik. Best way to understand it From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of virajith Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:28 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number localization hi guys, I need to understand or have a simple way of understanding + dialing and number localization. Can anyone help me wiht this? Thanks, Vir From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:29:38 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 79, Issue 65 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1red=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinestudylist.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccie_voiceisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Chrysostomos Christofi) 2. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Chrysostomos Christofi) 3. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern (Kevin Spicer) 4. Re: WAN QoS questions (Krishna) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:15:37 + From: Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.net To: Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern Message-ID: f3a446ed84ff9449b29f801927620de783ea9...@exmbxsrv2.lgcom.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi guys Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal numbers?(extensions) I believe no but what is your opinion Scenario: route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XX (local numbers
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Registration issue
Asking the same question 3 times in 15 minutes ? WoW Dude, we do not offer 24/7 support for your daily work. We are student trying to pass a certification. The CCNA book or CIPT1 book can explain you this in detail. Have fun reading and studying. Nic From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alpesh Bhakta Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:17 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Registration issue We have multiple sites with their own CallManagers. I am trying to get one of my phones to register with another one of the CM servers. There is a WAN link between the sites. I added the phone to the other CM and I manually configured the TFTP setting on my phone. What all do I need to manually configure on my phone to get it to register with the other CM? Thanks! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Registration to CME.
Hey guys Having some question regarding SIP/SCCP phone registration to CME during Labs I have a question regarding the difference between 7940/7960/7961 and 7965 loads ? For example : 7940/7960 SCCP got P00308000500 7940/7960 SIP got P0S3-08-6-00 7941 SCCP got SCCP41.8-3-3S 7965 SCCP got SCCP45.8-3-3S 7965 SIP got SIP45.8-3-3S My actual load file on my phone is SIP41.8-4-1S Looks like there is no SIP41.x.x.x. load for my phone in the router :( Thanks for the help on such a basic problem BR2-RTR#sh flash | inc 7965 104 3104 Jun 27 2011 23:33:50 Desktops/320x212x16/7965-TN.PNG 105 42707 Jun 27 2011 23:33:24 Desktops/320x212x16/7965.PNG 204 0 Jan 16 2012 12:27:02 PHONE/7945-7965 2052496963 Dec 18 2008 14:45:42 PHONE/7945-7965/apps45.8-3-2-27.sbn 206 585536 Dec 18 2008 14:45:48 PHONE/7945-7965/cnu45.8-3-2-27.sbn 2072453202 Dec 18 2008 14:46:18 PHONE/7945-7965/cvm45sccp.8-3-2-27.sbn 2082817568 Apr 29 2010 17:50:44 PHONE/7945-7965/cvm45sip.8-3-2-27.sbn 209 326315 Dec 18 2008 14:46:24 PHONE/7945-7965/dsp45.8-3-2-27.sbn 210 555406 Dec 18 2008 14:46:30 PHONE/7945-7965/jar45sccp.8-3-2-27.sbn 211 557452 Apr 29 2010 17:52:08 PHONE/7945-7965/jar45sip.8-3-2-27.sbn 212638 Dec 18 2008 14:46:30 PHONE/7945-7965/SCCP45.8-3-3S.loads 213638 Apr 29 2010 17:43:30 PHONE/7945-7965/SIP45.8-3-3S.loads 214642 Dec 18 2008 14:46:30 PHONE/7945-7965/term45.default.loads 215642 Dec 18 2008 14:46:30 PHONE/7945-7965/term65.default.loads BR2-RTR#sh flash | inc 7961 178 0 Jan 16 2012 12:27:10 PHONE/7941-7961 1792494499 Dec 18 2008 14:40:36 PHONE/7941-7961/apps41.8-3-2-27.sbn 180 547146 Dec 18 2008 14:40:44 PHONE/7941-7961/cnu41.8-3-2-27.sbn 1812452629 Dec 18 2008 14:41:12 PHONE/7941-7961/cvm41sccp.8-3-2-27.sbn 182 530601 Dec 18 2008 14:41:18 PHONE/7941-7961/dsp41.8-3-2-27.sbn 183 315827 Dec 18 2008 14:41:22 PHONE/7941-7961/jar41sccp.8-3-2-27.sbn 184638 Dec 18 2008 14:41:22 PHONE/7941-7961/SCCP41.8-3-3S.loads 185642 Dec 18 2008 14:41:22 PHONE/7941-7961/term41.default.loads 186642 Dec 18 2008 14:41:22 PHONE/7941-7961/term61.default.loads BR2-RTR#sh flash | inc 7940 161 0 Jan 16 2012 12:27:12 PHONE/7940-7960 162 15 Dec 11 2009 04:56:42 PHONE/7940-7960/OS79XX.TXT 163 129824 Dec 09 2009 23:29:36 PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-6-00.bin 164 130228 Dec 09 2009 23:30:46 PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-6-00.sbn 165 130952 May 01 2010 17:53:10 PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.sbn 166 130552 Dec 11 2009 03:02:36 PHONE/7940-7960/P003-8-12-00.bin 167 130956 Dec 11 2009 03:03:56 PHONE/7940-7960/P003-8-12-00.sbn 168 129824 Dec 18 2008 14:39:46 PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.bin 169458 Dec 18 2008 14:39:46 PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.loads 170 705536 Dec 18 2008 14:39:54 PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sb2 171 130228 Dec 18 2008 14:39:56 PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sbn 172459 Sep 30 2010 21:48:28 PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-6-00.loads 173 753560 Dec 09 2009 23:28:20 PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-6-00.sb2 174459 May 01 2010 17:34:20 PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.loads 175 756320 May 01 2010 17:34:32 PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.sb2 176458 Dec 11 2009 02:41:14 PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-8-12-00.loads 177 756524 Dec 11 2009 03:00:48 PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-8-12-00.sb2 -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Changing your exam date
LOL Priceless :P From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (AM) Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:32 PM To: Paul Kruger; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Changing your exam date Chann was sick in the hospital. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Chann pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious. The Policy says Chann better come in a wheelchair with an IV bag from his arm or lose his $1500 lunch.. http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/policies/index.html#8 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Paul Kruger Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:13 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Changing your exam date Hey guys, Not sure if this has ever been asked. I'm sure there is a policy that states you can't, but has anyone ever tried to move their lab date within the 3-month cut-off period? Just found out I need to be traveling on business around the time my lab is scheduled for. Do I have a shot at asking pretty please, move it out by a week, or am I down $1500? Thanks, Paul itevomcid ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PL Servers Issue
Hi ! Yeah it happened to me several times and make me loose time. Had to revert the pod / load config several time before I could lab properly Nic On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Guys Has anyone faced Servers not booting issue in the PL racks? I am unable to see the servers on the switch and they don;t seem to be coming up even after I tried to start/revert them from the session page. Let me know if I am missing something here. TIA Mann ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Lab Server
Hey guys. Just building me a lab since I would like to work whenever I want (read can :P ) and would like to have some advices about your server spec. What would be enough to run all the servers required for the lab in a single box ? I would like something powerful that will allow me to run more than required and I don't want to be penalized when waiting for the advanced CUCM service parameter window :) I was thinking to get an UCS C210 M2 but I am not sure that a single Xeon 5506 would be enough Also I am planning for something like 48Gb of Ram . Let me know what do you guys think ! Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NEW LAB in Voice
attempt dunno why i missed that so big chance Just want to check did anyone purchased from below link or another option purchasing directly from voice lab is bit expensive. http://www. c e r tknow l e d g e.com/forum/index.php?/topic/24-gb-ccievoicelabscom-real-labs/ Cheers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP/SCCP Phones ???
Thanks Dimithu. I ll add a new CUCM to my VMware Image Collection then :) Have a nice day ! Nic On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Dimuthu dim...@yahoo.com wrote: Firmware upgrades via WAN links takes few hours (at times) whether it's Proctorlabs or actual Cisco Lab facility. SIP -- SCCP conversion procedure varies depending on phone model. If you are using 7965 phones , best way is to first register to CUCM using existing phone type (SIP or SCCP). In phone configuration page you can specify individual phone load file. You can use new phone-load file name here (to be converted). After registering to CUCM , phone will then upgrade to new phone load. Once upgrade is done delete the phone from CUCM re-add with other type (SIP/SCCP). Also I think it's better to use CUCM rather than CME for firmware upgrades. Thanks *From:* Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com *To:* Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Wednesday, August 1, 2012 4:11 PM *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP/SCCP Phones ??? Hey Guys. Just did my first session this morning and noticed that in a few labs that some phones were using SIP. One of my phone was luckily using SIP but upgraded through the WAN and I lost so much time (upgrade took 3 hours ... blame the TFTP latency) Can you guys tell me if I can revert the phone to SCCP and continue to use it throughout my studies ? Also I should modify the XMLdefault.cnf.xml on a local TFTP server to modify it to SCCP right ? Thanks for your help :) Nic -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NEW LAB in Voice
Hi Steven and Dennis, I just wanted to tell you that you are both idiots. Coming here and trying to enroll people to cheat ? How smart is that ? Screw you for fuck sake I hope that these emails will be read by the CCIE Voice Program Manager and that you register to cisco.com using these emails adresses . I worked very hard to pass my CCIE and idiots like you are ruining all the effort I (and many other people) put in that certification. Dumbass. Sorry for my language if I offended anyone. Nic On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:06 PM, steven smith smith.steven1...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Its a pain to attempt attempt attempt better pass in first yes , certknow ledge has active lic i purchased it last week its really good going for next ping me on my email so that we can work together where in Aus I also purchased from cert know ledge last week it is very good Waiting for new updates lets see what is again new in lab hope it should not be major * http://wwwTC* On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Dennis Agosti dennisago...@gmail.comwrote: Heellooo Friends, I have a attempt on 13th Aug in Aus right now i can see something new update coming on their google talk status message of voice lab I need it man otherwise i wont pass the test if anyone is ready for group purchase please email me so that we can work together as i am going to purchase as i need to crack the lab in my first attempt now no more patience's left. It was better my friends did last year from their workbook in first attempt dunno why i missed that so big chance Just want to check did anyone purchased from below link or another option purchasing directly from voice lab is bit expensive. *http://www. c e r tknow l e d g e.com/forum/index.php?/topic/24-gb-ccievoicelabscom-real-labs/ * Cheers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Configuration to access the Proctor labs Servers ?
Hey guys, Just jumping into the CCIE Voice playground even if I was in Vik's bootcamp 4 weeks ago (highly recommended by the way, I ll write a review about it when I got some time). I ll be starting my very first remote session using proctorlabs this week and would like to have some feedback about the way you guys access to their servers. I know that they use EzVPN and would like to know if someone could share the config since I guess they got tunnel interface with Peer ip address command that I dont know :) . Same applies for the switch configurations but I can deal without .. Just have to put Vlans and ready to go Thanks for your time guys :) Nic -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Configuration to access the Proctor labs Servers ?
Thanks Will ! I have real phones and since my exp is limited with voice compared to you guys, I guess I have to stick with real gear :D Several members unicasted me the way to connect to PL. Now the fun begins ! Have fun Nic De : William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com Date : Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:39:53 -0400 À : Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Configuration to access the Proctor labs Servers ? Nic, The few times I have used Proctor I just used Cisco VPN client locally. Using that method you have to rely on soft phones. I used IP Blue, CIPC, and X-Lite. The IP Blue is nice because you can run multiple stations (compute resources permitting). However, the free version of IP Blue is annoying and eats up significant time over an 8 hour lab. There is a good overview VoD here: https://proctorlabs.com/swf/demo/PLDemo.html For the hardware VPN, Proctor labs has a link to IOS recommendations and configs when you attach to your vRack. I tried to find them on the site without connecting to a session but couldn't. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Jul 23, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Nicolas MICHEL wrote: Hey guys, Just jumping into the CCIE Voice playground even if I was in Vik's bootcamp 4 weeks ago (highly recommended by the way, I ll write a review about it when I got some time). I ll be starting my very first remote session using proctorlabs this week and would like to have some feedback about the way you guys access to their servers. I know that they use EzVPN and would like to know if someone could share the config since I guess they got tunnel interface with Peer ip address command that I dont know :) . Same applies for the switch configurations but I can deal without .. Just have to put Vlans and ready to go Thanks for your time guys :) Nic -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEST PASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS in DUBAAAAAAIIIIIIII WAAAAHHHHHH
Screw you And your magic number Sent from my iPhone On 19 juil. 2012, at 22:09, Sean Blackey sean.blac...@hotmail.com wrote: Seems you guys are more existed then me :) 36XXX is my magic number Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:03:00 +0400 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEST PA in DUBAA WHH From: lakpr...@gmail.com To: mrmha...@gmail.com CC: sean.blac...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com yes number please ? On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Mohamed Hassan mrmha...@gmail.com wrote: what is your number please ? On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Sean Blackey sean.blac...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi EVERYONE Dreams came true . What a feeling of pass ! so relaxed now Did the lab today and cleared it.. result is so fast cant believe it Got lab 7 , Dubai lab is really slow but did it ! Best of luck friends party time this moments are amazing.. Now will be with family all the time if anyone need help can email me TC ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Engineer / Mohamed Rabea Unified communication engineer ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Ravindra Lakpriya mime-attachment.txt ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEST PASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS in DUBAAAAAAIIIIIIII WAAAAHHHHHH
I mean that if you said I had lab X it means that you knew the labs and hence the fact that you cheated Sent from my iPhone On 19 juil. 2012, at 22:20, Sean Blackey sean.blac...@hotmail.com wrote: What you mean CC: lakpr...@gmail.com; mrmha...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com From: mcl.nico...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEST PA in DUBAA WHH Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:12:36 +0200 To: sean.blac...@hotmail.com Screw you And your magic number Sent from my iPhone On 19 juil. 2012, at 22:09, Sean Blackey sean.blac...@hotmail.com wrote: Seems you guys are more existed then me :) 36XXX is my magic number Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:03:00 +0400 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEST PA in DUBAA WHH From: lakpr...@gmail.com To: mrmha...@gmail.com CC: sean.blac...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com yes number please ? On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Mohamed Hassan mrmha...@gmail.com wrote: what is your number please ? On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Sean Blackey sean.blac...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi EVERYONE Dreams came true . What a feeling of pass ! so relaxed now Did the lab today and cleared it.. result is so fast cant believe it Got lab 7 , Dubai lab is really slow but did it ! Best of luck friends party time this moments are amazing.. Now will be with family all the time if anyone need help can email me TC ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Engineer / Mohamed Rabea Unified communication engineer ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Ravindra Lakpriya mime-attachment.txt ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] verify CUC 8.6
Cisco.com/go/design you will find all your answers Sent from my iPhone On 13 juil. 2012, at 19:54, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote: hi all, when we first install CUC 8.6 and configure ports. What are the steps to verify Unity Connection servers is good to go to move 5000 users/mailbox. License all good. Tks d ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Last Chance to Register for IPexpert’s Online Voice “Alchemy” Class….
Hi Wayne I'm a new customer to IPX, I already have a CCIE in Routing switching (passed with Another training company). I'm new to voice and recently bought your whole BLS program + a 12 days bootcamp (I'll be in SJ in 2 weeks to follow VIk's course and I'm traveling from France to get there) I won't be ready to pass the CCIE 3.0 lab so what would happen to customer like me ? Would I get a free upgrade to CCIE 4.0 products? Would I still get a free retake on a bootcamp ? Thanks for your answer cuz I'm a little worried. Wish you a good day . Nicolas Sent from my iPhone On 6 juin 2012, at 17:28, Wayne Lawson waynelawson-...@ipexpert.com wrote: CCIE Voice Candidates - I just released a blog, and feel that's it's important for you all to check it out. I don't want this to seem like a sales and marketing pitch (although it somewhat is?, but hopefully you all see the value towards this as it pertains to your CCIE Voice 3.0 prep. I can't give any details, but I would anticipate a new Voice blueprint being announced in the very near future. If you're studying (and hoping to pass 3.0 before 4.0 is introduced) - this post will help with that goal. Last Chance to Register for IPexpert’s Online Voice “Alchemy” Class…. CCIE Voice 3.o Candidates, As most of you are aware – there are leaks that the CCIE Voice lab will be changing soon. Although there hasn’t been an official announcement – I anticipate that this announcement will come soon (possibly within the next week or so). With that being said, if you’re studying for 3.0 – your window of opportunity to pass this blueprint is shrinking! A few weeks ago we announced a new online class entitled “IPexpert’s Online CCIE Voice Alchemy Class“. This course was announced (and offered) due to, what we felt, was a need in the industry.We sought out one of the industry’s most respected Voice Instructors – Kevin Wallace – and put the course together. As you all know – IPexpert leads the industry in CCIE Voice Lab training – as we have helped certify more CCIE Voice Engineers than any company – worldwide. This course, is highly recommended by me and our team. For such a nominal cost – it’s training that will drastically improve your chances at passing this lab – in that limited window in which the 3.0 lab will be offered. Here are a few facts: Q. When does this course start? A. Thursday, June 7, 2012, 8:00 – 10:30 PM EDT Q. Who should attend this course? A. This course assumes the student has already been through at least one practice lab on their own and that they are at least familiar with the technologies on the CCIE Voice Lab blueprint. Q. What is the basis for the course content? A. This live on-line boot camp walks the student through a new mock lab (that Kevin Wallace created) over a series of eight sessions. Q. What distinguishes this boot camp from a tradition boot camp? A. The biggest difference (huge!) is its focus on lab strategy. There are 12 strategies outlined in what Kevin Wallace calls his “CCIE Voice Alchemy” process, which helps the student “turn their lab day into gold.” This boot camp demonstrates these 12 strategies while working through the new mock lab (in a non-linear fashion). Q. What is the goal of this bootcamp? A. The goal is for the student to complete this boot camp with a much deeper understanding of the technologies on the lab, and (maybe even more importantly) have a set of strategies that they can use on lab day to make the most effective use of their time. Q. Who is this Kevin Wallace guy? A. Kevin Wallace is a CCIE RS and Voice. With Cisco experience dating back to 1989 (on a Cisco AGS+ router running Cisco IOS 7.x), Kevin has been a network design specialist for the Walt Disney World Resort, a Senior Technical Instructor for SkillSoft, and a network manager for Eastern Kentucky University. Kevin holds a bachelor’s of science degree in electrical engineering (focusing on digital communications) from the University of Kentucky, and has also authored or co-authored multiple books for Cisco Press, including: Voice over IP First-Step,Cvoice Foundation Learning Guide, TSHOOT Cert Kit, TSHOOT Official Certification Guide, and ROUTE Cert Kit. Kevin’s website is1ExamAMonth.com. I would also encourage you to review the following 3 videos (below) in which Kevin discusses some very interesting and valuable topics. 12-Step Strategy Video Interview w/ a Proctor Troubleshooting (CCIE Voice) Video Lastly (and what you all want to hear!) – For the few remaining seats, we are offering students an incredible promotion. Class begins June 7th (TOMORROW!), if you cannot attend the live scheduled times you will have access to review the recorded sessions from your IPexpert Account. If you purchase today or tomorrow, you will be entitled to $300 off the list price
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE Written dum ps
You failed because you didn't work enough. If you use dump you are screwing 2 things : 1- your career because it is easy to find it that you are a brain dumper 2- our efforts to keep the value of the certifications are huge because we work very hard and dumbass like you are just brain dumping Idiot Sent from my iPhone On 21 mai 2012, at 09:55, jacob franklin jac.frank1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I failed my CCIE VOICE written please if anyone has latest dum ps please share the same 80% was new and it cost me. tk ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GOING FOR ATTEMPT !!!!!!!!! 10 days left for battle
Screw you man. Sent from my iPhone On 23 avr. 2012, at 09:17, lab7done lab7done lab7d...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have found some varations of MGCP TS has some varations H323 TS has some varations Does anyone has it i am ready to share the cost, consider it urgent http://www. c e r t knowledge . com/forum/index.php?/forum/55-expert/ Cheers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Using IPX Racks
Hey there guys. Just passed the CVOICE and would like to get more skills on CUCM and would like to use IPX Racks. When I ordered my BLS I did not receive any documentations regarding the IP connectivity that you could implement with their racks. Can someone enlight me please ? I already got the phones and just would like to use their servers :) Thanks for the help provided . Nic -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cups...
You can devine Line appearance for the CUP device on the CUCM device menu . then click on the device and get the extension .. On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: CUPS - thought it was gonna be easy ;) but I do not seem to get it right - it's like it will not fit together And the more I try, to less clear it becomes... mainly about: line appearance for a deskphone is associated with a user: OK, to provide presence info to CUPS server. But from the CUPS deployment guide, to configure the CUPC client, you should also associate the line appearance of the CUPC device with the user (p3-18). No problem, but when you then take a look at the presence viewer @ CUPS, you notice that the CUPC does not have a line nor presence info, just an indication of it's (IM only) capabilities. (IM only I guess because there's no AD integration (?) and I cannot call contacts added via the Sync Agent (CUPC user pages) - but that's another story) When you on the contrary associate the CUPC too with the user on the CUCM user pages, then the line + presence state appears in the presence viewer from CUPS. So do you also need to associate the CUPC device with the user altogether ? And shouldn't you then see the presence state of each device (CUPC deskphone) seperately for that user in another CUPC client - I can only see the 'aggregated' presence state... any thoughts are more than welcome. I call it a day... ;) the morning will be wiser than the evening was (I hope) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP CAC Sampling Rate
Damn man, Do we need to correct you for everything you test ? Dude make your own assumption sometimes and please don't use this list as your please Can you verify this and tell me if I'm wrong or not mailing list. I guess this is a mailing list that is related to CCIE and I'm sure some of your post are very interesting but since we receive maybe 4 or 5 mails from you everyday I feel the need to tell you , man please don't flood us like this !! Have a good day ! ;) Nic Le 21 janv. 2012 à 13:33, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com a écrit : Sorry I make a little mistake here in calculation (at 30ms Sampling Rate G729 needs 40kbps for RSVP CAC), but it does not change the idea of question, So in case of 30ms Sampling Rate, we do not need to add any 16 bkps and: 10 G729 30ms Calls - 40 x 10 = 400kbps On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:20 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, When we are using default sampling rate for codecs, for example G729 of 20ms, then during the RSVP CAC caluclation we need to add 16 bkps for sum of all calls: 10 G729 calls - 24 x 10 + 16 = 256 kbps But when using non-default Sampling Rate for codecs, for instance G729 at 30ms, then we do not have to add 16 but add 12 kbps: 10 G729 30ms calls - 28 x 10 +12 = 292 Is it correct or not? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP CAC Sampling Rate
Hey there George. I agree with your statements, some of the posts are very very interesting but I think we are overwhelmed with the number of questions. Again I dont want to be mean with anyone but I received some private mails that agreed with my opinion. We could then start a forum that would track any voice topics... My 2 cts. Nic Nicolas, I think it would be more constructive if you actually answered the guy. this is a very good question, and I believe a lot of people might have this wrong. As I already answered Datucha in private. I'll just put here the correct formula for calculations as per Cisco SRND: For N amount of calls configured for any codec speed with any sampling period: bandwidth = (N-1) * (configured codec speed on configured sampling period) + (codec speed on worth case scenario sampling period - 10ms) as per this example for g729 configured with 30ms sampling period on CUCM for 10 calls: bandwidth= 9 * 19kbps + 40kbps where 19 is g729 speed on 30ms sampling rate... well it's actually 18.648bps but I rounded it up. and 40 is same codec on worth case scenario 10ms sampling rate. Hope this helps, On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.com mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com wrote: Damn man, Do we need to correct you for everything you test ? Dude make your own assumption sometimes and please don't use this list as your please Can you verify this and tell me if I'm wrong or not mailing list. I guess this is a mailing list that is related to CCIE and I'm sure some of your post are very interesting but since we receive maybe 4 or 5 mails from you everyday I feel the need to tell you , man please don't flood us like this !! Have a good day ! ;) Nic Le 21 janv. 2012 à 13:33, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com mailto:datucha...@gmail.com a écrit : Sorry I make a little mistake here in calculation (at 30ms Sampling Rate G729 needs 40kbps for RSVP CAC), but it does not change the idea of question, So in case of 30ms Sampling Rate, we do not need to add any 16 bkps and: 10 G729 30ms Calls - 40 x 10 = 400kbps On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:20 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com mailto:datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, When we are using default sampling rate for codecs, for example G729 of 20ms, then during the RSVP CAC caluclation we need to add 16 bkps for sum of all calls: 10 G729 calls - 24 x 10 + 16 = 256 kbps But when using non-default Sampling Rate for codecs, for instance G729 at 30ms, then we do not have to add 16 but add 12 kbps: 10 G729 30ms calls - 28 x 10 +12 = 292 Is it correct or not? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Expert Materials question and how to use them
Hey there. First I would like to apologize if my questions are a little bit off topic for this technical mailing list. I already passed a CCIE in RS and now need to focus on voice technologies since there is a business need from my boss. I have a very little knowledge in this field and already finished the CCNA books/videos. Currently reading the CVOICE book, my plan is the following : - CVOICE Book/Videos - Gateways and Gatekeepers book - CIPT1-2 Book/Videos - CUCM Book from Cisco Press - Unitiy Book from Cisco Press - Presence Book from Cisco press - SIP Trunking Book I guess this will provide me some background and I ll need much more hands on labs ... I m actually deploying a full UC solutions ... What I would like to ask you guys is how do you use the IP Expert materials. I m not going to ask that to the sales because we all know that sales guys would sale their own mother for 10 bucks :P I m asking here because you are using the materials on a daily basis and if anyone passed their lab using IPexpert please dont be shy to provide some useful advice :) (preparation advice using IPX materials I m asking . not non NDA stuff) Who is the instructor that is on IPX videos ? how are they ? Also what about the workbooks ? Are they both printed and electronic or electronic and videos ? ( I dont really like the videos for a solutions workbooks) Thanks for answering theses questions and please excuse me if this is a little bit off topic :) Nic -- Nicolas MICHEL CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Expert Materials question and how to use them
CCIE products Matt, I wont pass any CCNP test, I already have a CCIE and wanna go to sit another CCIE directly . But I will follow the CCNP path to go to the CCIE fist since I still don't have all the fondations. I just want to build a plan for my CCIE and this is why I'm asking some questions about the IPX products . Thanks and merry Xmas everyone ! :) Le 24 déc. 2011 à 19:15, Matt Just mj...@ipexpert.com a écrit : Nic, Are you asking about the CCIE products or the CCNP products? Regards Matt Just Chief Technology Officer image001.jpg Email: mj...@ipexpert.com Office: (810) 326-1444 Ext: 331 Mobile +1 (810) 406-7218 www.ipexpert.com/catalog From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nicolas MICHEL Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 9:25 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Expert Materials question and how to use them Hey there. First I would like to apologize if my questions are a little bit off topic for this technical mailing list. I already passed a CCIE in RS and now need to focus on voice technologies since there is a business need from my boss. I have a very little knowledge in this field and already finished the CCNA books/videos. Currently reading the CVOICE book, my plan is the following : CVOICE Book/Videos Gateways and Gatekeepers book CIPT1-2 Book/Videos CUCM Book from Cisco Press Unitiy Book from Cisco Press Presence Book from Cisco press SIP Trunking Book I guess this will provide me some background and I ll need much more hands on labs ... I m actually deploying a full UC solutions ... What I would like to ask you guys is how do you use the IP Expert materials. I m not going to ask that to the sales because we all know that sales guys would sale their own mother for 10 bucks :P I m asking here because you are using the materials on a daily basis and if anyone passed their lab using IPexpert please dont be shy to provide some useful advice :) (preparation advice using IPX materials I m asking . not non NDA stuff) Who is the instructor that is on IPX videos ? how are they ? Also what about the workbooks ? Are they both printed and electronic or electronic and videos ? ( I dont really like the videos for a solutions workbooks) Thanks for answering theses questions and please excuse me if this is a little bit off topic :) Nic -- Nicolas MICHEL CCIE #29410 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4700 - Release Date: 12/24/11 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ICT vs H225
Well, sometimes Datucha123 asks nice questions that's true. Sometimes he asks what are the default QoS settings without doing any show command on a switch or looking in the configuration guide ! To become a CCIE, you will need to learn how to get the information by yourself. Sometimes when you are stuck (and we all are sometimes ) you can ask help ... My 2 cp Good luck in your studies Datucha. Hope to see some nice questions from you and that you ll be able to answer mine :) 2011/12/20 brajesh kumaR brjku...@gmail.com It is not fair to say Datucha123 just putting question on this forum.He has well presented questions and come back with answer with lot new things which is not clear if you look at first sight. If Datucha123 continues to be on his way of such fast learning he will be very near to ccie. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Amit Singh batraji...@yahoo.com wrote: Mike I agree Datucha123 loves spoon feeding. Regards Amit Sent from my iPad On 20/12/2011, at 2:28 AM, Mike mik...@msn.com wrote: I gotta ask…are you using this list as your own study guide? I’ve watched you send over 200 questions to this list that can be easily answered in the Cisco documentation… From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of datucha123 datucha123 Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:39 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ICT vs H225 Hello, Please, can you recomment which one must be used in which situation - ICT vs H225 Trunk. First of all, I know that the SRND talks about that, but that is more the theoretical one, whereas I need some real practical recommendation. So the first thing that I have tested for differences between ICT and H225 Trunks: All H323 connections are made between CUCM and CUCME, either directly or through gatekeeper or even CUBE. Direct connect to from CUCM to CUCME. ICT (Non-GK controlled) - Does not support Supplementary Services (like hold, transfer and etc) unless the MTP is checked. The CUCME Admin guide says to use this Trunk type to connect CUCM to CUCME and check the MTP on CUCM ICT Trunk. H323 Gateway - when this type of H323 connection is made to CUCME, the CUCM IP phone support Supplementary Service even without the MTP checked. Connect to CUCME through CUBE H323 Gateway- wait for far end H245 TCS Unchecked. When using this type of connetion, I have enabled the emptycapablility command on CUBE, so that CUCM IP Phones could support Supplementary Service without MTP. While when using MTP checked, it does not matter any more whether the emptycapablility is enabled or not, the Supp Service are operational on CUCM IP Phones. ICT (Non-GK controlled) - When using this type of connection to CUBE, CUCM IP Phones does not support Supplementary Services (even the emptycapablility is enabled on CUBE), until I check the MTP for this ICT. Connect to CUCME using Gatekeeper ICT (Gatekeeper-controlled) - I beleive, when using this type of connection, it has the same charasteristics as described already above for ICT Trunks. (Not Supp-service unless the MTP is used) H225 Trunk (Gatekeeper-controlled) - I beleive, when using this type of connection, it has the same charasteristics as described above for H323 Gateway Type. Based on that, can you please recommend, at least for the exam, which type of Connection has to be used for those kinds of H323 connectivity between CUCM and CUCME? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 Tel: +33 6 08 72 75 97 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Codecs
Dude, 12 days ago you asked what are the default codec for I dont remember which feature, then you asked the default QoS settings without doing a show command... Now you ask for another default codec question and you are spamming the shit out of us I guess. Is it possible to do some research before asking here and flooding our mailbox ? I'm sorry I don't want to be a moron and I would help if I had the required knowledge but please Is it possible for you to do some effort ? I apologize if I am a little bit rough on this. I guess CCIE Voice is not all about knowing the default features... Thanks a lot for understanding and good luck in your studies. Nic 2011/12/15 datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com Hello, What codecs does the MGCP Gateway supports by default? There is a command - *ccm-manager mgcp codec-all*, which sets all codec for CallManager. So MGCP does not support all codecs by default, or that command is already default one? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Hunt group visual notification timer
Hey there guys, Not sure if this fit into the CCIE lab exam blueprint but this got me interested. I'm running 8.6.(2a) and when we are playing with hunt groups, a certain group of people got only visual notification as soon as the call is forwarded to their extension. When someone pickup the call the notifications stays for a few moments (I think 10 to 20 secs, I'm not sure) Is there a way to stop the notification as soon as the call has been picked up by someone ? I've looked into the CUCM services and hunt group/line group/hunt pilot configuration and I couldn't find anything. Thanks for your answers. Nic ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRR
Did you check the show commands ? 2011/12/6 datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com When we configure the SRR on a switch, does each ports has the following values by default: *srr shaped 25 0 0 0 * *srr shared 25 25 25 25* Even when I have not touched the Interface? For instance, I have configured auto qos voip on port fa 0/1, which will create SRR Buffer and other parameter globally, and will assing some SRR Shared and Shaped values for interface fa 0/1 for egress. But what about the other ports? Do they take automatically the shared and shaped values that I have already mentioned? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 Tel: +33 6 08 72 75 97 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Introducing myself
Hey Michael. Thanks again for all the help provided with the CCIE RS when I was studying for it :) How far from the CCIE Voice are you now ? I m just starting, building a phones lab and then I'll be using IPX and some other vendors as well I guess I remember you were building a rack with friends, how far are you from there ? :) Seeing that this Mailing list is far more active than the RS one ! Cheers !! Nic 2011/12/2 Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.com Hello Nicholas, Its nice to see some familiar faces from the RS OSL boards. =) Congrats on passing the RS, and good luck on the Voice! Thanks, Michael On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.comwrote: Welcome Michel! You will see this is just a nice journey as RS was for you. I am the opposite, I started into Voice, and when I get my CCIE, I will start on my CCNP, and CCIE RS... =) Welcome to the UC world. I really love it and I am hoping you will love it too! Best regards, brother. *Emanuel Damasceno* On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.comwrote: Hey There guys. I'm a french network engineer mainly focused into RS but as of now I m starting to deploy UC solutions and so far so good I like it. This is why I decided to pursue my 2nd CCIE into Voice and can't wait to be there yet :) I actually finished the CCNA book and the CBT nuggets for that series and now digging into CCNP stuff. I got CVOICE, CIPT1,CIPT2, Presence, CUCM+unity, Unity books. and then I ll start to read the SRND which looks awesome. I'm also building a lab to use some remote racks. If you guys have any advices, I d be glad to hear them :P Thanks for your help and cant wait to have the knowledge to ask question and answer on the OSL :) Nic -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ -- Nicolas MICHEL Ingenieur Réseaux CCIE #29410 Tel: +33 6 08 72 75 97 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
