On Friday, Feb 21, 2003, at 13:49 US/Pacific, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> In this case we're using the BlueDragon/J2EE edition running within a
> standard J2EE WAR file side-by-side with the JSP pages. In fact, some
> of the
> common page elements (headers, footers, menu bars) are implemented via
> CF
On Friday, Feb 21, 2003, at 15:07 US/Pacific, Barney Boisvert wrote:
> It seems it would be an amazingly trivial thing to incorporate,
> assuming
> that CF variables are accessible from the Java size of things in a
> consistent (and documented) manner. Haven't looked at the .java files
> much,
>
something like this?
GetDirectoryFromPath(GetCurrentTemplatePath())
but it will return the path of the current template only you can use it in
something like the app_globals.cfm to set the path dynamically
i code from home...it goes to a demo server...then it hits a production
server so i just
Hi
I am using cfmx pro version (with updater 2) on a RedHat Linux 7.2 system connecting
to MySQL 3.23.36
I just started updating my querys to use cfqueryparam and its not working.
example query (simple one but the same thing is happening everywhere i put
cfqueryparam in)
SELECT text
i use this for my image galleries all the time
#queryfield#
just wrote that out, looks right though : )
of course this is assuming you want to go left to right 3 records then go to
the next row for the next 3 records left to right
1 23
4 56
SELECT *
FROM childinfo
WHERE childID = #val(url.childID)#
Shotwatch Version Beta 1.0
Shot ##1
- Original Message -
From: "Hawkes, Keith A CIV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:45 PM
Subject: Dr
and 3) because to people who are familiar with regular expressions (and
probably those not so familiar), the RE solution is MUCH more readable than
the string manipulation code.
IMHO, RegEx are the way to go for most solutions because you end up with
cleaner code. Anything you can do with an RE c
There's no reason why it couldn't -- those of us familiar with regular
expressions answered the question with regex immediately for 2 reasons: 1)
because the way the question is phrased brings regex immediately to mind for
us and 2) because to a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
:
Question already answered, but I don't see why the wouldn't be
possible with standard string functions.
Just looking at your single line of pseudo-code, it looks like you want
to know if the referer is a cfm template in a certain directory.
This bit of code would do that and would definitely execu
> I hope that New Atlanta has worked on the compatibility
> problems I was seeing last year. I was quick to try out
> Blue Dragon as an alternate to CFMX Linux, primarily
> because CFMX at that time did not run very well w/ Linux.
> After a month or so with BD I hung up that hat and went
> back to
I hope that New Atlanta has worked on the compatibility problems I was seeing last
year. I was quick to try out Blue Dragon as an alternate to CFMX Linux, primarily
because CFMX at that time did not run very well w/ Linux.
After a month or so with BD I hung up that hat and went back to CF5.
Ther
See what I mean? That was much better advice than mine. :)
( even in spite of the corny slash-dot joke ) :)
> Note that this regex lets
> http://www.mysite.com/folder/subfolder/folder3/this.is.the
> .file.cfm
> and
> http://www.mysite.com/folder/.cfm
> through.
> You may want to get even fancier
The information must be stored on the server in an encrypted format and
retrieved later. SSL, as I understand it, only encrypts the transmission,
not the storage.
H.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cary Gordon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
It would be much easier to do this with ssl certificates. You wouldn't
need commercial certs for this. With IIS, you can generate both a server
and client cert and enrcrypt traffic between them. I am pretty sure that
there is an open source system to do the same on Linux.
Cary Gordon
The Che
I don't know much about encryption ...
If I encrypt something with one of the PertWeb encyption tools
(http://developer.perthweb.com.au/), can another user (assuming the user has
the private key) decrypt the string with software other than a cfx tag? I
mean, is there something I can have people
Hi,
Well, obviously, the code is only as good as the developer--no matter
what methodology is used. Fusebox can't really help with this issue. The
question that really has to be answered is: Does Fusebox enhance a
competent developer's effort to produce manageable, well documented
code? If your an
CFIMPORT lets you use JSP taglibs in your CF code. A very nice feature,
especially in hybrid environments, but not quite what I'm looking for. I'm
not really looking for a solution (there isn't one aside from hacking the CF
compiler), but more looking to see if anyone else has desired the same
th
Mmmm... Interesting
HATS is apparently a Specialized Server that runs under Websphere with
the function of emulating IBM terminals connected to a legacy system
and interfacing them to a network or the web.
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/webservers/hats/about.html
It is not clear if ther
Note that this regex lets
http://www.mysite.com/folder/subfolder/folder3/this.is.the.file.cfm
and
http://www.mysite.com/folder/.cfm
through.
You may want to get even fancier and do something like
refind("http://www\.mysite\.com/folder/[^/.]+\.cfm";, cgi.http_referrer)
Heehee. Slashdot!
And, as
> No, not with a direct string comparison. You must make
> your pilgrimage to
> the temple of RegEx.
> http://www\.mysite\.com/folder/.*\.cfm";,
> cgi.http_referer) GT
> 0>
I'd add the beginning of string and end of string markers just to be
thorough.
http://www\.mysite\.com/folder/.*\.cfm$",cg
> I don't see how you could compare a well-written
> fusebox3 with one that is non-fuseboxed, unless it
> is written in some other tight knitted framework
> /methodology. The code would speak for itself.
In my opinion, well-written code is always self-documenting - it always
speaks for itself. I
Have you looked at cfimport? (which is not exactly what you're looking for
but might help)
Matthew Walker
Electric Sheep Web
http://www.electricsheep.co.nz/
- Original Message -
From: "Barney Boisvert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 200
I do this in my Application.cfm:
//set DSN variable
request.GLDSN='mydsn';
request.siteurl='http://www.workingserver.com/';
request.securesiteurl='https://www.workingserver
New Atlanta's web site is built entirely using New Atlanta technology. The
"J2EE Server" is our ServletExec JSP/Servlet product, so it's entirely
appropriate that portions of our web site are implemented using JSP (just as
portions of Macromedia's web site are implemented in JSP on top of JRun).
Al
Thanks, James. Worked a treat.
Cheers,
Matthew P. Smith
Web Developer, Object Oriented
Naval Education & Training Professional
Development & Technology Center
(NETPDTC)
(850)452-1001 ext. 1245
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: James Ang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Thanks fellow pilgrim :o)
Thanks, Mark
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Wildcard in statements
No, not with a direct string comparison. You must make your pilgrimage to
the temple of Re
its like i said, i wasnt trying to knock it.
It was just my first reaction.
But i knew if i posted it here it would get clarified.
I'm more of a business man than a developer so i tend to look at things like
that.
:)
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Ganter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
No, not with a direct string comparison. You must make your pilgrimage to
the temple of RegEx.
http://www\.mysite\.com/folder/.*\.cfm";, cgi.http_referer) GT
0>
that should do it.
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Leder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 200
Hi Dave,
I think your "delivery" inference means that our
download page is a JSP, which is correct:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/download.jsp
However, that's merely due to "legacy" JSP code
leveraged across all product downloads, including
ServletExec and JTurbo.
New Atlanta's w
Can a wildcard character, such as a "*" be used successfully in the
following statement, or is there a better way:
http://www.mysite.com/folder/*.cfm";>
Thanks, Mark
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?
i dont know enough about it to really know. It was just my immediate thought
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Mosh Teitelbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
> If I understand co
If I understand correctly, and there's a very good chance that I don't, BD
allows you to use the CFML language while using a Java App server instead of
the CF App server. It basically allows you to embed CFML into JSP pages (or
something like that).
So, just because the file ends in JSP, it could
I totally hear you with that one. Although it could well be that their
needs are such that JSP/Servlets is a better choice, and so they are
marketing a product to an audience that they themselves are not a member of.
Still, since they're obviously running a J2EE server (which BD will run on)
it se
Ah, jeez. Can't believe I did that.
You're right; OBJECT is the correct tag, EMBED is browser-specific and
non-standard.
Thanks.
--
Mosh Teitelbaum
evoch, LLC
Tel: (301) 942-5378
Fax: (301) 933-3651
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.evoch.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: Gyrus
maybe its just me but I find it interesting when companies offer a product
but then they use a different product to deliver it to you.
What I mean is that take bluedragon for example, obviously its a cfm app but
they are using jsp. While I realize that cfmx can use jsp, I wasn't aware
that blue dra
I had already tried the embed method, just didnt work out right.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Gyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: mpegs
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mosh Teitelbaum" <[EMAIL PROT
Anyone know if there is a way to embed Java scriptlets into CFML pages like
you would in JSP pages?
The reason I ask is that since CFMX came out, I've been generating a lot of
code that uses Java, especially the java.util package. So I have snips of
code like this all over my apps:
missing =
For whatever this is worth and this is for us non-genius's with a little
ADD; I don't see how you could compare a well-written fusebox3 with one that
is non-fuseboxed, unless it is written in some other tight knitted
framework/methodology. The code would speak for itself.
Doug Teel - Web Develo
I guess once I've finished implementing multiple languages for Tapestry
(soon I hope) I need to investigate a VAR agreement with New Atlanta so I
can start distributing self-installing CD's.
> Part of me is elated and part of me has the shivers.
> We'll just have to sit and watch. With multiple *
For those who wish to discuss or debate this issue, please post to the CF-OT or
CF-Community lists. This is being sent as an Admin note.
Just a little admin mention about subjects. I got this as a bounce back from
more than one mail server due to spam filters:
554 Filtered out by Filter 0 because
> At 01:01 PM 2/21/03 -0600, Raymond Camden wrote:
>>I don't think you will ever kill that argument. There are
>>some people
>>who - for whatever reason - think ALL commercial software
>>is the tool of
>>the devil, and if you try to sell code you are commiting a
>>mortal sin.
>>They will NEVER be c
I'd take ALL reference styles into account, even lack of them. Reference ids are
one of those grey areas. :(
> Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> > Ah. It does some other stuff with the message's body, but that's besides the
> > point. Its just a parser tag and does nothing else. Once I get a free second
- Original Message -
From: "Mosh Teitelbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Typically, this would be the EMBED tag.
---
Though it's worth noting that EMBED is deprecated in XHTML. Or, more
precisely I think, it's never really existed in the HTML specs. The tag to
use for inc
They are standard inside the header as a container for the message-id. When I
store the message-id for a post, I remove them as unneeded. When I send a post,
they are added in as they have to be used for ALL posts. Just a preference on
how to store and use as each will work for storage and searchin
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Ah. It does some other stuff with the message's body, but that's besides the
> point. Its just a parser tag and does nothing else. Once I get a free second
> (yeh right!) I'll probably write some regex patterns for parsing mail headers.
> RFC compliant ones that'll reject
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Um, the code I sent you does that already. Otherwise, you can do a RegEx looking
> for the start text of Message-ID and an end text of >. The regex below will get
> the message ID for you from a raw header
> "Message-ID: <([^>]+)>"
The < and > are part of the messageid, w
Ah. It does some other stuff with the message's body, but that's besides the
point. Its just a parser tag and does nothing else. Once I get a free second
(yeh right!) I'll probably write some regex patterns for parsing mail headers.
RFC compliant ones that'll reject malformed mail.
> Michael,
>
>
Jeff Chastain wrote:
> I am running CFMX and am specifically looking for the message ID and reply
> information.
mID = REReplaceNoCase(headers,"^.*messageid: (<[^>]*>).*$","\1");
irt = REReplaceNoCase(headers,"^.*in-reply-to: (<[^>]*>).*$","\1");
etc.
> I tried parsing by linebreak, which did
Um, the code I sent you does that already. Otherwise, you can do a RegEx looking
for the start text of Message-ID and an end text of >. The regex below will get
the message ID for you from a raw header
"Message-ID: <([^>]+)>"
> I am running CFMX and am specifically looking for the message ID and
Michael,
The code sample looked pretty straight-forward, I just was wondering if
there were any other suggestions for working with the mail headers since the
CFX_ODSMime tag looked to do a lot more than that. I will try it, I was
just looking for other options.
As far as the mail header format g
Typically, this would be the EMBED tag.
--
Mosh Teitelbaum
evoch, LLC
Tel: (301) 942-5378
Fax: (301) 933-3651
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.evoch.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: Gyrus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:26 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subjec
Part of me is elated and part of me has the shivers. We'll just have to sit and
watch. With multiple *viable* platforms any manner of outcomes are possible.
Viable doesn't just mean technically sound, or even superior. Have seen some great
products flushed to neverland via poor marketing or
The CFX_ODSMime tag takes all the headers and puts it into a query that you can
loop over. If you want, I can explain the code sample I sent you in reference to
the tag. The problem with parsing email headers is that there is a LOT of
information and the format of the information is very poor. Take
I am running CFMX and am specifically looking for the message ID and reply
information. I tried parsing by linebreak, which did not work and I was not
sure how accurate that would be.
Thanks
-- Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, Febr
> I think you may need to provide a better example of
> what your talking about in terms of a "bastardized
> Fusebox app".
>
> ...
>
> I do not know how much experience you have had with
> Fusebox, but it sounds to me--and I do not mean this
> as an insult in any way--as if you aren't very fami
Fun question. I have been mulching on this for a while now, and here is
my *current* "solution":
In Application.cfm:
sttCFG = StructNew();
sttCFG.strAppPhysDir = GetDirectoryFromPath(GetCurrentTemplatePath());
// sttCFG.strAppPhysDir = GetDirectoryFromPath(ExpandPath("..\"));
sttCFG.strBasePhysD
At 01:01 PM 2/21/03 -0600, Raymond Camden wrote:
>I don't think you will ever kill that argument. There are some people
>who - for whatever reason - think ALL commercial software is the tool of
>the devil, and if you try to sell code you are commiting a mortal sin.
>They will NEVER be convinced oth
> This finally kills dead all of that php/asp 'but its
> free' garbage, which never had any validity in the
> first place.
I don't know if I'd go as far as that. First of all, BlueDragon != CFMX.
Second, there's validity to the argument that free software is better than
non-free software, all ot
Jeff Chastain wrote:
> Does anybody know of a tag or script somewhere that will parse out email
> headers?
What do you need to extract? Does it need to run under CF MX (which has
a ug in CFPOP which strips all linebreaks)?
Jochem
~
> Will be interesting to see what kind of traction BlueDragon gets in the
> marketplace. And if it suceeds(sic), what kind of pricing pressure this
puts on
> MM. And one could argue that if it causes sufficient pricing pressure, MM
> might have to respond in a way that reduces their revenue and the
Yes, that was what I was playing with. I was just hoping there were a
couple of nested template functions that would give me what I needed without
complex parsing.
Thanks.
Matthew P. Smith
Web Developer, Object Oriented
Naval Education & Training Professional
Development & Technology Center
Unfortunately, I'm helping out with a site that another developer at a
remote site wrote. We are bouncing files back and forth. I have some stuff
dependent on paths and wanted to make it portable so differences on the
site's root wouldn't affect functionality. A mapping is about the same as
hard
OK, that makes sense. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: RE: Registering Web Services on a CFMX Server - Why?
> > OK, so I am just now getting around to using WebServices
>
Does anybody know of a tag or script somewhere that will parse out email
headers? Michael Dinowitz mentioned CFX_ODSMime, but I am not finding much
in the way of documentation for it and it looks like it does a lot more that
just parse the header.
Thanks
-- Jeff
> OK, so I am just now getting around to using WebServices
> here at work. I went in, registered the web service in the
> CFADMIN. So now I am in DWMX, I set up my site using my
> laptop as the dev server, and the CFMX server that the web
> service is registered on as the remote and testing ser
That's a nasty problem, because the Application.cfm file might not be in the
same directory as the base template, because CF looks up the directory tree
until it finds one. I think you'll want to start with cgi.script_name and
getBaseTemplatePath() in your base template. The compute the part of t
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:05 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think you may need to provide a better example of what your talking
> about in terms of a "bastardized Fusebox app". Al
I'd use a mapping - and enforce the location under the mapping.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc
Member of Team Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog
Yah
Eric Dawson wrote:
> Are there any issues with installing Blue Dragon on an existing W2K, IIS,
> CF4.5.2 box? or will it be a clean install?
I would recommend a standalone install, shouldn't give any problems.
Then you should be able to verify your code works using the BlueDragon
internal webse
OK, so I am just now getting around to using WebServices here at work. I went in,
registered the web service in the CFADMIN. So now I am in DWMX, I set up my site using
my laptop as the dev server, and the CFMX server that the web service is registered on
as the remote and testing server. So I n
Ok, now I've changed my email address, my password, and even my name,
but my username is apparently (still) my old email address And I
can't appear to change it...
Cutter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You can always email me directly. :)
> I've altered the language and order to make it more cl
You might want to take a look at
http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=56
Haven't used it yet myself, but looks pretty good.
H.
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:44 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Allowing specific HTML Tags
Are there any issues with installing Blue Dragon on an existing W2K, IIS,
CF4.5.2 box? or will it be a clean install?
Eric
From: jon hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:01:40
Will be interesting to see what kind of traction BlueDragon gets in the
marketplace. And if it suceeds, what kind of pricing pressure this puts on
MM. And one could argue that if it causes sufficient pricing pressure, MM
might have to respond in a way that reduces their revenue and therefore cash
a
Hi,
I think you may need to provide a better example of what your talking
about in terms of a "bastardized Fusebox app". Although I have never
encountered anything similar to what you are describing, I am sure
someone else has. Even if the app is "Fusebox-ish", I would still be
able to quickly gra
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:49 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX
>
>
> Hi
Hi!
> > I think the reason that people make so many variations
> > of Fusebox is because they are constantly finding limitat
I don't think you will ever kill that argument. There are some people
who - for whatever reason - think ALL commercial software is the tool of
the devil, and if you try to sell code you are commiting a mortal sin.
They will NEVER be convinced otherwise. (Or so it seems.)
=
Unfortunately, as long as the extensibility of the free version is pretty
much non-existent, it's only place will be small limited scope
projects.
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, February 21, 2003, 1:53:55 PM, you wrote:
MR> This finally kills dead all of that php/asp 'but its free' ga
How do you call a cfc if you're not 100% sure what the site directory is
going to be. Is there anyway to call a cfc relatively.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.ho
I wrote:
>You do not store the public key on the server, ideally.
Oops. meant to say 'you do not store the *private* key on the server :)
--Matt--
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscript
This finally kills dead all of that php/asp 'but its free' garbage,
which never had any validity in the first place. All sorts of
implications here. Sure would like to see a lot of new cfml developers
enter the world as we know it.
Interesting times :)
--
Hi
> I think the reason that people make so many variations
> of Fusebox is because they are constantly finding limitations.
You could also say people are finding ways to improve the methodology
(framework), which, is a good thing in some cases.
> As you stated, there could be so many variatio
You can always email me directly. :)
I've altered the language and order to make it more clear. Your old password has
to be entered into the field called password (now called current password) and
the new password (if you want one) goes in the field called new password.
> It gave me the pw, but w
You have to enter your password in order to change your information. In
other words, fill in the 'password' field on the form, or it won't let you.
Not intuitive at all, but that's the way it is.
(Michael: perhaps a note to this effect could be added?)
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Hi David,
You store the *public* key, which does the encrypting, somewhere on your
server where your cf templates can get at it. If you have, lets say, a
cached default settings record for your application this would be where
you might want to keep the public key.
You do not store the public key
It gave me the pw, but when I try to edit my account info I get the
following message:
The username and/or password you have entered is invalid.
Any suggestions anyone?
Cutter
Ken Wilson wrote:
>Left side menu has this link. Used it myself a couple of days ago and it
>sent both UserName and P
- Original Message -
From: "Tangorre, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You can use sessions, you just have to append the cfid
> and cftoken to the url on each and every link and form
> action. Also, set the appropriate attributes in the
> cfapplication tag.
---
And do
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> whats the best way to insert an mpeg into a cfm template?
---
Do you mean for the user to view the MPEG inline on a web page? In this
case, it's not a CF issue: you need to search around for something gen
> Would I need a language pack of any sort to work the different charactor
> sets of the Japanese language.
no, nothing like that exists. i *think* there was a localized japanese
version. better off w/mx for i18n work.
~|
Archive
Hello list
I'm trying cfx_pwtextcrypt tag recommend on this list. My question is this tag
requires a public key and private key to be able to decrypt the value. The question
is where do you store these keys. In the table with crypted value? does this mean
if someone gets the table with k
Hi Nathan,
Did you ever have one of those experiences where, when you see the
solution it all becomes so painfully clear? Well, this is one of those
experiences for me. ;-)
Thank you very much for your incredibly timely help.
Truly,
Guy J. McDowell, M.M.C.P.
(705) 324-9144 ex 3422
[EMAIL PROT
I am trying to debug/get working an example app that covers cflogin and
makes extensive use of CFCs.
I keep seeing an error in the application log that looks like this:
Error Executing Database Query.[MERANT][SequeLink JDBC Driver][ODBC
Socket][Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] The Microso
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:35 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX
>
>
> >I think the reason that people make so many variations of Fusebox
> >is because they are constantly finding limitations.
>
>
>
> Or
> -Original Message-
> From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:30 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX
>
>
> I have to disagree with this opinion. As I see it, there are two major
> 'types' of fusebox: normal and fuseQ.
And the rest o
Would I need a language pack of any sort to work the different charactor
sets of the Japanese language.
Anyhelp would be appreciated.
Dave Clay
Trusjoist E-Com
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid
>I think the reason that people make so many variations of Fusebox
>is because they are constantly finding limitations.
Or you could rephrase that in a somewhat more positive light rather than
a negative one: One of the reasons you find so many variations of
Fusebox is because creative developer
not as good ;o)
but good
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JS-Jive
-Original Message-
From: Greg McDaniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Javascript List?
Could someone please recommend a Javascript List that i
I have to disagree with this opinion. As I see it, there are two major
'types' of fusebox: normal and fuseQ. However, FB includes much outside the
core file's functionality, such as filename prefixes, the breakdown in to
circuits, fuseactions and fuses, and the use of fusedocs, all of which
aren'
Thanks
That worked.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: numbers only
Bruce, Rodney S HQISEC/Veridian IT Services wrote:
>
> I am trying to remove commas from numbers being inputted by us
Could someone please recommend a Javascript List that is
at least as good as CF-Talk?
Greg M.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?me
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
