No prob. Will try it.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Ben Forta b...@forta.com wrote:
Oops, meant REMatch(), not REFind(). Use REMatch() and it'll do exactly
what
you want. Just be sure to check the length of the returned array before
using it.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
Yup you can install CFB on two machines
Sent from my iPhone
On 26 Jan 2011, at 19:01, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
no, sorry I obviously missed something off that post.
The individual products within CS have the same license, so it would be a
fair assumption that cfbuilder
Let me correct that.
cfreturn isStudentEmployee.recordcount = 0 / will return true
but
cfreturn isStudentEmployee.recordcount / will evaluate to false
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, these will not return the same value.
Lets assume the query
d'oH! Good catch.
So if you go the implicit boolean conversion route, switch the return
true for return false...
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, these will not return the same value.
Lets assume the query returns 0 records.
cfreturn
I have a requirement to check any and all mappings within the CFAdmin but do
not have access to the CF Admin.
Would anyone know how to retrieve them from the log files ( as I do have
access to these ) or maybe another method?
They're not in the log files. But they are in the configuration
Gotta say thats a first and I have been doing mssql for ten years. I am
telling you this is what is causing his error because tsql is not as flexible
as you think because its procedural and requires you do it in a certain way.
This is incorrect. Literal values can be placed on either side
Gerald,
Your comments about CFB being slow bother me, and warrant some exploration.
Can you provide more detail? Do you have projects set up into a shared dev
environment over the network? I can't imagine that would be fast for any
IDE.
I have a copy of all my projects locally, I install CF
Well considering that the normal lifecycle from alpha to beta to release is
actually 2 years, I added one more based on what Adobe have said about it
not being released this year, and don't expect it next year either.
But it is a guess at best, considering this is a major release in comparison
I had the same problems but I found the cause.
I had CFB set to connect to CF automatically and check the server state, RDS
etc.
If you don't have coldFusion running when u launch CFB (normal on a dev
machine) then this will make it slow to start up.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan
One last note. You need to var scope your query.
cfset var isStudentEmployee = /
cfquery name=isStudentEmployee
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Charlie Griefer
charlie.grie...@gmail.com wrote:
cfreturn isStudentEmployee.recordcount = 0 /
Unless I'm missing something, this should be:
cfreturn isStudentEmployee.recordcount eq 0 /
--
Ezra Parker
One would also presume they have learnt a thing or two about how often to
release a new version, I bet most customers are not prepared to upgrade
every single year, that gets quite expensive.
Speaking form a hosts perspective, we rarely get customers asking to
upgrade, they are usually happy on
I've lobbied for years to get a setup like that here, but it's a no-go.
Either way, CFBuilder in both the beta and 1st release version was dog slow
randomly. Not all the time, not always on the same template even, just
randomly jrun would peg the cpu to 100%. CFEclipse doesn't cause that
problem
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ezra Parker e...@cfgrok.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Charlie Griefer
charlie.grie...@gmail.com wrote:
cfreturn isStudentEmployee.recordcount = 0 /
Unless I'm missing something, this should be:
cfreturn isStudentEmployee.recordcount eq 0 /
So the solution to that one is just to have CF running before you start
CFBuilder. Does that affect anything other than Builder's startup time?
nathan strutz
[http://www.dopefly.com/] [http://hi.im/nathanstrutz]
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
I
That's the position it was found, the reFind if you read the docs also
returns the position and length.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Monique Boea [mailto:moniqueb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 6:02 AM
To: cf-talk
Just for sh*ts and giggles you could also use the underlying java split()
method.
cfset string=Department Summary by Employee 10/27/2010 - 10/27/2010 /
cfset ary_string = string.split( ) /
cfset firstDate = ary_string[5] /
cfset lastDate = ary_string[7] /
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM,
I'm not a liberty to share release dates, but I can certainly say that
ColdFusion X (codenamed: Link) is less than 3 years away. Historically,
we've been on a 2-year cycle (as we found that's really the earliest most
want to upgrade). 2 years is our goal, but as well know, it really comes
down to
Morgan,
Do you have any bug numbers I can look into?
-Adam
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:39 PM, morgan l greyk...@gmail.com wrote:
I've lobbied for years to get a setup like that here, but it's a no-go.
Either way, CFBuilder in both the beta and 1st release version was dog slow
randomly. Not
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
It would be nice if unicorns shit rainbows too.
Like
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Will it have the cfCowBell tag? It's a sure fire way to increase the
popularity of CF.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Adrocknaphobia adrocknapho...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not a liberty to share release dates, but I can certainly say that
ColdFusion X (codenamed: Link) is less than 3 years
Not offhand; we haven't messed with it around here since the 1st release
version.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Adrocknaphobia adrocknapho...@gmail.comwrote:
Morgan,
Do you have any bug numbers I can look into?
-Adam
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:39 PM, morgan l greyk...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, you can get unicorn meat:)
http://www.thinkgeek.com/caffeine/wacky-edibles/e5a7/
Wil Genovese
Sr. Web Application Developer/
Systems Administrator
Wil Genovese Consulting
wilg...@trunkful.com
www.trunkful.com
On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25,
It was when it first came out so I am a bit hazy on the details. I am
connected over the network to our dev, staging and Prod servers. I really
can't develop locally. I have no problem with CFE/Aptana. But DW can be
sluggish at times.
Since I had one license (and not aware that I could do two
Hi all,
We're using SQL Server mirroring w/ SQL Server 2k8, and have setup for
automatic failover in the connection string attribute (Other JDBC type). The
one thing that is a bit of pain is that the CF instances have to get a
failure message back from the DSN before actually failing over --
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
It would be nice if unicorns shit rainbows too.
Wait.you mean they don't?
*cries in the corner*
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can
wonder what the f*k
It would be nice if unicorns shit rainbows too.
Well, you can get unicorn meat:)
http://www.thinkgeek.com/caffeine/wacky-edibles/e5a7/
I don't know. Look at where those rainbows are in the meat chart.
~|
Order the Adobe
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
I had the same problems but I found the cause.
I had CFB set to connect to CF automatically and check the server state, RDS
etc.
If you don't have coldFusion running when u launch CFB (normal on a dev
machine) then
Hello all,
I am sending email messages to users of a site I run. In an effort to lower
the SPAM score. I am thinking about switching some of the more vital
communications to plain text only email. I haver tested this and the emails go
out fine. When check the email in my Hotmail account
Brian,
Read my blog post on this exact topic. It may help you with this issue of
setting the text portion of the email correctly.
http://www.trunkful.com/index.cfm/2010/5/27/How-to-CFMAIL-Properly-and-Keep-the-SPAM-in-the-Can
Wil Genovese
Sr. Web Application Developer/
Systems Administrator
It would be nice if unicorns shit rainbows too.
Well, you can get unicorn meat:)
http://www.thinkgeek.com/caffeine/wacky-edibles/e5a7/
I don't know. Look at where those rainbows are in the meat chart.
I think I covered that in my initial statement. I always choose my
words
Hi all,
Wondering if anybody has any experiences, positive or negative with using CF
Wheels and/or Model-Glue. Perhaps you have some advice to share on proper
techniques etc etc. PLEASE LET US NOT MAKE THIS A WHICH FRAMEWORK IS BETTER,
because I am looking at possibly using both of them in
Well,
To be honest you're coming at it a little backwards. Which one you would use
depends on what you're planning on building and what you hope to get out of
a framework.
This is like asking if you should buy a truck or a boat. The answer is
always going to be, it depends.
So start with What
Actually, CFWheels states in its documentation that it should be only used for
medium sized apps (aka not ten page websites or enterprise level). I stated
Model-Glue because I have used it on a enterprise level, so in fact my question
on that end has already been answered.
As to the learning
I do appreciate the assistance I have received from members of this group
but overpriced goods squeeze the cynicism out of my pores.
It seems defenders of Adobe's pricing like to compare the cost of CFB to
tools used by carpenters, plumbers and mechanics. However, that comparison
is invalid
Actually, CFWheels states in its documentation that it should be only used
for medium sized apps (aka not ten page websites or enterprise
level).
CFWheels is basically a Rails implementation for CF, so if you like
the things Rails brings to the table (ActiveRecord, rapid prototyping,
etc) it
FW/1 you say? I will definitely check it out. Never know, that might be the
one. I have to be honest in that I know almost knowing about Rails because my
last position was as a SQL DBA and was like out of the loop for a while and
that might be a good thing because I don't know any better
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Dave Long d...@northgoods.com wrote:
none the less. Oh well, they were told at Harvard that greed is good! Bill
Gates set the standard and they all want to be him at the expense of their
customers. Why settle for being millionaires when you can soak your
FW/1 you say?
+1 for FW/1. It is a joy to use.
G!
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Michael Firth mfsqlser...@gmail.comwrote:
FW/1 you say? I will definitely check it out. Never know, that might be
the one. I have to be honest in that I know almost knowing about Rails
because my last
I also second Daves recommendation about checking out FW/1, its very light
weight, very easy to learn, and IMHO hits the sweet spot.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
Actually, CFWheels states in its documentation that it should be only
used for medium
It seems defenders of Adobe's pricing like to compare the cost of CFB to
tools used by carpenters, plumbers and mechanics. However, that comparison
is invalid because there is only a small reduction of manufacturing costs as
volume of real world tool sales increases. Margin does not
Agreed. I did the download from RIA and probably will give it a test spin
perhaps tomorrow. Thanks for the info all.
On Jan 26, 2011, at 5:21 PM, John Allen wrote:
I also second Daves recommendation about checking out FW/1, its very light
weight, very easy to learn, and IMHO hits the
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Dave Long d...@northgoods.com wrote:
Another factor in Adobe's pricing is to discourage entry as much as
possible. This approach has been used by AutoDesk since the 1990s and
prevents a lot of architect wannabees carpenters from designing the
buildings they
I know I should ignore this thread, I know I should, but ...
Perhaps the folks at Adobe even want to kill it off, judging by the price
charged for their Enterprise version.
And if you talk to the ColdFusion sales reps (all of them over the years,
Allaire reps, Macromedia reps, and Adobe reps)
Ben, the entitlement mindset folks will never get it. Ever. Sad, but
true. :-(
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
That's just plain silly. You really think that Adobe is going to make
billions selling CFB? Not a chance.
Think about it. $300 for a tool you are likely to use every day, 47-50 weeks
a year? Even if you are hyper conservative in your calculations it would
still only take you a few months to pay
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Dave Long d...@northgoods.com wrote:
Time to learn PHP, I guess.
Don't forget to buy Zend Studio! It's only $299!
Perhaps the folks at Adobe even want to kill it off, judging by the price
charged for their Enterprise version.
As others have noted, Enterprise
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
As others have noted, Enterprise increased in cost from $5,000 to
Or was it $6,000? I just remember that by the time I started buying
Enterprise licenses (at Broadchoice), it was $7,500 - and we bought
four licenses in
Thanks for the info Wil. I did read your blog, and my original design was
coded exactly the way you specified using 2 mail parts (text and HTML) and
specifying the type as HTML in the cfmail tag itself as seen below.
cfmail to=#Candidates.EmailAddress# from=#SysSettings.Postmaster#
its too cheap for the enterprise corps and too expensive for everyone else,
so how about a new intermediate version then, would that make everyone
happy.
CF Standard - as it is now
CF Professional - the current enterprise edition
CF Enterprise - the current enterprise ediiton but with support
i believe there was also an option to automatically start cf when u start
CFB and stop CF when you stop CFB, this would of course also slow things
down as CF does take a while to start, but it never worked for me.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On
Brian,
If you are sending ONLY text then change the type attribute in the CFMAIL tag
from html to text or set it to text explicitly. I think at this point using the
CFMAILPART type text then become redundant. CFMAILPART is great for sending
multi-part emails, but you are sending a single
Hi Kris,
I don't really have a suggestion for your issue, but I was wondering what
factored in to your decision to use mirroring instead of a DB cluster. I use a
2 node database cluster running MSSQL 2K5 and can drop the primary node and see
my system recover (including running CF requests)
having valid SPF records or domain keys will often make up for the points
you have picked up by having an HTML email.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Wil Genovese jugg...@trunkful.com wrote:
Brian,
If you are sending ONLY text then change the type attribute in the CFMAIL
tag from html to
The point still stands though, the bugs in ColdFusion Builder that won't be
fixed are going to still be 2 years away. Which means the bugs that I care
about the most will not be fixed anytime soon.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From:
Ray,
You really don't want me to get started on Adobe and the pricing off CFB.
Screw it
It is overpriced, I use it because I was given a copy for home and it was
bought for me at work. Would I buy the next version, no I am going to be
very reserved on that. The reason being is that while
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Andrew Scott andr...@andyscott.id.au wrote:
ColdFusion and ColdFusion Builder get let me see 1 update, in other words
CFB has had one update, yes. CF9 has had multiple updates. Both before
901 and _after_ 901. Multiple. You do know that, right?
unless you
Hello All.
I am reading a text file and saving it in excel.
I am using the following code:
cfoutput
cfset filePath = #ExpandPath( \)#
cfheader name=Content-Disposition value=filename=agentDaily.xls
cfcontent type=application/vnd.ms-excel
file=#filePath#\user\dailyreports\agentDaily.txt
The client said that using one IP address, several domain names can
be used- multiple sites using host
header names. I am not sure what that means
It means that you'll probably have to create virtual directories for
both sites, as several people have mentioned.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig
Try this instead:
cfheader name=Content-Disposition value=attachment;
filename=agentDaily.xls
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Monique Boea moniqueb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All.
I am reading a text file and saving it in excel.
I am using the following code:
cfoutput
cfset
Hi Brian,
I mistyped -- we are running 2k8 in 2k5 compatibility mode.
I took the advice of my sysadmin who is also a certified MSSQL guy
(and a really smart one too). With Mirroring you can specify the
failover partner in the connection string. You have a primary, and a
secondary. When the
you probably have a mapping set up (in cf admin or in your
Application.cfc/cfm) for your above-web-root folder that contains your
.cfm files - that is why they can be included.
that cf mapping however would not apply to any other files - only to
cfm/cfc ones.
all other files will be served by
Thanks for replying. Everything is set up and I am able to access individual
sites. The problem is with the images folder. I am not able to get the
images to be displayed. Any ideas on this. I gave my directory structure in
my initial question. There is another folder at the same level as
Yeah...wife...and an ex-wife, 2 kids (one lives with us, other with ex) plus
3 step kids (one lives with us)...plus wife is going to school and the step
daughter that lives with us also has a daughter and is not employed so I am
the sole breadwinner for the household...so yeah...300 is a shitload
And if you spent what you could not really afford on a product that is this
buggy, with no plans to fix any of the current bugs for this release. How
likely would you be to upgrade to the next release?
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Eric
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Dave Long d...@northgoods.com wrote:
This is not true of software which, once developed, has only minute costs
involved as more copies are sold. Margin increases rapidly and thus the
software could be priced at one half the price and sales might double with
uhmn, what?
I think what you mean to say is that, *from what you know* there are no
plans to fix *the bugs that bother you*.
Which could mean that (a) they aren't being fixed or (b) you haven't been
told.
I don't think it can be unilaterally claimed that no bugs would be fixed,
that seems
Mark, I think I made my stance very clear in a previous thread. I did say
that the bugs will be fixed in the next release, and I feel that this is
wrong and I might be a minority on that, but I think that if one is going to
be paying so much money for a product one should have the expectation
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Andrew Scott andr...@andyscott.id.au wrote:
Mark, I think I made my stance very clear in a previous thread. I did say
that the bugs will be fixed in the next release, and I feel that this is
wrong and I might be a minority on that,
Might be a minority on
We all have priorities and choices and there are pros and cons to all of them.
I also have a wife (of 11+ years now) and we're still paying off her
MBA loans (from Pepperdine). We have no human kids but we have a lot
of four-legged furry 'kids' that eat us out of house and home. And I'm
the sole
Eric,
I understand you situation but it has nothing to do with the price point of
a great piece of software.
John
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Yeah...wife...and an ex-wife, 2 kids (one lives with us, other with ex)
plus
3 step kids
Hello All.
Does decimalFormat have any kind of making?
I need this number 78.57 to be converted to the .79
Thank you.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Does decimalFormat have any kind of making?
I need this number 78.57 to be converted to the .79
You want to use round instead of decimalFormat, I think:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/9.0/CFMLRef/WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbec22c24-7f88.html
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf
We had this problem on CF8. CF had been restarting on an almost daily basis.
After much more research, we added the -Xint option to the JVM
settings. This forces the JVM to run in interpreter mode and disables the
Hotspot compiler. This hotspot compiler was causing the JVM to crash
for
Ok let me clear one thing up, I never said it was a bad product. In fact my
words where I don't think it is a great product, but from what I am hearing
version 3 will be a must have for any developer. Now whether I think it is
worth the price, is indeed my opinion.
As for the bugs, I don't have
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 13:58
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: why is cf_builder so expensive?
Will it have the cfCowBell tag? It's a sure fire way to increase the
popularity of CF.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:55
That may apply to companies looking at the server products, but I can tell
from personal experience, I would never say CFB was too cheap if it was less
expensive and dont think any developers would either ;-) I also never
understood that mentality. Makes me want to go to CIO's and say sure,
I wouldn't buy Zend either...
I use CFEclipse for development, GIMP for graphics...so yeah...I use a lot
of free open source stuff because that is pretty much what I can afford.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:seancorfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011
I am sure you also make a lot more than I do (combined household that
is...especially if your wife has an MBA...mine is going for her CAN
certificate) Sean ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:seancorfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 22:21
To: cf-talk
You missed the part where he said, And I'm the sole breadwinner.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I am sure you also make a lot more than I do (combined household that
is...especially if your wife has an MBA...mine is going for her CAN
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Andrew Scott andr...@andyscott.id.au wrote:
from what I am hearing version 3 will be a must have for any developer.
Based on what Ram showed at MAX, I'd say version 2 is a must have
(but then I already think version 1 is pretty much a must have :)
1) When
See notes inline.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:seancorfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:47 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: why is cf_builder so expensive?
Based on what Ram showed at MAX, I'd
This thread is deteriorating and I'm afraid this email is going to
sound a bit pissy. It's really not intended to but I'm just not sure
how to respond to this line of thought without getting personal (and
Eric and I got personal the last time this topic came up - I'm just
not a very sympathetic
Depending on the size of the application (how much work involved in changing
code):
Cftry/cfcatch on database errors would prevent users from noticing anything
other than a slight delay on failover?
Mvh
Helge Hetland
WebSite as
Den 27. jan. 2011 kl. 03:35 skrev Kris Jones
101 - 184 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
