Re: Is creating datasources locally different under jrun?

On 4/24/05, Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?event=view&id=KC.6ef0253&extid=6ef0253&dialogID=7193183&iterationID=1&sessionID=9630d8ddd738754541a1&stateID=0%200%207191786&mode=simple > > Beware the wrap... Or use th

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

On 4/24/05, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps you should petition your shared host to offer that setup? > (Multiple installs within a single server instance, using one context > root per customer website) I've just blogged a (fairly long) piece about this...

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

On 4/24/05, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My point exactly. Sandboxing should also protect items in memory! Shared > hosting means sharing bandwidth, disk space, getting a slice of total > memory, but should NEVER EVER EVER mean sharing variable scopes, memory > space or anything th

Re: Structures (probably a stupid question)

On 4/24/05, Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to understand structures - I understand that they are like the > form scope in that I can access them as myStruct.myVar, but is there a way > to create an array of structures? myArray = arrayNew(1) myArray[1] = structNew() myArr

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

On 4/23/05, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, even so, that is a major bug in ColdFusion and or sandboxing, or at > least a problem with the configuration. No, it's a feature of the underlying Java servlet platform. Go read the docs about how the underlying context works and you'll s

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

On 4/23/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly as I've said before. You should expect compromise when sharing - > it's just that simple. Yes. > Saying "get a dedicated server" is all well and good but a lot of people > don't have the money. So what can you do with your $20 a month?

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

On 4/23/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using a hash of the directory ensures to a great degree of certainty that > the name won't be accidentally used again. Adding the salt attempts to > ensure that nobody could guess the name easily just by knowing your > application path. To be hon

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

On 4/23/05, Peter Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hashing your app name isn't going to protect you from others on a shared > server from looking in on you: > > > createObject("java","coldfusion.runtime.ApplicationScopeTracker")> But sandbox security can turn that off... -- Sean A Corfiel

Re: wtf are those advertizing links in the text?

On 4/20/05, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's why I think the ad approach is better. But, > if the only way for it to pay off is putting links > in the content, then it should go that way. Yeah, I meant to say that I have no problem whatsoever with Michael putting ad links in the

Re: wtf are those advertizing links in the text?

On 4/20/05, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only ones to drop from the list would be those who thought > they knew so much that they would rarely or never have a question > that they needed an answer to, or those who already know everything > and don't care to help others... I disa

Re: wtf are those advertizing links in the text?

On 4/20/05, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Woah. If this list went to a monthly/yearly subscription you can > expect a severe drop in subscribers. Many times, especially the last > few days, I've contemplated dropping of this list. As many people seem > to confuse this list and thier o

Re: Admin API

On 4/19/05, Sam Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, well I tried Sean's sugguestion (Thank You Sean) but I'm missing > something. The error I'm getting is > "Variable TEMPLATECACHESIZE is undefined" on the cfset for CacheBefore. It's a STRING not a variable! Try: getCacheProperty("TemplateCach

Re: Macromedia Exchange search down. Need a Forta tag.

On 4/19/05, Emmet McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like the exchange is broken. Seems to be working just fine for me... > Ben Forta made a tag to simulate a query results set. Does anyone have a > copy. I wish I could remember what it was called. Are you thinking of querysim.cfm? Ha

Re: Admin API

Sam also asked me offlist and my suggestion was to try using the Admin API to set the template cache size to zero and then back to the usual size (you can use getCacheProperty() / setCacheProperty()). Don't know if it would work but it seems worth a try. The same API also lets you turn trusted cac

Re: sorry, back to JVM/GC for a moment

On 4/15/05, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nm i assumed more than I should. Maybe they only allow you to put > a tag before the vars. RIght. The enhancement was to allow 'var' inside inside . Previously you had to either use inside before you switched to or write the entire f

Re: CF 7 and Flash Remoting

On 4/14/05, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why learn to do something the wrong way? It only invites bad habits and > tricking flash into not reporting an error is alot different than actually > fixing it. and then there's all these people who want strict typing in ColdFusion :) -- S

Re: Event Gateway's and runaway threads...

On 4/14/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, the "default value" is in effect if you do nothing, so requests will get > killed off when the Request Timeout expires, just like with CFM requests > processed via the web server. Just so I'm clear o

Re: Event Gateway sample apps

On 4/14/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a Devloper Edition restriction. Me giving you an Enterprise serial > number is what I recall fixed it :) Ah, that would be it, yes *looks sheepish* Just out of curiosity, could you modify the s

Re: OT: Using Spotlight on Tiger OS as an indexing tool

Just a reminder: there is a cf-mac mailing list dedicated to Mac-specific issues like this... On 4/14/05, jerry johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/MacOSX_Spotlight_TB.pdf > > From what I've gathered, you should be able to hit it 3 ways. Through > Applescript,

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On 4/14/05, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any chance you could write up a blog entry or something on the > development setup at MM? Maybe go into a little more detail on the > technical setup? You've got me intrigued. Hmm, I thought I'd blogged a fair bit about it over the years... M

Re: Conditional CFInclude

On 4/14/05, Jim McAtee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the following does CF include only one page on the fly, or does it > bring in both pages, but execute the code in only one? In CFMX, it doesn't actually "bring the code in" - each page is compiled to bytecode as a class and CF calls a method o

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On 4/14/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't sweat it. We've actually taken your suggestion to heart and we're > putting up a project whiteboard that's labeled "Hey bob". People can write > on it what they're working on and see what others are working on. We're also > going to put it

Re: Event Gateway sample apps

On 4/14/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK Tony...so I fired up Damon's thread examplethe problem is I can't > change my simultaneous threads settings in CF Admin (greyed out and stuck at > 10)any ideas...cause right now the single thread examplke completes and > the multi-

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On 4/14/05, RADEMAKERS Tanguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What i was trying to explain is that source control isn't a replacement > for team communications. We're in complete agreement on that! > If you often find yourself fighting for control > of the same file with one or more other developers

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On 4/14/05, RADEMAKERS Tanguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >That's basically how we've worked except for the source > >control. The "hey bob" part just doesn't work though. > > How many developers do you have? Tens? Hundreds? > > a) If you can't coordinate work between multiple developers then yo

Re: Threads in ColdFusion was Re: Event Gateway's and runaway threads...

On 4/13/05, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > found a link from christians blog, where it appears some > pondering on this topic happened... > > http://www.markme.com/cantrell/archives/003363.cfm That was quite a while ago and really highlighted, in my mind, that a lot of people don't really

Re: Event Gateway's and runaway threads...

On 4/12/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Async CFML Gateway looks for optional CFEvent structure field "timeout", > and if it exists, sets the time-out, in seconds, during which the listener > CFC must process the event request and return be

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On 4/13/05, RADEMAKERS Tanguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - set up one dev server > - set up one source control server > - check the code from the source control server out onto the development > server. > - everyone works on the same dev server. yes, you will need to take care > that two people d

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On 4/13/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Every developer has Developer Edition locally and a full > > version of the site. > Out of curiosity, how do you manage that? It's pretty straightforward for

Re: CFCs and CFMX

On Apr 12, 2005 12:40 PM, George Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > came out. I had only dabbled in CFCs till now. Now I am hearing that > the book may be outdated with regard to the way CFCs in CFMX 7 handle The big change was between CFMX (6.0 - which Hal's book was written for) and CFMX 6.1.

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On Apr 12, 2005 11:36 AM, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you have any suggestions for a windows only environment concerning > version control? I know the vb guy uses MS VSS. How easy is that to > integrate into DWMX? Personally, I'd avoid VSS like the plague. There have been two ma

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

I just want to add a big "+1" to this - real version control is an important part of being a professional developer. We have about thirty developers working on a single code base, covering up to six project releases at the same time (on different branches) and source code control makes it possible

Re: What's your setup for multiple developers

On Apr 12, 2005 6:13 AM, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How are other shops doing it? Central source code repository using CVS (free, good free tools as well). Every developer has Developer Edition locally and a full version of the site. We also have several shared dev servers for dev

Re: Posts too long!

On Apr 11, 2005 7:48 PM, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As someone else posted, the "post to long" message is a reminder, not a > warning that your message was rejected. It's designed to make the poster > aware that they should trim the post rather than having an inexact program > do

Re: Error - dereference a scalar variable of type class java.lang.String as a structure with members???

On Apr 11, 2005 4:45 PM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have been moving our app to CFMX7 and fb4.1 with no problems until > yesterday when this started to appear. And none of us have a clue as > to what it might mean. I'm going to guess that the line number is slightly off and it is actua

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 6, 2005 11:14 AM, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I find this weird. I was under the impression that CF threw > simple queries at the the Client Storage. Lots and lots of them, > but simple ones. That might make for a lot of lock contention and > delays, but not deadlocks. Ta

Re: Documentation Bug in GetCurrentTemplatePath()?

On Apr 11, 2005 4:01 PM, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. Is expandPath("./") a reliable means of determining > > the Application.cfm's absolute path? If so, is it > > cross-platform? If not, what is? expandPath("./") will return the full filesystem path of the directory con

Re: Devnet vs. Developer Edition

On Apr 11, 2005 2:04 PM, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think you can get a developer edition of cf6 anymore. Sure you can: http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusionmx61/downloads/ -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail?

Re: Event Gateway's and runaway threads...

On Apr 11, 2005 12:27 PM, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > lets say i have a cfc that makes a database call, returns 20,000+ rows > back to cf, > and it hangs, or drops and the sql connection dies, and cfmx doesnt > know (becuase this has been a problem in the past with our server and > cfmx

Re: Cookies, Client Variables, CFID/CFTOKEN

Don't forget that CF looks up the directory tree for Application.cfm and will continue right up to the file system root (C:\ on Windows). On Apr 11, 2005 7:45 AM, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to fix an application written in fusebox that uses client vars, > cookies, and CF

Re: Event Gateway's and runaway threads...

On Apr 11, 2005 5:38 AM, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what is there in place that keeps a thread from being, well, a malingerer? Not sure what you're asking here? > just wondering? im finishing up a reporting application, and id like > to offload LONG reports to threads of their own, a

Re: Upgrade or Hold on CFMX 7 Standard?

On Apr 8, 2005 9:04 AM, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How's CFMX 7 been running for everyone? Solid or does it have some > show-stoppers that would keep us at 6.1? First off I'll say that CFMX 7 is the same core code as CFMX 6.1 with all the updaters and bug fixes - and a bunch of indepen

Re: SOLVED: Re: CFTRY/CFCATCH exposing CF errors?

On Apr 7, 2005 5:42 PM, Matt Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK its very simple code. I'll send it over. Mostly what I posted > already. But it doesn't happen on my live server. Only my dev box > here on my desktop, where I could put in a simple s/w error handler on > a relatively clean

Re: recoding some parts into Java...

On Apr 8, 2005 2:00 AM, Protoculture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would take a guess that the queries that search for related data to a > specific client is what is slowing the whole thing down. As Jochem says, guessing isn't good enough. You need to measure things properly to find out where th

Re: SOLVED: Re: CFTRY/CFCATCH exposing CF errors?

And if you can create a relatively self-contained reproducible test case with instructions, send it to me and I'll test it on various CF versions and if it's still broken in CF7, I'll file a bug! On Apr 7, 2005 5:05 PM, Paul Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I follow all that... I'll see if I ca

Re: SOLVED: Re: CFTRY/CFCATCH exposing CF errors?

On Apr 7, 2005 2:37 PM, Matt Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What you can't do is put your try in /Application.cfm and your catch > in OnRequestEnd.cfm. Thinking on it I can't see a reason why > /Application.cfm can't have its own try/catch, unless there's a cf > rule somewhere that says so

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 7, 2005 1:12 PM, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How? No matter how much simultaneous updates and selects I throw > at a particluar record, it should not deadlock. It might time > out, but it should not deadlock. Yeah, I realized that after I wrote it... but even with Tony's

Re: cfc security

On Apr 7, 2005 12:40 PM, DRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I'm fiddling with cfcs and noting that I can get all the details > by calling the page in my browser. Only if you enter the CF Admin or RDS password (so you probably already have a session authenticated with your CF Admin). -- Sean A C

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 7, 2005 11:01 AM, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > still not freakin working, it shows 100 in, and 100 out... but nothing > actually takes > place on the server :( Permissions? Perhaps the user account that CF runs under does not have permission to copy the file you specified in the c

Re: calling an inherited cfc function from within a cfc

On Apr 7, 2005 6:28 AM, Protoculture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bryan, I think they mean this...while defined within a cfc. > > Super.YourCFCMethod(item1='this', item2='that'); Right, that didn't work in 6.1 but works fine in 7.0. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- h

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 7, 2005 6:31 AM, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Error","Thread-20","04/06/05","11:03:15",,"Error invoking CFC for > gateway Async CFML: Operation failed on the data source named > ""clientStorage"". Reason of failure ""[Macromedia][SQLServer JDBC > Driver][SQLServer]Transaction (Pro

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 6, 2005 10:24 PM, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Client variables work GREAT with CFMX7 Gateways. All good, no worries. No > cookies (obviously), but we made sure they work in the context of Gateway > apps, as with session variables. Sin

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 6, 2005 6:39 PM, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so, is that the case? no client vars with event gateway'd apps? No idea. I never have client variables enabled so I've never seen the message you posted. According to LiveDocs, client scope does work with event gateways but with some

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 6, 2005 11:37 AM, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > isnt the scarier question this: > > Are we not able to use CFML gateways in a system that uses client > variables stored in a database? You could always provide an Application.cfm just for your event gateway CFCs that disabled client

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

On Apr 6, 2005 8:41 AM, Bryan F. Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a specific reason I've missed that you recommend client variables > to be turned off? Lots of reasons. Your options are cookies, database or registry. You can only store flat strings so complex data needs to be encoded/

Re: calling an inherited cfc function from within a cfc

On Apr 6, 2005 3:00 AM, Protoculture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have two cfc's > > cfc (a) which extends cfc (b) > > In cfc (a) how can I call cfc (b) ? It isn't clear what you are asking. If b has a method foo and a does not override it, you can call it directly (because it is inherited).

Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)

Either turn client variables off or change them to cookies. I am always recommending people turn client variables off. On Apr 6, 2005 8:05 AM, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > im getting this error when trying to run the "threadsynch.cfm" demo from > damons blog. i can get "threadsynch_seri

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 1:30 PM, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, interesting. I've heard (repeatedly) that you can do J2EE > packaging from any edition but maybe it is restricted to Developer and > Enterprise? There's no technical reason why Standard Edition co

Re: cfdocument speeds

On Apr 5, 2005 5:29 PM, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a page where you can choose either or (fp or pdf) and granted there > are pix involved but the flashpaper takes about 40 seconds to load and the > pdf about 1 minute. Seems a bit long to me. Are you using Enterprise Edition? Docum

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 12:53 PM, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any performance reasons for omitting CF Admin and/or source code > 9or is it more to keep the app from being messed with in production)? Most people who want sourceless deployment, want it because of intellectual proper

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 1:07 PM, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, either the documentation is wrong, or there's something wrong with the > CFMX Standard server I'm looking at. In addition, I wouldn't be surprised if > you can only deploy from Developer or Enterprise if you've installed it on >

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 12:06 PM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So my lurking understanding is that you could provide a copy without a > license that would run as a Trial then Developer edition. This would easily > allow the testing of your code. Then if they wanted to keep it, either they >

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 11:27 AM, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. I buy CF EE, write an app, make a war You don't need Enterprise Edition to make the WAR. You can do it from Developer Edition. > 2. I want to sell it to Joe Blow > 3. Joe Blow likes the app, and wants to buy it > > 4. Joe Blow, who

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 11:22 AM, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've deployed other WARs to JRun without exploding them first. Flex works > nicely this way, actually. Are you sure you need to do this with CF? That's my understanding, yes, because CF writes to files inside the application. If you

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 11:08 AM, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can choose to package the CF runtime with your EAR/WAR package if > you'd like. If you use the J2EE EAR/WAR packager in CF Admin, you will get the CF runtime included. There's no choice. If you want code packaged without the

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 10:42 AM, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I mean to ask is, does the receiver of the ear/war need to buy CF > too, or is there a distribute license or something? Without a license, they end up with Developer Edition. A full Enterprise license purchase is required otherwise. I

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 10:36 AM, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You will need a CFMX Enterprise license to deploy an EAR/WAR. You can enter > the license number when creating the EAR/WAR, or after deploying it. Otherwise it will be Developer Edition. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Te

Re: CF app as EAR/WAR file

On Apr 5, 2005 9:42 AM, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing this crowd will be VERY interested in is deploying a CF app on J2EE > servers (so enhancing productivity through rapid dev in CF and deploying as > Java). I demo'd this at Fusebox 2004 so I can walk you through it (co

Re: application scope and CFMX(JRun) clusters

On Apr 5, 2005 8:29 AM, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, we have some apps that store CFC instances in the application scope. We > just set up a CFMX cluster in our production environment. For those of you > also doing this, how do you update your application scopes? For example, an

Re: CFMX7 Now casts query columns as datetime?

On Apr 4, 2005 12:20 PM, Mark W. Breneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can verify that it is CF that is doing this. In CFMX (6) you could set any > query cell to any value. In CFMX 7 it looks that CFMX uses typed columns. Yes, one of the changes in CFMX 7 is to make more use of query metadata so

Re: What are optimal GC/JVM settings?

On Apr 4, 2005 1:30 PM, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I read was that if you increase the heap size, you must also increase > the perm size. Where did you read that (because it isn't true)? > BUT... I can reduce the perm size on a couple of servers. Maybe I do not > need it this high.

Re: What are optimal GC/JVM settings?

On Apr 4, 2005 6:06 AM, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On my machines, with 2GB RAM and dual Xeons of various speeds, I have mine > JVM setting as follows: > > MAX HEAP SIZE: 1024 > MAX PERM SIZE: 512 Did you actually *need* to set max perm size that high? That's an enormous number for t

Re: Use THIS scope or not?

On Apr 1, 2005 3:46 AM, Mike Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But in reading the discussions here I thought it was now considered > poor practice to use the THIS scope in CFCs, and instead using the > variables scope was the thing to do. Correct. variables scope is better than this scope in gener

Re: CF7 instances and server memory

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:57:40 -0500, Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to be clear, are you saying it is better to have more simultaneous > requests in that scenario, or less instances, or both? Both. Although load testing real applications on real configurations is really the only way

Re: this scope

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:15:29 +0800, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I tried this and the VARIABLES scope worked just as well in > Application.cfc. Really? Oooo, that's good to know... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? --

Re: CF7 instances and server memory

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:35:30 +1000, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there some info somewhere I can read more on this? I went to Kai's Brandon Purcell and Steven Erat have a lot of good information on their blogs... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.

Re: Locking shared scope variables

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:14:20 +0100, Mark Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Makes sense about the named locks, but why are scoped locks recommeded for > session variables? Because named locks are server wide so unless you construct your named lock on a session scope variable very carefully, you co

Re: this scope

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:28:43 -0700, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been avoiding the "this" scope in my CFCs after reading several blogs > and posts on the topic. Is that still the best practice in CFMX 7? I ask > because all the examples I see of application.cfc set and refer to > this.

Re: CF7 instances and server memory

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:56:36 -0500, Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to be nuts about it, what if someone wanted to have 6 instances on a 2 > CPU box, would it be reasonable to have 1 simultaneous request per CPU? The overhead of switching between JVM processes would probably catch yo

Re: CF7 instances and server memory

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:44:03 +0800, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doesn't CF tank if the heap is over 1.6 GB or so? Or was that fixed in CF 7? That's a Windows limitation, not a Java one. We run on Solaris and can have heap sizes up to 4Gb (which is a Java limit, I believe). -- Sean A

Re: CF7 instances and server memory

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:29:24 +1000, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am wondering if there are some values on how much ram and memory to > the number of instances of jrun or cf server? It depends. Sorry that's not very helpful but it's accurate. It really depends on the applications on the se

Re: install cfmx7 on mac

Contact me off-list and I'll walk you through it. I'm writing up a set of instructions for this install after trying it out successfully on about a dozen different people who were initially having problems. One thing to bear in mind: most of the installation and most of the administration needs to

Re: New CFFORM website

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:35:47 -0500, Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um, I know that, what I meant was, what does the "markme" mean in the domain > name? Ah, sorry... It turns out there's an interesting story behind the domain name! Mike Chambers owned it before he joined Macromedia. He i

Re: MAX 2005 [USA] City?

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:23:25 -0700, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Makes it very hard to budget and plan without plenty of advance notice. I think typically you get about six months notice for MAX. Is that not enough? (genuine question) As far as training budget is concerned, I norma

Re: .CAR Deployment issue CFMX7 new install

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:42:26 -0500, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. it wasnt installed under the same dir's as the previous install > and i read somewhere that there is something with that... however, > when i look at the log, (the error log, or the deployment > log, forget what its calle

Re: .CAR Deployment issue CFMX7 new install

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:34:09 -0500, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > my .car file is saying that it deployed but no datasources, no > mappings... nothing? Are you sure that you actually checked all of those options when you built the CAR file? I don't believe it includes data sources by defa

Re: New CFFORM website

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:38:19 -0500, Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What exactly is "markme" about? Er, http://www.markme.com/ - home to dozens of Macromedia blogs and the MXNA news aggregator. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I

Re: New CFFORM website

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:16:13 -0400, Irvin Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike IS a Macromedia employee, so odds are these project is somehow sponsored > or at least sanctioned by Mike's employer. Quite possibly not. Macromedia employees set up and run their own sites for all sorts of things a

Re: Expanding Wikipedia content

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:26:21 -0500, Damien McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http:// > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ColdFusion > I started adding some extra content today to flesh it out some. Please > contribute your own thoughts. Bear in mind Neutral Point

Re: Best practice question?

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:10:09 -0500, Justin D. Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's why I like the way FuseBox handles input. So much so that I use it > even outside my FuseBox apps. It takes all of the FORM and URL variables > and moves them to the ATTRIBUTES scope if it doesn't already exis

Re: just noticed this when validating email

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:46:26 -0400, Will Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so I exaggerated, but who's the numb skull that came up with ++ and &&?? > And ==? Kernighan and Ritchie, when they invented C I think. But there are far worse syntactic monstrosities out there. C++ has a delightf

Re: CFUnited - Where's Macromedia?

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:36:44 -0500, Steven Erat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Already Macromedia is sending four speakers to CFUnited: Ben Forta, Tim > Buntel, Christian Cantrell, and Sean Corfield. Not to mention reps from > the User Group Program. Oops, I missed Christian

Re: CFUnited - Where's Macromedia?

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:09:32 -0500, Rick Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For what it's worth Macromedia is a sponsor of Powered by Detroit and > are sending keynote speakers for both ColdFusion and Flash. Several Macromedians are speaking at CFUNITED: http://www.cfunited.com/speakers.cfm Ben

Re: CFFTP and CFFILE server crash...

Anything in any of your log files? On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:34:02 -0800, Charles Heizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I was wondering if someone could verify a nasty little bug or whatever with > ColdFusion MX 7 running on Linux. Every time I try this code on a system > running CFMX 7 on RHE

Re: JRun Updater 5 Release Notes?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:29:00 -0500, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a small usability suggestion to anybody from Macromedia who can > pass this on to the right person: It would be more helpful to have the > Release Notes linked somewhere on the download page because that page > is

Re: eval

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:40:54 -0800, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's used when trying to save the state of a CFC to an xml file. > this[] syntax didn't work, but I seem to remember someone saying that > "this" in a cfc is wrong anyway - so it's probably wrong in the first > place

Re: JRun Updater 5 Release Notes?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:29:00 -0500, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a small usability suggestion to anybody from Macromedia who can > pass this on to the right person: Duly passed on... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I

Re: Best, Fastest, Cleanest, Most Elegant way to determine if your in an application?

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:41:01 -0500, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sorry - but then wouldn't storing the extra information have to be done > each time? If not then I want to know more. ;^) No, once you update the metadata, the server remembers it (it's effectively server scope storag

Re: Best, Fastest, Cleanest, Most Elegant way to determine if your in an application?

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:25:47 -0500, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The data stored is specific to a CFC class. So while I might have over a > hundred instances of "cfc_Depressedpress.Framework.DP_Session" I only have > one metadata cache for all of them. Use getMetadata(this) and then sto

Re: Ajax

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:10:42 -0500, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Stuff like that is not within the reach of the average programmer. Sorry, > but that's a fact of life." > > I disagree with that. You talked about "extremely skilled" people. "extremely skilled" is not the average progra

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >