, 2010 10:42 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfdot.net
I think the video demos are a nice touch.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Jose Diaz bleached...@gmail.com wrote:
To help people even further I also started a video series for each example
-
only one of the examples currently shows
, June 23, 2010 3:46 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfdot.net
Actually, the siute is dishonest, not necessarily the person. Apologies
for the harsh wording.
My judgment still stands. It doesn't matter why it's wrong, it's still
misrepresenting one side.
No flame wars needed
.
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Cobb [mailto:cft...@ecartech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:28 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfdot.net
Calling him dishonest is very short sighted on your part (to say the
least
, Bobby Hartsfield
bo...@acoderslife.comwrote:
Well put.
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Cobb [mailto:cft...@ecartech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:28 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfdot.net
Calling him
Wait - so now I have psychological issues? I didn't attack you, I attacked the
site based on the fact that *you* said it shows how 1 line of CF code equates
to 10 lines of ASP.NET and how it was a jab at .NET:
Unfortunatly the company I work for decided to move away from CF :( and
proceeded
...and I dare anyone to define said best practicesthere in lies the
problem with this debate ;-)
best is far too subjectivethere are shades of grey (and there is
no spoon)
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone:
Nobody yet has shown how my analysis was wrong, they just kept saying that I
called you a dishonest person and set about
defending you because you might not be very good at programming .NET when you
wrote the site and then told me that I need to
fix your site. I have no desire to be
-Original Message-
From: Eric Cobb [mailto:cft...@ecartech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:28 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfdot.net
Calling him dishonest is very short sighted on your part (to say the
least!). Has the thought occurred to you that perhaps the reason there
was so
Hi Jordan,
Many thanks for the feedback :) :)
I'm really happy that peeps are finding it useful - It was very much an
early dotnet project for me and done over a few days so is very very rough
in places.
I really need to tidy it up and also move the functions under the function
accordion
@Jose,
I think that cfdot.net looks excellent. Thank you for doing this for both
the CF and ASP.NET community's.
@hatton,
I prefer C# over Visual Basic because of two reasons.
1. C# Has More Jobs available
a.
http://www.careerbuilder.com/Jobseeker/Jobs/JobResults.aspx?SB%3Asbkw=C%23
: cfdot.net (was: CF vs. ASP.Net)
From: bleached...@gmail.com
To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Hi Jordan,
Many thanks for the feedback :) :)
I'm really happy that peeps are finding it useful - It was very much an
early dotnet project for me and done over a few days so is very very rough
in places
All language religion aside - it's not a fair comparison, it's biased towards
CF. You should be more honest in your comparisons if you expect anyone to take
it seriously.
Example:
CFEXECUTE:
CF:
cfexecute name=C:\WinNT\System32\netstat.exe
/cfexecute
ASP.NET
01.using System;
02.using
Calling him dishonest is very short sighted on your part (to say the
least!). Has the thought occurred to you that perhaps the reason there
was so much extra code in the .Net example was because he's not a
seasoned .Net developer? I know I certainly wouldn't know the absolute
best way to do
, 2010 3:28 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfdot.net
Calling him dishonest is very short sighted on your part (to say the
least!). Has the thought occurred to you that perhaps the reason there
was so much extra code in the .Net example was because he's not a
seasoned .Net developer? I know I
Actually, the siute is dishonest, not necessarily the person. Apologies for
the harsh wording.
My judgment still stands. It doesn't matter why it's wrong, it's still
misrepresenting one side.
No flame wars needed.
Calling him dishonest is very short sighted on your part (to say the
Matthew you appear to have taken offence to my comparisons, I did not intend
to belittle .net in anyway. I will openly admit when I built the site and
added the comparisons over a year ago, I was new to .net. I am not biased
either over the past year and a half I have become a highly certified
Well Said Eric ;)
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Eric Cobb cft...@ecartech.com wrote:
Calling him dishonest is very short sighted on your part (to say the
least!). Has the thought occurred to you that perhaps the reason there
was so much extra code in the .Net example was because he's
Well put.
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Cobb [mailto:cft...@ecartech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:28 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfdot.net
Calling him dishonest is very short sighted on your part (to say
This is pretty sweet Jose.
Thanks for taking the time to create this site! An excellent resource
indeed.
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
Open BlueDragon Steering Committee
Railo Community Distributions
On 06/22/2010 06:47 AM, Jose Diaz wrote:
Hi
, 2010 5:48 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: cfdot.net (was: CF vs. ASP.Net)
This is pretty sweet Jose.
Thanks for taking the time to create this site! An excellent resource
indeed.
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
Open BlueDragon Steering Committee
Railo
for the link.
Outlook barked at me when I hit send.
Cheers
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:bo...@acoderslife.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:10 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: cfdot.net (was: CF vs. ASP.Net
Im not trying to nitpick, I only noticed them (except for Coldfusion... that
usually stands out to me) because I sent the link to my colleagues along
with the text from the home page as a description for the link.
Two things that bug me -
1. It's C# which is one code-behind language for
have built the following site:
www.cfdot.net in C#.net.
The purpose of the CFDot Project (CFDot.net) is to create a code comparison
library between common ColdFusion syntax tasks and the equivelant using
C#.net 3.5 syntax.
These libraries are open source and may be used and modified to your
That is a big question since CF and ASP.NET are so different and the
.NET platform is infinite. A few things that are in ASP.NET with no
real equivalent in CF are tight integration with SQL Server (such as
Reporting Services integration and cache invalidation when database
data changes),
data changes), automatically maintaining a View State of
forms across form postbacks, and many of the built-in
CFFORM has the preserveData attribute which will take care of that for you
if I'm interpreting the ASP.Net view correctly.
-Justin
Hello All,
In a quest to get better at ASP.net and C# I have built the following site:
www.cfdot.net in C#.net.
The purpose of the CFDot Project (CFDot.net) is to create a code comparison
library between common ColdFusion syntax tasks and the equivelant using
C#.net 3.5 syntax.
These libraries
Nice initiative!
2009/5/17 Jose Diaz bleached...@gmail.com
Hello All,
In a quest to get better at ASP.net and C# I have built the following site:
www.cfdot.net in C#.net.
The purpose of the CFDot Project (CFDot.net) is to create a code comparison
library between common ColdFusion
...@gmail.com
Hello All,
In a quest to get better at ASP.net and C# I have built the following
site:
www.cfdot.net in C#.net.
The purpose of the CFDot Project (CFDot.net) is to create a code
comparison
library between common ColdFusion syntax tasks and the equivelant using
C#.net 3.5
the following
site:
www.cfdot.net in C#.net.
The purpose of the CFDot Project (CFDot.net) is to create a code
comparison
library between common ColdFusion syntax tasks and the equivelant using
C#.net 3.5 syntax.
These libraries are open source and may be used and modified to your
What does .Net have that you think is missing in ColdFusion? Should there be
a separate page for each language on what's missing and maybe how it can be
remedied?
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Mike Chabot mcha...@gmail.com wrote:
For features where there is no obvious equivalent you could
Hello All,
In a quest to get better at ASP.net and C# I have built the following site:
www.cfdot.net in C#.net.
The purpose of the CFDot Project (CFDot.net) is to create a code comparison
library between common ColdFusion syntax tasks and the equivelant using
C#.net 3.5 syntax.
These libraries
31 matches
Mail list logo
