Re: Mail Server Software

2010-05-11 Thread Jochem van Dieten
On 5/10/10, Carey Duryea wrote: If you just want an MTA try Postfix. If you want an MDA too add Dovecot to it. i know MTA means mail transfer agent, whats MDA mean? Like Judah said Mail Delivery Agent. It is the part of the mail system that takes care of routing email into the local mail

Mail Server Software

2010-05-10 Thread Dan Pacitti
Does anybody know of a good mail server with some sort of SQL or CF integration? A few years back we were looking at IMS mail server. Thanks DanP ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!

Re: Mail Server Software

2010-05-10 Thread Marc Funaro
Does anybody know of a good mail server with some sort of SQL or CF integration? A few years back we were looking at IMS mail server. Not sure what type of integration you're looking to accomplish, but we have had a great experience with SmarterMail (http://www.smartertools.com) overall,

Re: Mail Server Software

2010-05-10 Thread Jochem van Dieten
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Dan Pacitti wrote: Does anybody know of a good mail server with some sort of SQL or CF integration? If you just want an MTA try Postfix. If you want an MDA too add Dovecot to it. Jochem -- Jochem van Dieten http://jochem.vandieten.net/

Re: Mail Server Software

2010-05-10 Thread Carey Duryea
Does anybody know of a good mail server with some sort of SQL or CF integration? If you just want an MTA try Postfix. If you want an MDA too add Dovecot to it. Jochem -- Jochem van Dieten http://jochem.vandieten.net/ i know MTA means mail transfer agent, whats MDA mean?

Re: Mail Server Software

2010-05-10 Thread Carey Duryea
Does anybody know of a good mail server with some sort of SQL or CF integration? If you just want an MTA try Postfix. If you want an MDA too add Dovecot to it. Jochem -- Jochem van Dieten http://jochem.vandieten.net/ i know MTA means mail transfer agent, whats MDA mean?

Re: Mail Server Software

2010-05-10 Thread Judah McAuley
MDA is Mail Delivery Agent. If you are familiar with *nix systems, procmail and maildrop are MDAs. Judah On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Carey Duryea ca...@keepingitgreen.net wrote: Does anybody know of a good mail server with some sort of SQL or CF integration? If you just want an MTA

Re: Mail Server Software

2010-05-10 Thread Dan Blickensderfer
...@aspmedia.co.uk To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 8:53 AM Subject: Mail Server Software Does anybody know of a good mail server with some sort of SQL or CF integration? A few years back we were looking at IMS mail server. Thanks DanP

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-16 Thread Ben Rogers
It is a lot of money, but not expensive. If you do the math an organization with 5000 users gets a fully redundant mail gateway solution for about $1.5 per mailbox per year, including hardware. SA, RBLs, OpenLDAP etc may be free, time is not, and I doubt anyone can build a system with similar

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-16 Thread Ben Rogers
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:22 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Mail Server Software It is a lot of money, but not expensive. If you do the math an organization with 5000 users gets a fully redundant mail gateway solution for about $1.5 per mailbox per year, including hardware

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Umer Farooq wrote: For spam Spamassassin or Barracuda Spam Firewall.. Second that, Barracudas are nice. Typically a bit more expensive, but you do get the hardware with it. Perfect to drop in front of your existing mail architecture to offload spam and virus handling, all you need to do is

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Emmet McGovern
after you factor in the administration and setup time. The updates come on a daily basis and the support is excellent. Emmet -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Mail Server Software

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Robertson
what was the cause of this mass exodus from iMail to SmarterMail? Imail was killed by Ipswitch as a product, suddenly and without warning. Its dead and gone. (although after a user revolt they said on the Imail forum that availability might be offered on an individual basis with pricing to be

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Emmet McGovern
. emmet -Original Message- From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Mail Server Software Here's a sample for you: http://www.hostmysite.com/smartermaildemo E-mail Address: demo@ hostmysite.com Password: demo

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Ben Rogers
Second that, Barracudas are nice. Typically a bit more expensive, but you do get the hardware with it. Perfect to drop in front of your existing mail architecture to offload spam and virus handling, all you need to do is configure the box, add MX records and block outside port 25 on your

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Mark Leder
things about it as well from a number of sources. Mark -Original Message- From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:50 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Mail Server Software what was the cause of this mass exodus from iMail to SmarterMail? Imail

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Dave Watts
Why? I ask because, way, way back, we used to run Sendmail on Slackware. That box was hacked into once. Additionally, it seemed like there was a new exploit out every other day for relaying mail off of Sendmail. Running SMTP on a properly-configured Windows machine is no less secure that a

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Ben Rogers wrote: Second that, Barracudas are nice. Typically a bit more expensive, but you do get the hardware with it. Perfect to drop in front of your existing mail architecture to offload spam and virus handling, all you need to do is configure the box, add MX records and block outside

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dave Watts wrote: Why? I ask because, way, way back, we used to run Sendmail on Slackware. That box was hacked into once. Additionally, it seemed like there was a new exploit out every other day for relaying mail off of Sendmail. Running SMTP on a properly-configured Windows machine is

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Ben Rogers
IMHO, the nature of mail servers (handling and filtering the worst traffic the Internet can offer), dictates that doze is not the safest choice for high risk daemons like SMTP, POP or IMAP. Why? I ask because, way, way back, we used to run Sendmail on Slackware. That box was hacked into once.

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Stephen Cassady
Ipswitch's Imail Dead! LOL. And I was going to upgrade my version last February, but decided not to because their feature-set seemed to have been stalled. I guess I now know why. Well, without being part of the test everything group mentioned, I switched over to MailEnable

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Jamie Price
This is kinda OT so I'll only post it once and ne'er shall it be mentioned again... For anyone interested in running SmarterMail... 1. SmarterMail POP accounts come with every new shared hosting account setup at HostMySite.com. So, if you need a place to host your website but don't need a

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Dan O'Keefe
Here's a sample for you: http://www.hostmysite.com/smartermaildemo E-mail Address: demo@ hostmysite.com Password: demo If you have any other questions about SmarterMail, let me know I'll be happy to clarify. Recognized this as soon as I logged in to your demo. Crystaltech uses this

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-15 Thread Dan O'Keefe
filtering. emmet -Original Message- From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Mail Server Software Here's a sample for you: http://www.hostmysite.com/smartermaildemo E-mail Address: demo@ hostmysite.com

Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Mark Leder
Hi all, Just looking for opinions here. What do you recommend (and your customer like) for pre-packaged server based email messaging software (like iMail, Smartermail, sendMail etc). Could be either Win or Unix/Linux based. Would need to have webmail access and the ability for end users to

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Umer Farooq
My personal choice for Win.. is the IPSwitch IMail.. very easy to use.. setup.. etc.. and has pretty much all the features.. For *NIX.. my personal choice is PostFix with Courier IMAP (you can go UW IMAP also) Infact we switched from iMail to postfix.. in 99.. For spam Spamassassin or

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread dave
IMO imail is terrible, its slow, ugly and confusing for users im writing this on imail right now and i just hate it! smartermail is coming but not soon enough! squirrelmail is pretty nice though ~| Special thanks to the CF

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread dave
aside from looking like some program by some company i really dont like icewarp looks decent ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message:

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Matt Robertson
Imail is no longer for sale. Ipswitch folded it into another product and no longer sells it as a standalone. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2004/10/26.html They backpedaled a bit on continuing to sell their service agreements, but most on the ipswitch lists regarded it as a dead product as

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Paul
Matt, does SmarterMail do a pretty good job filtering out spam without constant babysitting? Floods of Imail users moved to SmarterMail. ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread dave
lol well, well, its still kinda nice. 4 a php app ;) -- Original Message -- From: Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:00:39 -0500 dave wrote: squirrelmail is pretty nice though Yeah but it's not a

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Katz, Dov B (IT)
: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Mail Server Software Imail is no longer for sale. Ipswitch folded it into another product and no longer sells it as a standalone. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2004/10/26.html They backpedaled a bit on continuing to sell their service

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Ben Rogers
of amazing. But their sales and pricing tactics are terrible. Ben Rogers http://www.c4.net v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 -Original Message- From: Mark Leder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 2:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Mail Server Software Hi all, Just looking

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Michael Dinowitz
I'll just chime in and say that iMS has been perfect for our needs. That and some custom list code makes the HoF system sing. ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Burns, John D
haven't had any issues or complaints from clients. John Burns Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer AI-ES Aeronautics, Web Developer -Original Message- From: Mark Leder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 2:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Mail Server Software Hi

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Rick Root
dave wrote: squirrelmail is pretty nice though Yeah but it's not a mail server =) ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message:

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Matt Robertson
In reading that last post I gave the wrong impression: I really like SmarterMail. I use it for my own personal domain services. I use ASSP as a gateway in front of it so I don't care about its bad spam performance (they mean well, and it has the potential to be a great system, but it isn't

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Matt Robertson
Matt, does SmarterMail do a pretty good job filtering out spam without constant babysitting? No, its tools are immature in my opinion. Worse than IMail if thats possible. To get Imail to do a halfway decent job you needed a third-party add-on like Declude, MXGaurd or ASSP. I bought Declude

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Michael Dinowitz
with it. Ben Rogers http://www.c4.net v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 5:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Mail Server Software I'll just chime in and say that iMS has been perfect for our

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Jim McAtee
- Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 4:16 PM Subject: Re: Mail Server Software Does anyone have any performance comparisons between SM and Imail? There was a lot of anecdotal reporting going on among

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Jamie Price
HostMySite.com is converting over from IpSwitch Imail Server to SmarterTools SmarterMail as of TOMORROW. I'm the email administrator for HMS, and let me tell you I will breath a sigh of relief when we get this up and running and all of our 30 or so Imail servers migrated over. We've done some

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread dave
u best be doing MINE 1st! then we can change your www.jamie.theman to www.jamie.themailman ;) haha -- Original Message -- From: Jamie Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:35:47 -0400 HostMySite.com is converting

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Jamie Price
That does it. All of your email will now be sent via a printout attached to an alpaca. ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message:

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread dave
ok that does it!! im switching to frontpage and baraging your bboards with questions such as whats css why do i need it when im using this great wussywig compliance? why the hell would i want that? damn did this cool asp stuff just come out? and last but not least dude, blink friggin

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Jamie Price
- Sorry about the delay on SmarterMail; I missed this topic when it first came around. Or were you talking about alpacas being cheaper for the future? ;-) If I were you I'd looking to selling your Imail license ASAP and pick up SmarterMail. Trust me it will save you soo much

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread phillip
Also, Imail is a fine product that can be easily extensible with a variety of 3rd party tools (i.e. Declude.com). Bottom line is that Imail is a very very developed product that is very powerful in the right hands. s/can be easily/is very Apologies, Phil --- [This E-mail has been scanned

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Rick Root
Mark, In my department here at Duke, we use Mdaemon on Windows, which is pretty full featured, including integrated webmail, web-based account admin, etc... I think IMail might be better, but it's also more expensive. For my web hosting, I use qmail, running virtual domains through vpopmail.

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Ben Rogers
: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 5:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Mail Server Software I'll just chime in and say that iMS has been perfect for our needs. That and some custom list code makes the HoF system sing

RE: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread Burns, John D
: Jamie Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 12/14/2004 9:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Mail Server Software HostMySite.com is converting over from IpSwitch Imail Server to SmarterTools SmarterMail as of TOMORROW. I'm the email administrator for HMS, and let me tell you I will breath a sigh

Re: Mail Server Software

2004-12-14 Thread phillip
3. Did I mention the web interface? Just my 2.5 cents: The interface is very nice. I have not seen the documentation of its capabilities. I am sure it is a great product... However.. and you knew that was coming... Imail's interface is totally customizable ( Apache webserver and parsed via