Amazingly those old bits on that NAS are still working. I do have that
installer. It's a 295Mb file. How do you want it sent?
Wil Genovese
One man with courage makes a majority.
-Andrew Jackson
A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.
On Feb 5, 2013, at 11:22 AM,
Just so you are aware, all security vulnerabilities that have come out will
never be patched on cf7, sp you should take exyra precautions to lock down
any server running old unsupported versions of cf.
Regards
Russ Michaels
www.michaels.me.uk
www.cfmldeveloper.com - Free CFML hosting for
Russ:
Thanks, I'm aware of that and have suggested to the client that they upgrade.
They're not interested. But thanks for the warning.
--
Mosh Teitelbaum
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Just so you are aware, all security vulnerabilities that have come out will
Just in case you're not already aware of it, you might take a look at Railo.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mosh Teitelbaum
mosh.teitelb...@evoch.comwrote:
Russ:
Thanks, I'm aware of that and have suggested to the client that they
upgrade. They're not interested. But thanks for the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Donnie Carvajal wrote:
We are setting up another server to add to the server farm for one of our
apps for load balancing. Needless to say, all of the configuration needs to
be the same as the current live servers. Is there a way to transfer the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Donnie Carvajal wrote:
We are setting up another server to add to the server farm for one
of our apps for load balancing. Needless to say, all of the
configuration needs to be the same as the current live servers. Is
there a way to transfer the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Donnie Carvajal wrote:
ColdFusion stores its configuration in the various neo-*.xml files in
the lib folder so if you copy those to the new server the system will
have an identical configuration. If you have Enterprise Edition, you
can also export a CAR on the
Looks like JRUN licensing is confused.
Have you tried to reinstall CF 7.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
You know what's funny.
After I went through this whole rigmarole. Turns out they're going to be using
MX 7 after all :)
Hey, at least I can setup MX6.1 with Apache now, if a client ever needs it.
Thanks again,
Ali
On Monday 20 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for pointing out
James,
Many Bothans died, when I couldn't get Apache 2.2 to work.. :P
Thanks for pointing out that Apache 2.2 doesn't work with MX 6.1
This saved me a lot of further aggravation and hair pulling.
Although I was very tempted to do as other suggested and load MX7 or 8, the
J2ee version and
On Monday 20 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for pointing out that Apache 2.2 doesn't work with MX 6.1
It won't work with the bundled JRun, but you could use mod_proxy, for
instance, to forward all requests to the 6.1 instances built-in web server.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to
I just wanted to thank everyone for their suggestions.
I think I will just try uninstalling apache, and reinstalling the version that
MX 6.1 works with.
I've never used the multiserver configurations for MX7 or 8 yet, so I wouldn't
know what I would be doing, by trying to add a new instance
Yes, quite right; the J2EE install is a good way to get both.
On 8/18/07, Matthew Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should condition that statement with a straight install of CFMX 6.1
will not work with Apache 2.2. A good work around for this is to
install CFMX 7 or 8 in multi-server
The ACME Guide is a good place to start:
http://www.acidlabs.org/approach/goodies/#acme
If you're using Apache 2.2, make sure you have this HotFix installed:
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=8001e97sliceId=2
Cutter has some more info here:
Not sure about 6, though I imagine it isn't drastically different from 7
(or 8). CF 8 is the only one that supports Apach3 2.2.x out of the box.
7 requires a patch from the Adobe site (connector fix, I think), and
fairly sure 6.1 wouldn't at all. I have a tutorial on my site for
setting up
On 8/17/07, Cutter (CFRelated) wrote:
fairly sure 6.1 wouldn't at all. I have a tutorial on my site for
setting up with 2.0.59:
Side note: FWIW, compiling the connector always worked for
me when the pre-compiled one didn't, for various apache vers.
I should have specified, that I have to load mx 6.1 since that is what I'll be
using at my current work.
It's been 3 hours, and there's very little on the net, or google, related to
the problem(s) I am having.
Sure I can install 7 or 8 and it will probably install smoothly, but I want to
Apache 2.2 will not work with CFMX 6.1. You will have to use Apache 2.0.
On 8/18/07, Ali Awan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, I installed Apache 2.2.
--
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
On 8/17/07, James Holmes wrote:
Apache 2.2 will not work with CFMX 6.1. You will have to use Apache 2.0.
Even if you compile the connector yourself?
There's always the proxy bit too, which bypasses the JRun connector.
I've got an example of using the AJP mod_proxy stuff with jboss- it, or
You should condition that statement with a straight install of CFMX 6.1
will not work with Apache 2.2. A good work around for this is to
install CFMX 7 or 8 in multi-server mode, and then just deploy MX 6.1 as
an EAR file. The problem isn't with CFMX, but rather with the JRun
shipped with
James, I turned it off but no chance so far...
Ravi.
James Holmes wrote:
Turn off the Windows firewall and try again...
On 6/15/07, [Sunshine Tech Solutions] Ravi Gehlot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran telnet localhost 3360 and got connection failed.
Ravi.
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
I am getting errors trying to connect to the DB even after
following these instructions:
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_1
9170sliceId=2
The OS is Windows XP
Connection verification failed for data source: aisg
java.sql.SQLException: Cannot connect to
netstat -a returns: TCP 3306 LISTENING
Ravi.
Dave Watts wrote:
I am getting errors trying to connect to the DB even after
following these instructions:
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_1
9170sliceId=2
The OS is Windows XP
Connection verification failed for
XP has a built-in firewall, could XP's firewall be blocking that port?
Can you telnet to it?
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
BlueDragon Alliance Member
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Sunshine Tech Solutions] Ravi Gehlot wrote:
netstat -a returns: TCP 3306
That WindowsXP firewall is for the outsiders not for locals.
Ravi.
Jordan Michaels wrote:
XP has a built-in firewall, could XP's firewall be blocking that port?
Can you telnet to it?
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
BlueDragon Alliance Member
[Sunshine Tech Solutions] Ravi Gehlot wrote:
That WindowsXP firewall is for the outsiders not for locals.
That does not answer the question. Can you telnet to it?
Jochem
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2
I ran telnet localhost 3360 and got connection failed.
Ravi.
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
[Sunshine Tech Solutions] Ravi Gehlot wrote:
That WindowsXP firewall is for the outsiders not for locals.
That does not answer the question. Can you telnet to it?
Jochem
Turn off the Windows firewall and try again...
On 6/15/07, [Sunshine Tech Solutions] Ravi Gehlot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran telnet localhost 3360 and got connection failed.
Ravi.
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
[Sunshine Tech Solutions] Ravi Gehlot wrote:
That WindowsXP firewall is for
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Dan Munez wrote:
Hey guys I was reading up on this feature and was wonderin if any of you
might know more about it. Would I be able to access event and error logs
and application logs.
Where from ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to globally aggregate bricks-and-clicks
from the event viewer in windows? :)
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7
Flex 2
Free Trial
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU
Archive:
You mean Window evt logs?
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the
On 5/24/07, Dan Munez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys I was reading up on this feature and was wonderin if any of you
might know more about it. Would I be able to access event and error logs and
application logs.
Do you mean the DirectoryWatcher event gateway?
Michael D has done a lot of
Am I the only one who saw this blank post (below)?
Not to tell Michael how to run HOF, but I bet if you added text to the
subscribe page http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs/subscribe.cfm
which stated that the list strips attachments, we'd see less posts like the
one below.
At
You think so?
How many unsubscribe requests do you see on mailing lists where every
post has to unsubscribe, go here? I see plenty.
I think a lot of people never read those things. Of course, it couldn't
hurt, either.
Jeffry Houser wrote:
Not to tell Michael how to run HOF, but I bet if
Point taken, but honestly I would like to think so.
At 07:01 PM 8/15/2006, you wrote:
You think so?
How many unsubscribe requests do you see on mailing lists where every
post has to unsubscribe, go here? I see plenty.
I think a lot of people never read those things. Of course, it couldn't
Not to mention all of the posts like how do I post to this list? ;-)
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 7:01 PM
To: CF-Jobs-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion
Im not sure this will help, because it was for mysql 4.1, but some of
the things I noticed may help you figure out what you need. Check
this blog entry:
http://www.ryanguill.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=C7BE3545-40CA-6D1C-8A6FDADE72B840CC
On 11/18/05, wolf2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have it working, but on Windows. I used the comments in Ben Forta's
post about MySQL 5, there are some links there to an MM tech note and
the MySQL connector:
http://tinyurl.com/9f7bf
The MM tech note says MySQL 4.1, but the it worked for v. 5 (at least
for me).
-Original Message-
: Re: ColdFusion MX CFLDAP NullPointerException bug
Thanks, we have authentication issues sometimes, it is completely
random.
Where we also have big issues is getting CFLDAP in MX(works find in CF5)
to return things like large record sets. Today I was looking at one that
on the
CF5 server always
I did remove the timeout, actually that is what allowed me to get as much as
what I am getting. This is how the process is done right now and it is ugly.
Query LDAP for the letter, if I know it has more than 3250 records I then
split it down to multiple queries such as A into AA, AB, AC, etc. Go
there were issues with CFLDAP and JVM versions. For certain, CFLDAP
does not work with 1.4.2_07.look like not _09 either.
workaround? write your LDAP call in Java...a bit of work but not too
terribly difficult.
DK
On 11/9/05, wolf2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I hit the CLDAP
I would not mind seeing an example of that. We have certainy had our fair
share of LDAP issues since upgrading to 6.1 from 5.0
On 11/9/05, Douglas Knudsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
workaround? write your LDAP call in Java...a bit of work but not too
terribly difficult.
DK
I hit the CLDAP NullPointerException bug with ColdFusion MX
6.1 (with Updater):
http://www.sargeway.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=36
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/messages.cfm/forumid:10
/threadid:1283
I am running ColdFusion for J2EE with JVM 1.4.2_09 and I cannot
revert
we have issues with CFLDAP also. We are 99% they have to do with the
LDAP server. THe issues are timeout related. I wrote my own LDAP
auth code in Java and tested that instead of CF's CFLDAP and got the
same time out issues. Maybe you will have better luck.
how your LDAP is used will vary,
Thanks, we have authentication issues sometimes, it is completely random.
Where we also have big issues is getting CFLDAP in MX(works find in CF5) to
return things like large record sets. Today I was looking at one that on the
CF5 server always returns 6200 records, on the MX it will return
On 11/4/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes sense, thanks. For those who might not have seen his thread,
Mike Nimer noted that you currently *cannot* have the Flex 2 Adapter
installed with this hotfix, as they have just uncovered an issue
On 11/4/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, we just released ColdFusion MX 7.0.1 Cumulative Hot Fix 1 (CHF1).
This CHF is recommended for customers running ColdFusion MX 7.0.1 if they are
experiencing one or more of the specific fixed issues
On 11/4/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, we just released ColdFusion MX 7.0.1 Cumulative Hot Fix 1
(CHF1).
This CHF is recommended for customers running ColdFusion MX 7.0.1 if
they are experiencing one or more of the specific fixed
On 11/4/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, we just released ColdFusion MX 7.0.1 Cumulative Hot Fix 1
(CHF1).
This CHF is recommended for
On 11/4/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes sense, thanks. For those who might not have seen his thread,
Mike Nimer noted that you currently *cannot* have the Flex 2 Adapter
installed with this hotfix, as they have just uncovered an issue with
]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 3:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
Yet the one question that I wanted .NET to appear in (what languages do you
want CF to interoperate with) the only choices were PHP and Python! At
least they provided an 'other' text box
,
Andrew Scott
Quote of the Day:
Pleasure and joy are deceptive
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klostermeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 3:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
Yet the one question that I wanted .NET to appear
A more work safe analogy couldn't have been used?
I mean really.
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
I agree its written in such a way
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
I agree its written in such a way as to provide skewed results.
This is going OT (please CF_comunity paranoids abstain...;-), but I
remember
a survey I had to compile when I
: Monday, September 26, 2005 12:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
Anyone esle find it interesting Macromedia ia asking about the .NET
stuff...heh just found it funny
Adam H
On 9/26/05, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A more work safe analogy couldn't have been
We are conducting a survey to get feedback on the new features in
ColdFusion MX 7.
The first question:
Which new features in ColdFusion MX 7 have you used so far?
is abusively mandatory.
In making answer to this question mandatory, you discart people who did
not use
any of the new features
We are conducting a survey to get feedback on the new
features in ColdFusion MX 7.
The first question:
Which new features in ColdFusion MX 7 have you used so far?
is abusively mandatory.
In making answer to this question mandatory, you discart
people who did not use any of the new
, September 23, 2005 11:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
We are conducting a survey to get feedback on the new
features in ColdFusion MX 7.
The first question:
Which new features in ColdFusion MX 7 have you used so far?
is abusively mandatory.
In making answer
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 11:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
We are conducting a survey to get feedback on the new features in
ColdFusion MX 7.
The first question
If you haven't used the new features, what sort of useful feedback
can you
provide about the new features?
As I said, if none of the new features is useful, this is an information
a survey should take in account.
If you prevent people for who nothing is useful to answer, your survey
is
Yes, but the very next question asks which ones are you planning on
using.
Correct, but if you do not check at least one of the options in the
first question, you're not allowed
to go to next step.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See
On 9/23/05, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you haven't used the new features, what sort of useful feedback can you
provide about the new features?
That the new features were not found to be useful by X%, thereby begging
other questions.
I'm not saying anything about CF7, only about
I agree its written in such a way as to provide skewed results.
This is going OT (please CF_comunity paranoids abstain...;-), but I
remember a survey I had to compile
when I was working in the Computer Center at university.
The survey was made over a prison community, and one question was
:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 7 : New Features Survey
This is going OT (please CF_comunity paranoids abstain...;-), but I
remember a survey I had to compile
when I was working in the Computer Center at university.
The survey was made over a prison community, and one question
Do you know that masturbation is not bad?
I'm not touching that one.
-Adam
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
I am. tee-hee.
On 9/23/05, Adrocknaphobia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know that masturbation is not bad?
I'm not touching that one.
-Adam
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/
Got Gmail? I have 100 invites.
NICE!
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--//-
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 7
On 5/17/05, Sean Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see this problem with Tomcat 4.x (on OSX) so maybe this is a
Tomcat 5.x issue? Mind you, neither version of Tomcat is actually
supported as a deployment platform for CFMX, according to the System
Requirements pages on the MM website.
On 5/19/05, wolf2k5 wrote:
Is there any way to have Dreamweaver MX 2004 (7.0.1) to connect to my
CFMX7 installation via RDS using the /cfmx7 context-root (the RDS
entry point should be http://localhost/cfmx7/CFIDE/main/ide.cfm)?
Apparently Homesite 5.5 can do it:
On 5/17/05, wolf2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running ColdFusion MX 7 for J2EE on Tomcat 5.0.28 on Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 3 with Sun JVM 1.4.2_08.
When I issue the shutdown command to Tomcat, it won't stop and I have
to use manually kill the process.
The same Tomcat installation
Mind you, neither version of
Tomcat is actually supported as a deployment platform for
CFMX, according to the System Requirements pages on the MM website.
Don't let this attitude stop you, Wolf. Jboss isn't officially supported,
either, but with a little time and patience, I was able to
, 2005 3:53 PM
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: RE: coldfusion mx 7 for j2ee: tomcat won't stop
Mind you, neither version of
Tomcat is actually supported as a deployment platform for
CFMX, according to the System Requirements pages on the MM website.
Don't let this attitude stop you
No, Dave, it has nothing to do with that either. It's pure economics.
There's no money in supporting OSI app servers. Simple as that.
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 4:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: coldfusion mx 7 for j2ee
On Thursday 28 Apr 2005 19:55 pm, Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC wrote:
I don't see how this is going to kee mod_jrun from conflicting with
mod_jrun in the same instance of Apache or the others.
You missed my point, don't use mod_jrun in Apache.
Run two jRun's with coldfusion in on two different
On 4/29/05, Thomas Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You missed my point, don't use mod_jrun in Apache.
Run two jRun's with coldfusion in on two different (non 80) ports, and then
use mod_proxy/pound/whatever to expose them over port 80 for different
requested hostnames.
I don't want to use
I don't want to use mod_proxy, since it makes things more
complex (e.g. URL rewriting).
Anyone got CFMX 6.1 and 7 running on different Apache virtual hosts?
I don't, but I think you should be able to do it. The easiest way would be
to install both CFMX 6.1 and 7 in separate JRun instances.
On Wednesday 27 Apr 2005 16:58 pm, wolf2k5 wrote:
On 4/27/05, Thomas Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, run it on a different port.
What about the JRun module name conflict reported by Jared?
Use Apache, Squid, Pound or Something Else as the front end web server and map
different
I don't see how this is going to kee mod_jrun from conflicting with mod_jrun
in the same instance of Apache or the others.
I've never done it before, but in theory, it would be fairly easy to set up
2 IP addresses on one interface, then bind one instance of apache to each,
and then run CFMX 7
On Tuesday 26 Apr 2005 19:42 pm, wolf2k5 wrote:
Can I install CFMX 7 Server Configuration on the same Linux server and
use it only for a few Apache virtual hosts, while keeping using CFMX
6.1 for the other virtual hosts?
Yes, run it on a different port.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion
On 4/27/05, Thomas Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, run it on a different port.
What about the JRun module name conflict reported by Jared?
Thanks.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
It's tricky...
There's a couple issues that are real gotchas doing things this way.
The short answers are:
Yes, CFMX 6.1 and 7 will co-exist on the same server, both running at
the same time.
No, without modification, the Jrun connectors won't load into Apache
because the connector name
On Friday 01 Apr 2005 18:46 pm, Dave Watts wrote:
generally works well, it is directly supported by the OS vendor, it is
scriptable, it includes several application server technologies, and so on.
Sounds like Apache... :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
generally works well, it is directly supported by the OS
vendor, it is scriptable, it includes several application
server technologies, and so on.
Sounds like Apache... :-)
Apache has a scripting API?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software
/Linux-HOWTO/Apache-Overview-HOWTO.html#ss2.6)
The 1.3 API in brief: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/apidoc/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2005 7:13
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
generally works well, it is directly
Web applications are written in high-level languages such as
Java, Perl, C# and so on and Apache has several modules that
integrate them with the server. In many cases the modules
expose the Apache API so entire Apache modules can be written
in those languages.
That's not what I meant at
Ah, I see. It would be straightforward enough to do all of that in any given
language by writing to the Apache conf files.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2005 8:56
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Web applications
Ah, I see. It would be straightforward enough to do all of
that in any given language by writing to the Apache conf files.
Well, yeah, except that you'd also have to kick the server to have it reread
the conf files. You can do that with IIS 6 too, if you want to - the
metabase is just a big
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Ah, I see. It would be straightforward enough to do all of that in any
given language by writing to the Apache conf files.
Well, yeah, except that you'd also have to kick the server
Keyboard and mouse ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2005 14:34
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Dave,
Do you know of a good scripting API for creating sites and such in IIS?
I'm trying to find a good reliable way
: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Dave,
Do you know of a good scripting API for creating sites and such in IIS?
I'm trying to find a good reliable way of creating sites in IIS6 using
CF.
John Burns
Certified
Here is the code to *delete* virtuals, just in case:
' Note: This script must be run numerous times until
' all virtuals have been removed. IIS can't keep
' up with the quick delete operations.
Set oIIS = GetObject (IIS://localhost/W3SVC/1)
Set IISRoot =
Developer
Wyle Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer
-Original Message-
From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Here is the code to *delete* virtuals, just in case:
' Note: This script must be run
Do you know of a good scripting API for creating sites and
such in IIS? I'm trying to find a good reliable way of creating
sites in IIS6 using CF.
When you install IIS, by default, you get a bunch of WSH scripts that will
do most of what you want. Look in your \Inetpub\Adminscripts folder.
IIS is built-in and has a simple-to-use GUI. Other than that, I
personally don't know why people even use it.
Those are both pretty compelling reasons. Other reasons include that it
generally works well, it is directly supported by the OS vendor, it is
scriptable, it includes several
No doubt IIS - it is quite possibly the crappiest Web Server there is.
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Le [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2005 14:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Hi,
Is ColdFusion MX 7 slow? I notice that House of Fusion site has been
extremely
Please tell me what you think of the site now. It should be at least a little
faster as I moved all of the logging over to an async gateway. I have seen the
CF engine slow down when the machine memory hits peak and after a cycle it
moves back to full speed. I'm still investigating what app is
Could be as the site should be faster than some people are seeing it. The issue
might also be SQL as it wants every resource it can get its hands on and you
need a tight reign on it. SQL might be pulling resources from IIS.
No doubt IIS - it is quite possibly the crappiest Web Server there is.
No, it isn't.
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
No doubt IIS - it is quite possibly the crappiest Web Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Please tell me what you think of the site now. It should be at least a
little faster as I moved all of the logging over to an async gateway. I have
seen the CF engine slow down when
I agree, it is a pretty good server. It is also in my opinion pretty easy
to setup and configure.
- Original Message -
From: Connie DeCinko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
No, it isn't
1 - 100 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
