Re: [Chicken-users] Automated builds

2007-06-28 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:54:59AM -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: The files are organized according to the following format: year/month/day/contents contents are: - chicken-automated-build.log: the global log of the build process. - salmonella.log: the raw log

Re: [Chicken-users] a file system using Chicken

2007-06-10 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 03:30:15PM +0300, Dan Muresan wrote: While I understand the spirit of POSIX advocacy, note that this thread is about a Linux file system. Also, care to share the concrete solution in this case? What's the POSIXly correct way to load a script in the current shell (.

[Chicken-users] Shutting up LOAD

2007-05-06 Thread Peter Bex
Hi there, I was wondering if there's a way to shut up LOAD. When it loads a file it always outputs ; loading blah.scm Now, in Spiffy, the handler for web-scheme swallows all output from the application using WITH-OUTPUT-TO-STRING, but this also captures the output from LOAD, but I don't want it

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy bug

2007-04-22 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:03:00PM +0800, John Janecek wrote: if spiffy serves a webpage that has a JS redirect in it. It will get an error unable to write to socket. If the page is served repeatedly eventually the server just locks up. If you can produce a testcase, please open a ticket in

Re: [Chicken-users] A request

2007-04-04 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:44:02AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks, Please evaluate the following on your available platforms send me the results. csi -n -e '(require-extension posix) (print (build-platform) - (software-type) -

Re: [Chicken-users] Centralized documentation

2007-02-21 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:50:44PM -0500, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote: Beautiful. Thanks for the improvement. :-) You're very welcome. This CSS was prepared on the basis of the original HTML as it was found on the wiki. I'd give this a huge overhaul, if possible, though. It's very

Re: [Chicken-users] Centralized documentation

2007-02-14 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:00:27PM -0500, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote: * Any improvements to the CSS used by the wiki would be more than welcome. :-) I've spent a couple of hours hacking the CSS. The result can be viewed at http://frohike.homeunix.org/stream-wiki.html Feel free to snarf

[Chicken-users] Centralized documentation

2007-02-12 Thread Peter Bex
Hi everybody, I was having an e-mail discussion with Mario Domenech Goulart about Spiffy and the conversation turned towards egg documentation. The discussion started because Spiffy's documentation is starting to grow beyond what fits comfortably on one webpage (which is the case at this moment).

Re: [Chicken-users] SXML tutorial draft

2007-02-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:37:09PM +0300, Dmitry Lizorkin wrote: I can think of two approaches: 1. Completely removing xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' from consideration here. However, as this namespace declaration is the essential part of the XHTML recommendation, such an approach

Re: [Chicken-users] SXML tutorial draft

2007-02-05 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 01:55:46PM +0300, Dmitry Lizorkin wrote: Hello, What a good tutorial! Thank you for taking your time and effort for developing illustrative tutorial examples and for presenting all this. Thank you! I found the existing documentation to be severely lacking. It isn't

Re: [Chicken-users] destructuring-bind?

2007-02-04 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:10:55PM -0500, Elliot Cuzzillo wrote: Coming from CL, I'm used to having macro definitions use destructuring-bind in their argument lists, so that if we have (defmacro blah ((x y) z) ...) then if you call (blah (fee fi) fo) then x = fee, y = fi, and z= fo. Does this

Re: [Chicken-users] Anonymous trac access

2007-01-16 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:44:11PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: Arto just informed me that anonymous access to trac.callcc.org has now been enabled, so everybody (even without an svn account) can now enter tickets. I'm not sure if this is such a great idea. The Rails trac site originally

Re: [Chicken-users] trac instance running - public rejoices - Arto for president!

2007-01-15 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:41:29PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: Hi, folks! Arto has set up the bug tracker now. Everybody with an SVN account can now add and edit tickets at: http://trac.callcc.org Hurray! All hail Arto! :) Regards, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- The process of

Re: [Chicken-users] Mac OS X: chicken-setup's access to fink-installed libraries

2007-01-11 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:20:50PM -0500, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote: Questions: [1] Is there a way to configure chicken to provide additional library search paths (and include file search paths)? [2] Alternatively, can chicken be made to know that on Mac OS X (Darwin), if /sw exists,

Re: [Chicken-users] Mac OS X: chicken-setup's access to fink-installed libraries

2007-01-11 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:14:08PM -0500, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote: Thanks for the info. It appears that csc offers the options I need -I/sw/include -L/sw/lib, but chicken (according to The User Manual and chicken -help) doesn't. When I include these in CHICKEN_OPTIONS, chicken

Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO

2007-01-09 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:15:00PM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: The Subversion dump could track change information. But the real issue is whether Peter is sufficiently interested in this to dig into it. I don't know how much work it is for Felix to keep the svn up-to-date. Releasing

Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO

2007-01-09 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:17:48AM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: It doesn't. Darcs is better than Subversion for the active developer. It has patching features that allow open source developers to work in distributed fashion. Mercurial is an alternative that has greater platform

Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO

2007-01-05 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:07:31PM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: If I were making the decisions on such things, I would drop Subversion support and force people to use / learn Darcs. I'd provide a HOWTO, of course. I'm not using Darcs this lifetime, at least as long as it has a ghc

Re: [Chicken-users] Minor issue with spiffy's sxml-html

2006-12-28 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:45:00PM +0900, Peter Wright wrote: After testing it a bit, it looks like any HTML generated via sxml-html will have all close tag(s) followed by end-of-line character(s). Does anyone know of a way to disable this behaviour? I was about to dive in and investigate

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy Webserver

2006-12-23 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 01:52:04AM -0500, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Anyone have some example sites run w/Spiffy? How robust is Spiffy? I have a site that is currently handling ~ 2.5 million hits/mo, or on average 51 a second. It's currently backed by MySQL and is using almost no cache due to poor

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy Webserver

2006-12-23 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 11:41:41AM -0500, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Quoting Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So I can't definitely recommend Spiffy based on hard numbers. However, my gut feeling says it's capable of serving up what you describe. It would be interesting to see how well it holds up

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy Webserver

2006-12-23 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 11:41:41AM -0500, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Quoting Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So I can't definitely recommend Spiffy based on hard numbers. However, my gut feeling says it's capable of serving up what you describe. It would be interesting to see how well it holds up

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code

2006-12-15 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:41:44PM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: I know and understand why to use tests. I'm not opposed to tests, but I am opposed to lumping the tests in with the main code. I'd much rather just keep the code clean and put the tests in another file. Well, I

Re: [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code

2006-12-14 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:51:46AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: Hi! While reading a bit about doctest (the Python utility), I thought it would be relatively easy to support embedded documentation in definitions, like: (define (foo ...) '(test (...)) body...) The basic idea is

Re: [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code

2006-12-14 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:13:19PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote: Hi! I have no ideas for the exact mechanism or the syntax. But I like the idea of having test cases embedded in the code. That makes proper maintenance of the test cases more likely IMHO. You're not worried about the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code

2006-12-14 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:10:28AM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: Bear in mind that PLT Scheme is LGPLed, as is the mzlib containing contracts.ss. http://download.plt-scheme.org/doc/mzlib/mzlib-Z-H-54.html#node_chap_Temp_9 That means it could only be snarfed as an egg. True, but that

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code

2006-12-14 Thread Peter Bex
mail. The mail you replied to had these headers set: From: Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code To: chicken chicken-users@nongnu.org Date: Thu

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy

2006-12-09 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 08:22:56PM +0200, Dan Muresan wrote: Hi, I have had, at last, the pleasure to play with spiffy to creaet a simple web front-end. As I said, it has been a pleasure, mostly, but there are some warts: Let me add one observation to that: It probably would be nicer to

Re: [Chicken-users] Announcement: http-server-form-posts egg

2006-11-06 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:10:07PM +0200, Moe Aboulkheir wrote: The first release of the http-server-form-posts egg is available! Cool! Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically

Re: [Chicken-users] epeg .setup file misses closing brackets

2006-10-21 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 05:16:35PM +0200, Peter Busser wrote: Hi! The epeg.setup file in the epeg egg misses two closing brackets. D'oh! That's what you get when you use vi instead of emacs w/ paredit for those quick editing jobs. :) Fix has been checked in. Felix, can you please update

Re: [Chicken-users] Bizarre chicken build/segfault problem

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:15:22AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: Hi, Peter! lookup-table.c is one source file of the lookup-table egg. The .c files are installed together with a compiled extension. The reason for the crash seems to be egg-dependency issues. I could reproduce a crash that

Re: [Chicken-users] Bizarre chicken build/segfault problem

2006-09-11 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:47:28AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote: srfi-19 uses srfi-29 uses lookup-table. The srfi-29.meta file does state the need for lookup-table, so I wonder why it is not installed. How old is your copy of srfi-29? The need for lookup-table is from version 1.2, quite

Re: [Chicken-users] adding a standard regexp engine?

2006-07-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Michele Simionato wrote: - PCRE - Oniguruma (very powerful, but also very big) I vote for PCRE, which is the one used by Python, IIRC. PCRE has my vote too. I never heard of Oniguruma, what makes it so much more powerful than PCRE? The most common

Re: [Chicken-users] repl with scgi?

2006-06-28 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:20:34PM -0400, jbarciela jbarciela wrote: Anyway, I tried making the thread myself, but make-thread is unbound. I noticed that srfi-18 is not an egg, and it doesn't show up if I enter ,r in csi. Does that means that I have to compile my own chicken? #;1 make-thread

Re: [Chicken-users] repl with scgi?

2006-06-28 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:46:45PM -0400, jbarciela jbarciela wrote: Hello Peter, Unfortunatelly in my system (PowerBook G4, OSX 10.4.6, Chicken Version 2, Build 3 - macosx-unix-gnu-ppc - [ dload ptables ], installed via Darwin ports) I get this instead: #;1 (use srfi-18) ; loading

Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken crashes when updating eggs

2006-06-09 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:10:40PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: Peter, can you test this? This absolutely works. Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically

[Chicken-users] Chicken crashes when updating eggs

2006-06-07 Thread Peter Bex
Hi all, When I update an egg that creates a dynamically linked object (.so), any running chicken instance that already loaded the egg instantly segfaults at the moment it tries to use a function from that egg. This is very inconvenient when running long-lived processes like Spiffy. After having

Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken crashes when updating eggs

2006-06-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:25:21PM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote: Hello, it's probably important to know under which operating system this problem occurs. Sorry, should've stated this. I run NetBSD, which is, or at least aims to be, POSIX-compliant. snip Maybe if you try to recompile the

Re: [Chicken-users] How to use prelude?

2006-05-28 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:31:14PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: Adding a quote in front of the define doesn't work either as that expands to (quote (define with-x #t)) Try '...' (one pair of double-quotes for scheme, and one pair of single quotes for the shell). It would be nice if you

Re: [Chicken-users] suspensions

2006-04-26 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:25:04AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: Hello! A new egg is available that provides support for suspensions (serialized partial continuations). It can be used (among other things) for hacking support for continuation-based web-programming into Spiffy. The egg is

Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework

2006-04-22 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:05:45PM -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: I'm afraid my own Chicken projects are getting the backburner right now. Technical stuff is just too much work when I'm spending a lot of time signature gathering. The season ends in early July and if I

Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework

2006-04-22 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:05:22PM +0200, Peter Busser wrote: Hi! Ajax egg. And some session support, but we can do that easily, and even _better_ with continuations. See (http://radio.weblogs.com/0102385/2004/04/03.html#a568) for some tasty stuff. This could ideally be integrated in

Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework

2006-04-22 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:21:02PM +0200, J?rg F. Wittenberger wrote: Dear all, who are interested in a decent web programming framework in Scheme. We've been spending quite a while on such a thing and I'm simply not the person to brag about my part of work (which has been too much), maybe

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-40 space leak?

2006-04-11 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:46:05PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: On 4/10/06, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, After reading the SRFI-40 (stream library) egg documentation at http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/srfi-40.html I thought that the implementation

Re: [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters

2006-03-23 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:32:17PM -0700, Shawn Rutledge wrote: I found that in the latest version I got an error like this: Error: call of non-procedure: ./web Call history: ... eval (load /etc/spiffy-conf.scm) eval (spiffy-root-path

Re: [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters

2006-03-23 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:32:29AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: Yes, blame him! ;-) Using parameters for all configuration options wasn't such a great idea from the beginning. It makes sense to use parameters, when you want thread-local options, but the spiffy configuration should be

Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?]

2006-03-12 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:58:34PM -0700, Shawn Rutledge wrote: Another feature (which might or might not be a good idea) is to have folders, rather than a single namespace. A problem arises when you try to use a conventional wiki for multiple projects - you have to be careful to choose

Re: [Chicken-users] 64 bit success stories for Chicken?

2006-03-10 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:35:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. Does anybody have seen a performance increase when running Chicken in 64 bit mode compared to similar (or same) processors running Chicken in 32 bit mode? If so, which modifications were needed and what type of

Re: [Chicken-users] 64 bit success stories for Chicken?

2006-03-10 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:21:43AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but I think this question applies to the C compiler your using, not to Chicken itself. If Chicken produces the same code on both platforms, you are right. Sven That's the point of using C instead of assembly. It means you

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy crashes occasionally

2005-06-14 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:12:52AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: Oh boy. Do you have PCRE or libc regex? Or are you using pregexp? I'm not sure. I think it's using libc regex, since ldd doesn't show any extra libraries (apart from libm) on chicken, libchicken etc. On closer look, the regex

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy crashes occasionally

2005-06-09 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: Would it be possible to examine a core-dump (with a libchicken version with full debug info)? I'd have to rebuild chicken and wait for it to crash again. I'll do so, but I have no idea when spiffy will crash since I still don't

[Chicken-users] Spiffy crashes occasionally

2005-06-07 Thread Peter Bex
Hi all, This is the problem: I simply run spiffy, and then someday I find out that it has crashed. Sometimes it takes weeks or even months before it dies, sometimes it takes only days. Unfortunately, I can't really pinpoint the problem anywhere. :( I was wondering if someone else also has

<    7   8   9   10   11   12