src/webkit/tools/test_shell/test_shell.xcodeproj
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:53 PM, daniel daniel.dreiber...@gmail.com wrote:
How can I run TestShell in Xcode on MacOS? Which xcode project I
should use?
--
Mike Pinkerton
Mac Weenie
pinker...@google.com
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm excited about using v8::Extension instead of CppBoundClass but the
JavaScript side of v8::Extension (via the |source|
Hi,
Chromium doesn't support window.external.AddSearchProvider , it supports
the OpenSearch specification.
And your right, it doesn't work for slashdot.org, you can create a new bug
request issue here: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/entry
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Marc-Andre Decoste m...@chromium.org wrote:
An alternative could be to send a bitmap the size of the union rect, but
only paint the individual rects in it, and extract them individually on the
other side of the IPC... But I wonder if it would be worth the
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:
3. Is there a way to specify native getter/setter functions for a property
defined on the JS side? For instance, myobject.foo = bar would somehow
call a natively defined setFoo function with the bar argument.
Was this a recent regression? I made some changes in that area
recently to support transparent webviews. I tried not to change
anything in the case where transparency is not needed, but I imagine
this could have been me.
Here is the change:
Salut Aaron,
no, this is not recent... This is something that was encountered a while
back and put on a shelf because it wasn't critical... I'm now taking it off
the shelf and trying to put an end to it :-)
Thanks!
BYE
MAD
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org
Salut Adam,
this is a theory that I'm currently validating... And I will try to
change the IPC message code to confirm that it will resolve the problem...
So I guess you don't see any problem in this approach... So if I succeed,
now I know who to ask for a code review :-)
Thanks!
BYE
MAD
On
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Matt Perry mpcompl...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
3. Is there a way to specify native getter/setter functions for a property
defined on the JS side? For instance, myobject.foo = bar
Google Chrome 2.0.177.1 has been released to the Dev channel.
It includes a number of fixes and a couple UI tweaks. For example, if you
have searched from wikipedia.org in the past, start typing wikipedia.org in
the omnibox, press the Tab key then a search term and suggestions and past
searches
+1, though this means the final nail in the coffin for chrome+jsc since the
layout test controller is written using CppBindingClass.
-Darin
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
I've felt this way for a while, and I figured I'd throw it out to see if we
all
As an intermediate point of reference, looking at the calls
to RenderWidget::DidInvalidateRect() and tracing the cases where the new
rect doesn't intersect with the current paint_rect, I get the following
results:
Without the resizer rect:
(0, 0, 743, 633) not in (0, 0, 0, 0)
(362, 8, 1, 1) not in
It doesn't take much of layoutTestController to run most of the
LayoutTests. At one point, I had a student implement the low hanging
fruit as a Firefox extension.
Adam
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think if we should definitely make it possible to
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@chromium.org
wrote:
+ chromium-dev
Can you please explain what you think has
The story is even simpler for localStorage. Everything is fairly self
contained and the only way it cares about the main thread is in asserts to
verify SQLite is not used on the main thread.
My guess is that the story for what's considered the main thread will change
for each API much like the
If anyone is interested in doing this extension work, come find myself or
Aaron. It's getting easier to add extension APIs. We'd be happy to show
you how.
Erik
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think if we should definitely make it possible to run
In retrospect, this would probably be better as a V8 extension behind a
command-line flag. That's probably what Darin meant to begin with. ;-)
Erik
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Erik Kay erik...@chromium.org wrote:
If anyone is interested in doing this extension work, come find myself or
In http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=14983 I
removed a CoInitialize()/CoUnInitialize() pair in the renderer process
of your favorite browser.
This should be the last one of them. COM should now be unusable from
the renderer.
As far as I can see, this was a leftover and we
Hint:
If you write your changelist bug line like this:
http://crbug.com/7991
instead of like this:
BUG=7991
your bug line will be linkified and clickable in numerous places (like
the buildbot pages, Rietveld, the issue tracker, etc).
-Ben
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote:
Hint:
If you write your changelist bug line like this:
http://crbug.com/7991
instead of like this:
BUG=7991
your bug line will be linkified and clickable in numerous places (like
the buildbot pages,
I'm not likely to want to type bugs.chromium.org every time ;-)
-Ben
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Wan-Teh Chang w...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org
wrote:
Hint:
If you write your changelist bug line like this:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, cpu c...@chromium.org wrote:
In http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=14983 I
removed a CoInitialize()/CoUnInitialize() pair in the renderer process
of your favorite
Hi Chromium users, there has been some discussion on IRC regarding
redirecting users from #chrome to #chromium, etc. Please take a look at
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=7776 for the feature
request.
As user on irc (Jason Spiro) stated that would you (Chromium) would like to
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Chromium users, there has been some discussion on IRC regarding
redirecting users from #chrome to #chromium, etc. Please take a look at
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=7776 for the feature
Hi Chromium,
I usually browse the issue tracker for HelpWanted tags, and try to solve
those bugs. It would be great if more HelpWanted tags would be tagged, so we
can have more variety of bugs to fix. It would be nice if anyone in the team
could go through them and decide whether that bug is
25 matches
Mail list logo
