Hi,
I appreciate if someone can help me understand what is the Message send from
Browser to Renderer in the case of html form submission.
I think the message ViewMsg_Navigate_Params is for HTTP get only, not for
HTTP post, since I dont' see any attribute in that struct to store form
submission
- est electronix...@gmail.com wrote:
not working on 4.0.202.0 (23600)?
chrome.exe --enable-sync
Did you enable the option in the wrench menu? See
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2009/08/dev-channel-update_17.html
cheers,
mike
Hi est,
If you happen to be using a Chromium (blue logo) build, then this is the
expected behavior. The feature is currently available as a preview via the
Google Chrome dev channel, but not in Chromium branded builds. Sync won't
be usable in Chromium until we can build the feature entirely
Do you mean
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/form-autofill?If so,
that is a whole other thing (form autofill, as opposed to what you are
looking for - form submitting).
(Sorry for not being helpful, but just a heads up so you will not read
irrelevant stuff (to your case), unless
Thanks for the explaination, Nick Carter.
I understand now, Chrome is a Google product while Chromium is a open-
source project.
Any thing else differs between Google Chrome and Chromium? I found
dictionaries missing from Chromium.
On Aug 18, 2:13 pm, Nick Carter n...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi
Now, will there soon be a way to add a reference item in Google Docs at the
Google Chrome section there?I mean, when you go to Google Docs, after you
sync, there is a Google Chrome folder under My Folders. When you go into
it, there are folders and the items has some sort of a reference icon.
Will
Official explanation -
http://blog.chromium.org/2008/10/google-chrome-chromium-and-google.html
☆PhistucK
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:19, est electronix...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the explaination, Nick Carter.
I understand now, Chrome is a Google product while Chromium is a open-
A blog posting,
http://blog.chromium.org/2008/10/google-chrome-chromium-and-google.html ,
answers this question.
- nick
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:19 PM, est electronix...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the explaination, Nick Carter.
I understand now, Chrome is a Google product while Chromium
Also, I just noticed I cannot delete the items manually from Google Docs, it
says they come from a read only source. This is not optimal, I want to be
able to manipulate the things I have in my own Google Docs account, from
within Google Docs. Will that change soon?
☆PhistucK
On Tue, Aug 18,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:46 PM, PhistucKphist...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I just noticed I cannot delete the items manually from Google Docs, it
says they come from a read only source. This is not optimal, I want to be
able to manipulate the things I have in my own Google Docs account, from
Then, run this command (from an Administrator command prompt):
netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled
Hopefully, it will be fixed for you as it seems to be for me.
Reference:
http://blogs.technet.com/asiasupp/archive/2006/12/14/windows-vista-tcp-auto-tuning.aspx
Dave
Is there any indication of when this feature will be available for the
Linux version of Chromium?
Cheers
Nick
On Aug 18, 8:00 am, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, that does not mean the plan may not be to keep it a read only
folder.Which
is why I am asking this right now.
ObjC 2.0 apis should provide pretty clean ways to get all the data for ObjC
classes, see
http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/source/browse/trunk/Foundation/GTMStackTrace.m(we
already use some of GTM in Chrome/Chromium).
TVL
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Viet-Trung Luu
I pasted this onto
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/debugging-on-os-x
so it's not forgotten. I don't know much about this stuff so I didn't
clean it up too much.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jeremy Moskovichjer...@chromium.org wrote:
I've collected some useful links on
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Albert J. Wong
(王重傑)ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
It seems that git rm didn't delete the directories themselves. :( Thanks
for fixing Mark!
git doesn't distinguish between nonexistent directories and
existent-but-empty directories, so as I understand it it will
Though this isn't my area of expertise, if you didn't find something
on dev.chromium.org, I believe there isn't such a doc. We've done a
pretty good job of moving all prior internal docs to the public site
and off the top of my head I can't think of any example of
post-going-public documentation
I recall at some point hg didn't integrate as well as git did with
svn. At least http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/WorkingWithSubversion
(first hit for [hg svn]) claims While pushing changes back to
Subversion is not officially supported yet, interoperating with it is
possible with third-party
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Nico Webertha...@chromium.org wrote:
`git cl patch` reuses existing issues, so when landing stuff for other
people, I used to edit the issue on codereview to add Patch by
someone+usuallytru...@example.org before landing. So for me editing
other people's
I would like to make this switch, but it is not yet reliable. I don't
want build bots failing because of dependency bugs. (Heh, heaven
forbid we sometimes need to click a hypothetical clobber checkbox on
the buildbots to work around a build system issue! :P)
I'd been using the makebuild
It will be after it's completely landed in the public repository, so
only after the work Tim mentioned at the beginning of this thread is
complete.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:29 AM, codfatherswcodfat...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any indication of when this feature will be available for the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Though this isn't my area of expertise, if you didn't find something
on dev.chromium.org, I believe there isn't such a doc. We've done a
pretty good job of moving all prior internal docs to the public site
and off the top
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:19 PM, estelectronix...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the explaination, Nick Carter.
I understand now, Chrome is a Google product while Chromium is a open-
source project.
Any thing else differs between Google Chrome and Chromium? I found
dictionaries missing from
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
I think it'd be neat to somehow use git's distinction of author vs
committer such that when you patch in a cl (with git cl patch) it
plumbs the rietveld-side author info into the local git commit info
and from there into the
At Mozilla we're currently working on implementing multi-process
plugin hosts similar to the model used by Chromium. However, we're
having trouble working through the many potential race conditions
introduced by having multiple processes (and therefore multiple flows
of control). I've read
If the aggregate of bookmarks can be considered to be a document,
doesn't the wave protocol solve the sync/coordination problem?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or
Anyone adding more resources (xibs, etc.) to the Mac, please remember always
fetch them from mac_util::MainAppBundle() (base/mac_util.h) and do *not* use
any Cocoa apis that assume [NSBundle mainBundle]. As part of the l10n,
packaging, and updating, where resources live and what bundle is running
Explicitly adding jam to make him notice this.
(I don't know the answer to your question. As far as I know we try to avoid
implementing things with synchronous messages as much as possible.)
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using url_request for a while now,
Random drive-by note: Most consumers of URLRequest would be much happier
using URLFetcher (which layers atop it to provide a much simpler interface,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:43 PM, bsmedbergbsmedb...@gmail.com wrote:
The most obvious problem is that both processes may send a synchronous
IPC message at the same time. Assuming that these don't deadlock, the
native stack for the two calls would end up interleaved.
While there may be a
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall
Greenblattmagreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using url_request for a while now, and I find myself consistently
forgetting the relationship between the various managers/handlers and order
in which the asynchronous calls take place. Does
Cool!
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Huan Ren hu...@google.com wrote:
UI test can not walk the stack as for now. There is a script to print
stack traces of all crash dumps after the test is finished. This one
from the latest chromium cycle:
+1 to what Tony (and Evan and others) have said. The stated goal *is* to
convert the official builds to Make, but we need to get the Make generator
(gyp backend) on par with the other generators.
Gyp now has a test infrastructure that we're using to characterize the
various generator behaviors,
Thanks. I did debug on Renderer process.
As a matter for fact,
This breakpoint 'WebFrameLoaderClient::dispatchWillSendRequest() breaks,
but
this 'WebFrameLoaderClient::dispatchWillSubmitForm()' does not.
I was doing a 'google search' (i.e. enter text in search box, and click
'Search' in google
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using url_request for a while now,
Random drive-by note: Most consumers of URLRequest would be much happier
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Wan-Teh Chang w...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall
Greenblattmagreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using url_request for a while now, and I find myself
consistently
forgetting the relationship between the various
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, bsmedberg bsmedb...@gmail.com wrote:
At Mozilla we're currently working on implementing multi-process
plugin hosts similar to the model used by Chromium. However, we're
having trouble working through the many potential race conditions
introduced by having
If you see errors like the following, clobber your build:
C:\b\slave\chromium-dbg-builder\build\src\chrome\utility\utility_thread.cc
: warning C4651: '/DCOMPILING_SYNCAPI_STUB' specified for precompiled
header but not for current compile
( chrome.gyp no longer defines COMPILING_SYNCAPI_STUB )
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Nico Webertha...@chromium.org wrote:
`git cl patch` reuses existing issues, so when landing stuff for other
people, I used to edit the issue on codereview to add Patch by
This is very useful. How about a link to this some where on the main
builder page.
-Scott
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Paweł Hajdan
Jr.phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
So, the flakiness dashboard is now public and updated daily,
at http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/flakiness-report/ . It
A couple weeks ago, I wrote an email emphasizing the need to fix
flakiness/crashes/etc. Since you might be having trouble figuring out how
to bite off a piece of that problem, here are concrete ways you can help:
* 20 people needed to fix failing LayoutTests.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm asking here and not in the chromium-discuss list because
I'm using the very latest CI build and I am not confident anyone is
going to be able to answer this except for the devs.
You should have asked in
It's chrome://extensions/
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 13:32, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm asking here and not in the chromium-discuss list because
I'm using the very latest CI build and I am not confident anyone is
going to be able to answer this except for the devs.
Is
Maybe we should alias about:extensions to point to chrome://extensions/ ?
Adam
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm asking here and not in the chromium-discuss list
If you don't commit to WebKit, you can stop reading now.
I am looking for someone to own a fairly large-sized task: bringing up
WebKit-side build of our port to life. The bug for it is here:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28396
The big picture is here:
I'm incorporating Chromium into an existing that uses the shared CRT.
To minimize footprint, I'd like to experiment with linking Chromium to
the shared CRT as well. I've tried changing RuntimeLibrary in
common.gypi, but I'm getting numerous linker errors (I think b/c of
tcmalloc's dependence on
Hi,
How can I run the reliability tests, specifically the automated UI
tests, locally?
Thanks,
James Hawkins
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm incorporating Chromium into an existing that uses the shared CRT.
To minimize footprint, I'd like to experiment with linking Chromium to
the shared CRT as well. I've tried changing RuntimeLibrary in
common.gypi,
Question, have all the strings been translated? I tried Spanish and
saw some untranslated stuff, i.e. IDS_OPEN_FILE_DIALOG_TITLE,
IDS_OMNIBOX_SEARCH_HINT_INFOBAR_TEXT, and
IDS_BLACKLIST_MESSAGE. I think these all made it in before the deadline.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Glen
The strings are still being processed, I haven't merged in the translations
yet.
Kind Regards,
Anthony Laforge
Technical Program Manager
Mountain View, CA
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
Question, have all the strings been translated? I tried Spanish and
The information on how to do this is currently on the internal wiki,
although it seems there's no reason it shouldn't be moved to the public wiki
(not it :) ).
http://wiki.corp.google.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/ChromeDebuggingChromeBotCrashes
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM, James Hawkins
Hi all,
Currently, all the functionality in Chrome toolbar has a keyboard shortcut
connected to it, except for the App and Page menus. For a keyboard user,
currently, you can SHIFT+ALT+T and use the right arrow key to move focus to
the menus. This is not very effective and would be better to have
I'm not sure about accesskeys, but my feeling is just pressing Alt
should definitely hilight the one of the two menus.
-Ben
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Mohamed Mansourm...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, all the functionality in Chrome toolbar has a keyboard shortcut
connected to
on linux we do alt+e for page menu and alt+f for wrench menu. The
reasoning is that these two menus are reasonable approximations of the
Edit and File menus, respectively.
-- Evan Stade
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)b...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm not sure about
sgtm.
-Ben
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Evan Stadeest...@chromium.org wrote:
on linux we do alt+e for page menu and alt+f for wrench menu. The
reasoning is that these two menus are reasonable approximations of the
Edit and File menus, respectively.
-- Evan Stade
On Tue, Aug 18,
Alright, I have changed it to use alt+e and alt+f.
http://codereview.chromium.org/174044/show
http://codereview.chromium.org/174044/showWould be nice if a user presses
just alt and it would bring up the default main menu. The page menu is
used more than the app menu. Would be nice to incorporate
Shouldn't `git pull gclient sync` be sufficient? That's what
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/UsingGit recommends, and what I
use (although my git sometimes gets confused about svn, and I have to
do `rm -rf .git/svn git svn fetch` every now and then).
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:54 PM,
Is the page menu really used more than the app menu?
If the keys correspond to file/edit equivs, that would suggest wrench
should be default.
-Ben
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Mohamed Mansourm...@chromium.org wrote:
Alright, I have changed it to use alt+e and alt+f.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote:
Would be nice if a user presses just alt and it would bring up the
default main menu. The page menu is used more than the app menu. Would be
nice to incorporate that into Chromium. What do you all think?
Please copy
btw, alt alone appears to do nothing for gtk apps.
Also, I don't really care which one alt highlights, but it seems to me
that alt just highlights the leftmost menu. This happens to always be
File. If the File menu is not leftmost, then it's unclear which should
be highlighted.
-- Evan Stade
Just so we don't waste Darin's time on administering code.google.com when he
could be doing Yet Another Code Review...
Please send requests for issue tracker changes --like getting automatically
CC'd for a given label-- to jon@ and laforge@ (chromium.org).
--Mark
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:36,
60 matches
Mail list logo
