[c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

Hi, I have a query regarding implementioan of 4 Byte AS on Cisco routers. Does any one implemented/tested 4 byte AS on Cisco routers? Cheers. Pratap. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

At 12:10 AM 13-08-08 -0700, Darryl Dunkin wrote: There are a few already using it: http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=2.4view=2.0 http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=5.1view=2.0 Just do a BGP search for AS23456: aut-num:AS23456 as-name:RESERVED-AS descr:

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

Already supported in IOS-XR. Recently heard from Cisco: 12.0S late Q4 2008 12.2SRE even later Q4 2008 12.5(1)T Q2 2009 That said, unless you're directly connected to a BGP peer with 32-bit ASNs, routing still works. You however lose visibility as to which AS it goes it. (Prolly have to resort to

[c-nsp] Alternantive to REB(route bridge Encapsulation)

Hi guys I am trying to find a Feature that will be able to replace Route bridge Encapsulation..because we are migrating to the 12.2S and does not support that feature..any thoughts or Ideas will be useful. Thanks TIA Hash ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

David Prall wrote: Both will remain for SX releases as far as I know. Eventually only modular rant Which I believe is in large part the cause of the problems they've had with SXH. Think about it: You're the 6500 IOS team. You have a large body of upstream IOS code, and you have to

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

On Wednesday 13 August 2008 16:24:14 Hock Jim wrote: 12.2SRE even later Q4 2008 Hmmh, AFAIK, SRE is out mid-'09. What's planned for Q4'08 is SRD. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] SRC2?

On Tuesday 12 August 2008 23:32:42 Chris Griffin wrote: Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, specifically for the 7600. I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release. Same here... heard it was meant to be mid-July, but nothing yet. Having waited this long,

[c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

Hi there. Does anyone have a guide or list of stuff to look for if you think you've been sold fake gear? I've gathered little bits and pieces over time on what to look for.. We have a number of 2621XM's deployed at remote sites. They all have similar configs, similar IOS loads (although

[c-nsp] SRB4 (was RE: SRC2?)

speaking of the releases... is anyone running SRB4 in production yet? cheers -- deejay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: 13 August 2008 14:04 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SRC2?

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

Thanks.. none of these particular 2621XM's have any additional cards in them but that's a handy reference for sure ;) Paul -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stretch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 13, 2008 9:12 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

Hock Jim wrote: Already supported in IOS-XR. just for completness, NX-OS on Cisco Nexus 7K has it too. cheers, lincoln. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: The exact same problem keeps happening about every 3-4 weeks on most of these 2621XM's - the FastE0/1 port goes to sleep. When a technician goes onsite, he does a shutdown/no shutdown and everything starts working again for 3-4 weeks. At first we

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

This page has some good info and pics: http://www.andovercg.com/services/cisco-counterfeit-wic-1dsu-t1-v2.shtml -- stretch http://packetlife.net Paul Stewart wrote: Hi there. Does anyone have a guide or list of stuff to look for if you think you've been sold fake gear? I've gathered

Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

That is good news. The other good news would be that SXI monolithic could run with only 256 MB of SP memory and 512 MB of RP memory (default config of ME6524) ,Advanced IP Services. Any guess on this one ? Rubens On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:11 PM, David Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Both will

Re: [c-nsp] SRB4 (was RE: SRC2?)

I'm running it on 7600/SUP720 and 7600/RSP720 without any problems (upgrade from SRB2/3; no L3 features used). -- Tassos Tomas Daniska wrote on 13/8/2008 3:58 μμ: speaking of the releases... is anyone running SRB4 in production yet? cheers -- deejay -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

Phil Mayers wrote: You're the 6500 IOS team. You have a large body of upstream IOS code, and you have to back-port it, but at the *same* time you also have to modularise it. I'm really going to dive off into OT land, but does anyone know if the Metro Ethernet 6500 is under the Enterprise BU

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

On (2008-08-11 07:41 +0200), Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: BTW: the LDP filter only prevents advertisement of the binding, it doesn't prevent the LSR from assigning a label (the imp-null in your example). I think we had this discussion some years ago, but it would be nice, instead of ACLs

Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

Latest info I've got is that the ME6500 is under the ISBU, Internet Systems. 7600 is under the ERBU, Edge Routing, and 12000/CRS is under the CRBU, Core Routing. Rubens On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Phil Mayers wrote: You're the 6500 IOS team. You

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

Paul Stewart wrote: The exact same problem keeps happening about every 3-4 weeks on most of these 2621XM's - the FastE0/1 port goes to sleep. When a technician goes onsite, he does a shutdown/no shutdown and everything starts working again for 3-4 weeks. At first we thought this was the

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

Saku Ytti wrote on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:18 PM: On (2008-08-11 07:41 +0200), Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: BTW: the LDP filter only prevents advertisement of the binding, it doesn't prevent the LSR from assigning a label (the imp-null in your example). I think we had this

[c-nsp] Sub-interface question...

I'm in an awkward situation where I've been given the task to investigate how to design MPLS vrf connections without using vlans define locally, and with using sub-interfaces. I'm unsure of how this is possible...any suggestions on where to look? ___

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

Thanks.. yeah, we've looked at that... but in the meantime as they fail we are pulling them out of production and scrapping them pretty much... I'm estimating we have 10-12 of these still left at sites and they all came from the same supplier which is suspicious (hence my questions on fake

Re: [c-nsp] SRC2?

Chris Griffin wrote: Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, specifically for the 7600. I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release. Thanks We have a very annoying bug in the previous version and are waiting for this release for our 7206VXR. According to someone

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

It's a good way to justify new gear too. stroking chin with an evil grin while looking around network at what could suddenly start failing at regular intervals... :-) Justin Paul Stewart wrote: Thanks.. yeah, we've looked at that... but in the meantime as they fail we are pulling them out

[c-nsp] ES40 / ES20+ / SRD

Hello Does anyone has informations / availability / pricing about the new ES40/ES20+ Linecard and SRD... thanks Ben ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

On (2008-08-13 17:29 +0200), Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: well, an LSR needs to allocate labels also for other nodes' loopbacks, so this alone will not be enough ;-) All boxes would advertise everything they get, but only generate loop0. However, IOS now has a label allocation filter

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

Saku Ytti mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:23 PM: On (2008-08-13 17:29 +0200), Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: well, an LSR needs to allocate labels also for other nodes' loopbacks, so this alone will not be enough ;-) All boxes would advertise everything

Re: [c-nsp] Sub-interface question...

Frame relay, ATM ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Cartier Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:36 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Sub-interface question... I'm in an awkward situation where I've been

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

Paul Stewart wrote: The exact same problem keeps happening about every 3-4 weeks on most of these 2621XM's - the FastE0/1 port goes to sleep. When a technician goes onsite, he does a shutdown/no shutdown and everything starts working again for 3-4 weeks. At first we thought this was the

[c-nsp] VMPS and 6500

I was thinking about playing with VMPS but from what I can tell it's not supported on IOS, is that correct? Robert Teller Washington Dental Service Network Administrator (206) 528-2371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] #

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

Neither had I... I have hard of lots of fake 2950 switches though and that they are extremely hard to tell the difference Thanks everyone for the replies anyone aware of a way to run serial numbers on Cisco.com and verify the correct model even? I'm heard of some grey market resellers

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

well, an LSR needs to allocate labels also for other nodes' loopbacks, so this alone will not be enough ;-) Could it not just based is allocation of labels based on having it in the LFIB already? Why does the LSR need to allocate a label for all the learned prefixes? Juniper only binds the

[c-nsp] 6500 snmp and vty acls ?

Does anyone know if VTY and snmp ACLs are implemented in hardware or software on a 6500 with 720-CXL running 12.2(33)SXH. I am trying to understand COPP and move away from the VTY and SNMP ACLs. Thanks for any info. Jeff Fitzwater OIT Network Systems Princeton University

[c-nsp] CLIPS functionality for DHCP clients

All- I'm trying to create a solution to allow for subscriber management based on client PC MAC address. I see that Redback offers this CLIPS (CPE mac address RADIUS record) method of subscriber management but Redback equipment is pretty pricey... Does anyone have a suggestion on a Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

What if the counterfeiter simply copies a valid serial number and uses it to produce x number of fake Cisco labels (those are faked to look like real labels too) which they then affix to x number of fake chassis'? Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[c-nsp] RES: conditional bgp default-originate

I haven't tested this, but you can configure two access-lists with both BGP session IP addresses of your upstream providers and match them in the route-map. neighbor 10.1.0.2 default-originate route-map BGP-UP route-map BGP-UP permit 10 match ip address 101 match ip address 102 route-map

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 snmp and vty acls ?

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:17:21PM -0400, Jeff Fitzwater wrote: Does anyone know if VTY and snmp ACLs are implemented in hardware or software on a 6500 with 720-CXL running 12.2(33)SXH. If implemented with line vty 0 4 access-class it's done in SW. I am trying to

Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

Hi, On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:02:52AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: Think about it: You're the 6500 IOS team. You have a large body of upstream IOS code, and you have to back-port it, but at the *same* time you also have to modularise it. Contrast: You're the 7600 IOS team. You have a

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

Hi, On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:24:14PM +0800, Hock Jim wrote: That said, unless you're directly connected to a BGP peer with 32-bit ASNs, Even then it will work, sort of. Just configure the peer as AS23456. You'll lose AS-path filtering capability, though, and if you have multiple 32bit peer

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:07:36PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: If you have a 32bit ASN yourself, then you're doomed. (You could buy a Vendor J router, they have implemented it on time... - it's not like it's especially hard, or cisco has not been told that the ASN clock is ticking or even

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Rest assured that updating the festering piece of crap that is IOS to change every data structure that holds ASNs and every piece of code that tched them (think as-path, regexp, show/cli changes for the unbelievably retarded #.# syntax, etc),

Re: [c-nsp] CLIPS functionality for DHCP clients

I don't think there is any Cisco low-end solution to this; 7200, ASR, 10k and SCE are the platforms I think can do this one way or the other. Consider using Mikrotik or NoCat/NoDog solutions (http://nocat.net/). Rubens On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Kyle Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] 1252ag backwards compatibility

Dan: Unless you're running Greenfield mode, which I'm not sure you can even configure on a Cisco AP, there's full backward compatibility such that 802.11b/g clients will operate at b/g and 802.11n clients (with 2.4 GHz support, of course) operate at n. Be aware that mixing 802.11n with 802.11b/g

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

It's called lfep. Late feature exception process. btw, I've got a call to outline some of the 4 byte ASN stuff with the folks running 12.0S. Especially regarding 75xx, 10720, etc. support along with GRPB's. On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:04:05AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Wed, 13 Aug 2008,

Re: [c-nsp] 1252ag backwards compatibility

Can it be prevented, i.e, configuring 1252 to only run 802.11n, even in WDS mode ? We are hoping that 802.11n can improve on Wi-Fi tradition of having low pps rate, which is due to the sum of the 802.11b/a/g standard and low speed processors on the devices. Rubens On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:49

[c-nsp] RES: SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

Just kidding... while ( ! ( succeed = try_sx_train() ) ); -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Gert Doering Enviada em: quarta-feira, 13 de agosto de 2008 18:01 Para: Phil Mayers Cc: 'Cisco-nsp' Assunto: Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

On Wednesday 13 August 2008 23:29:03 Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: However, IOS now has a label allocation filter (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/g uide/mp_ldp_all oc_filter.html) having a allocate global host-routes shorthand to only allocate labels for /32s (or

[c-nsp] Setting up a Internet Gateway (NAT-PE) for MPLS VPN Customers

Hi All We are looking at providing our Layer 3 MPLS VPN customers with the option of a managed internet gateway via a NAT-PE router. This would mean that remote sites no longer have to access the internet via the Central Site model as this is the way we've been implementing Internet access for

Re: [c-nsp] RES: conditional bgp default-originate

At 05:30 PM 13-08-08 -0300, Leonardo Gama Souza wrote: I have tested this and it is working at a specific customer: neighbor 10.100.80.7 default-originate route-map track-Broadwing neighbor 10.100.80.7 distribute-list nothing-else-plus out ! ip access-list extended nothing-else-plus ! Insert