you can use BGP Conditional Route Injection to generate the /28. (it shud
be a child subnet out of the parent /24). then filter the prefixes so select
which all upstreams shud receive this injected subnet.
cheers
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Dracul chris.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Sebastian,
What do you mean by if you exceed your bandwidth?
You could try the following debugs for more info:
debug ppp nego
debug vpdn l2x event
debug vpdn l2x error
debug radius
Arie
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Ganschow [mailto:s.gansc...@buelow-masiak.de]
Sent: Tuesday,
Dracul,
Be aware that many (most) ISPs would filter subnets longer than /24, so
your /28 would be most likely filtered (even if you direct upstream
would send it through).
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Hi Arie,
I mean, that if you've got a DSL-line with 160kbit upstream and you use
it all.
The main thing I don't understand, is the error message invalid
destination. Do I understand it right, that the message I see in sh
vpdn hist fail is send by the LAC to our LNS?
Sebastian
Yes, it is sent from the LAC.
This is a message from the RFC, but I would assume it has something to do with
the PPP/L2TP negotiation between the LAC and LNS, and the LAC not agreeing to
something sent from the LNS...
The debugs below should help.
Arie
-Original Message-
From:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
I'm happy to announce, that nfdump-1.6 is available for downloading
@ Sourceforge. Several new features have been added ( see list below )
nfdump-1.6 is mostly compatible with nfdump-1.5.x.
nfdump-1.6 works with current NfSen 1.3.2, however,
Are you trying to do destination-based routing (packet TO specific address
should go over specific link) or source-based routing (packet FROM specific /28
should go over specific upstream link)?
-Original Message-
From: Dracul [mailto:chris.gar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January
Hello,
I actually have problem with my cisco 2600 configuration.
I have a cisco 2600 in a datacenter which is connected to a Numeris
connexion
In my office , i have a windows xp computer which is able to use a Numeris
connexion.
My goal is to be able to use the windows XP computer to connect
Okay, probably the first line will tell us, where the problem is. But
why are keepalives suddenly get lost?
Jan 5 10:41:51 mrl01cor01 35245: 035250: 1w0d: Vi26 PPP: Missed 5
keepalives, taking LCP down
Jan 5 10:41:51 mrl01cor01 35246: 035251: 1w0d: Vi26 PPP: Sending Acct
Event[Down] id[667]
hi,
we've had an issue with certain IOS - now running 12.2(44)SE6 - on the 3550
platform.
note...there is a newer IOS floating around - 12.2(50)SE-somesuch..but that
seems to only be relevant for the 3550-24td or such specific version - dont
run it on any other one as , though it appears to
So there's a few things that I see missing here.
You need to have an IP that you will assign to the dial-in user. (Unless you
intend to use this as a bridge, which I don't know if XP will support).
You should define some local pool of IP(s) that you will hand out.
eg:
ip local pool mypool
Thanks for your help.
I try your configuration and i have the same debug output.
The very strange point is the fact that i didn't see any I CONFREQ in the
debug output, isn't it ?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
So there's a few things that I see
hi all
i have 2 web servers connecting to one of the LAN switches
i am thinking of implement HSRP for outgoing traffic thats right ??
the 2 servers are connected via cross cable as well for making data transfer as
fast as possible
now the what i want to do from my routers is that when
On 1/5/2010 5:26 AM, Alan Buxey wrote:
hi,
we've had an issue with certain IOS - now running 12.2(44)SE6 - on the 3550
platform.
Yes, 12.2(44)SE6 is the last officially supported release for all but
the DC-powered 3550 (the only one not EOS/EOL).
I've heard of others running later
What switching platform are you using?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khalil
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:55 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Load Balancing
hi all
i
The memory impact isn't that bad and one person's over kill is another
person's good planning ahead of time. Why not do something right the first
time and prevent the redesign / reconfiguration down the road which makes
things that much more tricky in the long term. I can't tell you how many
you can use BGP Conditional Route Injection to generate the /28. (it
shud be a child subnet out of the parent /24). then filter the prefixes so
select which all upstreams shud receive this injected
subnet.
thanks swap will explore your suggestion.
Be aware that many (most) ISPs would filter
Hey guys. I hope you all had a good holiday break.
Does anyone know for sure what the Ethertype is for the CLNS packets?
I've found a couple IEFT drafts that talk about it it to a degree:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-ext-eth-01
Brandon, you nailed it exactly and much better put.
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Ewing nicot...@warningg.com
To: Ivan Pepelnjak i...@ioshints.info
Cc: 'Scott Granados' gsgrana...@comcast.net; 'Drew Weaver'
drew.wea...@thenap.com; 'Cisco-nsp' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent:
Inbound traffic: advertise /28 to upstream2. It will not get very far, though,
so it's questionable whether it will leak over to upstream1 and influence the
return traffic coming from upstream1.
Outbound traffic: policy routing seems to be the quickest (and the dirtiest ;)
solution. Getting it
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Alan Buxey wrote:
we've had an issue with certain IOS - now running 12.2(44)SE6 - on the 3550
platform.
note...there is a newer IOS floating around - 12.2(50)SE-somesuch..but that
seems to only be relevant for the 3550-24td or such specific version - dont
run it on any
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
Do you have traffic graphs during this timeframe? Maybe a DDOS at or
through these boxes tied up the available memory. Especially since 'I/O'
was the pool it was trying to grab from at the time?
Actually, after studying more of the graphs, I think
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:30:27AM +0100, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
And, BTW, I wish those of you that propose redistributing connected and
static routes into BGP a huge budget you'll need to upgrade RAM and TCAM of
your routers/switches when everyone decides (after reading this mailing list
This might help:
http://wiki.nil.com/IS-IS_in_OSI_protocol_stack
The drafts you've found deal with the fact that LLC1 packets (those that don't
use Ethertypes) cannot use the length field higher than 1500 (otherwise the
differentiation between LLC1 and Ethernet-II breaks down).
Ivan
Hi,
EOL. I saw that it would boot on a 3550-48, but didn't go any further
with it than watching it boot. What goes wrong with it?
loss of access to management interface, failure of spanning-tree
calculations, memory leak with SNMP polling - these are the basic
things I noted before a quick
Hi all,
I've got some ME3400Gs with CWDM SFPs, and some of them are causing errors to
be logged:
Jan 5 14:21:30.087 PST: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Gi0/1: Voltage high
warning; Operating value: 3.56 V, Threshold value: 3.50 V.
These SFPs are not Cisco official, which I think is the
On 2010-01-05 11:26, Alan Buxey wrote:
note...there is a newer IOS floating around - 12.2(50)SE-somesuch..but that
seems to only be relevant for the 3550-24td or such specific version - dont
run it on any other one as , though it appears to work, you egt some
interesting
results! ;-)
What
On 1/3/10 3:37 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/command/reference/ipv6_10.html#wp2269378
Although C doesn't seem to be there.
I believe that the C is for Corrupted. Bad checksum on the ping reply
or some other corruption to it.
-Mike-
--
28 matches
Mail list logo
