Peter,
Most likely you would need to create a per-subnet class, and assign a
policer.
You may take a look at microflow policers (available only on 6500/7600):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con
figuration/guide/qos.html#wp1571584
Also, maybe aggregate
I did some NETEM on Linux testing couple of years ago. Seems to be a good
tool if you do not need superb accuracy in impairment generation - I
remember at least the delay generation being accurate in the +-2ms ballpark.
If you you need dead on accurate impairment generation, I suggest looking
Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 03:57:42AM +, Yap Chin Hoong - wrote:
Hi guys, vote for me, the Next-Generation technical writer, on the Cisco
Share the Wealth Contest! :-)
Well, you have my vote, but on the low end of the scales -- someone who
does not understand that certain mailing lists
Hi,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:27:39PM +, jgi...@gmail.com wrote:
Your biggest issue will be support and associated costs. they tend to
position themselves as a cheaper option in the begining but in the
long run you end up paying more for deployment, support, spares
[..]
What about the
On Thursday 13 May 2010 05:33:23 pm Gert Doering wrote:
What about the CPE side? We have been offered Huawei
devices to be used as G.SHDSL.bis termination devices
(on the CPE side), and they look quite interesting - a
Cisco 1841 with a SHDSL-WIC would also work, of course,
but the WIC
What about the CPE side? We have been offered Huawei devices to be
used as G.SHDSL.bis termination devices (on the CPE side), and they
look quite interesting - a Cisco 1841 with a SHDSL-WIC would also
work, of course, but the WIC is just too expensive for a CPE...
It's been a few years, but
Also, stabbing the cable with various sharp implements at random
intervals is another option :)
--
David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Group
Marcus.Gerdon wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for the not really Cisco-related topic, but the collected
expertise present on this list might
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 19:29 +0300, shake righa wrote:
Output from show ip ospf interface are as folows
FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Internet Address loopback ip , Area 0
^
This isn't an unnumbered interface by any chance? Or is that just a
typo?
What
What about the CPE side? We have been offered Huawei devices to be
used
as G.SHDSL.bis termination devices (on the CPE side), and they look
quite
interesting - a Cisco 1841 with a SHDSL-WIC would also work, of course,
but the WIC is just too expensive for a CPE...
We have a couple installed ,
Shake,
Output from show ip ospf interface are as folows
FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Internet Address loopback ip , Area 0
^
This isn't an unnumbered interface by any chance? Or is that just a
typo?
What about MTU on both sides? And what does the
Hi Shake,
1. Check if you can ping the other router over the link. If no, check ip
configuration, etc.
2. Check ospdf network type. Ospf network type must match at both ends, for
eg, ip ospf network point-to-point.
HTH.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:32 AM, shake righa ssri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 13 May 2010, Mark Tinka wrote:
As an IP engineer, reiterating what Pshem said, they are just not yet
mature.
My take on this:
Huawei wants to win RFQ:s. Anything people usually put in their RFQs,
Huawei will most likely have. If it's usually not in RFQs, it's quite
likely it's not
I've used netem and dummynet with good success for almost all applications.
I'll echo the Anue box if you want 100% precise results and more 10G
capability.
Packetstorm Communications http://www.packetstorm.com/psc/psc.nsf/site/index
also makes a very good box, but like the other dedicated
Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:30:52AM +, Tim Franklin wrote:
What about the CPE side? We have been offered Huawei devices to be
used as G.SHDSL.bis termination devices (on the CPE side), and they
[..]
Out of curiosity, what are you doing that necessitates that 1841+WIC instead
of the
We're an enterprise (not service provider) and our hub sites each
aggregate about 10 DS-3's, a handful of OC-3's and a handful of DS1's.
We're getting actual raw circuits from carriers (not Frame, ATM, MPLS,
Ethernet, etc) and today we're aggregating them via MGX ATM switches -
non-IP traffic like
On 2010-05-13 16:39, Gert Doering wrote:
What about the CPE side? We have been offered Huawei devices to be
used as G.SHDSL.bis termination devices (on the CPE side), and they
Out of curiosity, what are you doing that necessitates that 1841+WIC instead of
the much cheaper 878 / 888, or even
What about VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 ?
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Richey myli...@battleop.com wrote:
I am trying to populate a 2851 with 6 WIC-1DSU-T1v2 Cards. The first 4
cards can fit into the WIC slots on the 2851 but I am at a loss as to how to
get the 5th and 6th card in the box. One page
Hi
Does cisco equipments (router or switch) configure to effect the speed the vpn?
I am not talking cisco vpn. I have vpn server to connect to cisco equipments
Thank you for your help
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Or the VWIC-2MFT-T1 VWIC-2MFT-T1-DI - those are a bit cheaper per port,
used, and can be used for data. VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 replaced them, but the
older revs should work fine for you.
sc
--
Stephen F. Cobb • Senior Sales Engineer
CCNA/CCDA/DCNID/ATSP
Telecoast Communications, LLC • Santa Barbara,
On 5/13/2010 10:09, Stephen Cobb wrote:
Or the VWIC-2MFT-T1 VWIC-2MFT-T1-DI - those are a bit cheaper per
port, used, and can be used for data. VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 replaced them,
but the older revs should work fine for you.
I've heard horror stories with regards to timing between VWIC cards
Geoff-
You've got some other [older] options - might as well throw these out
there...still supported by recent IOS:
6500/7600 OSM-1CHOC12/T1-SI (stopped shipping less than a couple years ago,
IIRC)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2831/products_data_sheet09186a008015cfe6.html
Hi everybody
I have worked at ISP company. My company is going to implement
Ethernet-to-Ehternet solution with another ISP on the co-operation plan
between 2 companies. But I still don't know clearly what is
ethernet-to-ethernet solution? and How does it work? I have tried to search
the materials
The VWIC-2MFT-T1 cards (unlike newer VWIC2) only takes one clock even though
its got 2 ports...if your'e getting your clocks from the line, I could see
this perhaps being an issue. I know that a lot of people use the older ones
for MLPPP and they've worked fine. Horror stories could arise from the
Hi Geoff,
A couple of comments - we're currently running a bunch of 7600 with a bunch of
chSTM-1 SPAs in SIP-200 for n*DS0 - DS-3 aggregation, so hopefully some of our
experiences might be of interest.
We've actually found the 7600 with SIPs to be really reliable boxes, after a
few issues in
Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 06:45:58PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
The 888/888E may be of interest to You. It easily fills in the
G.SHDSL wire-speed with services, the drawback for 888E being it's
available right now only with 15.1(1)T image.
Thanks, we'll check this out. Will it only do
FYI, the 12000 series channelized oc12 line cards are supported by IOS XR as
well, and used chassis+PRP-2+oc12 hardware should be well below the cost of
a used 7600+sup720+sip+spa combo...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/xr12000/software/xr12k_r3.9/general/release/notes/reln_391xr12k.html
Hi,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:02:20PM +0700, Nam NGUYEN wrote:
Thanks a lot for your quick feedbacks. I now have a better understanding of
the scenario. In my network, the optical links between the client routers
and RRs have had problem a few times due to transportation faults from
service
Hello Deric--
Any equipment that your data traverses will affect the round trip
time of the packet, that includes Cisco equipment. It is very
difficult to give you a good answer because there are so many
variables involved. There are several things that could have a bad
impact on latency
Anyone know of an online ipv6 tool that will allow you to specify # of bits
when calculating? Trying to subnet a /32 into /48's.
Thanks,
Bill
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Been looking for one too. Would be great to have.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Bill Buhlman
Sent: Thu 5/13/2010 5:58 PM
To: NSP list
Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 subnetting tools
Anyone know of an online ipv6 tool that will allow you to specify # of
Hi billbuhlman,
I think you can use http://www.dnskey.net/Main.html. where you can
calculate ipv6 address as per your requirement.
Regards
Ram Krishna Pariyar
Network Engineer L3 R D
Subisu Cablenet (P.) Ltd.
148 Thirbum Sadak
Baluwatar, Kathmandu
Nepal
T: 00977 1 4429616/17 Ext.: 121
F:
you could try APNIC's IPv6 Subnet calculator
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipcalculator/
-sunny
Sharlon Carty wrote:
Been looking for one too. Would be great to have.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Bill Buhlman
Sent: Thu 5/13/2010 5:58 PM
Hi group,
We are facing output drops problem on interface f0/2 of ME3400. Our topology
as below:
Metro---(G0/1)ME3400(f0/2)---CPE-STB--TV
|PC
We try to watch a HD movie on TV and download file
Not exactly an online tool, but I think what you're looking for is this:
$ sipcalc 2001:468::/32
-[ipv6 : 2001:468::/32] - 0
[IPV6 INFO]
Expanded Address- 2001:0468::::::
Compressed address - 2001:468::
Subnet prefix (masked) - 2001:468:0:0:0:0:0:0/32
Hi,
The network now has 20 Cisco 7613s as P routers, 20 Cisco 7609s as PE
routers, along with some other Huawei NE/NE40s as PE routers. RR is a must,
I guess.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:02:20PM +0700, Nam NGUYEN
35 matches
Mail list logo
