[c-nsp] Failed TestSPRPInbandPing

Hi Experts, Kindly, our node 7606 has been reloaded due to below log: %CONST_DIAG-SP-2-HM_SUP_CRSH: Supervisor crashed due to unrecoverable errors, Reason: Failed TestSPRPInbandPing c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB2 Please advise. Regards, Ahmed Erfan

[c-nsp] (no subject)

Hi Experts, Kindly, our node 7606 has been reloaded due to below log: %CONST_DIAG-SP-2-HM_SUP_CRSH: Supervisor crashed due to unrecoverable errors, Reason: Failed TestSPRPInbandPing c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB2 Please advise. Regards, Ahmed Erfan

[c-nsp] Chassis replace

Hello friends, Kindly, I have 7606 chassis with SUP32 IP/MPLS , I want to replace the chassis with same same type so I will turn off the old chassis then plug out the SUP32 from old chassis and plug in to the new chassis then pore on the new chassis. So once I turn on the new chassis , the

[c-nsp] Policy-map / not reaching the required band

Dear Friends, We have set below policy as below: Policy Map xxx Class class-default police cir 435400 bc 136062500 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop bc value is auto and our customer cant reach more that 4330 Mbps, if i remove the policy , he

Re: [c-nsp] Policy-map / not reaching the required band

we can calculate it as below: Bc (normal burst) = CIR / 8 * 1.5 seconds 435400/8 * 1.5 = 816375000 What do you think ? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Friends, We have set below policy as below: Policy Map xxx Class

[c-nsp] BGP conditional advertisement

Dear Friends, We are planning to configure BGP conditional advertisement at our Network. I would like to share with you the idea behind that. We have 4 UP Links , we are advertise our prefixes to them identical on all of Links. So what is the best practice to deploy conditional advertisement.

Re: [c-nsp] BGP conditional advertisement

i want to understand it On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:27:20AM +0300, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: We are planning to configure BGP conditional advertisement at our Network. I would like to share with you the idea behind

Re: [c-nsp] BGP conditional advertisement

that ? On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: i want to understand it On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.dewrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:27:20AM +0300, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: We are planning to configure BGP conditional

Re: [c-nsp] BGP conditional advertisement

thanks On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote: No. -Blake On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Friends, when i force prefix Z to be advertised to ISP A only and to ISP B only when ISP A is down. does my end

[c-nsp] SWO - Active to Standby then reboot back to active RSP

Dear Friends, We have faced an Switchover in our 7606 router for unknown reason. SWO to standby than reboot back to active one. Based on crash file: Aug 1 21:45:13 UTC: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor Aug 1 21:45:13 UTC: %FABRIC-SP-STDBY-5-FABRIC_MODULE_ACTIVE:

[c-nsp] Fwd: SWO - Active to Standby then reboot back to active RSP

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:58 AM Subject: SWO - Active to Standby then reboot back to active RSP To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Dear Friends, We have faced an Switchover in our 7606 router for unknown

Re: [c-nsp] Same static-route to different destination / Port-chanel

, Michael (Business Technology) mdikk...@postmedia.com wrote: For port channel load balancing you should look into your hashing method rather than routing. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed Hilmy Sent: Wednesday, July 17

[c-nsp] Same static-route to different destination / Port-chanel

Hello Friends, Can i configure a static route for prefix x.x.x.x/y to different destinations a.a.a.a b.b.b.b ? Router 1 Router 2 directly connected. I want to do this thing because i have port-chanel between R1 - R1 with two interfaces, one of them is carrying 990 Mb but 2nd one is

[c-nsp] Best Support of Tier 1 ISP

Hello Friends, We are going to establish a new 10GE circuit as a UP Link. So what you suggest a best Tier 1 ISP that provide high level of support ? Right now we have TATA,Cogent,Interout, Turktelecom and Level3. Thanks, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

-family vpnv6 unicast from the igw to the rr on both sides and of course from rr to other internal pe's Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed Hilmy Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 5:00 AM To: Mikael Abrahamsson Cc

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

” ? what happens ? ** ** Aaron ** ** *From:* Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:hilmy...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 1:05 PM *To:* Aaron *Cc:* Mikael Abrahamsson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE ** ** Hello Aaron, ** ** Thanks

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

** ** Aaron ** ** ** ** *From:* Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:hilmy...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 1:47 PM *To:* Aaron *Cc:* Mikael Abrahamsson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE ** ** I think in 6vpe u dont need send-label because u already

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

? On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: What do u think ? I don't have experience with mixing 6PE and native so I can't offer much advice in this case. I also do not know what IGW is. -- Mikael Abrahamsson

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW RR, I have pure BGP IPv4. So ? On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR, since it is directly connected

[c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Dear Friends, I am working on IPv6 deployment at our Backbone. Our network design is as below: PEs --- MP-BGP ---RR ( address-family vpnv4 ) RR-- BGP-IGW ( address-family ipv4 ) what i understand is : - Add address family IPv6 at PEs : address-family ipv6 neighbor x.x.x.x activate

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Thanks Mikeal, I have seen this dos and it is super useful, but still i need to confirm the plan for you guys !!! Regards, Ahmed On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Dear Friends, I am working on IPv6

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Thanks Mikeal. address-family ipv6 unicast but you add send-label. at PEs RR ? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: We can say MP-BGP ( vpnv4 ) will carry IPv6 packets as a label across IPv4 MPLS Backone

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

family ipv4 and other IPv6 address ? What do u think ? Regards, Ahmed On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Mikeal. address-family ipv6 unicast but you add send-label. at PEs RR ? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote

[c-nsp] IPv6 prefixes

Hello Friends, At IPv4 prefixes , we advertised with /24 ( maximum prefix length ) At IPv6 prefixes , it will be /48 ? I would like to confirm it ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Add 2nd Trunk

of redundancy if one GigE fails for some reason. A bundle also allows for capacity increases to be implemented quite easily in the future too. All valid solutions with pro's and con's. :-) On 7 June 2013 21:35, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Friends, I have a Cisco SW ( 3560

[c-nsp] Add 2nd Trunk

Hello Friends, I have a Cisco SW ( 3560 ) with one Trunk link to my router ( 7606 ), Trunk link is fully utilized so i need to add 2nd Trunk. Shall all move some customers from old trunk to 2nd one and create a new subterface for them ? I am think if i can create bundle and add subinterfaces

[c-nsp] Multi-VRF / Back to back VRF

Dear Expert, I am planning to deploy Global VPN ( Multi-VRF / NNI ), but the concept is not clear for me. I have active a new link with my UP Link and configure it as sub-interface. Now i am going to connect one customer of mine with destination in UP Link network as VPN. at first what is the

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone

:17:3000::2e 1332 ms32 ms32 ms 2400:8800:7f04:6::2 1432 ms32 ms32 ms 2600:1404:8:1:9200::90 Trace complete. C:\ Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed Hilmy Sent: Monday, April

[c-nsp] LLDP-7606

Hello Friends, I have Alcatel-Lucent 7750 SR7 router connect to Cisco 7606 router. At Alcatel router i enable LLDP and at Cisco router i enable CDP but i didnt get MAC address at both sides. I tries to enable LLDP at 7606 but it seems it is not supported. Do you any idea how to enable LLDP at

Re: [c-nsp] LLDP-7606

Yes right, my IOS is not supported. How CDP works, it should enable CDP at both sides, it means it should be Cisco router right ? CDP cant work with LLDP ? On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 27/04/2013 16:48, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Do you any idea how

Re: [c-nsp] LLDP-7606

CDP is at Cisco only On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 27/04/2013 16:59, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Yes right, my IOS is not supported. How CDP works, it should enable CDP at both sides, it means it should be Cisco router right ? CDP cant work with LLDP

Re: [c-nsp] LLDP-7606

i am totally agreed with you On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 27/04/2013 17:04, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: CDP is at Cisco only Yes, correct. LLDP is not supported on the C7600. CDP is not supported on the SR7750. CDP and LLDP are incompatible. If you

[c-nsp] Network Test Plan

Hello Friends, Alcatel-Lucent has completed our project deployment IP/MPLS Backbone, 7750 SR7 - 7750 SR12, they suggest test plan but i am thinking if i can ad some tests. Test Strategy: IGP, OSPF MPLS, LDP+RSVP+ LSP Fast Reroute VLL VPLS VPRN Any idea to share, and test to add your comment is

Re: [c-nsp] Network Test Plan

] On Behalf Of Ahmed Hilmy Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:17 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Network Test Plan Hello Friends, Alcatel-Lucent has completed our project deployment IP/MPLS Backbone, 7750 SR7 - 7750 SR12, they suggest test plan but i am thinking if i can ad some tests

Re: [c-nsp] Network Test Plan

874 7000 On 19/04/2013 16:02, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Ryan, actually i didnt get your point , would you clarify it for me ? On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Booth, Ryan rbo...@pantex.com wrote: This is true about the misses. From my own experience and what

[c-nsp] Best Network Journal for Network Eng.

Hello Friends, Any idea about best journal that it is interested by Networking Stuff like IP/MPLS/VPLS/VPRN etc thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Filter - Best Practice

Hello Nick, Thanks for your reply, i am totally agree with you. Regards, Ahmed On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 15/04/2013 21:44, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: I am using Prefix-list and as-path for BGP filter. But if i apply Prefix-list as inbound filter

[c-nsp] UP Link / http://www.spamhaus.org/

Dear Friends, I am advertising some prefixes that are belong to my end user to one of my UP Links. They said, these prefixes listed in CBL/XBL as a Spam IPs at this Website : http://www.spamhaus.org/ So what does it mean ? i think there is no nee to block them as long as i am Transit circuit ?

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone

* 104 ms 2610:18:17:3000::2e 1332 ms32 ms32 ms 2400:8800:7f04:6::2 1432 ms32 ms32 ms 2600:1404:8:1:9200::90 Trace complete. C:\ Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed Hilmy Sent: Monday

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone

Hello Mikael, Thanks for sharing link, your comments are helpful as usual.Thanks friend. Regards, Ahmed On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Would you please guide me from where can i start ? http

[c-nsp] BGP Filter - Best Practice

Hello Friends, I am using Prefix-list and as-path for BGP filter. But if i apply Prefix-list as inbound filter at PE, then from PE to RR ( Route Reflector ) i apply as-path filter, i think it is more scalable than modify Prefix-list continuously ? or use community ? If my question not clear

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone

...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed Hilmy Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 15:56 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone Hello Expert, We are planning to deploy IPv6 at our IPv4 Backbone, our PE to as Dual Stack and carry IPv6 packet through MPLS label

[c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone

Hello Expert, We are planning to deploy IPv6 at our IPv4 Backbone, our PE to as Dual Stack and carry IPv6 packet through MPLS label. There are different scenarios, one of them is 6PE. Would you please guide me from where can i start ? Thanks, Ahmed

[c-nsp] BGP Advertised Prefixes

Dear Friends, Recently i have faced a strange issue, BGP session with my UP Links goes down due this log at UP Link side: --- RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Apr 8 13:10:54.818 : bgp[1044]: %ROUTING-BGP-4-MAXPFXEXCEED : No. of IPv4 Unicast prefixes received from

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Advertised Prefixes

of the session. I think that number will increment anytime a prefix is added for whatever reason (downstream link flap, static route removal, whatever). On 2013-04-09, at 4:27 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Jason, thanks for your reply, i know that it clear but why this is happened

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Advertised Prefixes

your actual config it's hard to guess what is going on here... -Blake On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Friends, Recently i have faced a strange issue, BGP session with my UP Links goes down due this log at UP Link side

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Advertised Prefixes

wrote: The message is pretty clear. x.x.x.x is announcing more prefixes than what your max prefix setting is configured for. Either the uplink side is misconfigured or your max prefix setting is too small. On 2013-04-09, at 4:13 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Friends

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

Thank Mikeal for your comments, yes right toe 10 GE SPAs have been inserted so i can understand from that 10 G IN / 10 G OUT for my whole SIP ? On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: My questions are: - shall my SIP

[c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

Hello Friends, I have 12000 router, i have installed SIP 601 which is supported to 2x XFP 10 GE. I have connect the 1st one to my UP Link and 2nd one to my Backbone. At this SIP, Traffic in will be ( Download from UP Link and Upload from Backbone ) Traffic out will be ( Download to Backbone and

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1002 / Crashhed / Bug id CSCtx17480

, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Expert, I have ASR 1002 router which has been crashed due to bug id CSCtx17480. The issue is related to PPP. This issue has been fixed in 15.2(2)S2 and later. Currant IOS version : asr1000rp1-advipservicesk9.03.06.00.S.152

[c-nsp] ASR 1002 / Crashhed / Bug id CSCtx17480

Dear Expert, I have ASR 1002 router which has been crashed due to bug id CSCtx17480. The issue is related to PPP. This issue has been fixed in 15.2(2)S2 and later. Currant IOS version : asr1000rp1-advipservicesk9.03.06.00.S.152-2.S.bin I am planning to IOS XE upgrade, would your please share

Re: [c-nsp] Is this list not active anymore ? Gossamer - Cisco - uBR

Hello Aaron, You are welcome to NSP list, it is an active one and you can ask and share what you like and if there is anybody who has a good answer for your question, he will do.. this is from my personal at this list , it is very useful. Regards, Ahmed On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] SYSTEM_CONTROLLER / Cisco 7606

Hello Devon My router is running out of warranty so i can't contact TAC, what do you think about IOS upgrade ? On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Devon True de...@noved.org wrote: Ahmed, Hello Devon, Kindly, find below output: #remote command switch show bootvar BOOT variable =

[c-nsp] Analyze crash file / Cisco 7606

Hello Expert, I have a 7606 Cisco router got crashed, i have the crash file. Would you please tell me how can i analyze it to identify the problem. The below Log is shown: *%SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-MISTRAL_RESET: System Controller is reset:Normal Operation continues* * * *Regards,* *Ahmed*

Re: [c-nsp] Analyze crash file / Cisco 7606

Thanks Buddy for reply. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote: On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 12:14 +0300, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: I have a 7606 Cisco router got crashed, i have the crash file. Would you please tell me how can i analyze it to identify the problem. You

[c-nsp] SYSTEM_CONTROLLER / Cisco 7606

Hello Expert, I have 7606 router, got crashed today and i noticed these logs: *Mar 15 09:58:01 UTC: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-MISTRAL_RESET: System Controller is reset:Normal Operation continues* ** Mar 15 09:58:30 UTC: %CPU_MONITOR-2-NOT_RUNNING: CPU_MONITOR messages have not been sent for 30

Re: [c-nsp] SYSTEM_CONTROLLER / Cisco 7606

, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: [logs trimmed] On Mar 15, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Based on the information i got , it seems it is normal and it is related tothe Mistral ASIC, which is the ASIC used to connect the MSFC with the Pinnacle

Re: [c-nsp] SYSTEM_CONTROLLER / Cisco 7606

Hello Devon, Kindly, find below output: #remote command switch show bootvar BOOT variable = bootdisk:c7600s3223-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRD4.bin,1; CONFIG_FILE variable does not exist BOOTLDR variable does not exist Configuration register is 0x2102 Register value is correct as i think, what

[c-nsp] BGP Route Dampening

Hello Expert, If i am a transit ISP, is it recommanded to enable dampening feature ? Regards, Ahmed ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Route Dampening

Thanks Sahu for your reply, would you please clarify this point ( just make it negative local_pref penalty ) ? On Monday, March 11, 2013, Saku Ytti wrote: On (2013-03-11 11:23 +0300), Ahmed Hilmy wrote: If i am a transit ISP, is it recommanded to enable dampening feature ? If you want

[c-nsp] IRR Tool

Hello Expert, I hope you doing fine. I am looking for how can i implement a Routing Registry server in our network to be updated regularly from RADB that mirrors almost all the Routing registries (www.irr.net) and build the appropriate IP prefix-list and IP as-path access-list ( BGP session

[c-nsp] Greeting

Hello, It is pleasure to be in touch with you guys. Please keep us posted. Thanks, Ahmed ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/