Yes, the “lanbase-default” seems much better than the “lanbase-routing”. I just
wanted to know why did they call it that way… Can you share your experience ? I
guess it wasn’t very good J
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP/DC)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473
No TCAM error
messages and routing works normally (between SVIs and using the static
route). I'm using 15.2(2)E3.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP/DC)
<mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt> amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net <http://www.cci
.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP/DC)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Alireza Soltanian
Sent: domingo, 19 de Junho de 2016 04:33
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c
gure-nexus-00.html
I can't understand the logic behind it. On the 5K, if we want to do the same
thing we need "port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-port".
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net <h
Try again after removing the IGMP join on the outside vlan.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lobo
Sent: quinta-feira, 29 de Janeiro de
Enable PIM on the loopback.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lobo
Sent: quarta-feira, 28 de Janeiro de 2015 17:38
To: cisco-nsp
These outputs are always relevant. Here you should see what is the maximum
routes available. It should be different in case you have 4GB or 8GB or RAM.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
Can you share these outputs from both routers ?
show cef fib
show cef table
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gabriel
Sent: terça-feira
When you changed the settings, you rebooted the all box, right ?
Check this:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/1156/cisco-7609-rsp720-3cxl-g
e-mls-cef-maximum-routes
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message
#
In your case, it's strange we don't see the MPLS value marked as default.
Are you sure you removed the mls cef maximum-routes for MPLS ? You should
have only one line:
Router#sh run | inc mls cef max
mls cef maximum-routes ip 768
Router#
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS
Check this document, maybe it can help you:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-swit
ches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html
Can you share the show mls cef max output ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http
- 1k (default)
IPv6 + IP Multicast - 8k (default)
1007+1+(2x8) = 1024
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco
Maybe IPv6 and IP Multicast must share the same region of the TCAM.
Just try to remove all the mls cef maximum-routes commands then just add
this one:
mls cef maximum-routes ip 768
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original
,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Victor Sudakov
Sent: terça-feira, 8 de Julho de 2014 10:09
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] Divide large PVST domain
Check this article:
http://slaptijack.com/networking/max-spanning-tree-stp-diameter/
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Victor Sudakov
Sent
not normally support proactive RMA, we are contacting our planning
team for further instruction
Then they will tell you Fix on Failure.
Not easy to handle...
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
Hello Pete,
Two topics that could be added to the article:
- recommendations when receiving 1 full ipv4 + 1 full ipv6 BGP feeds
- issues if using ebgp multipath
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From
)
---
By the way, what values are you guys using with 1xfull BGP ipv4 + 1xfull BGP
ipv6 feeds ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco
It works. Procedure:
Old SUP:
#copy nvram:ifIndex-table disk0:
New SUP:
#delete nvram:ifIndex-table
#copy disk0:ifIndex-table nvram:
#reload
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco
No issues with OTV on a stick:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DCI/wh
itepaper/DCI3_OTV_Intro/DCI_1.html#wp1215970
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/simple-network-management-proto
col-snmp/28420-ifIndex-Persistence.html
But nothing about moving it to a new SUP/Router.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
, in a situation where you only have one SUP and it gets faulty, the
procedure I mentioned would be perfect.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson [mailto:sigurbjo...@vodafone.is]
Sent: segunda
Did you find anything else in the meanwhile ? What you found is potentially
catastrophic...
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
I can try it on our lab.
I need the exact IOS version and the module/submodule used as input interface.
Also, the method to simulate the high levels of BFD traffic.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message
is that after replacement
and after changing the slot, the problem happened again
SUP2T system running 12.2(50)SY4.
I had something similar one year ago. And the funny part is that the SNs are
very close. Maybe theres a (hidden) field notice about this
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares
Spanning-tree was working normally but it was Cisco's RPVST. CDP was working
normally but it uses a Cisco MCast address. UDLD was working as well, once
again it uses a Cisco MCast address.
ARP, IGMP, Multicast were not working.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Antonio Soares
Sent: sexta-feira, 11 de Abril de 2014 14:09
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Strange Issue
Great, thanks for the feedback. Are you able to tell me the bug id ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan
Brisson
Sent: sábado, 12 de
It's exactly this !
cat4k stops processing ARP, IGMP and other control protocols
CSCuj73571
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/cscuj73571
Unbelievable, this was marked with severity 2 ?!!!
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473
Any pointers are more than welcome.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net http://www.ccie18473.net/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
/net_implementation_white_paper0900aecd80308a66.pdf
Anyone has pointers to share ? The hardware I need to analyze is the MSC-B,
FP40 and FP140.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
It happened to me. Last week two ASAs with 4 GB or RAM each (4x1GB) died
after a power off/power on. All the 1Gb modules were tested individually and
were dead.
The reference of the module for those interested:
Micron, PC3200U-30331-B1, 1GB, DDR, 400, CL3, ECC
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE
topologies. L2 encryption seems the perfect solution and it seems there are
several options on the market.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Orr [mailto:j...@communicorr.com]
Sent: domingo, 2 de Fevereiro de
-encryption/
And heres another one I received offline:
Engage:
http://www.engageinc.com/Products2/BlackDoor.htm
Now Im trying to find if someone already made a comparison of the available
options on the market.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
mailto:amsoa
.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net http://www.ccie18473.net/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net http://www.ccie18473.net/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Thanks Adam. I'm aware of the new SCM tool. Does it mean that the old tool
is gone ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Sent: segunda-feira, 9 de Dezembro
I can confirm that the reload solved the issue. It was a 1x100GBE/CRS-FP140
pair of cards.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Edward Salonia [mailto:e...@edgeoc.net]
Sent: quarta-feira, 6 de Novembro de
to
reproduce this in the lab with 12.2.18SFX17b.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andy B.
Sent: quinta-feira, 12 de
://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/resources-2.0.5/js/jquery-1.8.2.js:624;
Java, JavaScript, etc, why do we need that ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Thank you for the feedback. It's good to know that the reload worked for
you.
The new bug tool shows that 65 support cases were opened for this issue:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCts11174
If it was something severe, we would know it.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP
cosmetic ?
I'm getting it on a 1X100GBE/CRS-FP140.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco
have 8.4.3.9 and I want to go to 8.4.6.5. I would love to know
if the intermediate upgrade to 8.4.6 will be enough.
I didnt see the problem on the 5520s, only on the 5585-X. The bug doesnt
mention anything about that
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
mailto:amsoa
error.
Anyone has seen something like this ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net http://www.ccie18473.net/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Based ACLs, not with Webtype
ACLs.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sai
Sent: sexta-feira, 6 de Setembro de 2013 14:36
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] How to reset
. The feature seems specific to the
7600 and some kind of hardware but the documentation is not clear at all.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
I need to see all the possibilities. Typing lots of stuff to tell the device
to do nothing is not something that makes me happy :)
I will consider this closed.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From
? That when we don't have QoS
enabled, the network control traffic doesn't have any special treatment in
the output queue ?
I know that there is SPD but this only applies for the input direction:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/spd.html
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE
-queue cos-map 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
end
Router(config-if)#
+++
But doing this kind of stuff for hundreds of interfaces doesnt make too
much sense.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-queue random-detect 1
wrr-queue cos-map 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
end
Router#
Does it make sense ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Do you have logs associated with the problem ? Did you see something like
no valid adjacency ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: vinny_abe...@dell.com [mailto:vinny_abe...@dell.com]
Sent: segunda-feira
Are you running OSPF ? If yes, check this bug:
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fet
chBugDetailsbugId=CSCuc12967
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
confirm this suspicion.
The replacement RPs are V10 and V11.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
I forgot to mention that in the lab, and after replacing the faulty RAM
modules, we were able to go to Rommon. In Rommon, the dir bootflash: caused
a reboot and this was systematic.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
It seems you have a Type 2 consistency check failure. Check the output of
the show vpc consistency-parameters.
I think this is the best document about this topic:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/operations/
n5k_vpc_ops.html
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473
This was discussed here:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2133112
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Dikkema, Michael (Business
is refusing
that saying that the card reached the end of life on 30-Jun-2011.
The mentioned a Product Bulletin but they don't disclose it.
Can someone confirm what is the correct End of Support Date ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473
Somewhere in the past the queue was increased due to the same type of symptoms
it seems. But the impact this time is worse (bgp/isis sessions going down).
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rathlev
The outputs related with the fabric don't show any drops.
What bothers me is the impact: how could the drops affect the bgp/isis
adjacencies to the point of bringing them down ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message
at 06:30:38.772 UTC Thu Jan 13 2011
I was convinced that the flushes had to do with Hw. What happens with these
counters when we have bursts of traffic ?
Is it possible to a have a burst of traffic impacting the bgp/igp
adjacencies ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa
of 5 million drops.
It's a sporadic thing, it lasts a couple of minutes then everything returns to
normal.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
Sent: terça-feira, 7 de Maio
traffic is Layer 3-switched
instead of Layer 2-switched. This indicates that the traffic is being punted
to the CPU.
This is not correct, right ? In my case I just see the L3 in/out Switched
value increasing.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
Supply A
+
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
interested on IOS-XR
Platforms.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
#Configuring_EtherChannels
They mention DEC but there's nothing about Mac Address Sync.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Soares [mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt]
Sent: segunda-feira, 18 de Março de 2013 13:30
To: 'Jeffrey
issues with this before.
Any pointers are welcome.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
don't understand why some
design guides still have this...
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent
to be an IOS issue that may be triggered by a GLC-T problem. Any
hints ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
Cisco has an enhancement to overcome these limitations:
CSCsm81086 Allow user to exclude the status of the SSM or SSP from failover
checks
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Remove AH from the equation and it should work. For example, change your
Transform Set to this:
crypto ipsec transform-set L2L esp-aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
I'm not sure but maybe NAT-T doesn't work with AH.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
.
Basically what I want to know is if a move from SXI4 to SXI10 or SXJ4 is a
good option. Common cards (SUP720, 6704, 6724, 6748) and common features
(BGP, ISIS, IPv6) are in use.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
SXI4 has more than two years. The purpose is just to have an updated image
and have working the things that were working.
Are you already on SXJ4 ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun
This was almost 6 years ago:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-March/038946.html
I would upgrade to the latest catos/msfc releases to see if it goes away. I
assume these are not in production.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473
]
-- ---
Temp: Center 0/15 CRITICAL Faulty Temperature Sensor [0]
+++
We are not able to clear this alarm. What should be done here ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-IPS40 Module in slot 1
experienced a data channel communi
cation failure, data channel is DOWN.
Conditions:
ASA-IPS pair in failover running code versions 8.4(4)1 and 7.1(6)E4,
respectively
Workaround:
None
+++
Fixed-In: Release-Pending
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE
was not able to help
me. Anyone has experience with this ?
Here I have the description of each Power System:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/crs/crs1/8_slot/system/description/h
q6345_2.html
But no details about moving from one to the other.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS
Thanks. It seems theres something. I was searching for the KIT PN but no
luck
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net/ http://www.ccie18473.net
From: gawu...@gmail.com [mailto:gawu...@gmail.com
Thank you Hagen. Did they tell you what is the impact of this ? We are
thinking about not doing anything :)
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun
Just found that even with a basic configuration change like enabling a
signature, I have a failover... Is this normal ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
to send the IP ACLs
(Policy Elements-Authorization and Permissions-Named Permission
Objects-Downloadable ACLs).
Has anyone run into the same problem ? The only workaround I see is via the
configuration of the Webtype ACL on the ASA but I want to avoid it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio
You don't see the interfaces when you switch to the VDC in question ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arne
Must be related with the new 4+1 or 8+1 VDC support in the SUP2/SUP2E. Check
this:
http://ccie5851.blogspot.pt/2012/09/supervisor-22e-and-admin-vdc-in-june-of.
html
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From
Feature Navigator should do the job:
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/index.jsp
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Have you played with fragment delay ? The usage guidelines mentions the
different bandwidth links:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/dial/command/reference/dia_p2.html#wp101
3182
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original
something like this.
I wonder if there is some documentation that can help me doing this.
There is the BRKDCT-2121 presentation about VDC design but is not deep
enough.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
Just for future reference if someone runs into the same issues:
The hw revision of the M132XP that had no problems: 1.7
The hw revision of the M132XP that failed: 1.5
The hw revision of the spare card that had no problems: 2.3
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
What upgrade did you make ? In my case it was from 5.2.3a to 5.2.7. The
5.2.3 EPLD was already installed.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Neil Barnett [mailto:interarchet...@gmail.com]
Sent: segunda
,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Tim Stevenson [mailto:tstev...@cisco.com]
Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Novembro de 2012 18:21
To: Antonio Soares; 'Dirk Woellhaf'
Cc: 'cisco-nsp'; 'Charles Spurgeon'
Subject: RE: [c-nsp
Unbelievable, this is a 70k card, isn't it ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Colin Whittaker
Sent: sábado, 17
still trying to find where this
is documented.
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Thanks, it seems another enhancement that won't see the light of day...
Found in 8.0.3... Code that has almost 5 years...
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Pete Lumbis [mailto:alum...@gmail.com]
Sent
seconds.
+
I don't see how to upgrade the RAM and upgrade the NX-OS with the install
script in just one shot...
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Charles Spurgeon [mailto:c.spurg
Yes it is. But you can still use the ISSU method of doing things (install all)
with just one SUP. It doesn't make too much sense, right ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Lim
I just have one SUP... You are talking about dual supervisors setup, right ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Woellhaf [mailto:dirk.woell...@gmail.com]
Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Novembro de 2012 14
/5_x/nx-os/upgrade/gui
de/b_Cisco_Nexus_7000_Series_NX-OS_Software_Upgrade_and_Downgrade_Guide__Rel
ease_5.x_chapter_00.html#task_304731
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Tim Stevenson [mailto:tstev
running the new NX-OS release and
the modules the old NX-OS release ?
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net http://www.ccie18473.net/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Charles Spurgeon [mailto:c.spurg...@austin.utexas.edu]
Sent: terça-feira, 6 de Novembro de 2012 22:39
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp
:
(inside network)===IOS Switch===OSPF===ASA Failover Pair===OSPF===ASA
Failover Pair===(outside network)
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo