Re: [c-nsp] Whats happens when TCAM is full on 7600/RSP720RSP-3CXL?

lter incoming routes. That way your session is still up. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] Whats happens when TCAM is full on 7600/RSP720RSP-3CXL?

-unstable state where some traffic is dropped/unusable, and can only be fully recovered by reboot. My advice is "don't let that happen". -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Internet speed

On Sun, 12 Aug 2018, ring...@mail.com wrote: It also selects a public server which is outside of your AS thus taking into consideration the busy international links which are outside of your administration andas a result for a 30Mbps package the measure shows 15 for example. My experience

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Router IRB

was important to use features that were CEF enabled, otherwise performance would go down a lot. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9k Multicast commands

On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote: HI All, Logged onto a ASR9k and trying to find commands to show me the following : BSR router "show pim bsr", there are multiple commands under that. Where pim is enabled. "show pim interface" -- Mikael Abrahamssonema

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K Software Recovery

, I just want to roll back to it Any help? You need to re-install IOS XR. The re-install procedure is called "turbo boot". https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/123576/asr9000xr-understanding-turboboot-and-initial-system-bring -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...

Re: [c-nsp] Typhoon support on XRe

more platforms to choose from. But yes, I agree, the type of traffic you're expecting worst-case dictates what platforms you can choose and how to use them. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.neth

Re: [c-nsp] Typhoon support on XRe

em, probably meaning significantly higher cost compared to the gear coming out that caters to the "less-complicated" networks. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.

Re: [c-nsp] Wierd MPLS/VPLS issue

regarding BFD is not acceptable. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 routing vs IPv4 Nating

? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] hardware accelerated ipv6ip tunnels?

remember correctly, this works in accelerated mode as long you have a unique IPv4 address per tunnel endpoint. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Nick Hilliard wrote: you're very brave with your iphones. Shining a laser on a CMOS sensor doesn't seem like a smart thing to do. Smarter than looking into laser with remaining good eye. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] 6500/7600 TCAM Usage

dropped to (let's say) 95% again. The problem would only be solved by reboot. Is this still the case? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and Netconf Operational Data

version of XR are you trying to do this with? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] MTU size, fragmentation and drops

as dropped. If there were some L2 switches in between the PE and CE, then it/they might have dropped it. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archi

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

optical within a chassi. It seems there were copper advancements in the meantime that made copper still scale well for backplane connectivity, and that's why existing vendors have kept using copper traces switch fabric connectivity instead of going optical. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

and configuration handling. I prefer that the vendor does a proper job. We'll see if XR 6.x actually is properly done, or if it's just failed promises again. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

will have a new package handler, I am curious to see if that actually fixes a lot of the problems. I kept stating to people involved with XR that the Debian apt tool was better in 2000 than the package handling in XR in 2014. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

want something that works, wait 1-2 years after first customer shipment and try it, then it usually works. Now, at that time it's not fast and cheap anymore... -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

of testing and that they were in different BUs back then. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Equipment for a large-ish LAN event

of the complexity and dynamic inspection stuff, you could even have static ACLs on each subinterface/port if you want to. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Equipment for a large-ish LAN event

imit your broadcast domains (I'd say 20-50 users per broadcast domain), and make sure you do antispoofing (BCP38) for everybody. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.n

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206 VXR || Can I use new old IOS with new bootloader

and then boot with old IOS. A newer bootloader can always load an old IOS, so keep your existing boot loader, especially with the above versions which are both fairly recent (and not 15 years old). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] GRE fragmentation and ASR9001

is, you most likely find it under support if it works ok, otherwise it's not mentioned at all. Re-assembly of fragmented packets is typically something that routers do not do. As soon as you need to keep state across packets you need a fairly differently engineered device. -- Mikael

Re: [c-nsp] issues with Cisco 12413 12.0(32)SY15 per packet load balancing

loadbalancing on? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Fibre Channel over SDH STM64

. Reverse on the other side and it should just work. I doubt it. That device seems to do 3R which means it does not look past individual bits, and it can't do speed conversion (because that would require media insight). So it means it can do MM to SM for 8G but it won't do 8G over 10G. -- Mikael

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR and interface discards (input)

. Also, I am curious behind your reasoning for the carrier delay settings (I'd say they are backwards to what I would configure), and why are you using flow control?. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] multicast routing tabel

and different platforms work differently. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR replacement suggestions needed

of the cost of a router that can do full DFZ routing table. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Router 2821 is having issue getting error

-- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] CRS secondary RP not syncing properly

or completely clean disk0: on secondary RP after initial boot? I know this can be done with turbo-boot, but I haven't been able to find anything on how to do this if I don't want to turbo-boot. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR needs PIMMLD for clients to receive multicast stream

version directly under router mld. This way it seems I get away from having interface-unique entries under router pim and router mld. I still don't understand why the design choice to require PIM to be running on a client-interface, was made. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

[c-nsp] IOS XR needs PIMMLD for clients to receive multicast stream

of this multicast group without PIM enabled on the interface. I just don't understand why. Could someone please enlighten me? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS LDP Sync w/ ISIS over point to point Link

. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Customer getting its own AS

). Traffic now flows according to BGP routing. Change route object. In case someone has a problem with the route object, your encompassing larger prefix is going to make sure you get the traffic anyway. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] Customer getting its own AS

different origin ASs for a short time ? What are your suggestions ? I would contact my upstream just like you say, and also add their new AS to the route-object so the route-object has two ASes mentioned in it. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] Removing An Interface from a Port Channel

channel and the interface retained the information that was applied by being a member of the port channel this caused a loop. Don't want to repeat this. Are you running LACP or not? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Issue with MPLS implementation using cisco ME-3750-24TE-M within our backbone

ip on. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Issue with MPLS implementation using cisco ME-3750-24TE-M within our backbone

if there are particulars details to consider when implementing MPLS with ME-3750-24TE-M. How am i supposed to do. Apart from that they have very little RAM and forwarding table, everything is fine :P They're very restricted, make sure you test them properly for your scaling needs. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail

Re: [c-nsp] Issue with MPLS implementation using cisco ME-3750-24TE-M within our backbone

interface? VLANs interface? Please post config. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] 7301 - copper vs fibre port throughput

at each end, make sure there is no policing of traffic anywhere, etc. There is no obvious culprit from what you have described so far, the solution you described should have worked, at least up to 70-90 megabit/s of actual TCP througput. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

[c-nsp] MTU on XR

are contradicting. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gigabit Ethernet Card - Strange behavior

supported. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Peering with AS larger than 65535

notation? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] No telnet access

-and-VRF-Lite.html -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Licensing ASR9k

of the router itself ? There is no binding of software version to serial number of chassi, so just take the software you already have and apply to them. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] how to reload an asr9000 with dual rsp's

both at the same time. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading to 40G

40GE and 100GE was standardized it was taken for granted that 40GE would be used to connect servers and perhaps a little inter-building backhaul, because of that only up to 10km was standardized. If you want longer reaches, you have to do 100GE. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading to 40G

think about, but it also helps to know what application the vendor thought the equipment would be used in, in order to understand why things are the way they are. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading to 40G

the camps, that's when good balance usually happens. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR to ASR upgrade

in common with the ASR9k, ASR5k or ASR90x platforms (which each of them have nothing in common with each other, ASR is just a marketing name). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] uBR7246VXR - etherchannel outbound load balancing ?

ECMP instead (have two links with separate IPs on them) and see if that works better. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] Search small replacement for Cisco 12k with ATM/OC3 interface

for instance work just fine on NPE-400 and is supported. To original poster, you probably want 512M of ram on it. It'll use approx 130-150W of power. If you need full tables, get NPE-G1 with 1G of RAM. So +1 on the 7200 recommendation for the description of what's needed. -- Mikael Abrahamsson

Re: [c-nsp] Search small replacement for Cisco 12k with ATM/OC3 interface

-of-software development in sep 2011. However, hardware support is available until Sep 2015. Also, they are still releasing images (probably because NPE-G1 runs same code). 15.2M and 15.2S seems to be the last images made for it. Last image available is from september 2013 anyway. -- Mikael

Re: [c-nsp] Search small replacement for Cisco 12k with ATM/OC3 interface

(latest) will boot on NPE-300 with 256M of ram (with warning saying it's not supported), but there isn't much memory to spare for routes. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] ARP on ASR9k 4.3.2

/addr_serv/command/reference/b_ipaddr_cr42asr9k_chapter_010.html. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 in the lab......

On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Bill Blackford wrote: My experience with Cisco IPv6 is limited but I believe you can't even configure a v6 address until you have the IPv6 SDM template loaded. You don't need to have an IPv6 address on an L2 switch, to L2 switch 0x86dd ethertype frames. -- Mikael

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco bug locator?

. Only by customers complaining will we see improvement. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco bug locator?

-10 years ago it was possible to do bug scrubs based on information on CCO. This is no longer possible, now one needs to pay advanced services for their NOS service to be able to do it, just because the customer accessable information just isn't complete enough. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 filters

who are no longer customers can end up being transited to your network because you now receive the prefix via a peer, but still announce it to your transits. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Amix Peering

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, naresh reddy wrote: will they charge us for the traffic that we pump and pull to internet on per MB basis ?? if so what would be the cost No, they will not charge you for traffic. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] IOS 12 and 15

service in IOS15. I am particularly interested in the differences in IOS 15 command line. Think of 15.x as 12.(5+x). There isn't that mcuh different when it comes to commands, it's mostly under the hood and of course new functionality. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] IOS 12 and 15

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Jeff Kell wrote: On 8/28/2013 10:46 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: Think of 15.x as 12.(5+x). There isn't that mcuh different when it comes to commands, it's mostly under the hood and of course new functionality. Is that true on the 6500? Yes. -- Mikael Abrahamsson

Re: [c-nsp] speed and duplex change of remote router

to force duplex. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Output queues - access vs. trunk

speed and the loss you're seeing would be understandable. Any ideas? And would QOS tuning be likely to help? QOS is a way of selecting what packets to drop. I don't see how it would help here. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Card 12000-SIP-601 reboot

. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

-advanced-technology-class/ipv6-over-mpls-with-102.html I managed to watch one of them, then it requires registration (so I can't watch this one). If it's as good as the one I watched, it should be worthwile for the topics in this thread. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: What do u think ? I don't have experience with mixing 6PE and native so I can't offer much advice in this case. I also do not know what IGW is. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR, since it is directly connected ? Sure. I would configure send-label there as well so that you do thing in a consistent manner, but that's a matter of opinion. -- Mikael Abrahamsson

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW RR, I have pure BGP IPv4. So ? You said it was a PE so I presumed it was an MPLS speaker. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco

Re: [c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out of box?

-ChrisCole.pdf might be interesting to read if you want to see where things are and where they're headed for the future. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

-label. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

but you add send-label. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: Dear List What is the difference between the chassie versions? Is the V2 just a hardware revision? V2 is probably the uprated FAN array, which means you can have DWDM optics in all slots in a 24x10GE card. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

in the event of one of the modules failing. Apparently V1 can just about do a fully loaded chassis with 2 modules. My bad. Yes, I knew about the power shelves/supplies, just didn't know that they were reflected in the chassis ID as well. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 and QoS for lower bandwidth

-- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR 4.3.0 or 4.3.1

is that this is appreciated. Basically release all fixes in a rollup SMU pack every 3 months, mimicking the way IOS used to work, releasing a new fix release every 3-4 months. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1k to ASR9k CLNS MTU problems

. If you configure main interface mtu 9114 on ASR9k and 9100 on IOS, it should just work out of the box, no need to adjust clns mtu or any other protocol MTU. Both Juniper and IOSXR includes the 14 byte ethernet header in the MTU calculation. IOS does not. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR 4.3.0 or 4.3.1

at least 6 month after major release if you want stable software. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR 4.3.0 or 4.3.1

the same logic here as I do in IOS-land. You start to get on 12.0(32)SYx when X is above 3 or 4. Same with SRE for 7600, SRE4-5 or so started to be ok. Cisco is not alone in this, I'd say most vendors have similar problems. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR 4.3.0 or 4.3.1

step and new manufacturing technique the next step, then new arch again. Not both at the same time. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease notifications with Graceful Restart

. Please talk to your account team and ask them to talk to the BU and get them to fix this. Desired behaviour: On a dual RP system, advertise yourself as GR capable. On a single RP system, only do GR helper. Either auto detect this or make it configurable. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm

Re: [c-nsp] 4GE-SFP-LC EoS

--- This is the date they should be looking at. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Lee Starnes wrote: would have any issues with this or if it's only difference is the ability to do POS. I was under the impression that the WL did 10GE WANPHY (and LANPHY), not POS. POS is not Ethernet. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] Most Stable IOS-XR Version for ASR9K

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, gu...@golas.ru wrote: Try to use another version 4.2.3 with SMUs. 4.2.3 with SMUs seems stable. There are still some bugs, but nothing causing catastrophic failures (with smupack 2 released end of January). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone

as well. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

bidirectionally. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

the SIP will carry only 10 GE ( IN + OUT ) ... ? Would you please share your experience about this isue. A SIP-601 will do ~11-12 gigabit/s of througput, full duplex. By inserting two 10G SPAs you've overbooked the SIP by almost a factor of 2. There is no local switching I'm aware of. -- Mikael

Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron wrote: Any assistance is appreciated show controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 both ends. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] Performance issue on link

to a pcap file and open this is wireshark and to a TCP stream analysis so you can actually *see* what is going on. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Performance issue on link

on the servers and look for packet loss. Wireshark has excellent TCP analysis tools that can show you exactly what's going on, if the problem is maxed out TCP windows or if it's caused by TCP saw-toothing due to packet loss. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

[c-nsp] ASR9k sw quality (Re: Sup2T - poor netflow performance)

with the bug still in review yesterday. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2T - poor netflow performance

. For Internet peering router at 10GE with typical eyeball traffic my opinion is that 6500/7600 doesn't have working netflow. I'm sure there are use cases where 6500/7600 netflow works just fine, but not in the scenario a lot of poeple seem to want to use it. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm

Re: [c-nsp] entry-level 10gbps for exchange

, and probably skip some nice-to-have ones. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in SP Core

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Gordon Bryan wrote: Also, even in a completely private core, a PE still becomes exposed to the outside world on its PE-to-CE interface when delivering Internet services. Has anyone developed any proficient methods for locking down these interfaces and making them

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

are there for controlling routed multicast? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

, ie multicast between ISPs. Watching NASA multicast streams for instance (I did this at my university in ~1995). Very few commercial ISPs support this. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes wrote: On 01.03.2013, at 07:44, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: Proper way (at least it was in XR 3.6 - 3.8 time) is to put multicast sources into BGP address-family multicast. By default, if the source is only in BGP af-unicast then it's

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes wrote: On 01.03.2013, at 10:01, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes Do you have your sources addresses in IGP? Nope, BGP SAFI unicast. Well, your experience contradicts mine. I have had to solve issues

  1   2   3   4   5   >