Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

--- Begin Message --- Here is an old 3750e stack (non-critical!) at almost 8 years: Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(1)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) xxx uptime is 7 years, 44 weeks, 6 days, 5 hours, 31 minutes Switch Uptime : 7 years, 24 weeks, 5 days, 3

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1K forwarding failures on 10G SPA's

tight CoPP with discards, iACLs, and the like to only allow things towards the boxes that are as trusted as possible. On Tuesday, 4 October 2016, Sascha Pollok <s...@iphh.net> wrote: Just to make sure: latest IOS XE version? Its not the NTP processing bug filling up interface queues? How do

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1K forwarding failures on 10G SPA's

Just to make sure: latest IOS XE version? Its not the NTP processing bug filling up interface queues? How does the input queue look on the affected interfaces? Cheers Sascha Am 4. Oktober 2016 05:33:39 schrieb Stephen Fulton : ISIS adjacencies drop as well as BGP

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206VXR with NPE-G1

Well ... Am 7. Juli 2015 22:28:12 schrieb Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de: Hi, On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:16:10PM +, Matthew Huff wrote: I would strongly recommend picking up a refurb NPE-G2. They should be cheap and available. We are running 15.2(4)S7 on ours with BGP/EIGRP. Very

Re: [c-nsp] Optical - rx power low warning

Hi Mike! the Alarm status comes from the SFP. Togehther with the crapp chars I would say some internal values got messed up maybe incl the thresholds for alarms. -16dbm should be fine. Talk to the vendor. Cheers Sascha Am 30. April 2015 08:09:27 schrieb Mike

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 3750E w/ MAC learning disabled shutting port?

Hi Adam, the why is simple. Some on the remote end disconnected the wrong cable :-) But I still dont understand why the edge port saw a link up/down then. Thanks Sascha Am 25. April 2015 16:59:23 schrieb Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk: Hi Sascha, Isn't there anything else

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR as-path-set

edit as-path-set xxx Am 6. April 2015 14:14:35 schrieb M K gunner_...@live.com: How can i modify an existing as-path-set on Cisco IOS XR ? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Deny default route (From customer - BGP)

received-routes show all routes even though they might have been filteres out. Take a look at show ip bgp neigh ... routes Cheers Sascha Am 10. März 2015 03:53:58 schrieb CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com: Hi Everyone, Only had a few hours sleep, so I may be overlooking something

Re: [c-nsp] question on s/rtbh 6500 with sup720-3cxl

Didnt the OP write that he receives packets originating from RFC1918 and not destined for? Cheers Sascha Am 9. Februar 2015 06:54:06 schrieb Rod James Bio rju...@gmail.com: Hi, In case I fail to get the whole scenario. Why is a provider sending packets destined to 10/8 to you? Are you

Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

Hi Jen, +1 for Tony. I would just like to make clear: please do NOT deaggregate the /19. You can advertise a more-specific /24 to ISP3 OR advertise the more-specific /24 to all three ISPs. But please do *not* deaggregate the /19 into 32x /24. Good luck Sascha On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Tony

Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

in only 4 extra prefixes being announced than a single /19. regards, Tony. __ From: Sascha Pollok nsp-l...@pollok.net To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com Cc: Jennifer Pruett jennypruet

Re: [c-nsp] Overlapping Subnet Issue - Gateway IP Resides in Vendor Assigned Public IP Range

Spencer, You could have your isp assign a transit ip subnet for the link and then out your ips internal your border router. Another thing you could do static nats if the first option isn't available. On Jul 9, 2012 7:50 PM, Spencer Barnes spen...@ceiva.com wrote: Hello, [...] Our new ISP

Re: [c-nsp] Overlapping Subnet Issue - Gateway IP Resides in Vendor Assigned Public IP Range

route OK in this setup? -Original Message- From: sp-pri...@locus.tech.iphh.net [mailto:sp-pri...@locus.tech.iphh.net] On Behalf Of Sascha Pollok Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 5:03 PM To: Chris Evans Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Spencer Barnes Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Overlapping Subnet Issue

Re: [c-nsp] IOS IPv6 Forwarding over Virtual-Access%IPV6_FORWARDING-3-NULLIDB

Moin Oli, *Jun 18 2012 12:17:48 CEST: %IPV6_FORWARDING-3-NULLIDB: Uninitialized interface pointer - ipv6_fib_forw -Process= L2X Data Daemon, ipl= 0, pid= 193 -Traceback= 0x8173D634z 0x81096DACz 0x8133B70Cz 0x8133BFF4z 0x8133C050z 0x801F1254z 0x801F1734z 0x801F1960z 0x801F1A94z 0x804E6FC4z

[c-nsp] IOS IPv6 Forwarding over Virtual-Access %IPV6_FORWARDING-3-NULLIDB

Hello Cisco-folks, Friend G**gle does not really help about this logging message when trying to forward IPv6 down a Virtual-Access terminating a PPTP tunnel: *Jun 18 2012 12:17:48 CEST: %IPV6_FORWARDING-3-NULLIDB: Uninitialized interface pointer - ipv6_fib_forw -Process= L2X Data Daemon, ipl=

Re: [c-nsp] glbp migration to hsrp anycast

Gents and Ladies, [...] Will all servers update their arp table, if the hsrp function propagates gratious arp. I've never seen this fail except on REALLY REALLY old things; Solaris 2.6 had a problem, IIRC. We saw firewalls of customers not accepting ARP-Replies when no ARP whohas was

Re: [c-nsp] Strange trunk behavior

Hello Ghassan, just to make sure: is the encapsulation set to 802.1q on the ME3400? Afaik it does still support ISL. You might want to share sh int x/x capa on both sides and maybe also the interface's config. Also, is there anything in between the switches that could cause some interference

Re: [c-nsp] IP GRE tunnel up/down

Can you route from the source to the tunnel destination and are there any firewalls that would block the GRE protocol? Can the destination route back to the source loopback1? All not relevant, unless tunnel keepalive is active. Normally, the tunnel is down if either source or destination IP

Re: [c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR? *Solved*

I did some digging and found, that show mem dead is awfully long. Feels like millions of lines (could be ten thousands of lines, too). Most of them refer to a process that I can not find anything about: 07406718 40 074066C8 0740676C 001 001FF434 acct periodic timer

Re: [c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR?

Me again, These occur due to memory leaks in the BGP process. Disabled BGP sessions can cause memory leakage and the type of CPU issues you are seeing. there are currently none on this box. Solution is upgrade to latest 12.0(33)S train. The PRP-1 is on 12.0(33)S7. Quite new I guess.

Re: [c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR?

Some more details below, sorry for the noise. Work around is periodic reloads and eliminating down/shutdown bgp sessions. I am sure there are other bugs but not sure what all of them are. So I guess I am more likely hitting one of those other bugs :-( I did some digging and found, that

[c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR?

Hello people, before I dig too much into it, I wanted to ask whether anyone here as experienced sth similar. Is anyone aware of a memory leak on latest 12.0(33)S or 12.0(32)S releases for GSR? We see our graphs constantly going down and jump up again upon reload. Things that we see is right now

Re: [c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR?

-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sascha Pollok Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:28 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR? Hello people, before I dig too much into it, I

Re: [c-nsp] sup2 VRRP/HSRP limits

Hello Andrew, What is the maximum number of VRRP groups which can be configured on a 6500/sup2? I've found that the limit for HSRP seems to be 256. Do these limits increase on the SUP720-3BXL? I'm trying to use a pair of 6500s as the default gateway for a couple of thousand VLANs, and am

Re: [c-nsp] sup2 VRRP/HSRP limits

I can't remember the exact limit for VRRP or HSRP (keep in mind you can only use one of those on a 6500 at a time - no mixing). However, just use the same group number on all of the SVIs and you'll be fine. You can also mix group numbers of course. Most important information is that you can reuse

Re: [c-nsp] two quick bgp questions

Hello Drew, only answering to one of your questions. 1) I know they're old, but Is it normal for a PRP-2 to take 10-12 minutes to receive a full routing table from a transit provider? Is there anything you can do to speed this up? the reason I am asking is because the BGP ROUTER process is

Re: [c-nsp] GE servers in the data center -

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 21/01/2011 01:07, chris stand wrote: I did not realize folks thought I meant GigE ... I meant the company GE for those who are hosting vendor boxes. ROFL. punked! :-) He could've sent a quick thank you so far instead of telling people they

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Android or iphone apps?

Jeff, thanks for that link. My wife says it's just perfect for me. Why's that? :-) Rgds from the engine room Sascha On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Jeff Wojciechowski wrote: Feel free to ban me from the list after this one but I had to interject this T-Shirt:

Re: [c-nsp] GRP vs. PRP-1

Hola, The PRP-1 has much more room to put stuff in (1GB Ram) and is much faster. It still shows high CPU though when it comes to a high number of peers etc. You might consider PRP-2 in that case. But in your case PRP-1 should be perfectly fine. The GRB-P is also out of support and gets no

Re: [c-nsp] GRP vs. PRP-1

Hello Mike, We had a GSR with the GRP-B fall over this morning when we brought up a 3rd transit (full table) connection on the device with an Out of Memory error. We are running 3-port Gig cards with full memory and the GRP as the base. Would upgrading to a PRP with full RAM alleviate this

Re: [c-nsp] IOS - ipv6 uppercase in config - why ?

Is there a reason that ipv6 addresses are stored with uppercase letters in config ? [...] At issue is when I do 'show run | inc 2607:ff70' and get nothing I scratch my head for a second. Then I try 'show run | inc 2607:FF70' and get what I expected. This seems inefficent, error-prone, and

[c-nsp] Script to track memory leaks?

Hello routing-people out there, I am currently trying to track down a memory leak on a Cisco router and I'm wondering whether there is a script out there to collect sh proc mem periodically so that I get the chance to find out which process is leaking. Most likely BGP but who knows. Of course a

Re: [c-nsp] Script to track memory leaks?

] On Behalf Of Sascha Pollok Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 11:02 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Script to track memory leaks? Hello routing-people out there, I am currently trying to track down a memory leak on a Cisco router and I'm wondering whether there is a script out

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

http://www.data-connect.com/RAD_AMC-101.htmWonder if anyone uses those kind of converter and how reliable are they? I have a FDDI hand off. I use a Cisco Catalyst 5500 for this purpose (and to translationally bridge from FDDI to Gigabit Ethernet). The cheap solution, back in the day, was to

Re: [c-nsp] Is GLC-FE-100LX= really unsupported?

Salut Christophe, Cisco lists the GLC-FE-100LX= SFP as unsupported for several switches like most Catalyst 3560. However, they say it is supported in small 8PC and 12PC boxes. Does anyone know for sure that it is not working in e.g. Cat 3560-24TS switches? I am surprised that Cisco lists the

Re: [c-nsp] Is GLC-FE-100LX= really unsupported?

Salut Christophe, Does anyone know for sure that it is not working in e.g. Cat 3560-24TS switches? I am surprised that Cisco lists the GLC-FE-100FX (Multimode fiber) as supported but not the LX (Singlemode) module. Hi, I am in front of the same problem. If you have off-list answers I am

[c-nsp] Is GLC-FE-100LX= really unsupported?

Hello people, Cisco lists the GLC-FE-100LX= SFP as unsupported for several switches like most Catalyst 3560. However, they say it is supported in small 8PC and 12PC boxes. Does anyone know for sure that it is not working in e.g. Cat 3560-24TS switches? I am surprised that Cisco lists the

Re: [c-nsp] hsrp/vrrp with mpls vpn's

On 8 September 2010 08:44, Michael Sprouffske msprouff...@yahoo.com wrote: So, I have this hsrp lab setup with a coulple PE routers and come CE routers.  Everything works and all is well.  I wanna know how the 2 PE routers that are playing in the hsrp role notify other PE routers upstream or

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 dies a fantastic death - What went wrong?

Morning, PSes with Output Fail red lights. Upon close investigation it looks [...] Has any seen two PSes seemily die at the same time? Deep down I think I *think* (read: I might be wrong but) that the PSes also switch off and show OUTPUT FAIL when the router is shutdown from the

Re: [c-nsp] GEIP+

My years-long quest to get a pair of GEIP+ boardsets has finally come to fruition. However, I have one question. Does the GEIP+ support 1000BASE-T GBICs? I don't need it to be eligible for Cisco support; I just need it to work. Failing that, does the C4912G support 1000BASE-T GBICs?

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6: HSRP vs Anycast

Hello Billy, Is anyone using IPv6 Anycast in replace of HSRP? Would there not by issues with Duplicate IP addresses? I can not seem to find any relevant documentation that discusses the use of IPv6 Anycast to replace a FHRP such as HSRP or VRRP. What are other SP's using as a FHRP or are/have

Re: [c-nsp] Incarnations of 0.0.0.0

Hello William, 2) Routing to 0.0.0.0 does not do what you may think it does. That is because CEF maintains a receive entry for 0.0.0.0/32 ex: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.1 ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 This will cause all traffic except the 10.0.0.0/24 prefix to be routed to

Re: [c-nsp] smaller PI

It is like it is. RIPE NCC allocates PI according to the demand within 12 months. If it is a /26, you'll get a /26. RIPE NCC does not guarantee that the block they allocate is routable. Tricky eh? There is a policy proposal to make PI blocks at least /24 in case it is planned to announce them to

Re: [c-nsp] Recommend router for ATM OC-12

Hello Rich, you could look at getting a GSR. It might be a little big though but there are plenty of WAN cards like ATM and POS available at good prices. Cheers Sascha On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Rich Davies wrote: Hello, Someone has asked me a question regarding what Cisco router platform can

Re: [c-nsp] How to find the root cause of packet loss

Getting output drops and packet loss on Catalyst WS-C2960G-48TC-L. Someone should start selling T-shirts with a pun on that. :-) Any idea how the EOSed 2970 performs in terms of buffers and bursts? I have some of those in stock and wondering where to put them next. -Sascha

[c-nsp] 3750E 12.2(53)SE2 swallows blank lines for banner motd

Good day, I just started to finish configuration of a new 3750E-24TS-S running 12.2(53)SE2 IP Base software. Normally, we configure motd banners like this: banner motd # This is __switchname__ Blabla Unauthorized . # It seems, that this switch ignores blank lines as it results in:

Re: [c-nsp] 3750E 12.2(53)SE2 swallows blank lines for banner motd

better: banner motd # This is __switchname__ Blabla Unauthorized . # HTH Ziv -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sascha Pollok Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:48 AM To: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 3750E 12.2(53)SE2 swallows blank lines for banner motd

Alexander, good point! It seems, that this switch ignores blank lines as it results in: banner motd# This is __switchname__ Blabla Unauthorized . # Anyone with a similar experience? I get the same. My workaround is to dump the config over TFTP somewhere, tweak up the banner there,

Re: [c-nsp] FlexOptic

Hello Tim, Anybody have any experience with FlexOptic? Their website seems a little crazy: http://www.flexoptix.net But they claim to have an SFP/GBIC programmer, plus tunable optics, which is what interests me. they do. And they are crazy indeed :) Thomas held a presentation at DENOG1 about

[c-nsp] GSR: 3GE-GBIC-SC v4 traffic influenced by v6 traffic?

Good day, the 3GE-GBIC-SC card does IPv6 in software on the linecard. Is anyone aware of a problem that IPv6 traffic that is software-forwarded could influence IPv4 hardware forwarding? It looks like a linecard could hit 100% with ~80 Mbit/s of v6 traffic + other tasks like TAG Stats Backgr or