On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
from 6pe to 6vpe we need to creat a VRF as u mention and send-label only in
6pe scenario
When looking for some other information, I came across this that might be
useful:
internal pe's
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Ahmed Hilmy
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 5:00 AM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
But i dont have MP-BGP between
: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW RR, I have pure BGP IPv4.
So ?
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson
swm...@swm.pp.sewrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
Can i add address family IPv6
What if I do 6vpe and don't use the send-lable ? what happens ?
Aaron
From: Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:hilmy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 1:05 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
Hello Aaron,
Thanks
” ? what happens ?
** **
Aaron
** **
*From:* Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:hilmy...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 1:05 PM
*To:* Aaron
*Cc:* Mikael Abrahamsson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
** **
Hello Aaron,
** **
Thanks
: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
I think in 6vpe u dont need send-label because u already establish vpnv6
family.
in 6pe we need send-label because we establish ipv6 family.
This is what i have understood !!!
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
What if I do
** **
Aaron
** **
** **
*From:* Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:hilmy...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 1:47 PM
*To:* Aaron
*Cc:* Mikael Abrahamsson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
** **
I think in 6vpe u dont need send-label because u already
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
What do u think ?
I don't have experience with mixing 6PE and native so I can't offer much
advice in this case. I also do not know what IGW is.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
___
cisco-nsp
Hello Mikael,
IGW ( Internet Gateway ) is PE has a ebgp session with UP Links.
I have Full BGP table IPv6 at IGW and IPv4 as well.
RR is directly connected to IGW.
RR has IBGP IPv4 with IGW.
Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR, since
it is directly connected ?
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR,
since it is directly connected ?
Sure. I would configure send-label there as well so that you do thing in a
consistent manner, but that's a matter of opinion.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson
But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW RR, I have pure BGP IPv4.
So ?
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR,
since it is directly connected ?
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW RR, I have pure BGP IPv4.
So ?
You said it was a PE so I presumed it was an MPLS speaker.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Dear Friends,
I am working on IPv6 deployment at our Backbone.
Our network design is as below:
PEs --- MP-BGP ---RR ( address-family vpnv4 )
RR-- BGP-IGW ( address-family ipv4 )
what i understand is :
- Add address family IPv6 at PEs :
address-family ipv6
neighbor x.x.x.x activate
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am working on IPv6 deployment at our Backbone.
Our network design is as below:
PEs --- MP-BGP ---RR ( address-family vpnv4 )
RR-- BGP-IGW ( address-family ipv4 )
what i understand is :
- Add address family IPv6 at PEs :
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
We can say MP-BGP ( vpnv4 ) will carry IPv6 packets as a label across IPv4
MPLS Backone.
Thanks in advance for sharing info.
vpnv6 is what you need for 6VPE (IPv6 VRFs).
6PE is for Internet IPv6, and there you do it under address-family ipv6
unicast
Thanks Mikeal,
I have seen this dos and it is super useful, but still i need to confirm
the plan for you guys !!!
Regards,
Ahmed
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am working on IPv6
Thanks Mikeal.
address-family ipv6 unicast but you add send-label. at PEs RR ?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
We can say MP-BGP ( vpnv4 ) will carry IPv6 packets as a label across IPv4
MPLS Backone.
Check the link below
http://eng-mssk.blogspot.com/2012/10/mpls-l3-vpn-6pe-ebgp-pe-ce-routing.html
BR,
Mohammad
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:57:16 +0300
From: hilmy...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
Dear Friends,
I am working on IPv6 deployment
Hello Mikael,
it is clear to add send-label at PEs RR.
Now i am thinking about IGW, if we consider it as a PE so we have to enable
MP-BGP.
RR is directly connected to IGW, i am thinking to establish a new link for
native IPv6 ?
So at RR has two links connected to IGW, one of them is address
19 matches
Mail list logo
