here?
Thanks,
Brian Meade
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
You'll probably want to make that into 2 SIP trunks so it can actually
failover to the other if it gets an error message back from the
Expressway-C.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:43 AM Nick via cisco-voip <
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> We have a situation with a client where they h
You can put Finesse behind a reverse proxy and get it externally accessible.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:32 PM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The UCCX 12.x SRND is telling us that an end point (like CSF or 8851)
> registered via MRA is supported as an Agent device.
>
>
of Guelph
>>
>> Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
>> N1G 2W1
>>
>> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>>
>>
Have you tried using the Quick/User Phone Add? That works pretty well.
Just assign device/line templates to user profiles and adding a
CSF/TCT/RDP/Deskphone/TAB/BOT device for a user takes all of a minute at
most.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:42 AM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> I guess it’s a combo of
olloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't know Brian. My work email is only associated to a single
> password, not multiple. Ask me for my password, and then show me my list
> of sites. Makes sense in my head.
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:59 AM Brian Meade wrote
in a python script to automate the
> scraping of this data. Not that I did that. Laughs in PSIRT.
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:56 AM Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> I just did some testing here. I'm also seeing some Control Hub-only
>> customers in my list. I'm set
heliontechnologies.com*
> [image: Helion Technologies] <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> [image: Facebook] <https://facebook.com/heliontech>
> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech>
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
> *From:*
I think the issue he's talking about is when logging in to something such
as the Webex Meetings App. After entering your email address, you get a
list of sites to choose from. Technically you could enter anyone's email
address and see what Webex sites they have an account on.
This mostly seems t
n changed the HTTPS Ciphers Enterprise
> Parameter to use EC certs then? Because that's not the default setting.
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:20 AM Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> Some customers of mine with Linux environments connect to the CCMAdmin
>> pages with the EC certs.
Some customers of mine with Linux environments connect to the CCMAdmin
pages with the EC certs. It's definitely a good idea to get those signed.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:06 PM Tim Smith wrote:
> Is it time to start getting our EC certs signed as well?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *cisco-voip on behalf
ote:
> You can't convert the model from LAN to WAN, per se. You basically just
> destroy your HA by deleting the Sub from the Pub GUI. Then delete your Sub
> VM. Then, you rebuild the whole Sub integration from scratch, as if it was
> new.
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:55 A
HA over WAN allows each server to have different configurations for the
Unified CM connection as well as your call control groups. So you could
have the subscriber connect to a local CUCM subscriber and have different
device pools for those CTI groups to use that local subscriber as well.
I've de
I would keep pushing this. There is an internal review process for bug
release notes but clearly they failed here. That should not be the only
thing keeping Cisco employees from potentially putting malicious code in
bug notes. The reviewers probably wouldn't even be able to tell what is
maliciou
I don't think SPAN is actually supported on ISR's. You could probably do
an embedded packet capture.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:34 AM Reto Gassmann wrote:
> Hello Group
>
> I try to set up a SPAN Port on a ISR 4451
> (isr4400-universalk9.16.06.06.SPA.bin).
>
> The interface config are configured
ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Meade
> *Sent:* Friday, August 9, 2019 2:21 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* Jonath
ter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Brian
> Meade
> *Sent:* Friday, August 9, 2019 2:09 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:
occupied and deny the request
> (i.e. the physical room accepts it and the room kit sees it as now in
> use...)
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:43 PM Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> Webex doesn't respond to the invites. All it does is monitor the Room
>> Resource mailbox.
Webex doesn't respond to the invites. All it does is monitor the Room
Resource mailbox. So you can just use the same and it will look for any
meetings on the calendar. O365/Exchange should be the side setup to
auto-respond to the invites.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:03 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
vBrick is the main player in the Cisco space.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:14 AM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> All,
>
> Thanks in advance for any direction anyone can provide.
>
> I have a need to implement a recording/streaming solution for CMS and
> telepresence 1:1 calls similar to what used to be off
I usually do 6000 across the board. This pretty much maxes out any
endpoint.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:19 AM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
> Interesting… Quite a few phones support immersive.
>
>
>
> And I just found out I’ve got 2 tbps (terabits, not tablespoons) of
> immersive video bandwidth. Wo
Also make sure proxyAddresses are set correctly for the users-
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/jabber-windows/116152-problemsolution-product-00.html
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:23 AM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> This might have something to do with how default
933 is usually just provided by the SIP carrier in my understanding. A lot
of the circuits I've installed don't have 933 as an option.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:38 PM Jason Faraone wrote:
> We’re using the default address information – this TN is provided via
> SIP.us, and so I manually entered
You can just ignore it. When provisioning users/places, just don't enable
the Calling Service for them.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:32 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> I'm going through a webex provisioning process and the screens look
> differently than the last time I did this. It's presenting me wi
Yea, the Webex Contact Center (CJP) platform has this type of analytics
platform. Cisco is working to make it available for UCCX/UCCE data as well.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:47 AM Matthew Loraditch <
mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> Got a client on Shoretel right now and they have thi
Ariel,
Where was that screenshot taken? It looks different than Cisco Meeting App
and the WebRTC App I'm used to for CMS. I didn't see those icons in the
user guide either.
Thanks,
Brian Meade
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:11 PM ROZA, Ariel
wrote:
> I am having this issue with a
I don't believe that field allows any sort of subnet. It's /32 IP's only
from my testing.
There's a feature enhancement request to add the ability to add more than
one IP at once but doesn't mentioned by subnet-
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvn52086
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 6:31
Be aware that Call Service Connect is being deprecated for anything besides
Video Endpoints.
If this is for Webex Teams client, they want you to start looking at
Unified CM calling in Webex Teams.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cloudCollaboration/wbxt/ucmcalling/unified-cm-wbx
't. Be. True. Right? If so, Brian Meade has been wasting his
> time with UltraISO.
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:26 PM Evgeny Izetov wrote:
>
>> That's good to know. Was it 12.x or 11.x?
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:19 PM Haas, Neal
>> wrote:
>&g
I've given up on trying to get bootables. I haven't had any issues with
ones made with UltraISO.
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:39 AM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> Just wondering what the Put Tool Bootables are at now? We're planning on
> upgrading to v11.5.1 SU6 due to the field notice and I'd like to
ould write an article on the hidden costs of
> owning Cisco solutions. I mean, who pays for all of the work to add these
> devices, associate them, and then clean it all up later?
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:03 AM Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> Here's the bug for the Satellite s
Here's the bug for the Satellite server-
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvh16069
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:40 AM Jason Aarons (Americas) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> I seem to recall seeing a bug note, about works with Smart Software
> Manager Satellite. Open a c
Yea, it will use the MRGL from CUCM. If you've got hardware video
conference bridges registered. Otherwise, audio-only.
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:08 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> I recall seeing a section on the SX20 config screen about using the media
> resource list.
>
> Does this mean and SX2
Yea, I almost always do single NIC because of this. Not many customers
have a separate DMZ-Outside and DMZ-Inside. If they do, I go with the
dual-NIC design.
Almost always when I see a dual-NIC implementation done, they've got the
inside NIC directly attached to the inside network. It seems lik
Yea, they're hoping you allow inbound calls with source of @yourdomain.com
or @populardomainhere.com.
Usually they're not targeting Expressways on purpose, they just see it as a
device responding to SIP messages. A lot of PBX's on the internet have
very little security on them so things like chan
Not every system on those affected versions is vulnerable.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:56 PM Matthew Loraditch <
mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> What do you mean? It lists the affected releases and the ones with the fix?
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch
> Sr. Network Engineer
> p: *443.541.15
API.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Stephen Welsh
> Founder & CTO
> UnifiedFX
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 25 Apr 2019, at 14:02, Brian Meade wrote:
>
> Yea, was hoping someone from Cisco would jump in to confirm if there's
> something like a SetRingToneWB
PM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alright, well, I guess that's the end of the road then, huh?
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> Thanks for testing Anthony! You're seeing the same thing I saw in that
>&g
ne.rwb
> \r\n\r\n'
>
> So, I used the following as a supplement to the previously linked site, so
> that I could figure out this 240 sample thing:
> https://www.netcraftsmen.com/uc-toolkit-using-audacity-for-cucm-ring-tones/
>
>
> My phone (8851 on 12.5(1)SR2) still plays
you have it working now then?
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:42 PM Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> So I confirmed the sample rate should be 16000 Hz as well.
>>
>> Then exported as Raw (headerless) Signed 16-bit PCM
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:25 PM Brian Meade
So I confirmed the sample rate should be 16000 Hz as well.
Then exported as Raw (headerless) Signed 16-bit PCM
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:25 PM Brian Meade wrote:
> SetRingTone is a bit undocumented in any of the API guides similar to
> setBackground. They both work but RingTone may no
me detailed info. Have you already seen this info?
>
> http://usecallmanager.nz/ring-list-xml.html
>
> Interestingly, this information doesn't seem to be present in the normal
> Phone API guide. Is this hidden information, or just documented elsewhere?
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 201
Anyone had any luck using the IP Phone Services API to set a wideband
ringtone? It doesn't seem to like the file size for me even though my files
are smaller than the default wideband ringtones.
Thanks,
Brian Meade
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco
Are you looking on the right node that alerted? I wouldn't expect this to
be in the DB either if it doesn't display in OS Admin.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:23 AM ROZA, Ariel
wrote:
> I am receving RTMT alarms about an expired tomcat-trust certificate, but
> the certificate is not listed in the
Actually meant o= line is the origin line.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:39 PM Brian Meade wrote:
> It's definitely failing at parsing the SDP on that invite and finding an
> invalid parameter:
> 07517620.001 |16:00:23.657 |AppInfo |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_UdpDataInd:
> Incoming SIP
-5.2
Maybe just check their server has NTP synced okay to start?
Thanks,
Brian Meade
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:33 AM ROZA, Ariel
wrote:
> Here´s the trace file with the bad call
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De:* Brian Meade
> *Enviado el:* lunes, 25 de marzo de 2019
Can you send the trace file you pulled the bad call from?
Is MTP Required set on the SIP Trunk?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:14 PM ROZA, Ariel
wrote:
> My issue is not a CUCM upgrade. The other side from the SIP Trunk was the
> one that was updated (a local in-house development, called Mitrol). Th
Your Cisco partner can have external admin accounts for your org to disable
SSO if needed as well.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:16 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> OK - Here's a chicken and egg question.
>
> Unlike with Webex legacy admin console, when you enable SSO on Control
> Hub, everyone uses it,
I'd say it would make sense to just do it on SME if you don't have any
dedicated leaf clusters for this kind of stuff already.
Some places have a leaf cluster dedicated for shared apps like voicemail
that would be a good fit for this but not worth re-inventing the wheel if
you don't have a dedicat
West/Redsky are the 2 big players in this space.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:49 PM Lisa Notarianni
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are currently using SPOK as our E911 system in our Cisco VoIP
> environment. We populate the data nightly through a provisioning tool
> called 2nd Nature. SPOK also provid
e
>
>
>
> As stated I understand CVP/VXML is not supported, but good to know basic
> TCL working.
>
>
>
> -jason
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of
> *Pawlowski,
> Adam
> *Sent:* Friday, February 15, 2019 2:55 PM
> *To:* 'Sreekanth Nara
You can't tell from just this snippet. The disconnect happens higher up.
Are these pre-9.x traces as well?
Can you send full traces with SDLs off-list?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:15 PM Nilson Costa wrote:
> Customer weren´t able to specify the issue correctly, actually the issue
> is that some
ts on here
may have seen this one.
Only thing I can think of is it's a way for them to send some sort of
per-page confirmation page?
Thanks,
Brian Meade
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Nope, it's just Error level logging. This is saying MTP is not needed due
to DTMF mismatch.
The MediaConnectRequest line above this will have much better info on why
an MTP may have been required.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 1:45 PM Nilson Costa wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Does it error means a DTMF
This is interesting because I was working to move a customer to a different
platform due to fax detect scripts no longer working in ISR4k's. Should
that still be working as well? I thought the new architecture couldn't
terminate the audio streams like this.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:59 PM Pawlow
, ON |
>> N1G 2W1
>>
>> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>>
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Brian
> Meade
> *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2019 9:07 AM
> *To:* Jason Aarons (Americas)
> *Cc:* cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
>
You can't do VXML on ISR4k's so there's no way to play any sort of audio
any more. None of the Voice TCL scripts really work on the 4k's if they do
any media termination so things like fax detection no longer work.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 8:43 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) <
jason.aar...@dimensionda
My 12.5 download just finished. Confirmed not bootable.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:02 PM Charles Goldsmith
wrote:
> 12.0 CUCM was not bootable except what was on PUT of course.
>
> I haven’t seen any indication that 12.5 was to be different.
>
> On Jan 28, 2019, at 11:44 AM, Bri
Pretty easy with UltraISO. I do it all the time with no issues.
https://htluo.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-to-make-non-bootable-iso-image.html
There's no difference at all from the official bootable assuming you do it
correctly.
Newer Cisco releases with CentOS should be bootable by default on cisco
Is this for inbound B2B or for MRA?
If inbound B2B, it's more up to the caller's implementation of DNS. If the
caller is Webex, their may be some documented behavior out there somewhere.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ryan Huff wrote:
> I’m trying to guarantee an active/passive use case; so m
Be aware that the 12.5.1 88XX firmware breaks phone VPN. There's a Sev1
bug for this and hopefully this firmware will be deferred soon -
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvn76864
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:17 AM Paul Bottone wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> We have upgraded our CUCM system t
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
> On Dec 24, 2018, at 11:09 PM, Brian Meade wrote
Heads up on this one. Upgrading to 12.5 firmware on 88xx phones breaks
Phone VPN completely. There's a Sev1 bug on this now-
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvn76864
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.net
ter (or so it sounded like), I'd wager this problem is
> not with the PLM side, but is probably on the network path where it begins
> to be unique for this CUCM cluster in question, to include the CUCM cluster
> (or more specifically, the Publisher) itself.
>
> As for logs, I
Are you sure the destination port is 56648 and it's not the source port in
that handshake?
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 10:51 AM Jason Aarons (Americas) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>
>
> Have a centralized Prime License Manager (PLM) for several clusters. One
> cluster the Product Insta
https://www.unifiedfx.com/unifiedfx-free-software/phoneview-asset-and-inventory
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:53 PM Claiton Campos
wrote:
> Hey all,
> I have a cucm cluster with 1000 phones registers and i need to collect the
> serial numbers of this phones to make an inventory. How i can collect the
Looks like it's a problem with the way H.323 to H.323 calls work.
Unlike SIP, H.323 uses TerminalCapabilitySet messages to advertise to both
sides all possible capabilities/codecs between the 2 sides then the master
gets to pick.
On the call leg between Avaya and SME, Avaya gets chosen as master
The Line Templates used for Quick User/Phone Add and Self-Provisioning
allow you to use tags in various fields:
#FirstName#
#LastName#
#UserID#
#Email#
#Department#
#Manager#
#PrimaryExtension#
#Extension#
#LineIndex#
#DeviceName#
#Product#
#Protocol#
I've been trying to use this feature more and
You can use MS SQL on 11.5 if you've got that infrastructure in place
already.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:54 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> I'm looking to get a postgres support contract to ensure we have the
> support we need if we decide to do persistent chat rooms with Jabber. I'm
> also hoping
I don't think there's another way in IM&P.
You could use Subscribe/Notify from a technical standpoint but that doesn't
scale super well.
I've used the Publish Trunk for integration to custom XMPP deployments for
those reasons.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:03 PM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v
This one should do it direct but it's sold out-
https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=7145
Would need a combination of these 2 instead:
https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=7121
https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=7146
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:41 PM James Dust <
james.d...@charles-stanle
SK said it was sporadically, wouldn't a Privacy setting indicate a
> consistent experience? Or is there some variability to it?
>
> How about this:
> https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCup22449
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:57 PM Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> Usu
Usually this is due to the Privacy setting on the phone. Privacy On means
the other shared-line users won't be able to see/pick up those calls. You
probably need to make sure Privacy is set to Off on those phones.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:44 PM SK wrote:
> We have a weird issue with some of o
Yea, I'd just keep those on top just in case you ever register anything
directly to the C/E.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:42 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> Just wondering, this is likely a best practice question, I see the
> auto-generated search rules (on E) and local zone match rules (on C and E)
>
Usually tomcat-trust issue. It's all web services. Make sure tomcat-trust
looks good across the board then restart Tomcat.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 2:03 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>
>
> Any pointers on when Serviceability can't show services status on anot
I think they're skipping 14 as well similar to IOS. It's a bad number in
certain cultures.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:53 PM Jose Colon II wrote:
> SCCP from the last time I looked is going away. However I can't remember
> if its 12.5 or the next version 14. Skipping 13, apparently it's bad luck
The ExtensionMobilityDynamic table shoule preserve over an upgrade.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:54 AM James Dust
wrote:
> Good afternoon all,
>
> We are shortly going to be undertaking an upgrade on our CUCM cluster from
> and too the versions listed below:
>
> Our staff logon to their phones usin
Audiocodes looks to dynamically block IP addresses, but not phone numbers.
May be worth a call to them to confirm.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:49 AM Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> Hi Kent,
>
> That's not a bad idea to handle the calling numbers we know about, thanks
> for the tip. I'm trying to figure out
Was it when you added the SIP TLD in CUCM?
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 1:46 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> At some point in my configuration tasks for the roomkit, it seems all
> calls from both the roomkit (CE) and the SX20 (TC) are now sip uri calls. I
> used to dial a DN and not see the @otld info.
>
>
> *BR*
> *Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman*
> *Senior Network Engineer*
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 21, 2018, at 12:34 AM, Brian Meade wrote:
>
> You just use Post Call Treatment to send calls to a survey application and
> then store each result as an Enterpr
gineer*
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 20, 2018, at 1:57 AM, Brian Meade wrote:
>
> You can do it with Call Custom Variables Report and using Enterprise
> Parameters as a cheap/quick solution.
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:53 PM Tooze-Froggatt, Peter (ISS) <
> p
For name modification, CUCM doesn't have much. Probably would need a LUA
script to update the name in the SIP messaging.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:33 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> It’s been a while, and I know I can use route lists and route groups to
> customize called party number display but
You can do it with Call Custom Variables Report and using Enterprise
Parameters as a cheap/quick solution.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:53 PM Tooze-Froggatt, Peter (ISS) <
p.tooze-frogg...@lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
>
>
> In order to do this, I would recommend using an external database t
Yea, it will overwrite it with the CUCM configuration. You can try turning
off provisioning and point it manually to CUCM.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:21 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> Alright, got this webkit registered, both on-prem and through expressway.
> My testing while on expressway wasn't
This is probably their Level3 SIP Service they bought out which is much
better.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:51 PM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's interesting, I just performed the turn up of some CL SIP trunks
> this month, and it was multi-tenant registrations o
er for “Cluster Fully Qualified Domain Name” is
> cluster1.company.com.au so it’s learning this via AXL on the Expressway
> Connector.
>
>
>
> Do I need some kind of search rule / or transform on my Expressway Edge to
> convert this back to x...@company.com.au?
>
>
>
> Chee
I would just manually create the devices. There are many limitations with
automatically creating the devices.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:34 AM Dana Tong wrote:
> Further to this. When I search all users, the user is present but it looks
> like he controls many phones which is odd.
>
>
>
> I’ve tr
For SX20, you have to pair the Touch10 over the network. You can't attach
it direct. There were originally some plans for a USB to Ethernet adapter
for Touch10 but that got cancelled.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:22 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Thanks Jeremy… especially the part about the upgrades.
Probably worth keeping the search rules the same and just using
transforms. I don't think it's checking against Transforms.
Thanks,
Brian Meade
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:53 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> So, we’re saying then, that the Cisco recommended approach to simplifying
> v
uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Meade
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2018 11:29 AM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* cisco-voip voyp list
&
There's no way in CUCM to modify URIs other than SIP Normalization Scripts
as far as I'm aware.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:20 AM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> Just reading through the Cisco Webex Meetings Enterprise Deployment Guide
> for Video Device-Enabled Meetings<
> https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/
Raspberry Pi with browser may be a better option. You are a lot more
flexible with config files on those to have it never turn off.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:34 AM JASON BURWELL
wrote:
> Thanks Terry, I have actually been in contact with the Unified FX team
> already. Although functionally that
What does your SIP bind config look like? What IP addresses do you see in
the 1XX response from the carrier? What is the IP in the Contact header
for the outbound invite?
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:42 PM Benjamin Turner
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> Ran out of options. I have a new CUBE deployment
Good timing. Doing the same thing this very minute. CUAC Standard 12.0.3
on Windows 10 with CUCM 11.5.
Not able to get it working. I'm getting the Socket Bind failed message on
login as described here-
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvh79669/?rfs=iqvred
It looks like it is cos
> Thanks
>
> Tommy
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Brian Meade
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:43 PM
> *To:* eric.isak...@ogdenclinic.com
> *Cc:* cisco-voip voyp list
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco
Sounds like a CYA type of thing similar to how call recording over MRA was
for a while. I think x8.11 is supposed to be the release that the
forward-proxy is officially supported for APNS.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 3:15 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> I _thought_ I remember reading about that. That wou
oom 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve
ke up to an hour after logging
> into the VPN for users to check in and run the SCCM script.
>
>
>
> We've pushed a local registry file to everyone's machines to allow them to
> manually run it but HKLM requires them to elevate their accounts to local
> admin.
>
>
ing into
the VPN for users to check in and run the SCCM script.
We've pushed a local registry file to everyone's machines to allow them to
manually run it but HKLM requires them to elevate their accounts to local
admin.
Has anyone found a way to do this fairly seamless to the e
101 - 200 of 1162 matches
Mail list logo
