Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.6 HA LAN to WAN

wrote: > >> Yea, I think the process would work fine with new hostname. I'm >> wondering if deleting a sub and re-adding/rebuilding with same hostname as >> WAN causes some issues which needed that cleanup script. >> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:06 AM Antho

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.6 HA LAN to WAN

You can't convert the model from LAN to WAN, per se. You basically just destroy your HA by deleting the Sub from the Pub GUI. Then delete your Sub VM. Then, you rebuild the whole Sub integration from scratch, as if it was new. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:55 AM Brian Meade wrote: > HA over WAN a

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.6 HA LAN to WAN

You shouldn't need TAC to perform the cleanup of the Sub, but it's my understanding that they already know that the action of deleting the server is not 100% clean, so they have a command (a script) to run as root to clean up some left behind entries. I'd just as soon have them do this, as it cost

Re: [cisco-voip] CIMC MIC self-signed cert and new browsers

Another thing I've noticed is with HSTS, you cannot bypass the cert warning until you fix your cert issue on the server, or until you trick your browser into connecting anyway. https://appuals.com/how-to-clear-or-disable-hsts-for-chrome-firefox-and-internet-explorer/ Also, it looks like you're c

Re: [cisco-voip] PSA: Hunt Groups and Alerting Names

;(.*)<(.*)>\";", "huntpiloturi=\"%1\"<%2>;") On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:40 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was configuring some new stuff for a customer recently, and as I was > making test calls, I noticed the

Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Inbound and Two-Stage Dialing

Bump On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:50 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > A few years ago, Cisco introduced us to the Toll Fraud prevention changes > in 15.1(2)T > <https://www.google.com/search?q=cisco+ios+15.1%282%29+toll+fraud>, and > one of

Re: [cisco-voip] Bug Search Code Injection

Here is the response I got back after Cisco looked into my report: *"And as CDETS is not accessible to external users no malicious code can be entered and internal users will not enter any malicious code."* On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:02 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v

[cisco-voip] PRI Inbound and Two-Stage Dialing

A few years ago, Cisco introduced us to the Toll Fraud prevention changes in 15.1(2)T , and one of the changes was dealing with two-stage dialing. Pre-15.1(2)T, two-stage dialing was the default behavior on an inbound POTS dial-peer

Re: [cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

I was going to mention that, but your email signature Chat button doesn't work. Just kidding. Kudos to Kent for the quick thinking. But why did you turn off KPML? On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:41 AM Heim, Dennis wrote: > The issue was related to the overlay (VXLAN), that I use in our lab > enviro

Re: [cisco-voip] Bug Search Code Injection

FWIW I submitted feedback via the website and have already been contacted by someone on the Bug Search Tool team stating they're looking in to it. [image: image.png] On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:35 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like I stumbl

Re: [cisco-voip] Bug Search Code Injection

l Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tag

Re: [cisco-voip] Bug Search Code Injection

Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Im

Re: [cisco-voip] Bug Search Code Injection

. Basically every language has > standard functions for properly sanitizing/escaping text so there is no > excuse other than sloppiness... which makes one wonder what else they are > sloppy with. > > -mn > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Anthony > Holloway > *Sent:* Augu

[cisco-voip] Bug Search Code Injection

Looks like I stumbled across some code injection on the following defect page: https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvq27976 It's innocent enough, but concerning that it's even possible. [image: image.png] ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-v

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

That's some good insight. Thanks for sharing. On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:25 AM Pawlowski, Adam wrote: > I agree on several points you've made. As we continue to "run lean" > (meaning, in some cases, on fumes) and our management and leadership are > bombarded with firms offering to deliver everyt

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Anthony > Holloway > *Sent:* Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:50 AM > *To:* Charles Goldsmith > *Cc:* cisco-voip voyp list >

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

s have historically been more challenging. > > So now, I plan to wait until at least su2 before upgrading :) > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:15 AM Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why not just all Major versions all the time? Google Ch

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

g 15, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ryan Huff wrote: > After 12.5, no more “.5” releases, it’ll just be major versions (and the > SUs in between). After 12.5 we skip 13 and go right to 14 (then presumably, > 15 after that). > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 15, 2019, at 02:05, Anthony

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

What's going on with .5 releases? I don't think I heard about that. On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:16 PM Charles Goldsmith wrote: > Yeah, I think with the move away from the .5 releases, we'll be getting > more SU's and less major releases. > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:58 PM Ki Wi wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity DRS components

[image: image.png] Source: Install, Upgrade, and Maintenance Guide for Cisco Unity Connection Release 11.x On Mon, Aug 12, 20

Re: [cisco-voip] UC 12.5 zero out report

> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] > > On Aug 8, 2019, at 5:10 PM, Anthony

Re: [cisco-voip] UC 12.5 zero out report

Really, bulk edit is gone in 12.x? Neither of the release notes for CUC 12.0 and 12.5 mention this in the What's New and Changed sections. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unity-connection/products-release-notes-list.html On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:47 PM Lelio Fulgenzi

Re: [cisco-voip] UC 12.5 zero out report

Have you given User Data Dump a try? *Caller Input Key Actions. This value will dump out a human readable action string for each of the 12 user input keys for all users. Columns “CALLER_INPUT_0” through “CALLER_INPUT_9”

Re: [cisco-voip] Azure to Webex User Provisioning and Tokens

t; token”, and worst case, generate a new one. > > > > Ryan Ratliff > > Manager, Cisco Cloud Collaboration TAC > > Standard Business Hours: 8:00AM-5:00PM EDT > Email: rratl...@cisco.com > > Office: +1 919-476-2081 > > Mobile: +1-919-225-0448 > > Cisco U.S. Cont

Re: [cisco-voip] Azure to Webex User Provisioning and Tokens

chnologies] <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> > [image: Facebook] <https://facebook.com/heliontech> > [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech> > [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies> > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Ant

Re: [cisco-voip] Azure to Webex User Provisioning and Tokens

27;s the latter, but I fear its the former. All it would take is one curious Admin to click on the link in the document, and inadvertently break the integration. On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:17 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm using th

[cisco-voip] Azure to Webex User Provisioning and Tokens

I'm using the following link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/saas-apps/cisco-webex-provisioning-tutorial And in step 6 it describes how to obtain the secret token from Cisco, to input into Azure. It notes that the token is valid for 365 days, however, in my testing it's

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Call Escalation/Tiered CSQs

1st tier agents to select from to route to > agents that specialize in different areas. > > > > *From:* Anthony Holloway > *Sent:* Monday, August 5, 2019 10:55 AM > *To:* Johnson, Tim > *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Call Escalation/Tiere

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Call Escalation/Tiered CSQs

I wouldn't worry too much about cluttering up your scripts (or apps, or triggers). First and foremost, I would worry about reporting. Does the solution allow the stock reports to adequately meet the needs of the reporting personnel? Second, I would worry about ease of execution for the Agent. A

Re: [cisco-voip] PSA: Hunt Groups and Alerting Names

-cucm-and-lua-scripting/ba-p/3099409 > > > > Jinto. > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Anthony > Holloway > *Sent:* Thursday, August 01, 2019 12:40 PM > *To:* Cisco VoIP Group > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] PSA: Hunt Groups and Alerting Names > &

[cisco-voip] PSA: Hunt Groups and Alerting Names

I was configuring some new stuff for a customer recently, and as I was making test calls, I noticed the 7800/8800 series phones were not showing the Hunt Pilot Alerting Name like I'm used to. I found a defect (CSCvn39109 ) which basically

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection Mailbox

/> > [image: Facebook] <https://facebook.com/heliontech> > [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech> > [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies> > -- > *From:* Anthony Holloway > *Sent:* Mon

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection Mailbox

I would disagree. If I put myself into the caller's shoes, and I call Steve but hear Mark's voicemail, I will think I called the wrong number, and likely delete Steve's phone number from my contact list. On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 7:41 PM Matthew Loraditch < mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

Guelph, ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

to the NTT brand will be complete soon. Visit us at > hello.global.ntt > <https://hello.global.ntt/?elqTrackId=3F7027E56EB15D03DBADE8E3418458AD&elq=a39c94d982094528a3908202d287fc13&elqaid=5286&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=2994> > > > > > > *From:* Anthony Holloway > *S

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

just video endpoints > similar to a 8845/8865. > > > > Guess I was going by the video screen size. Big meant Telepresence. > Struggle was TAC SE didn’t know what Immersive Video vs Video was. The > CCIE Collab lab is pretty clear the 8845/65 are just video as you have > tasks

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

Did you already change the value of Service Parameter: Use Video BandwidthPool for Immersive Video Calls? The classification is per version of CUCM, and thus can be queried in CUCM. See below from SRND. *Endpoint Classification* Cisco TelePresence endpoints have a fixed non-configurable Video Ca

Re: [cisco-voip] cool tool - visualping.io

Instruction unclear Entered https://www.usdebtclock.org/ and now my phone wont stop dinging On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:54 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > I found this neat tool I wanted to share. > > https://visualping.io > > It allows you to enter a web page and then scan it as an image, text or >

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Jabber / Outlook Presence Status

Your own name is on my top ten list, Lelio Fulgenzi! On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:49 AM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > Ah – good article. > > > > And even _*better*_ name! Bruno Van Turnhout is on my top ten list now. > > > > --- > > *Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.* | Senior Analyst > > Computing and Communications

Re: [cisco-voip] room kits - smartnet or not?

Don't you require active smartnet in order to download software for video endpoints? I mean, I suppose if you're gambling on the hardware working for that long, you could also gamble on the software to last that long too. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:02 AM Charles Goldsmith wrote: > Phones are re

Re: [cisco-voip] SSO and uccx phone agent

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:10 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > It’s a deal! > > *-sent from mobile device-* > > > *Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.* | Senior Analyst > > Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph > > Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | > N1G

Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager Route Pattern Regular Expression Calculator

I know this is a little old, but I wanted to follow up nonetheless. I am working on a web based tool which helps with summarizing number patterns for CUCM. http://avholloway.com/ Right now, the only thing it does is summarize your patterns, but I would like to include the following features soon

Re: [cisco-voip] for those upgrading to 12.5 and use BIB

Wowza! That's not good. Thanks for the heads up. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:13 AM Scott Voll wrote: > For those that are upgrading to CM 12.5 and use call Recording with BIB, > just wanted give you a heads up on a Bug > https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvo36582/?rfs=iqvred > > Du

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

sco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone?? >> >> >> >> rh...@byteworks.com, if any hard chargers are in the process of setting >> up a space... >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> On May 23, 2019, at 14:13, Peter Slow wrote: >> >> I wa

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

We're a little over two weeks away from CLUS. Ryan were you a fan of the Webex Teams space for us? Or is this one of those Rounders moments, where everyone else is in the space right now, and I'm on the outside wondering if it even exists? :( On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:15 AM Anthon

Re: [cisco-voip] FN 70379 - reboot issues

Well ok then. I guess it's Monday morning and it's time to get to work. We collectively have a lot of work to do now. On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 1:24 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > Ok. I’m 99% sure that this FN said upgrade to SU5 or later when I first > read it. So it would seem that the update to

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

"... this stuff is soo fluid right now, it’s a contradictory mess..." This bothers me to an unhealthy degree. I really need to meditate or something. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:39 PM Ryan Huff wrote: > Yup, this stuff is soo fluid right now, it’s a contradictory mess 😂. > The on-prem re

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Tool Bootables - what version?

That. Can't. Be. True. Right? If so, Brian Meade has been wasting his time with UltraISO. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:26 PM Evgeny Izetov wrote: > That's good to know. Was it 12.x or 11.x? > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:19 PM Haas, Neal > wrote: > >> I had a TAC Call last week, they told me t

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 12.5 Licenses not loaning down.

"Severity: 5 Cosmetic" = Don't worry, everything is fine, it just looks like it's not working "Workaround: on CUCM ... assign additional device to the users" = Do a bunch of work to fix our mistake, that you'll later have to rip out, once we get it working. So, is it cosmetic, or is it a huge pr

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

l, easier to > support and troubleshoot and keeps you from having to “hairpin” in the > firewall (ewww, like gag me with a spoon man lol), which I have never been > a fan of from a design perspective. > > -Ryan > > On Apr 30, 2019, at 12:12, Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

dress up in character. How do you look wearing green body paint? > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Stephen > Welsh > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:35 AM > *To:* Anthony Holloway > *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

Ryan, Do you have any insight as to whether or not it's common for Firewalls in the field to already have more than one DMZ defined? In my limited experience, I have never seen it done, and I am having to have that second DMZ created to support Expressway. For that reason, I actually tend to thi

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

I'll be there! Last year, I started a webex teams room for those of us who were in attendance (and wanted to be in the room). A few of us used it to coordinate meetups. There was also some good conversation in the room during the week as well. Mostly, heads-ups on events, humor and commentary o

Re: [cisco-voip] Cloud registered user manual for room kits

Slightly off topic, but are the documents/articles on help.webex.com organized in any way, or is it a flat structure you just have to search through? On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:04 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) via cisco-voip < cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Yes you can dial anything with a SIP

Re: [cisco-voip] SetRingTone Wideband

there's > something like a SetRingToneWB command or something similar or plans to > update this API at some point. > > Adding Stephen Welsh as well since he's pretty familiar with these phone > APIs. > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:47 PM Anthony Holloway <

Re: [cisco-voip] SetRingTone Wideband

gList-wb.xml file and upload it to TFTP and it works fine. Seems like > the limitation is just around the SetRingTone command only working with > legacy ringtone parameters. > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:14 PM Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: [cisco-voip] SetRingTone Wideband

needle a little further? On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:35 PM Brian Meade wrote: > I've got it working using the RingList-wb.xml globally, but still can't > get it to work via API. It seems like SetRingTone was just never updated > to allow for wideband ringtones. > > On

Re: [cisco-voip] SetRingTone Wideband

7;s playing too fast. >> >> Anyone know if the sample rate needs to be changed from 8000 Hz or any >> other changes for wideband? >> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:12 PM Anthony Holloway < >> avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I&#x

Re: [cisco-voip] SetRingTone Wideband

I've never heard of this before, but a quick google search turns up the following page with some detailed info. Have you already seen this info? http://usecallmanager.nz/ring-list-xml.html Interestingly, this information doesn't seem to be present in the normal Phone API guide. Is this hidden i

Re: [cisco-voip] 8800-V-KEM Background Image Issue

Did you end up solving this? I might have an opportunity to run into this issue soon, and want to be prepared. Thanks. On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:23 PM JASON BURWELL wrote: > Hello all, > > > > Just connected my first few 8800-V-KEM modules today to an 8865. Having a > problem with them. Unlike

Re: [cisco-voip] One of the silliest bugs ever

And here I thought only UCCX had username case sensitivity issues. Damn. We're in 2019 now, and we're still being bamboozled by upper and lower case letters. It's too bad we can't extend the web design mantra of "separate content from presentation" at a much lower level, such as the case of lett

Re: [cisco-voip] ESXi 6.5U2 - Edit VM Settings - VM Shuts Down

OVA’s so if you use the preinstalled VM’s it could be related to >> that. >> >> >> >> I am curious what you find. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Tommy >> >> >> >> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of >&g

Re: [cisco-voip] ESXi 6.5U2 - Edit VM Settings - VM Shuts Down

I should have mentioned that the unregistering/re-registering of the VM does allow me to power on the machine. Prior to that, the VM will not power on. On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:42 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Twice now, on two separate systems, as I

[cisco-voip] ESXi 6.5U2 - Edit VM Settings - VM Shuts Down

Twice now, on two separate systems, as I was doing my fresh installs of CSR 11 apps, I disconnect the bootable ISOs from the VMs, and ESXi throws the following Event Log error, followed by shutting down the VM. *Issue detected for on in ha-datacenter: Configuration file has unexpected changes. V

Re: [cisco-voip] Removing certificates by hand

I'm not saying this is what's happening, but the node which sent the alert, could be different from the node with the expired cert on it. Maybe just double check the alert email. Alternatively, just look on the other nodes in that cluster for the cert in question. Keeping in mind that IM&P nodes

Re: [cisco-voip] Strange Webex Meetings PMR URI Thing

| 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagli

Re: [cisco-voip] Application Dial Rule with variable length

Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | >>> N1G 2W1 >>> >>> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca >>> >>> >>> >>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook &g

Re: [cisco-voip] Application Dial Rule with variable length

ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] > > On Apr 3, 2

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Apparently I have been living under a rock for 13 years. I didn't know the VG248 wasn't IOS based, because, well, I've never worked with one. So, what is it then? On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:03 PM NateCCIE wrote: > VG248 was the best one ever made by Cisco. Not IOS based made the thing > super s

Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Collaboration V2

Collab Cert use to sell a written study guide, and I wouldn't see why he wouldn't do the same for the V2. Maybe it would be worth shooting them an email and asking about it. FWIW, I never actually saw the product, I only saw it for sale on the site, so I cannot say if it was helpful or worth it.

Re: [cisco-voip] Application Dial Rule with variable length

Huh, I have never noticed this before. I just checked a few different environments I have access to, and none of them address international patterns. Good catch though. It seems like you already know it, and Lelio confirmed the solution. Though, I'd argue that Lelio's configuration is backwards;

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Email Templates for Outlook

Did you find anything out about this? On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 6:04 PM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also just looked through my email templates, and none of them seem to be > the one, so I would agree that it's hidden. > > For referenc

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] Phones to be Deprecated in CUCM 14 (ETA 2020)

I noticed that you waited until 11:14am to send this email. Nice. You can never be too careful. On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Johnson, Ken wrote: > Ah gotcha – thanks! > > It’s funny – at the hospital we go to, it’s a 13 story building, but it > has two mechanical floors on levels 4 & 5 so

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Email Templates for Outlook

I also just looked through my email templates, and none of them seem to be the one, so I would agree that it's hidden. For reference, I am using the newer Webex Meetings app, not Productivity Tools, and I clicked the Schedule Personal Room Meeting menu option. [image: image.png] On Mon, Mar 11,

Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager Route Pattern Regular Expression Calculator

There's a few programming types on this mailing list, surely someone has written their own utility for this; I know I have. I wrote mine a few years ago, and have been enhancing it a little since then, but it still has its quirks, and is written entirely for my own use. I wouldn't mind giving the

Re: [cisco-voip] Moving Unity 10.5 to Office 365

Here you go: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/10x/unified_messaging/guide/10xcucumgx/10xcucumg025.html Oh wait *"...moving Unity into the cloud..."* I'm not sure I understand now. Do you want to integrate CUC with O365, or move CUC functions into O365 and get

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CME Syslog

If you already have syslogging to a syslog server enabled, then the command gw-accounting syslog is all you should need. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/h323/14068-cdr-logging.html On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:09 PM Fares Alsaafani wrote: > Hi everyone, > Any recommendations what w

[cisco-voip] Strange Webex Meetings PMR URI Thing

I am wondering if anyone else knows why this might be happening, or if they have even themselves experienced this. I am a Cisco Partner, and thus, have a Partner Account for Webex Control Hub, and several customers in there, for which we manage. I am a Partner Admin. I am a Full Admin in the Cus

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCCX Play ToD and Calling number Prompt

t; > > One thing, is there another method other than N[XX] ? > > > > Reason being, it reads the number correctly, but it’s reading it out as a > whole number, for example 155 > > Is read as “Fifteen Billion… “ > > > > Thank you. > > > >

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCCX Play ToD and Calling number Prompt

1 > > It plays the extension accordingly. > > > > > > *From:* Anthony Holloway > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2019 9:51 AM > *To:* Wagner, Fredrich > *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCCX Play ToD and Calling number Prompt &

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCCX Play ToD and Calling number Prompt

For ToD, the simplest method is to use the Create Generated Prompt step. So, you would store the current time like this: Set time_now = T[now], and then you would use the generator step to output to a Prompt variable, for which you would play with the Play Prompt step. For calling number, the simp

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Guest as a “live chat for help” solution

If anyone is looking for chat, Upstream Works for Finesse is about a mile out in front of SocialMiner+Context Service. They are now SolutionsPlus too. https://www.upstreamworks.com/products/ On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:08 PM NateCCIE wrote: > For chat you want social miner connected to UCCX. J

Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat

Is this the white paper you are talking about? https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/im_presence/database_setup/BestPractices/Cisco_IMP_ExtDB_WP.pdf On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:05 AM Pawlowski, Adam wrote: > When we evaluated the cleanup jobs when 12.0 came out, it didn't

Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat

is* > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf > Of *Erick Wellnitz > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 13, 2019 9:36 AM > *To:* Anthony Holloway > *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat > > > > If I ever f

Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat

which route you take. On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:56 AM Erick Wellnitz wrote: > That works for what loads in Jabber but they're concerned with the > messages existing in the database which makes them fair game for legal > discovery. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:59 PM Anth

Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat

Is it not just the setting labeled Maximum number of messages that can be retrieved from the archive? On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:12 AM Erick Wellnitz wrote: > All, > > With the introduction of WebEx Teams the request for persistent chat isn't > so common anymore. > > I have a client asking abou

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway B2B calling questions

I feel like Lelio just went through a hell of time with this exact thing recently. https://cisco-voip.markmail.org/thread/mdiy66e6rojirfob Is his scenario the same as yours or different? On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 10:59 AM Erick Wellnitz wrote: > All, > > I think I'm just missing something simple.

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade from 10.5 to 11.5

rvisor, much like most of our install base uses, > there are no tools to do this without spending money, at least that I’m > aware of. > > > > On Jan 21, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But it says: " To prevent

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade from 10.5 to 11.5

’s all what your more comfortable with, I guess. I’d rather double the > amount of prep time to complete the upgrades offline in order to reduce the > downtime to the production service. Especially when both CUCM and UCCX need > to be upgraded simultaneously due to version compatibility. >

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade from 10.5 to 11.5

gt; > > *Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.* | Senior Analyst > > Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph > > Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca >

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade from 10.5 to 11.5

Does this sound a tad over engineered for an upgrade to anyone else, or is it just me? On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 3:28 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > That sounds like exactly what I want to do! > > Thx! > > > > *-sent from mobile device-* > > > *Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.* | Senior Analyst > > Computing an

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple COP Files Requiring Reboot

Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] > > > > *F

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple COP Files Requiring Reboot

Opened a PDI case for CUCM, and yes you can install multiple and reboot once at the end. Also, I just learned that PDI goes away at the end of this week. On Mon, Jan 14, 2019, 10:51 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: > Looks like I had better luck than I suspe

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple COP Files Requiring Reboot

/true#M14032 On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:39 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > I should mention, that normally I would open a PDI case for this type of > question, however, it seems as though PDI dropped support for UCCX. If > this thread doesn't get a

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple COP Files Requiring Reboot

2019 at 10:05 AM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can anyone confirm that one can install one or more COP files, each > requiring a reboot, back to back, and just reboot once, as opposed to after > each? > > Specifically: > &

[cisco-voip] Multiple COP Files Requiring Reboot

Can anyone confirm that one can install one or more COP files, each requiring a reboot, back to back, and just reboot once, as opposed to after each? Specifically: UCCX Struts and DST Fix COP files. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway 12.5

Cool, I'll check it out. Reminds me that this exists: https://www.yarnlab.io/certmate/ On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:28 PM James Buchanan wrote: > Hello, > > I just saw this is out. Check out the release notes, including support for > Let's Encrypt. > > Thanks, > > James > _

[cisco-voip] Chrome Auto Tab Discarding and Finesse

This was news to me, despite not being a new feature in Chrome. Probably, because Finesse only somewhat recently starting supporting Chrome. https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/finesse-agents-suffering-from-automatictabdiscarding-chrome/m-p/361/highlight/true#M109727 This would be

Re: [cisco-voip] Scheduling Server Reboots

Now, if we could just get the Network Migration supported across more products... :) On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 10:41 AM Dave Goodwin wrote: > Let's tick one in the W column for PCD... 😀 > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 10:30 AM Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.co

Re: [cisco-voip] Scheduling Server Reboots

eliontech> > [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech> > [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies> > *From:* Anthony Holloway > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:20 AM > *To:* Matthew Loraditch > *Cc:* Dave Goodwin ; cisco-vo

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >