lph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 25, 2019 10:15 AM
> *To:* Lelio
Understood. It's a bit pricey for us though.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019, 8:47 AM Brian Meade wrote:
> vBrick is the main player in the Cisco space.
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:14 AM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any direct
g | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip
All,
Thanks in advance for any direction anyone can provide.
I have a need to implement a recording/streaming solution for CMS and
telepresence 1:1 calls similar to what used to be offered by the
telepresence content server.
Cloud based or on premise are both acceptable but I would prefer the ea
All of the hardware in a VG 224 is FXS. There are significant differences
between FXS and FXO and unless the manufacturer gives a hardware way to
change it, like DIP switches, it will not be changeable.
The Bogen TAMB equipment I worked with in the past had DIP switches to
change it between FXS a
Anyone ever seen an issue where the saved chat log in Outlook has an
unrelated email address but the address associated does exist in the email
AD field within the domain?
For example:
I chat with John Doe. john@company.com
But the message in the Cisco Jabber Chats folder is from jen@scho
TMS:ExternalConferenceData
attribute gets stripped somewhere in transit to the Exchange room mailbox.
The email team is taking it from here as TMSXE is working as expected.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:32 AM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> I have discovered that the WebEx information is not present
?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:34 PM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> I might be on to something. I found that the booking service wasn't set
> up for HTTPS. I did that but the next section of the TMSXE install guide
> talks about adding the booking service to the WebEx site.
>
> Sett
ons in the WebEx site. It's the old WebEx Site Admin
and not Control Hub.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:26 PM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> That didn't do it.
>
> I'm not exactly sure why TMSXE isn't picking up the WebEx information and
> setting it as an external participa
on Technical Marketing Engineer
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2019 11:50 AM
> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] TMSXE and CMR Cloud
>
>
>
> I have TMS 15.6.1 and TMSXE 5.6 trying to get CMR
I have TMS 15.6.1 and TMSXE 5.6 trying to get CMR cloud scheduling working
through TMSXE.
I can schedule my MX300 in the portal with an externally hosted WebEx URI
and it works fine.
When I use either the WebEx Meetings plugin in Outlook or the @webex macro
for calendar connector, as described i
>
> *~Chris*
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 13, 2019 9:36 AM
> *To:* Anthony Holloway
> *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat
>
rite the procedure to delete
> records older than X days.
>
> Good luck, and I'd be curious to know which route you take.
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:56 AM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> That works for what loads in Jabber but they're concerned with the
>>
imum number of messages that can
> be retrieved from the archive?
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:12 AM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> With the introduction of WebEx Teams the request for persistent chat
>> isn't so common anymore.
>>
ase, is to just reverse engineer
> the script and grab the queries and pass those along to your customer’s SQL
> admin..
>
> https://github.com/ryanthuff/cpimdb
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 12:12, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
>
> All,
>
> With the
All,
With the introduction of WebEx Teams the request for persistent chat isn't
so common anymore.
I have a client asking about it and how we can limit how long messages are
kept in persistent chat.
I can't find a native way to do that but was thinking if IM&Presence
doesn't index the database i
ity of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 12:15 PM
> *To:* NateCCIE
> *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Hybrid Calendar Connector
>
>
>
&g
use their own admin account and not a “service account with lots of
> privileges with a password that doesn’t change” like Unity Connection to
> exchange.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 9:05 AM
> *To:* Cisco
eyond that.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 11:05 AM
> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Hybrid Calendar Connector
>
>
>
> Has anyone set up the O365 hybrid connector (clo
Has anyone set up the O365 hybrid connector (cloud to cloud) via Control
Hub?
My client is concerned with the requirement of needing a global admin
account. Is this only for setup or is it used like a service account?
Documentation eludes to the fact it's only for setup but it isn't clear to
me.
I do have "Deliver URI only in connected party, if available" set on my SIP
trunk. It seems to be working now for whatever reason.
Anthony pointed me in the right direction on the first one. Maybe that
solved both issues.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:13 AM Pawlowski, Adam wrote:
> You probably a
oip.markmail.org/thread/mdiy66e6rojirfob
>
> Is his scenario the same as yours or different?
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 10:59 AM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I think I'm just missing something simple.
>>
>> I have Expressway set up for B2B video an
All,
I think I'm just missing something simple.
I have Expressway set up for B2B video and it works. Two things I noticed
and need to resolve.
1. If I call my Webex room say, ewellnitzv...@voip.webex.com it connects.
When it connects in my Jabber client the called party changes from
ewellnitzv.
ion Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve
I just want confirmation I'm not crazy.
.I thought I read somewhere in documentation not long ago that to do OBTP
with TMSXE you needed to have either a DX or a touch 10.
Did I imagine the whole thing?
Thanks!
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puc
Unity Connection with B or
> C won’t work.
>
> -Ryan
>
> > On Jan 8, 2019, at 17:37, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
> >
> > The SMTP address has no mailbox associated with it.
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
All,
I have a client with a hybrid Exchange/O365 system.
I have an issue where free/busy information is retrieved successfully from
Exchange users but not O365 users.
O365 users return a 'mailbox not found' error along with the contents of
this SOAP message.
11:38:35.878 |system.pe.eal.ews 5732
All,
I have an interesting scenario.
2 - CUCM Telephony clusters (11.5.1 SU5)
1 - CUCM SME (11.5.1 SU5)
1 - IM&Presence Centralized Cluster (11.5.1 SU5 / 11.5.1 SU5a)
ADFS on Windows Server 2016 for SSO
SSO works as expected with individual clusters for admin and user web
pages. Jabber works f
ast time I looked is going away. However I can't remember
>> if its 12.5 or the next version 14. Skipping 13, apparently it's bad luck
>> lol
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018, 4:50 PM Erick Wellnitz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The answer to this might be
The answer to this might be 'ask your partner channel rep' but here goes
anyway.
What's the skinny on SCCP? I've seen the slide from CLUS 18 about
deprecation but keep hearing rumors that SCCP is going out the window for
phones with CSR 12.5. I find it implausible but customers are starting to
a
I have always set my OTLD to acme.com and my cluster FQDN to *.acme.com
Or if I'm using a subdomain for my CUCM I do an OTLD of acme.com then in
cluster FQDN I put *.telecom.acme.com *acme.com (space seperated)
I could be doing this completely wrong but it's always worked in the
environments I've
You are correct. It's similar to registering an 8800 series phone via
expressway. Username and passpharase (password) are the user you have the
device assigned to as a controlled device. Domain is your service domain,
acme.com in your example. It will look for _collab-edge._tls.acme.com, for
ex
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvd51691/?rfs=iqvred
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:59 AM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> Let's reframe this a little as it doesn't appear CER can be centralized
> with SME.
>
> CER can be set up into two CER groups and the two groups clustered, per
> the adm
environment so identifying
by switchport is off the table.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 8:49 AM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> Hey everyone! It's been a bit too long since I have been active here.
>
> I have a situation where I have an SME cluster and 2 leaf clusters. Both
> leaf clusters ne
Hey everyone! It's been a bit too long since I have been active here.
I have a situation where I have an SME cluster and 2 leaf clusters. Both
leaf clusters need to have telephones discovered and located by CER.
Is there a way to have all of the CTI functionality of CER residing on the
SME and o
http://ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/MessageShuttle/MessageShuttle.html
TAC supported even.
On Oct 31, 2016 9:12 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" wrote:
> What is this message shuttle magic you soak of?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
>
> Plus +1 to Anthony
Anyone know if the csr 1000v is no longer available without a service
contract?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
I agree with this sentiment. Nesting CSQs is not only subject to resource
limitations, it can become quite confusing to figure out if you haven't
looked at the configuration in some time.
If you do end up having to nest CSQs, document, document, document.
On Sep 8, 2016 5:28 PM, "Anthony Hollow
No. The 6608 series blades were never supported on IOS, only CAT OS
On Sep 4, 2016 9:36 AM, "Ahmed Elnagar" wrote:
> Hello;
>
>
>
> Anyone knows if I can run the above module “WS-6608-E1” with SUP-720…I
> cannot find any support information regarding this module.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ahmed
things missing?
-w
On Aug 30, 2016, at 8:14 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
I thought I was missing something obvious. Good to know someone else
noticed as well.
On Aug 30, 2016 4:15 PM, "Anthony Holloway"
wrote:
> Is it just me, or is the documentation getting worse?
>
> Spec
I thought I was missing something obvious. Good to know someone else
noticed as well.
On Aug 30, 2016 4:15 PM, "Anthony Holloway"
wrote:
> Is it just me, or is the documentation getting worse?
>
> Specifically, what's going on with the CUCM Administration Guide? It's so
> watered down now. It
ype="0";
NetworkName="ciscouclab.com";Interfaces="0x2";IceRole="2";
RtpRtcpMux="0,FirstHopRTTInMs=0";
2016-08-26 16:32:58.891 Info SIP trace: ICEWarnEx="0x1";LocalSite="192
.168.10.73:25086";RemoteSite="192.168.11.17:51
Does it work from the 'thick' desktop client or does that also fail after
30 seconds? Are all of your licenses installed? Before the rebrand there
were two license files. A general file for the Acano product and another
for xmpp.
On Aug 26, 2016 1:27 PM, "Heim, Dennis" wrote:
> Has anyone play
I created for FIPPA (and you must give it its own Application User). If you
> don't, you end up with a weird error message at the end of every call.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone used the Fine
Has anyone used the Finesse IP Phone Agent yet? Good, bad, ugly? Does it
look and feel similar to legacy IPPA?
Thanks!
-E
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Based on that caveat, I'd think that's the best bet. Same with running out
of storage space in anything other than the common partition. Too bad PCD
doesn't do CUC migrations.
If I remember correctly this caveat is due to an application limitation and
not the OS.
On Jul 27, 2016 11:17 AM, "Anth
Take a look at the Acano/CMS product. It has IVR capability and can
integrate with pretty much everything.
On Jul 25, 2016 9:54 AM, "Scott Voll" wrote:
> What are others doing for video conferences?
>
> we have a Polycom RMX that we have an extension that everyone dials into.
> Then it asks wha
It's likely along the same lines as NAT and Finesse for CCX. It works and
people do it fairly often but TAC won't support it because it hasn't been
thouroghly tested for issues and full functionality.
On Jul 19, 2016 2:29 PM, "Justin Steinberg" wrote:
> interesting - i wonder why that is not su
I did one of these a few months back. Make sure SQL Express is supported
and you set the SQL up exactly as the documents state otherwise you'll have
problems.
One quirk I noticed aside from SQL is that your "service account" for AD
connectivity cannot be in the root of your AD domain structure.
I did one of these a few months back. Make sure SQL Express is supported
and you set the SQL up exactly as the documents state otherwise you'll have
problems.
One quirk I noticed aside from SQL is that your "service account" for AD
connectivity cannot be in the root of your AD domain structure.
Intrado makes a product so you can update the locations any time with as
much detail as local law requires. Some other companies offer this as
well, Verizon did at one time and may still offer their PS-ALI serivce but
it was still modem based last time I used it.
Intrado will integrate directly i
Parts of McAfee really dislike any app placing files in the AppData folder.
On May 20, 2016 8:14 AM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" wrote:
>
> Lovely. I guess we'll have to work with our team to skip those directories
> in an enterprise settings. Not sure they like doing that. :(
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>
se a public CA or private CA? And did you
> upload all certs in the chain (sans the root) as one file, or as separate
> files?
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> The root CA cert wasn't uploaded. The bundle the CA provided didn't
&g
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ryan Huff
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:19 PM
> *To:* Erick Wellnitz
> *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P - services reported in un
to romcat-trust after the cert bundle upload.
On Mar 16, 2016 4:35 PM, "Anthony Holloway"
wrote:
> What do you mean? Was it simply not uploaded to the Tomcat Trust? Or was
> the cert bad?
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> It was
resolve the issue, I would verify db replication is healthy.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
> I did that as well but I'm not 100% sure if the entire Root CA chain got
> installed. I'll check that.
>
> What
to say you did?
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> I have a strange issue with CUCM 11.0.1 and IM&P 11.0.1
>>
>> We installed the multi-server SAN cert for tomcat and now the IM&P data
>> monitor service is in an unknown st
I have a strange issue with CUCM 11.0.1 and IM&P 11.0.1
We installed the multi-server SAN cert for tomcat and now the IM&P data
monitor service is in an unknown state according to the system
troubleshooter.
The SAN cert is installed to tomcat-trust so it shouldn't be a cert issue.
Done service re
I'm going off of table 2 in this document.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/unified-communications-licensing/product_solution_overview0900aecd806cc7a4.html
Does 'Included' mean you can have a hard phone and a jabber soft phone for
enhanced or do we need to h
Quick question regarding DNS and Finesse.
Can I use a CNAME (alias) record for Finesse pointing to an A record with a
different name than the hostname of the CCX server? The CNAME record would
be the name in the certificate.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
According to PDI helpdesk, Finesse does not support any nat at all which
coincides with the design guide statement.
On Nov 24, 2015 9:51 PM, "Erick Wellnitz" wrote:
> Would someone be able to clarify the statement in the UCCX design guide
> where it states NAT is not suppo
Would someone be able to clarify the statement in the UCCX design guide
where it states NAT is not supported for Finesse?
For example, in a hosted environment the customer's internal IP of
CCX/Finesse is natted to the real IP in the hosted environment.
Thanks!
___
hat sounds wrong IMO.
>
>
>
> I would follow the same recommendation documented for CUCM (stratum 3 or
> better) on CUC.
>
>
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> - Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> O
I like both IOS and Linux ntpd
I synch those with time.nist.gov
Remember that you need a stratum 6 or better to sync UC apps like
connection or CUCM.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Charles Goldsmith
wrote:
> I personally prefer an IOS based device, a core switch or router.
>
> On Wed, Oct 2
All,
I seem to remember hearing something about a plugin or a tool to configure
the BE6KS but I can't seem to find such a thing.
I thought it was a Firefox plugin. Was I imagining things?
Thanks!
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
lated bug, but as with all filed defects, you can never really be
> 100% sure.
>
> https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCur10651
>
> Good luck. Also, you should be on 10.5(2)SU2a. ;) Just say'n.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
&g
e call. Do you see the 487 final response six seconds *after* the
> CANCEL/200 exchange? I ask only because this should help you determine
> where the delay is coming from - the phone or CUCM.
>
>
>
> - Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck
le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> --
> *From: *"Erick Wellnitz"
> *To: *"Lelio Fulgenzi"
> *Cc: *cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Wednesday
id unexplained post configuration behavior.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037,
see if they hit the wire at the
> same time.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> anyone seen issues with the 88xx phones on firmware 10.3(1) and CUCM
>> 10.5.2 SU1 where the line starts ringing on some phones right away and some
>> star
24‐4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> --
> *From: *"Erick Wellnitz"
> *To: *cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Wednesday, Septembe
anyone seen issues with the 88xx phones on firmware 10.3(1) and CUCM 10.5.2
SU1 where the line starts ringing on some phones right away and some start
ringing up to 15 seconds later. Some also experience ringing after the
call is answered up to 15 seconds after answered.
88xx phones are the only
Hey all,
Quick question regarding PCD and migrations.
Migrating a CUCM 9.1.2 to 10.5.2 SU1 does co-res E(P)LM get migrated as
well? I understand I would still need to contact licensing.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puc
Will end users notice any difference if we change the im&p service default
domain other than the interruption while making the change?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
That was what I thought. Have to steer the client toward Jabber softphone.
Thanks , man!
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Justin Steinberg
wrote:
> CIPC isn't MRA aware
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> Had a question posed to
Had a question posed to me and I'm not 100% on the answer. I think the
answer is no but I thought I'd see if anyone had done this successfully.
Anyone been successful at getting CIPC to register via MRA?
I'm thinking that because the connection to Expressway-E is TLS it isn't
going to work.
CC-96A8-8A17AF38C15C] <https://twitter.com/netechcorp>
> [image: cid:F52A69B8-DA49-4CD7-91E9-C057917D90C2]
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/NetechCorporation>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Wedn
Anyone ever used IOS firewall with Expressway?
Having a difficult time with NAT configuration getting Expressway C to talk
to the Expressway E public IP.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisc
I think you should be able to add translations or number expansion from
extension to E.164 in your SRST config.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Armstrong, Michael <
michael.armstr...@cccs.edu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Any ideas for an SRST configuration for a WAN outage that is preventing
> call
ote:
> In the GUI, you have to create the root SRV records under the protocol
> folder/subdomain, in this case ‘_tcp’.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 12, 2015 6:30 PM
s._tcp.xyz.com. @ SRV 0 0 8443 cucm1.xyz.com
>
> dnscmd . /recordadd _cisco-uds._tcp.xyz.com. @ SRV 0 0 8443 cucm2.xyz.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 10 April 2015 9:24 AM
> *To:* Eric Pedersen
> *Cc:* Anthony
or NAT reflection
> for the traversal? Is your traversal connected? I would check for
> firewall drops when trying to connect if the traversal is connected.
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
> > Not a security or a firewall guy so please bear w
Not a security or a firewall guy so please bear with me.
We've opened up the ports as advised in this:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X8-1/Cisco-Expressway-IP-Port-Usage-for-Firewall-Traversal-Deployment_Guide-X8-1.pdf
Now, the weird part is that wi
Hey all,
Wondering if anyone has done expressway c&e with multiple clusters. Am I
correct to assume it's a 1:1 relationship (1 C&E to 1 CUCM cluster) or is
there a way to use 1 C&E with multiple CUCM clusters?
Thanks in advance!
___
cisco-voip mailing l
They should be able to find all of the old PAKs if you have MAC/License MAC
the PAKs were registered to.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:55 PM, James Buchanan
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Do you have the original SO#s used to order the CUWL licenses? I would
> think based on that they could get their licenses.
obtaining licenses that the new PLM
> reports and not what the customer has paid for.
>
>
>
>
>
> The original purchase (SO#) was some 8 years ago with another partner.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Dana
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewell
That's what we did to make sure everything was good with their contracts
contained the right licenses. Then go through the pre-upgrade process to
verify then the post upgrade goes pretty fast.
5 calendar days, three of which were weekend and holiday, for my last
upgrade.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2
RR> Right on, see my previous comments on ways partitions get unaligned.
>
>
> How'd I do Ryan? I'm I getting it, or am I missing it?
>
>
> RR> Definitely getting it.
>
>
> Erick, do you have any further details to share with us since you just
&g
wrote:
> Nothing about an upgrade from 8.6 to 9.x or later guarantees unaligned
> partitions. You will only get the error because your partitions were
> unaligned already.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:19 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
> I used 10.5.2 upgrade media
on on
> the GW, but it cannot be MGCP controlled.
>
> HTH.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ryan LaFountain
> Unified Contact Center
> Cisco Services
> Direct: +1 919 392 9898
> Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time
>
> On Jan 7, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
ers. So, do we have:
> upgrading, installing, and restoring all affected by this bug?
>
> On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:33:27 PM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> For those of you sill out there doing upgrades from pre-9.x to 10.x and
>> running nto the unaligned partition issue...
>>
For those of you sill out there doing upgrades from pre-9.x to 10.x and
running nto the unaligned partition issue...
There is a bug that was opened on 12/30 regarding the fresh install with
110.5.2.1-5
and installing the subscriber(s) ater the restore to the Publisher.
You get about 99% comp
Happy new year all.
I have a couple questions about CCX and outbound IVR.
First, is there a way to automate the upload of the csv file for the
campaign or is it all manual?
Second, is there a way to pul data from a web service in a CCX script
without using custom java? or example, the dialer di
SCCP did you try dialing the MWI off number on the
> phone? Other option is to run a MWI sync from voicemail.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:46 PM
> *To:* cisco
I have one phone, a 7962 with 1 7915 - 24 button (*SCCP42.9-3-1SR3-1S for
the phone and *
*B015-1-0-4-2 for the 7915) where one line is set to none for MWI but it
still shows the flashing icon. I've removed and added the line, checked
the database across all nodes and it is the appropriate value.*
It was read receipts enabled.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
>
> I know I've fixed this particular issue before but I can't seem to find
> where I did it.
>
> I have one mailbox in Connection 8.6 that shows 9 messages in the Admin
> interfac
I know I've fixed this particular issue before but I can't seem to find
where I did it.
I have one mailbox in Connection 8.6 that shows 9 messages in the Admin
interface but at the user's phone it only tells us there are 8 saved
messages.
Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
_
I never had a license take longer than 24 hours for 8.x to 9.x but
apparently those days are gone with 10.x
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Roger Wiklund
wrote:
>
> I second the hahahahaha@24 hours. More like 30-40 days of dealing with
> the robots at licensing.
> It's literally like talking to
s is
> hinted at in the upgrade guides but was very clear in my opinion.
>
> My most recent 8.6 to 10.5 was early November and it took about 2 week or
> so to get then BIN file to upload to PLM.
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:22 PM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>
All,
Quick question about licensing for CUCM/UCONN
Going from 8.6 to10.5 I should be able to run the license count tool and
submit to licensing along with a contract number, correct? Is there
usually a long turn around time or is it still a day or less?
Thanks!
_
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
