is there an n-1 type metric so you know what you can upgrade before CM?
we have CER, UCCX, UC, PLM, CUPS, and CM.
Looks like UCCX and CM have to upgrade together (thought that was changing,
but guess not), but looking for a doc on what can be done before hand.
Just trying to have a few smaller ma
https://www.variphy.com/ used to be able to do this Not sure if they
still do.
Scott
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Depends on what type of "settings" you're talking about. From a 10,000
> foot view, I'd say you could probably go to the bulk administration tool
> and u
Back in the day there was a compatibility matrix for routers / vgw's with
each version of CM software. I'm not finding anything like that in 11.5.
is it that it's no longer an issue, or am I just not google fu'ing it well
enough?
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-v
Plantronics Savi 745 have been working well for us, both on 7961 with
lifters and now with 8861 with HHC cables. you can get them in one ear or
dual ear configurations. Works with Jabber and IPC also. All around a
great headset.
Scott
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:12 PM, chris wrote:
> Hello,
>
Wow Frank, that is a lot of troubleshooting, and a great run down.
Can I ask what your failure rate is?
We have about a 2-4% failure rate and have decided not to troubleshoot
those as they tend to be a Telco issue between us and the sender. We use a
lot of toll bypass so if it doesn't work over
OK, as of yesterday I started having reports of users in Chrome and Firefox
getting an error connecting to the Finesse webpage.
Looking at the cert It's sha2 but I get Not secure in FF and not private in
Chrome.
Chome complains of NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID
cert is internal CA and the sig
;
> CCIE Collaboration # 40065
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *cisco-voip on behalf of
> Nathan Reeves
> *Date: *Friday, 28 April 2017 at 4:04 AM
> *To: *Scott Voll
> *Cc: *"cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error
>
>
How often does CM query smtp DNS name? we are changing our Cname for SMTP
and would like to know how long I should expect for the emails to change.
Thanks
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/list
ved at service start (like NTP references on IOS), or
> possible never cached and DNS is hit for every connection (like SIP trunks
> with DNS names in CUCM).
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> How often does CM query smtp DNS name? we are changing our
I'm guessing you have a cisco router or two Simple put NTP on them,
pointing to 3-5 good NTP sources and then use them company wide. Works
pretty well for us. we use Two different Routers with different sources,
then use both routers for all our devices, including Windows. Haven't had
any is
Anyone have SSO working with UCCx 11.5su1?
Have had a TAC case open for a while and can't get it fixed. Just
wondering if anyone else has it working? CM / UC / CUPS etc went fine.
Just seeing if anyone has it working.
Thanks
scott
___
cisco-voip mai
Moves the login to ADFS, you put in the user / pass there now instead of
the admin page. it's not sending the credentials for some reason.
Scott
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Nimloth wrote:
> Yes, we have it working.
> What issue you have?
> W dniu 16.05.2017, o 22:20, uż
Is there a way to tick the check mark on Home Cluster automatically with
each new user? we are running 11.5.
TIA
Scott
[image: Inline image 1]
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Management>User/Phone Add)
> you specify the 'Home Cluster' tick box as well as IM&P, Service Profile
> and User Profile.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 2017-05-24 08:31, Scott Voll wrote:
>
> Is there a way to tick the check mark on Home Cluster
I agree with Neal,
but I would use one partition for each site for 911, then a third partition
for everything else, then, put the correct 911 partition in the site CSS
and use the third partition in both CSS. Save a lot of time recreating RP
for the other stuff Guess it depends on how many RP
1. I'm guessing we are 10% True bugs and 90% environment, but I will agree
with other comments about DNS and NTP being a dumb reason to fail
2. as for time, over the years we used to spend over 6 months on
upgrades.. we are down to about 2 months. in our enviroment we have to
document all the
have you used DNA to confirm it's not matching something else?
Scott
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Gary Parker wrote:
> Morning all, I came across a significant block of numbers in the UK that
> can’t be called by our cucm (11.5.1(SU2) with the 3.1.34-GB dialplan) due
> to them not being rec
On 1 Sep 2017, at 14:44, Scott Voll wrote:
> >
> > have you used DNA to confirm it's not matching something else?
> >
> > Scott
>
> Yes, definitely. DNA came back with “unallocated number”.
>
> Gary
___
cisco-
What do other use for add, moves and changes to there environments?
We have a home grown app that is not working well, to notify Telecom group
about changes to the phones, new users, configuration changes, etc.
Does anyone know of any can'd or cloud based software? Are there any that
interface w
20 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120>
>
> le...@uoguelph.ca
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
>
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
>
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Scott Vol
to dove tail off this we found that if we integrated with outlook, we
were then under retention laws for email but if we left the vm on UC
the retention law was much different.
We just (april) enabled our 30 day retention policy for any heard messages.
if they are marked unread they can k
Quick question. is PLM patching service affecting?
we just want to patch PLM in the middle of the day and afraid to poke the
button. ;-)
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisc
you are good.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:01 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] PLM service affecting?
>
>
>
> Quick question. is PLM
am I last to know? They are once again moving licensing?
https://communities.cisco.com/message/271653
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Lisa,
we found our selves in this same situation about 3 years ago. we were
pretty much a 7961 environment (1200+ phones). because we have multiple
sites we just came up with a refresh cycle. for us, it was just 3 short
years. Depending on your deployment, you might have to take longer.
We ch
if the call goes from pattern to route list, add to the Route List the next
place for it to go.
else, use your UCCX and on transfer you have some options there to use.
Not sure of your exact problem, but those come to mind.
scott
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Carlo Calabrese via cisco-voip <
Enghouse has QMS. we use it without contact center but it does have plug
ins for it. Works for our needs. Both for inhouse and remote users.
Scott
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Dan Mason wrote:
> Has anyone had any experience with 3rd party call recording vendors? Any
> recommendations f
Not sure how far the wireless needs to go, but we have used Plantronic
headsets and they get most of the floor coverage.
But have started to move to Jabber for the Iphone ( we do have
expressways). That has been expanding like wildfire. It might expand
enough that we will finally be able to get
Does anyone have a good solution for on boarding new employees?
we have to:
create a 7961 EM profile
create a 8861 EM profile
Create a IP Communicator EM Profile
create an IP communicator device
associate the user EM profiles to the AD account
create an Unity connection VM box
set the zero out op
on CER 11.5 where does CER send call back numbers after the 3 hours after
the post 911 call?
I've done some googling and it said the default ERL on site contact, but
that 's not what is happening. Need to change it as an end user is getting
the calls.
TIA
scott
___
Nevermind I was looking incorrectly at the default ERL. it is the top
on site person.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:33 AM Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> What you read was what i understood it to be, so i'm interested in hearing
> what you find out.
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 2:26 PM
Anyone getting reports in CM 11.5 of Hunt groups not working correctly? We
have the hunt group set to longest idle but one person seems to be getting
all the calls.
How do you trouble shoot this? it's not like UCCx reports.
is there a way to see who is logged into the hunt group? and How long?
All--
I"m currently running most all UC apps on 11.5/6. It looks like from what
I can find, ESXi is supported up to 6.5.
My infrastructure Engineer would like to upgrade to 6.7. Does anyone see
any problems with that?
Will TAC explode if they find out?
TIA
Scott
_
Any way to find out what an application user password is? I really don't
what to reset it, so I was hoping there was a way to find it.
Thanks
scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-vo
Anyone running 11.x apps (CM/UC/UCCx/CER/etc) on VMWare 6.7? I know the
docs don't show it being supported, but Cisco usually doesn't go back and
test older versions of UC with newer versions of VMWare.
Just wondering what is happening in the real world.
TIA
Scott
__
& Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
&
For those that are upgrading to CM 12.5 and use call Recording with BIB,
just wanted give you a heads up on a Bug
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvo36582/?rfs=iqvred
Dumps the CM process. you lose most of all registrations (phones and
gateways) when it core dumps and restarts the
and what it supports now is all it will support. They are not continuing
the product moving forward. Great product. have used it for years. Call
to see if they were going to support the 8861 as that is our new
standardized model and found out it's not getting anything new. Guess we
will look
This was the same thing I got also. we are running 8.6 with 2012 AD DC's
and running mixed 2008 schema. No problems. running CM, UC, UCCx, CER,
etc.
Scott
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> Dan Keller points out the Cisco officially
What hardware is everyone using to upgrade there UC enviroment to?
We have UCS Blades with netapp storage, but have had some limitations on IO
(prior to the upgraded controllers) that I'm a little concerned about.
I like the idea of vmotion. But I'm thinking if it's my back side on the
line with
You are ALWAYS going to have wires. if it's wireless it will always have a
minimum of power wires.
With that said, we had the same issue 2 years ago before the 8831 came
out. We went with the FLX2 from revo labs like nick suggested.
everyone loved the fact that there was NO wires. Here we are
Anyone have any of these DX80's?
How are you supporting it remotely?
Log me in Rescue does not work.
Webex does not work
I'm deploying these to remove sites and need to support the users and don't
want to drive 4 hours each way.
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-v
, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> Anyone have any of these DX80's?
>>
>> How are you supporting it remotely?
>>
>> Log me in Rescue does not work.
>> Webex does not work
>>
>> I'm deploying these to remove sites and ne
Same Error.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Brian Meade wrote:
> You need to use a user that has CTI control of the device.
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> unless the admin user / pwd is something
y Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is an Android Tablet at the end of the day, so I did a google search
> for remotely supporting these guys and this was the first link.
>
> http://www.bomgar.com/solutions/mobile-device-support
>
> On Wed, Apr 15,
who is using BE7000m for there UC deployment. Any pro's vs con's?
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
we are looking at upgrading soon. Can someone confirm what I believe:
in version 10.x our licensing changes to user based. With this, I can add
as many nodes as I like? I currently have 2 nodes. if I wanted to add a 3rd
that would be included? or adding HA?
This would be for CM, UC, CER, prese
We are troubleshooting a wireless deployment of 8861 phones.
is there any way to monitor just a phone / phone model / device pool / etc
so I can just see what I'm looking for?
Looks like RTMT is just all registered phones.
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mai
Sorry, yes. I just want to see the registration of those pilot phones.
Scott
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
> What exactly are you trying to monitor? Just registration status?
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> We are
manager?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
>
> ---- Original Message
> From: Scott Voll
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 05:34 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone
>
> We are troubleshooting a wireless deployment
> Ryan
>
>
> ---- Original Message
> From: Scott Voll
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 05:39 PM
> To: Brian Meade
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone
> CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> Sorry, yes. I just want to
the primary
> subscriber the phones are registered to. That will show all phone
> registrations/unregistrations.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> we have 8861 phones that are just below an AP that are registering and
>> unregistering (but workin
What if a phone loses connectivity to CM while in the middle of a firmware
update?
I need to load new firmware for my 8861's but I have had some connectivity
issues over wireless and don't want to brick the phone.
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
2015, at 4:58 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
>
> I believe the 8800 series has an active/inactive partition so shouldn't
> be too much of a worry.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> What if a phone loses connectivity to CM while in the middle of a
>&
I have not seen anything on either nsp or voip this morning.
Just checking that I'm not having issues.
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
use case might help us to understand...
But things that come to might are using UCCx for sending calls where you
want them to go. you could also look at using Hunt groups native to CM but
knowing what your trying to accomplish will help us to give a better answer.
YMMV
Scott
On Fri, May 2
I think you could also use a global variable and look up which call your on
and route 1-3 to one and number 4 somewhere else. But my UCCx is a little
rusty as my partner has managed UCCx since I came here.
or a circular hunt group in CM might work to. Haven't' tried this.
YMMV
Scot
On Fri, M
re about the circular HG as it distributes evenly.
>
> On 22 May 2015 at 17:33, Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> I think you could also use a global variable and look up which call your
>> on and route 1-3 to one and number 4 somewhere else. But my UCCx is a
>> little rusty
Any cool videos of IKE (cartoon guy) and Extension Mobility or something.
we are rolling out Extension Mobility corporate wide and they were hoping
for something fun.
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.
Our Current call recording vendor just told me they only support SCCP
phones. is anyone else using a Forked audio call recording server that
supports SIP and Built in Bridge? we are migrating to 8861's which are SIP
phones.
What Vendors are you using and do you have the pro's and con's you would
We have had telrex callrex now enghouse QMS for about 2+ years. System
works with forked audio. Does the job. I don't care for the fact that you
have to have two different servers so you can run SCCP phones and one to
run SIP phones. The front end is wrote in silverlight, which I'm not a fan
of
I"m still on UC 8.6. we are planning an upgrade to 10.x We currently have
DLU's for licensing and will be moving to CUWL Standard ( I think).
How does Expressways factor into this?
is it part of CUWL? Is there a Cost? What all can you do with
Expressway. What I believe I understand is that i
Has anyone setup the 8861 phone on wireless? How is it going? We continue
to have issues with our Proof of Concept. I have a idea that it's the
phone drivers. but can't prove it.
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
ht
OK, I have found the upgrade, but where do I find the bootable version of
PCD?
I've tried PUT and can't find it. Any ideas?
Thanks
scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
I have Valid contracts and just PUT for UC, CM, CER, UCCx, PLM and got all
of them downloaded. But I Can't find PCD in the PUT. Am I looking for the
wrong thing?
I do see a Prime Collaboration Standard. is that it in PUT?
TIA
Scott
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Scot,
Follow up.
I did find it under my edelivery for CM.
Sorry for the noise.
scott
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Scott Voll wrote:
> I have Valid contracts and just PUT for UC, CM, CER, UCCx, PLM and got all
> of them downloaded. But I Can't find PCD in the PUT. Am I look
How do you setup the buttons on the right hand side?
I have two 8861's
one has a phone and recent.
the other has a phone, vm and recent.
How do I get them configured the same?
Thanks
scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https
can you get a HD camera that you could power over USB extensions? or is
the computer close enough to the camera?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> Neat idea Lelio, i might try that out myself.
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>>
>> anyone try r
running Jabber 10.5.2
CM 8.6.2
UC 8.6.2
I have my Jabber client and I have VM, Meetings, and Phone control.
My coworker does not have the VM.
Any ideas why I have the account tab and he does not?
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.
No end user service profile in 8.6.2
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> My first thought off the cuff is make sure they have that service in their
> end user service profile , not sure if its the same in cucm 8 though
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015, 5:29 PM Scott
So I've dealt with intrado and CER for a while and always end up with
issues.
for every Location I create two ELIN's. The problem is that with the
export it ends up with the primary ELIN is the same as the main number, but
the second ELIN is not the same as the Main telephone number so it gets
ki
rnett, Nick <
nick.barn...@countryfinancial.com> wrote:
> I also got stuck supporting CER. I have never used two ELINs. What is the
> purpose of that scenario?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.ne
For all those UCCx guys that upgrade lots and lots of UCCx deployments.
How do you get the CAD client before the upgrade so you can have the
workstation guys deploy it?
Do you setup a test UCCx box and just download it from there, or is there a
better way?
we are upgrading from 8.5 to 10.6. We h
I've been looking through the list to find some more answers, but i'm
really looking for real world experience.
We plan to use PCD to upgrade our CM from MCS servers on 8.6.2 to VM's on
10.5. Sounds like this is a pretty easy way to go. Can someone confirm or
deny. What are some pitfalls?
It's
What is the right way to upgrade my licenses? I know there has been talk
about associating phones to users. What is the current thought?
I have Smartnet UCSS, whatever it's called now for 1000 CM, and UC
I have ~1400 phones mainly 7961. a few others see below.
All Users are using EM. All us
just upgraded to UC 10.5 having the same issue with the extension grayed
out on LDAP enabled users after the upgrade. is this a bug? Can someone
let me know what you found out?
Thanks
Scott
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Chris Ward (chrward)
wrote:
> Ryan,
>
>
>
> Can you unicast me your
ail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 2:41 PM
> *To:* Scott Voll ; Chris Ward (chrward) <
> chrw...@cisco.com>
>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Unity user parameters greyed out
>
>
>
> Here you go:
>
>
>
> h
OK, everyone has complained about the licensing nightmare that EM plays in
CM 9 and 10.
My coworker has come up with a fix..
In thinking this all through, I thought about how I would like it all to
work mechanically. Here is what I would like to request as a
Feature/Enhancement Request:
real time? Which was probably how it worked prior to ELM. Just
> spitballing a few ideas.
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:29 PM Scott Voll wrote:
>
>> OK, everyone has complained about the licensing nightmare that EM plays
>> in CM 9 and 10.
>>
>> My coworker has come
and assign each
> person a random phone, because their CUWL Standard would cover it. The
> negative is that the UCM User page, and their Jabber client on the PC/Mac,
> would show this random phone for them to manage.
>
> I think
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Sc
Ed-- (Troy too)
Thanks for posting the fix. That was perfect for our upgrade too!!
Scott
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Countryman, Edward <
edward.country...@presencehealth.org> wrote:
> This turned out to be a setting in Rightfax. Now working again!
>
> Many thanks to Troy Putnam for ema
OK, as of this weekend we have joined the rest of the new world. We are on
CM/ UCCx / UC / CER / etc 10.5.2 or better.
But when we looked at RTMT under Hunt List and Memebers Available We are
seeing Zero. But if I look at Calls in Progress / calls active, I see my
call and get someone, so I Know
Why can't I delete a file in CCx 10.5.
Licensing gave me a bad one and now my call center is down.
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Any bugs on this version with CM not sending CDR's to reporting server?
our Reporting vendor is saying they are not getting the CDR's.
we just upgraded from 8.6.2 to 10.5.2.12901-1
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https
ice under
> network services?
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:05 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CDR on CM 10.5.2.12901-1
>
>
>
Follow up. got the SOAP thing working, but this is a rebuild of the SUB.
Anything I have to do with a SUB rebuild? I'm wondering if I'm only
getting PUB CDR's.
TIA
Scott
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Scott Voll wrote:
> Sorry, we are getting some, not all. but that le
we upgraded from UCCx 8.5 to 10.6. in 8.5 you could setup the CAD client
to NOT take the focus on the screen.
Now, no matter what we try, the CAD client always takes focus as soon as
the phone rings. Anyone know how to change that?
TIA
Scott
___
cisc
Has anyone seen Error 23 on a extension Mobility login in CM 10.5.2? We
are AD LDAP integrated.
I can't figure out what the issue is. I've reset the phone. removed Extmob
and re-enabled it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing
update. in case anyone else runs into the error 23 with Extension
Mobility on CM 10.5. under the user profile, you have to select the
Home Cluster Check box.
Scott
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Scott Voll wrote:
> Has anyone seen Error 23 on a extension Mobility login in CM 10.
Does anyone have a simple SIP SRST config they can share? What is the
difference between the SCCP vs SIP?
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Does anyone have CAD and Finesse running at the same time? Can you? We
have seen documentation that you can only run one or the other. But I seem
to remember that someone said in 10.6 you can run both.
Anyone able to confirm or deny?
TIA
Scott
___
c
OK so we had CM 8.6 running on MCS servers with 146 gb mirrored drives.
Now I'm on VM CM 10.5 and the OVA came with a 80 gig drive.
Now I'm bouncing at my 90% used common partition.
is this normal? is this a bug? is it that i'm using a 80 gig drive.
Before I open a TAC case... What is the
What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
FTP?
I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to
restart it and run my backups again.
What have others had good success using?
Thanks
Scott
___
c
could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXX translates to
130xxx.
Scott
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <
nick.barn...@countryfinancial.com> wrote:
> Here’s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our
> field offices have their own pots KSU solu
So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
Do you like them?
Pro's and Con's?
We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made
their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It
seems very
Nice list. Thanks for the feed back.
Scott
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Tom Sparks
wrote:
> I recently did some research into these tools and here are my pros and
> cons for whoever is insterested.
>
> *UnifiedFX, Singlewire*
> Pros: nice, functional, affordable
> Cons: thick client, po
It's not just you. we were hitting the hunt group disconnect with
Extension Mobility. All users were logged out and it would disconnect also.
we got an ES (10.5.2.13038-1) and that seems to have fixed the hunt group
log out disconnect issue.
FWIW
Scott
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Robe
Our experience is NO. After Begging and telling them we were going to
upgrade they did get us a Temp license but it was only good for 365 days.
They said the EoS stands. you have to upgrade.
YMMV
Scott
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Rob Dawson wrote:
> Ca you still order Unity licenses? Any
+1 on the plantronic Savi's we have the 740 / 745 / and dual ear and have
loved them. also love not having to have a lifter with the built in HHC.
We have about 750 deployed currently
Scott
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
wrote:
> In my experience the bluetooth headse
OK, I'm on CM 10.5.2.13038-1
I have 8861 phone running both 10.3.1 and 11.0.1. Both phone loads after
logging into or out of extension Mobility leave the application windows on
the screen. Is this a configuration issue? I don't see a bug ID for it.
But users are tired of hitting the exit button
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
