For everyone (or maybe the one) asking why the DNS system exists, as the
person who came up with the idea in the first place (or the idea of stealing
it from the DNSbls ) I thought I would provide a link to the original
discussion in which is was hashed out ( beaten to death) back in 2004:
Should anyone ever search for this, the problem was solved by upgrading gcc
to 4.8.1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
Under Solaris 10 x86, gcc 4.7.1, gnu ld 2.21.1 libclamav is failing to
link. Here is an exerpt from the compile:
make[4]: Entering directory
Under Solaris 10 x86, gcc 4.7.1, gnu ld 2.21.1 libclamav is failing to
link. Here is an exerpt from the compile:
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/chris/apps/mail/clamav-0.98.1/libclamav'
CC unrar15.lo
CC unrar.lo
CC unrar20.lo
CC unrarppm.lo
CC unrarvm.lo
CC
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Robert wrote:
I've been hit by this also (started around 2:50pm today UK time).
All the FP's are via the same MBL_349876.
I've commented out the MBL lines in the /etc/clamav-unofficial-sigs.conf
file and killed all MBL sigs for now.
I had 10 different sigs in mbl.ndb
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Joel Esler wrote:
If I would have written back and said ClamAV's db includes detection for
malware on all operating systems someone would have wrote back and said
all operating systems? srsly? 4real? all?
OK, who has some old Apple ][ boot sector viruses so we can
Solaris 10, gcc 4.6.3, Program.cc gives the folloing errors:
..
CXXProgram.lo
In file included from llvm/lib/System/Unix/Program.inc:34:0,
from llvm/lib/System/Program.cpp:52:
/usr/include/spawn.h:42:14: error: expected ',' or '...' before 'argv'
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Dan wrote:
At 7:44 AM -0500 9/14/2011, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/14/2011 2:29 AM, sys...@ra-schaal.de wrote:
i made some changes to the firewall. if it works be now, please
mail me as soon as possible.
I started getting successful updates from 88.198.67.125 a
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Luca Gibelli wrote:
If anyone can provide a CVD mirror in US, please contact me directly.
We definitely need more capacity in the db.us.clamav.net RR.
What sort of bandwidth do the mirrors use, as in what would be a typical
burst or peak load - 5mbit/sec, 10mbit/sec, etc.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, James Ralston wrote:
We are in a situation where we have multiple hosts that need to run
ClamAV, but those hosts are highly restricted in what outbound
Internet access they have. Thus, we need to run a local ClamAV
mirror.
I have one machine run freshclam, and use rsync
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Luca Gibelli wrote:
Dear ClamAV users,
This is a bugfix release recommended for all users. Please refer to the
ChangeLog file for details.
Download : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/clamav/clamav-0.97.1.tar.gz
FYI to any Solaris users, my compile failed on
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Roy McMorran wrote:
The virus submission page won't let me upload my sample though - Result: This
file is not detected by ClamAV. How can this be?
I've just tried to submit a virus sample and am running into the same issue.
Some testing shows that neither clamscan not
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Roy McMorran wrote:
The virus submission page won't let me upload my sample though - Result:
This
file is not detected by ClamAV. How can this be?
I've just tried to submit a virus sample and am running
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
It said these were deprecated so I commented the two lines out and now
no more warnings. However, was this a wise thing to do or have I
misinterpreted the deprecating message? What would those who are more
familiar with clamav advocating?
Those
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
May I suggest for the future a --checkconfig option to clamd (and
clamav-milter) that would parse the config file, report any such
errors, and
clamconf is already doing this.
Thanks for reminding me about that !
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
Hi!
Most of my clamd died today after freshclam updated to...
bytecode.cld (version: 16, sigs: 3, f-level: 51, builder: nervous)
What version of ClamAV are you running ?
==
Chris Candreva
On Sat, 8 May 2010, G.W. Haywood wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-de...@lists.clamav.net/msg03353.html
I look forward to your patch.
==
Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162
WestNet Internet Services of
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Toby Bryans wrote:
The very latest update causes the following debug output. A quick search on
twitter finds someone else with similar issues too.
@40004be3ecf5208b0ff4 LibClamAV debug: Initialized 0.95.3 engine
On Fri, 7 May 2010, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Luca Gibelli wrote:
We apologise for the inconvenience.
http://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg33265.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg34794.html
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
It's running software that is EOL ? Most definitely
And Microsoft have sent it a poison pill ? No they haven't
And is it hitting Microsoft's servers for full updates even when it should
only be
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, lists wrote:
Doesn't change a thing. If you threaten me with a course of action, if I
fail to do something that is blackmail. It's nothing else. It does not
matter if the product is free.
Oh come on. If I tell you you'll get wet when if you go out in the rain
without an
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
No, according to certain people on this list, you are a cretin, and
incompetent to even handle the off switch of a computer. If you check the list
archives - particular for threads (no subject) and Those EOL tweets you'll
see that you are far from
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
No, according to certain people on this list, you are a cretin, and
incompetent to even handle the off switch of a computer. If you check the
list
archives - particular for threads (no subject) and Those EOL tweets
you'll
see that you
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Eray Aslan wrote:
Knowingly disabling running software on computers that is not your own
is not acceptable. It is immoral, unethical and perhaps illegal.
But that's not what happened.
==
Chris Candreva --
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Bill Landry wrote:
Doesn't agree with the example you provided, is all I'm saying, not
without notification via certified mail or personal delivery, which
takes notification to a much higher standard and requirement then you have
been trying to justify.
The example I
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Bill Landry wrote:
For me, the lesson I take is to always be aware of the laws in your
locality. And the policies of the software you use.
Oh yeah, and I bet you read the public notifications in your local paper
Be aware of the laws != read the public notifications in
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
- It is a simple fact that the purpose of this update was to make running
software break.
I disagree with that statement because it's incomplete.. The purpose of this
update was to make running software break WITH A DESCRIPTIVE ERROR .
Important
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Steve Wray wrote:
This is part of the attitude problem from many open source projects.
They are (too often) run by technicians and programmers with no input from the
business side.
IMHO, open source projects don't have a business side.
Opensource projects exist for the
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
And you can cut the crap about well you should have configured your
system to not stop when ClamAV stopped - that's rubbish because it's
already been made perfectly clear right at the start of one of these
threads that the project team consider any
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
It is not something to do know, but instead something that could have been
done introducing 0.96...
Giampaolo: There are lots of things that COULD be done, but it is not the
philosophy of the ClamAV project.
As I said, the devs have made it
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Gary MacKay wrote:
OK, who's the mental midget that decided to just up and kill all
installations of clamav ??? I am flooded today with calls that email
servers are not working! Every d*(n one of them is the same thing.
ClamAV just died. Stupid I have never
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
The ClamAV team have commanded old versions of its product to stop working.
I would not describe what they did that way.
Older versions of clamd were going to crash on signatures that newer
versions would accept, and the devs have been prevented
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:25:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Christopher X. Candreva ch...@westnet.com
To: cla...@lists.clamav.net
Subject: llvm/jit CPU dependant
I just did a compile of 0.96rc1 on a Sparc server, and received this
message:
configure: error
Trying to compile on Solaris 10 i386, gcc 4.4.3 gives the following
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/chris/apps/mail/clamav-0.96rc1'
Making all in libltdl
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/chris/apps/mail/clamav-0.96rc1/libltdl'
make all-am
make[3]: Entering directory
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Solaris defines CS as 15, which causes an error when CS is used as a
parameter/variable name.
Please open a bugreport on bugs.clamav.net so we can track this.
Bug #1878 openeed
==
Chris Candreva
I have started testing the new clamav-milter. We had been doing some
specialized procvessing with the old one, and I am trying to see if we can
do this with the new one.
We reject (5xx) viruses in the initial connection. We use the postmaster
notify feature, and feed those message to a script
Yes, I know I am about to contradict myself.
GESBBB wrote:
Is there any reason you cannot read the documentation prior to
installing a newer version?
Anyone using a package manager will have the new software installed before
they can read the documentation.
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Colin
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Not true. I have a package manager installed on all my machines. But they
do NOT do automatic updates... The above is only true of those who have
a package manager installed and configured to do automatic upgrades.
But you are on this mailing list,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
It was hard enough finding a player that works in Windows. is there a
better format?
If you view the stream, it downloads a Java player that worked in Linux.
Maybe they have a stand-alone java player that will let you play the
downloaded file
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Henrik K wrote:
Who cares if it scans 100ms or 20ms. I prefer features and stability more
For those of us who use it as an incoming mail scanner (which I seem to
recall being the primary focus of clam from statements on this list) it
matters a great deal. The rate of
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Brian Morrison wrote:
FWIW it built quite happily on my RH9 (I know!) box with no changes
needed to my spec file. As yet I have not actually installed and run
the resulting rpms.
Built and run here on Solaris 8. I have clamav-milter running on a test
machine.
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, David F. Skoll wrote:
S:220 smtp.example.net Go ahead
C:MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S:220 Sender OK
C:RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S:451 Greylisted... try again later
C:RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S:451 Greylisted... try again later
C:DATA
S:500 Need recipient first
Just built and the resultant clamscan and clamav-milter both segfault when I
attempt to run them.
built with gcc 4.3.0 on Solaris 8 Sparc
The last lines with --debug enabled are
LibClamAV debug: Loading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav
LibClamAV debug: in cli_cvdload()
LibClamAV debug:
On Thu, 22 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/clamav/clamav-0.93rc1.tar.gz
That's an old version -- 0.93rc1 not 0.93.1rc1
However, the initial message said that the new release candidate would be
released SOON -- not that it has been released.
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Matthias Häker wrote:
is there any change in the conf ? ort anything else i should look for ?
Uhm, yes:
* clamd:
- NEW CONFIG FILE OPTIONS: MaxScanSize, MaxFileSize, MaxRecursion,
MaxFiles
- ** THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS ARE NO LONGER SUPPORTED **: MailMaxRecursion,
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
I have ClamAV running on several Linux mailservers. All of them stopped
working last night with similar symptoms:
In terms of the freshlcam failing, I had the same problem last night.
However, I run freshclam on a separate machine from my mail
The same problem seems to have just happened again. For the past few hours
my jobs has been returning errors . Before I post the details I'll put the
question here -- is anyone else seeing mirror issues or should I be looking
for a local problem ?
These were the errors my regular job
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, leonel wrote:
the daemons of 1 server died to last night but that server had the
freshclam as a daemon the other servers have the freshclam in the crontab
I should say -- I'm not the one who had servers die last night, just errors,
What I wanted to find out was anyone
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Independent Edit wrote:
Currently running ClamAV 0.90.3 on an OS X Server installation.
You are running an outdated version. Current release is 0.92.1
There were many performance improvements since 0.90.x
==
Chris
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote:
I thought so since I had tried scanning with it and it worked but when
I try to get the version info mine also segfaults. :-(
Interesting -- yes, it does actually scan, just --version causes the
segfault.
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote:
Maybe you could also try the packages from Blastwave?
http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/clamav
Wow, this is a switch -- don't we usually tell people they are better of
compiling from source ? :-)
Seriously, do you have a reason to think this
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Randal, Phil wrote:
clamscan --version behaves differently in 0.92.1 to 0.92
# clamscan --version
ClamAV 0.92.1
I seem to have a bigger problem:
[castor]:~/apps/mail/clamav-0.92.1/clamscan$ ./clamscan --version
Segmentation Fault
Solaris 8, gcc 4.2.2
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, john wrote:
am running fedora 6
Fedora 6 is end of life -- there aren't going to be updated packages for it.
You can compile it youself from source, or upgrade to Fedora 7 or 8
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Jon Wagoner - Red Cheetah wrote:
Yes, I'm periodically doing scans of the full drive. I could just skip
the mysql directory, but that seems pretty bad security practice.
Why does it seem that way to you ?
I don't think scanning raw mysql database files is going to give
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Jon Wagoner - Red Cheetah wrote:
It appears clamav just does a substring match on the exclude, so it
would be easy to hide viruses. E.g. If I excluded .MYD, then you could
just have your virus named somevirus.MYD and it would not be caught. If
I would not exclude *.MYD
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Jon Wagoner - Red Cheetah wrote:
hidden
in /home/someuser/var/lib/mysql/my-virus-here.
Users should not be able to write to that directory at all, it should
be
Take a closer look, that's not the real mysql directory, just a
subdirectory under the users home
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after a while I get this:
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:06.0/config: OK
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:06.0/:17:00.0/host1/sfp: OK
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:06.0/:17:00.0/host1/vpd: Empty file
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, John Rudd wrote:
(filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omission can cause crashing
The bug is protected so I can't look at it. However, is it enough to add
CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLISt to the
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
I am running clamav on various versions (5.8 - 5.10) of Solaris on Sparc
and Intel and have no problems with stability. I've built everything
from scratch except gcc. I'm very happy with it.
I'm running clamav/clamav-milter 0.91.1 on Solaris 8
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Tom Bombadil wrote:
Is anybody else experience a much higher load with 0.91 compared to 0.90.3?
Not seeing any higher load her, Solaris 8 on UltraSparc
Using clamav-milter with direct access to libclamav however, not the tcp
socket.
I thought this problem had been pretty well beaten to death when
Sanesecurity added their mirrors. In any case I put the set of
scripts/Makefile I use on my web site:
http://www.westnet.com/~chris/Clamav/
These were not written for general distribution, so it is your
responsibility to check
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Peter Boosten wrote:
clamdscan solved that issue, although I would have appreciated this
effect *before* I upgraded to a newer release.
This keeps comming up, perhaps it needs to be addressed in the docs.
Could you tell us why you used clamscan instead of clamd/clamdscan
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Peter Boosten wrote:
I had some problems running clamd on one of the machines a long time
ago, and with mimedefang running clamscan is the second option (which
had worked until sometime ago). So I configured mimedefang for clamscan.
Maybe it's time to ask the mimedefang
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Anyway, my point is, your millage may vary. Don't try to impose your views
on everyone else.
Whoa here. Did you chime and and give a good way to use clamscan on
production ?
Every time this comes up the answer is don't do it. If that is the answer,
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Chris wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamdscan phish1.txt
/home/chris/phish1.txt: Access denied. ERROR
I can't figure out why I keep getting this Access denied error. Anyone with
any ideas?
Because you didn't RTFM. :-)
clamdscan passes the file name to clamd, which
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
I seem to be having trouble with clamscan 0.91rc1 choking with the current
daily.wmd file. It was working fine until the most recent db update.
I don't have this problem, but I don't seem to have a daily.wmd file in my
daily.inc either. I have
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
fatfinger error on the name, I am referring to daily.wdb as the
pasted session shows.
Ah, sorry. Bleary-eyed error not catching it in the sesion. :-)
Are you using 91rc1? It's very repeatable here. I have
Yes, so far it has been running fine. My
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Steve Basford wrote:
(depending if you want the phishing sigs or the scam sigs)
Main:
http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/clamav/phishsigs/
http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/clamav/scamsigs/
The only problem is the lack of the final file-name in the URL. This breaks
my perl
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, CPTeam Hostmaster wrote:
I get this in maillog whenever I start clamav-milter:
--
Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter (clmilter): local
socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe
Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
It makes a great deal of sense to move the files into the clam DB directory
to insure an atomic operation. If clamd/clamav-milter should happen to
reload with a half-copied file in the DB dir, it will likely stop running.
Yah - I realized that
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
What would be the point of having a socket ready before clamd is ready
to do any work? Maybe I'm missing something.
It would be something for other programs to connect to and wait for a
response, instead of generating a socket does not exist error.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
It would be something for other programs to connect to and wait for a
response, instead of generating a socket does not exist error.
So that they could potentially wait around until their internal timeout,
instead of immediately returning? That
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
In my case the only difference from every previous build was to enable
experimental. I have just one build script I've used for years.
Try without experimental.
I have a similar set-up (Sun Sparc Ultra 2s, Solaris 8, gcc 4.1.1)
I was running
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Steve Holdoway wrote:
Have you patched 8.14.0. I had everything falling over until I did that...
FWIW the problems I had were with 8.13.8
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 948-3162
WestNet Internet
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
What breaks? I agree that at first glance it seems like an unnecessary
include, but I'm curious what error you get.
Here are the errors I get building rc3 with --enable-experimental
gcc 4.1.1 binutils 2.17
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Arnaud Jacques wrote:
Yeah, we all waiting for this new stable release :)
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is more stable than
the 0.88.x I was running previously.
Just yeaterday I received a Bugzilla note from one I had submitted that it
was fixed
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
50-50 isn't bad. Can you share your configure params?
Compiled fine on Solaris 8 Sparc, gcc 4.1.1, binutils 2.17
I configure with just ./configure --enable-milter
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
The 0.90rc2 release has greatly improved performance.
OK. Could you define greatly improved? I'm quite happy with clamav but I use
postfix/amavis with pre-queueing and therefore... :)
It's been a while, but things that took minutes to scan now
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I don't want to discuss about performance in general, I would just like to
know if this is normal and/or if there is a way to tune up that process.
I use 0.88.7
Yes, it is normal for 0.88.x
The 0.90rc2 release has greatly improved performance.
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey, who's the guy who maintains the phishing sigs? They hacked my
http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Sander Holthaus wrote:
a very basic perl script which opens a listening socket and a shell? I
found it after a hacker tried to gain entry. The script is nothing
special (far from, 612 bytes) but I doubt people are actually using it
for any legitimate means. BitDefender
Is there a compelling reason for clam to die on a malformed database,
instead of just ignoring the bad line and continuing with all the other
sigs ?
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 948-3162
WestNet Internet Services of
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Sander Holthaus wrote:
A malformed database points to:
- - serious system malfunction
- - security breach
- - security breach / system malfunction between you and (or at) the
database provider
In my experience, it means a database maintainer who made a simple
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Bill Landry wrote:
The MSRBL-Images.hdb database started showing up corrupted yesterday and
This is not the only reason I ask, but the most recent. I have a script that
checks that evidenly has a bug. I can either spend time fixing that, or
fixing clam so it ignores the
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Freshclam provides this and much more.
Except the ability to operate from a given specific URL pointing to a file.
If the only updates come from freshclam-verified sources it wouldn't be so
bad. The problem comes up that other mechanisims are necessry
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
There's no limitation for choosing a URL - you can put anything you like in
the freshclam.conf file. Using the --config-file=FILE option of freshclam in
The only option I see in man freshclam.conf is for a database mirror
server name, not a URL.
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Luca Gibelli wrote:
How exactly is this better then a possibe false-positive, if a corrupted
sig
happens to match some valid piece of mail ?
It's better to delay N emails rather than delete N emails.
A false-positive won't delete the mail - it will cause an
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Has anyone else observed such large improvements?
Yes. 0.8.x boggs down on some MIME types. The 0.9x RC's have been much
faster.
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Jonathan Armitage wrote:
I have just tried to configure, make and install Clamav-0.9RC2 on a Dell PC
running Solaris 10. I have previously done the same with various 0.8 versions
I don't know if this is your issue, but if you have bash installed, try
editing the first
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
I assume the answer is yes. :)
No, it probably means you didn't provide any of the information that was
asked for -- what it found, your platform and OS, etc.
Your premise that rc.2 isn't updated is wrong. There may be a language
barrier causing this, but it
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
I use clamav 0.90rc2 and my friend uses clamav 0.88.5 (the latest
stable). Just now, after I ran freshclam, i run clamdscan for a worm.
His could detect it as worm and mine didn't. Why is that?
It would be helpful to state what platform and what worm.
IE, I
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Ken Jones wrote:
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89
Access Denied
You are not authorized to access bug #89.
I think the clam Bugzilla require you to have an account and be logged in to
watch bugs.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Ken Jones wrote:
I do have an account I even have open reported bugs that I am working on
with the developers :) (ok, I've reported and they are trying to fix)
Look man, I just use the bugzulla. I don't want to have to understand
how it works.
Ducks for cover . . .
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
He scores!
Thank you, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitresses.
I get the same login error, btw, and since I use Solaris exclusively, I'm
interested.
Look like it's been clasified as a security bug, so I'll let the devel
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
My observation is that of all the modern packages ClamAV fails to
install and run successfully and securely without operator
intervention. I think that this should be refined to reference
Fedora packages and perhaps not all of them.
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Please report the problem to http://bugs.clamav.net
Opened. Sorry, I just assumed it was Sun's problem.
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal members of this
list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
I would disagree, in that I don't see it as suffering.
Forgive me if I missed it, but what is your specific problem ? Perhaps we
I don't know if this helps anyone else, but on Solaris 8 I had to tell
configure explicily to use bash instead of stock sun /bin/sh . It was
generating an error on the check for the clamav user (looked like it was
trying to run a program called clamav:: )
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:53:30AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These
mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. To scan 2000 identical
messages is insane, not to mention a total waste of system resources.
Other than
I have a sample of W97M.Lafool.U caught by 0.88.5 that 0.90rc1.1 says is
clean. I also received an almost identical mail that both say is clean.
The second I've submitted as a new virus sample. The first isn't taken,
since the web form's 0.88.5 catches it.
I assumed I had missed a config
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
I have a sample of W97M.Lafool.U caught by 0.88.5 that 0.90rc1.1 says is
clean. I also received an almost identical mail that both say is clean.
Looks like this may be a word/unpacker problem on Solaris/Sparc, as it is
properly detected
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
