16MB? 24bit addressing related somehow, is it?
But yes, it is very likely the assignment of this REXX stemmed variable
attempts a storage request over 16MB (including control information). I will
check.
Just to be thorough, are there limitations regarding the area of CMS available
memory
Have a situation where we keep running into FPLRVR236E when trying to populate
very large stemmed arrays.
Any idea what maximums the STEM stage / REXX itself is capable of handling?
(If it helps: virtual machine currently set to MACHINE XA, 1G of virtual
storage, IPL'ed CMS saved segment.)
available to solve more complex data management issues.
Now, you re-platform.
Regards,
Alan Altmark
IBM
> On Sep 12, 2020, at 12:27 PM, Paul Gilmartin
wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-12, at 06:18:25, Rob van der Heij wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 01:18, Stanislawski, Sh
Would be preferable to avoid truncation of a longer new record when dealing
with recfm=VARIABLE.
But at this point, it sounds as if there is not an elegant resource-light
method for so doing?
--Shawn S.
-Original Message-
From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List On Behalf
Of Rob van
Anyone have a great idea on how to use PIPE to replace single record at a
specified record number in a file without having to read / write out the entire
file, with the following caveats?
* the file could be either recfm FIXED or VARIABLE
* the new record could potentially be either
The Book says: "The facility is enabled for messages FPLDSK124E and FPLDSK129E.
There is no user interface to enable other messages, though it would be
possible to write a REXX program to enable other messages in the field, should
this be necessary. "
Stupid question: How would I go about
8 at 16:25, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) <
shaw...@dxc.com> wrote:
> Ah, apologies, you're right, failed to provide that piece:
> original record is desired at the end.
>
So you could do something like this:
... input records
| o: fanout
| j: juxtapose
| ... resu
ust the bytes beyond column 30, or something else indeed.
On 10/31/2018 03:17 PM, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) wrote:
> Want to filter a stream of records, letting only certain ones through based
> on a keyword in each record.
> What we know:
> -the keyword could be any
(National VM Capability) wrote:
> Want to filter a stream of records, letting only certain ones through based
> on a keyword in each record.
> What we know:
> -the keyword could be anywhere in the first 30 characters -the keyword
> is space delineated (no leading space if keywor
Want to filter a stream of records, letting only certain ones through based on
a keyword in each record.
What we know:
-the keyword could be anywhere in the first 30 characters
-the keyword is space delineated (no leading space if keyword is first word)
-the first and last part of that keyword
T.EDU
Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Selecting multiple record chunks
pick from 5.2 == /99/ for 4
On 03/02/2018 06:31 PM, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) wrote:
> I've got some data, within it reside multiple record chunks that I want.
> The desired record chunks are randomly space
I've got some data, within it reside multiple record chunks that I want.
The desired record chunks are randomly spaced within the data. The desired
record chunks are composed of 4 consecutive records.
The record chunks all start with records whose column 5 & 6 contain the
characters "99", and
d."
--Shawn S.
-Original Message-
From: Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability)
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 13:31
To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: RE: [CMS-PIPELINES] FPLSPX1086E Improper operand for string comparison
Getting same error if performing from an EXEC (portrai
ank of America
> CA4-136-01-01, 2546 SAN PABLO AVE, Berkeley, CA T 510.529.4128
> alan.acker...@bankofamerica.com
>
> Life's better when we're connected®
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List
> [mailto:CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf
Decided to give Mike's pipe a try, but it gives me an error:
pipe literal *|dup 8|spec if #0=='' then set #0:=-5 else set #0+=1 endif print
#0 n|Cons
"
FPLSPX1086E Improper operand for string comparison
FPLMSG003I ... Issued from stage 3 of pipeline 1
At this point the expected output format is just the same as CP QUERY PATHS
, but sans the "Legend" line:
"
Device 0192, Status ONLINE
CHPIDs to Device 0192 (PIM) : 11 12 1A 22 30 40
Physically Available (PAM) : + + + + + +
Online (LPM) : - - + + + -
, /* Back to original order. */
> "| ", /* More processing */
>
> "? c100: ",
> "| pick w1 \== /Online/ ",
> "| pick w2 \== /Available/ ",
>
Been working on developing my Pipethink, but this scenario has me stumbling.
Taking "CP QUERY PATHS 0-" and filtering so that only those with potential
problems (those who are NOT: "status ONLINE" AND "show a '+' for every
CHPID") get output to console.
The more I poke at this, the more
The way I’ve written a SPEC stage appears to be causing error:
“
FPLSPX1038E Not a decimal number: RANDOM EXEC F 80 40 1 2013-02-06 07:40:30
FPLMSG003I ... Issued from stage 5 of pipeline 1
FPLMSG001I ... Running "SPEC a: 1-* . SELECT SECOND b: 1-* . IF (a¬==b) TH"
”
Input is paired sets
Would someone please explain to me the internal mechanism(s) behind why the
following causes an error?
PIPE LITERAL PICKLES CAKE | SPLIT | A: DROP 1 | SPEC /CHEESE/ 1 W1 N | A:
FANINANY | CONSOLE
"
Label A is already declared
... Scan at position 70; previous data "CHEESE/ 1 W1 N | A:"
That example of LOOKUP is fascinating! Going to take a bit to digest.
After Sir Rob's reply, I managed to hammer out something that works.
Perhaps an unbeautiful / inefficient solution, but not sure?
Data file (SOMEFILE MAP A) :
"
*VOLUME: AA1A11
Provologne PEAR
Muenster PEAR
Flipping through the manuals, and testing it, that does seem to be easy enough.
But rather than the number of entries per volume (Word1) , prepending the
number of entries per subpool (Word6) would require...
Well, I imagine after the JUXTAPOSE (so the Volser and Device-type are now
part of
Juxtapose. Beautiful!
After that bit of processing, I'm left with records containing 6
space-delineated words.
Is it even possible to have PIPE append the record into a STEM where the stem's
name is Word6 in the record?
--Shawn S.
-Original Message-
From: CMSTSO Pipelines
INES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Converged custom profiles for 'CMS Productivity
Aids'
On 7/10/2016 12:12 PM, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) wrote:
> I couldn't get EMSG to show up when using CSLMAP command from CMS,
> however, which was very strange. Was unable to qu
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 9:57 AM
To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Converged custom profiles for 'CMS Productivity
Aids'
On 2016-07-08, at 08:50, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) wrote:
>
> I would like to make these overrides more portable: one XEDIT file instead of
> multiples.
>
Can you use synonyms and PARSE SOURCE?
-- gil
ist [mailto:CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 9:57 AM
To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Converged custom profiles for 'CMS Productivity
Aids'
On 2016-07-08, at 08:50, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) wrote:
>
The CMS Commands and Utilities Reference Appendix "Customizing Profiles for CMS
Productivity Aids" lists 10 profiles (plus 4 just for FILELIST) that can be
seen with the CMS command DEFAULTS and can be overridden with "DEFAULTS SET
PROFILE newprof" (where "" is an EXEC Fn from
27 matches
Mail list logo
