On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 10:39 PM, David Crossley wrote:
I propose Reinhard Pötz to be a Cocoon committer.
+1 Welcome!
Diana
On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 09:56 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I really don't understand why some of you are so emotionally attached
to something like
but even more I'm surprised to see 'conservationism' on this list.
Are you guys getting old or shy or what? ;-)
I'd guess that they are all
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 08:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...I guess Bertrand's purpose is not to use it on production servers,
but to have a small standalone server that can be used for e.g.
demonstrations.
Exactly, demos and teaching.
What if the build target were called teaching/
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I'm starting to think that porting Cocoon to the Whitespace language
(http://compsoc.dur.ac.uk/whitespace/) could bring a lot of benefits.
Apparently this language allows one to get rid of all encoding problems
by using a stric
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
With latest HEAD, if you do
http://localhost:/?cocoon-reload=true
you get an internal server error that says that
"you cannot lookup components on a disposed ComponentLocator"
See also:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forr
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 08:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Agreed - in this particular case, the best thing might be to cancel the
current vote and make a new proposal (taking into account the
"cocoon-docs alias" stuff)?
Wasn't Pier going to experiment with this approach and report ba
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 10:52 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Hm. Could be, although this particular subject has been discussed,
semi-proposed and whatnot already at some serious length in the
past, the usual circular discussion following suit hereafter.
I only ever saw haphazard discussion, n
On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 10:34 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
My own belly tells me that people will write more and better user
documentation if they get some proper playground. Having to worry
about code sitting right beside their documents will not bring peace
in their minds.
Ok, please, expl
On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 09:15 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
On 24/03/2003 14:23 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I don't expect 2.0 to live long after 2.1 is out. There is no reason
to.
To be really honest, I'd like to see some facts backing this statement.
Not technical facts, but truly compelling re
On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 07:50 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
A source-only distribution is not necessarily harder to use, it all
depends how it is packaged and used.
... and documented. Most of the problems I've had with oss
make-install-before-try software were related to some glitch,
e
[ +1 ] creation of cocoon-docs module
[ ] docs should stay in src/documentation of the code tree module(s)
I feel strongly about this, give the past year of my watching cvs
commits. The fact remains that many committers don't update both doc
branches when committing docs. If someone needs *
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:22 AM, David Crossley wrote:
I propose Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer. He has been
involved with Cocoon since mid-2000 and more intensely during
the past year.
+1. I was lucky to meet him in person and can confirm his first-rate
ideas and experience. He's offe
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:38 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
1) cocoon moves to forrest for its documentation production
+1
2) if so, cocoon does it before releasing 2.1
+1
3) if so, I'd like a 'fast-yet-potentially-disruptive' move rather
than a 'slow-yet-carefully-planned-not-to-disrupt-
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:55 AM, David Crossley wrote:
I propose Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer.
He also contributed an excellent tutorial on custom generators.
+1
Diana
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 02:59 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Diana Shannon wrote:
For example, current forrest build capability with cocoon's cvs
is only possible with Forrest CVS, not the last Forrest release.
This violates your "building on sand" p
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 11:13 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Perhaps it's just the nature of open source software, that a
tremendous amount of energy is unleashed right before a release date.
Perhaps there's no other way. Still, it feels, to be honest, like poor
planning. If we follow t
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 09:14 AM, Stephan Michels wrote:
No, I mean not ignoring for the validation, I mean ignoring for the
documentation generation process.
At the moment you couldn't generate the docs by Cocoon. I want to make
the
step invasive as less as possible.
Stephan, many thank
Responding to Steven and Stefano here:
On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 05:23 PM, Steven Noels wrote:
there's a lot of stuff out there and we should be able to work on this
as a team. Even if the transition is carefully documented (as you
already did at great length), I assume there might be issu
On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 08:15 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
There's movement on the -docs list and perhaps also a Forrest quantum
leap blossoming, so we'd better do this before or after this assumably
disruptive step.
I also wanted to state strongly that I don't believe Forrest transition
need
On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 08:15 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
So, if we have a volunteer to update the site, and we all agree, we can
start straight away.
There's movement on the -docs list and perhaps also a Forrest quantum
leap blossoming, so we'd better do this before or after this assumably
On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 08:16 PM, David Crossley wrote:
However, this raises an issue. I presume that considering
Cocoon is now a top-level project, that all reference to
the Cocoon project should be removed from xml.apache.org
That will be tricky because the xml-site CVS module
contains al
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 12:22 PM, Steven Noels wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
So, should we perform 'forrestization' of our documents to go ahead
with the plan?
That's not a strict requirement, just cronifying 'cvs update', 'build
docs' and some 'cp' to a live website will do ATM IIU
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 03:22 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Diana Shannon wrote:
I agree 100% with Andrew that two "clearly" separated repositories
won't
really improve on what we had. But it's all we have at the moment.
Sure. I'm happy to help
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 10:49 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches
with their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the
branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release branch,
which is what is used
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 07:30 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I would move it in a slightly different way, that will help us to be
more
flexible wih the new/updated documentation for v2.1 comes out:
Why not have this now for alpha/beta docs? It would save some tedious
manual synching. There's
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 05:32 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I suggest linking to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/mirror.cgi#nightly
but
I guess that's your intention ;-)
Yes, but at that point we'll have to re-build the site once again...
Ok, we shouldn't be so limited in rebuilding the site as
I updated the live site docs, with changes primarily reflecting the new
cvs setup. A big thanks to Pier for the new cvs setup and
**particularly** for making such a thorough update of all relevant docs
in both 2.1 and 2.0 repositories.
Diana
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 07:14 AM, Diana Shannon wrote:
Carsten,
My cvs update isn't showing the lib/optional/commons-lang-1.0.1.jar.
So, in spite of your very thorough xmlutils bug fix -- many thanks --
cocoon-2.0 still isn't compiling for me based on this new bug fix.
Diana
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 06:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:lib jars.xml
src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation
SQLTransformer.java
Added: legalLICENSE.jakarta-commons-lang
lib/optional commons-lang-1.0.1
On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 02:18 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
FATAL_E 2003-03-09 13:44:45.854 [] (): Exception caught
org.apache.avalon.framework.configuration.ConfigurationException: Could
not load parser org.apache.avalon.excalibur.xml.JaxpParser
Reviewing Carsten's cvs commit
Has anyone been able to build cocoon-2.0 docs successfully?
I'm trying to rule out a configuration problem on my end before digging
deeper. (OS X, Java 1.3.1) I'm getting the following after ./build.sh
docs
docs:
ERROR 2003-03-09 13:44:45.683 [] (): Could not load parser,
Cocoon obje
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:46 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Diane, can you roughly push the new site live tomorrow or Monday?
You bet! Thanks Pier!
Dian-a- ;-)
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 01:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...
Is there _anyone_ who knows how to rebuild and put live the
site??? :-) :-)
I can help, Pier. If someone can provide some modest language
describing the new setup, I'll extend it and place it where appropriate
in the xdocs
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 09:17 AM, Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
+1
Diana
On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 06:01 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I'm asking the Cocoon PMC to vote for the inclusion of the below
proposed project named Lenya (ex wyona.org) as a Cocoon subproject.
This vote will take place on cocoon-dev where the Cocoon PMC lives.
I'm CCing the incubator l
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 01:24 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
As Stefano is remodeling the build system, would it be better to have
it in
src/blocks/proxy/doc or in src/documentation/...
I'd say src/documentation for now, in spite of its imperfections...
Otherwise, the doc won't be
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 03:56 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
Sure, David - fully aware of that. My 'big hidden agenda' (duh) was to
add a first step to the main cocoon build, so that others could jump in
and expand. That doc makes reference to a trail-run-F target which was
buried somewher
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 02:16 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
As I've just done it for axis-dev, should we move the cocoon mailing
lists
from cocoon-(dev|user)@xml.apache.org to
(dev|user)@cocoon.apache.org ???
Just don't forget cocoon-docs!
Diana
--
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 07:55 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Thank you and happy birthday to all those born in January (so far, on
this list, me, Sylvain, Ivelin, Pier, Jeremy... anybody else?)
Me too, on Friday -- in the US, one of the more notorious -- 40 !!
Definitely a cake torch!
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 02:46 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I hereby propose Jeff Turner for cocoon committership. He is one of the
major forces behind Forrest and has been proposing important patches
and features addition to the main Cocoon repository.
+1 One of the many qualities o
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 02:46 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I hereby propose Jeff Turner for cocoon committership. He is one of the
major forces behind Forrest and has been proposing important patches
and features addition to the main Cocoon repository.
+1 One of the many qualities o
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
I'd like to propose Michael Melhem as Cocoon committer. He has come up
with lots of ideas for improvement in various parts of Cocoon including
the control flow, and recently contributed an excellent patch for
expiring continua
I had my fingers crossed that 2.0.4 might be released by today. However
I understand the reasons for the delay.
Starting today, I am traveling away from my office for the next seven to
ten days and predict that I will have little, if any, time/bandwidth to
update the live site. Therefore, I did
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 07:13 AM, Giacomo Pati wrote:
Can you describe the steps you've taken until you got this error
(essentially the commands you've issued where in which repo)?
I maintain separate cvs directories for head and release files. After
checkouts, I simply use:
cvs
I was trying to sync HEAD and release versions of
src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/actions/database-actions.xml
but when I try to commit the updated version to the release branch, I
get:
cvs server: sticky tag `cocoon_2_0_3_branch' for file
`database-actions.xml' is not a branch
Any suggest
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 06:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Christian Haul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 27.Nov.2002 -- 10:19 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
All right. I hereby propose Matthew Langham for commit access.
+1 (sorry for the late vote)
+1 ..also being late;)
+1
On 22.Nov.2002 -- 12:42 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I would like to propose Andrew Oliver for commit access.
+1 A steadfast proponent for improved docs!
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 11:26 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
The most important bug seems to be the broken documentation
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12396), but I can't
produce the bug on my system. There are now at least 3 people with the
problem.
Sorry, but I
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 12:21 AM, David Crossley wrote:
[+1] Call 'validate-config' by default during the build.
+1 Quite helpful!
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email:
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 08:29 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
+1 Hooray!
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm generally in agreement with Ken (in fact I proposed a separate CVS
module for docs, powered by a Forrest webapp back in July on
forrest-dev), but I agree with David that we need to clarify a number of
key issues to make such a transition successful and efficient.
While I haven't posted much
On Saturday, October 19, 2002, at 09:17 AM, Geoff Howard wrote:
Excuse my ignorance here, but isn't xml.apache.org
still being served statically?
You are correct. For the record, I updated the site earlier today.
Diana
-
T
Thanks very much.
Diana Shannon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tributor, one of the earliest authors of docs for cocoon cvs and
third party sites (www.cocooncenter.de), prolific CocoonWiki
contributor, and Cocoon community member for just over one year.
Thank you for your consideration.
Diana Sh
On Tuesday, October 8, 2002, at 03:51 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> "build docs" seems to be broken in 2.1-dev
> or it is just mine (2.0.3-dev is fine).
> The debug messages do not seem to reveal issues.
If you look in the logs, you will see that Cocoon is complaining about
not finding the SVGS
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 03:50 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Ok, agreed. I only wanted to give a hint that most articles are
> already linked in the docs.
I agree with Carsten's earlier point. Most articles have links within
existing docs.
> BTW: What does our documentation team
On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 05:42 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Just a tip: if you install Cocoon jars in the WEB-INF/lib, you can add
> your classes in WEB-INF/classes, and just restart Tomcat to use the new
> classes. I do it also when developing Cocoon itself, since classes come
> b
On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 03:24 AM, Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> I'd like to propose Christopher Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as
> committer
> to Cocoon.
+1 Great news!
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
Based on the status of 2.0.3 branch as of this am, the web site was
updated.
This includes javadocs (in spite of some warnings on build)
and regular documentation.
-- Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 07:42 AM, Diana Shannon wrote:
> Platform: Mac
> OS: OS X 10.1.5
> Compiler: Pizza
Sorry: JVM 1.3.1
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, emai
Platform: Mac
OS: OS X 10.1.5
Compiler: Pizza
Results
- I'm getting NPEs using the Lucene indexing page
- http://localhost:8080/cocoon/hello.svg
Still crops funny, but that's a OSX/Batik issue, IIRC...
Suggestions
- What database configuration is required for ESQL sample to work?
http://lo
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 11:35 AM, Enke, Michael wrote:
> Hi Diana,
> in section 3b) Manual install:
>
> [unix] ./build.sh -Dinclude.webapp.libs=yes
> -Dinstall.war=$TOMCAT_HOME/webapps webapp
> [win32] .\build.bat -Dinclude.webapp.libs=yes
> -Dinstall.war=%TOMCAT_HOME%\webapps webapp
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 11:25 AM, Diana Shannon wrote:
>
>>> 5. Test *all* samples. Hit each and every sample page from links
>>> beginning at http://127.0.0.1:8080/cocoon/samples/
>
> You're right, John. Going to ...cocoon/samples/ is incorrect. It goes
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 11:18 AM, John Morrison wrote:
>> 5. Test *all* samples. Hit each and every sample page from links
>> beginning at http://127.0.0.1:8080/cocoon/samples/
You're right, John. Going to ...cocoon/samples/ is incorrect. It goes to
a 2.0.2-dev
samples page. This was m
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 06:35 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> So, we need do to the following:
>
> a) Testing if everything works, espcially with regards to the different
>JVMs - I did a quick SQL test with both versions and they both
>worked.
>
> b) Update the documentation to inc
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 02:26 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I think we should vote on some patches we have in bugzilla.
>
> And here is the list of patches we could apply for 2.1-dev:
>
>
> 10429:[PATCH]ParameterSelector:new User doc, overview + examples
Already applied ag
Is it correct to flag the userdocs/concepts/modules.html doc with the
following note:
Modules are only available in Cocoon 2.1 or 2.0.3 (with scratchpad
libs).
Thanks.
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
Can someone help fill in the holes below?
On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 10:10 AM, Jason Foster wrote:
> We should really get this in a FAQ somewhere!
>
>>> What's the difference between having two pipelines with one matcher
>>> each, and one pipeline with two matchers?
>>
>> If there is no oth
On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 10:16 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm, as developer, can work with CVS. Lots of the users can't.
>>
>> I think this is an education issue which can be addressed down the
> road.
>
> AFAIU the issue, this is the point in 20% of cases.
Even if true, 20% equals
On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 09:22 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Lots of users.
>
> I'm, as developer, can work with CVS. Lots of the users can't.
I think this is an education issue which can be addressed down the road.
Many users don't understand "why" -- i.e. the benefits of
using cvs. IMHO,
On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 06:45 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Chris, I have another strong feeling: without at least a sample and a
> few lines of documentation about all this and what it is supposed to
> achieve, nobody will ever use it, nor even give you feedback. So I'd
> strongly sugges
On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 08:47 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Anyone still interested in a 2.0.3 release?
Yes, but as we discussed off-list, I am counting on having until Monday
of next week to update a number docs.
I *really* need this additional time. Thanks for all your hard work in
t
On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 08:39 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Personally in the projects I do on krysalis I simply add the person to
> the authors.
You know, personally, I like to share credit as much as possible, even
when I do most of the work. It's easy to do, it's free to give, and f
On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 08:44 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
> We could add some (non-required) CMS revision elements/attrs to the
> document>header element and generate the revision history automatically
> at the bottom of the page. An idea for Forrest, perhaps?
Yes, of course.
Diana
--
I need your input on how to think about bylines Cocoon docs, both
community-contributed and core docs (soon to be patched by new
volunteers).
I'm struggling to understand how to credit the efforts of people who
make the docs better. This effort doesn't always equate to authorship,
that is, yo
On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 07:36 AM, Piroumian Konstantin wrote:
> For simple samples (e.g. 'hello world', 'svg') this file can be the
> front-page, and then it's worth it. But the samples with their own
> layout
> and styles would like to have their own front-page (i18n, flow).
>
> So, I'd l
On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 04:46 AM, Piroumian Konstantin wrote:
> This is already done for the scratchpad and would be fine also for the
> samples. The only problem is that you'll need also some additional info,
> e.g. a short description, for the sample. I've proposed to add a
> 'map:descrip
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, at 01:00 PM, Enke, Michael wrote:
> Stephan Michels wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I noticed that the samples doesn't work anymore? I think the reason
>> are the changes for the bug://10277 (mime-type).
>>
>
> Long time ago I n
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, at 02:34 AM, Mikhail Fedotov wrote:
>> After just a few hours of poking around I have decided
>> that it will be much simpler for me to simply hand-code
>> a whole hat-full of servlets than to try and pull any
>> meaning out of Cocoon and it's documentation.
>
> Two
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 12:25 PM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> So what use cases do we have?
>
> * It should definitely be easy to write wizards in a flow description
> language.
> I believe this is the case for flowscripts (see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=1020526627
I am working on a How-To for the command line. To get started, I had to
deal with a few issues described below.
First of all, I just committed a patch for run.sh which now reflects the
revised lib directory structure of 2.03 and HEAD. (Note that run.bat
already reflects the correct directory s
On Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 10:03 AM, Enke, Michael wrote:
> -All links in "More Samples" (except Portal and Authentication) are
> broken.
> -Scratchpad sample doesn't work
> -Slides link (Documentation) is broken
> -Documentation (Form Handling) is broken
> -Control Flow: If I follow the l
On Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 08:06 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
> we would be able to host this.
Great news, Steven.
> this seems however like a core documentation effort. Could you please
> synchronize your efforts with Diana's and Forrest's? The last thing we
> want to happen is the document
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 06:31 PM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Feel free to ask if you need further clarification about my integration
> proposal.
What *I'm* most interested in is a statement you made a while ago on
this list about the difficulties students can have learning about
cont
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 04:04 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Diana Shannon wrote:
>>
>> 1. How can we change the FAQ pointer, a signature on cocoon-user
>> emails,
>> to point to the new FAQ location:
>>http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/
>
&g
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 01:30 PM, Michael Hartle wrote:
>> How should I provide the source code so you can check it out? (I'm new
>> to cocoon-dev.)
>>
> This sounds interesting, so just go to Bugzilla and add it as a "bug"
> for Cocoon 2, prefixing your Summary with "[PATCH]" and addi
[FYI: sorry for xpost]
Did you know you can help improve Cocoon's documentation?
Right now, in the most recent CVS release branch and on the live site,
you'll find the resources you need to contribute new FAQs, How-Tos, and
Code Snippets to the Cocoon project. Specifically:
How to author a
1. How can we change the FAQ pointer, a signature on cocoon-user emails,
to point to the new FAQ location:
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/
2. Could we add links to the Bugzilla and Patch How-Tos within
the autogenerated PATCH QUEUE email? If so, here is some
proposed language.
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 09:49 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
>>>
>>> [ http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ ]
>>> The links to the faq section are linked wrong. They point to faq.html,
>>> but it's faq/
>>>
>>> Regards, Daniele
>
&g
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 02:51 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> [ http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ ]
>> The links to the faq section are linked wrong. They point to faq.html,
>> but it's faq/
>>
>> Regards, Daniele
I'm not sure what links she's referring to, but Vadim astutely point
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:43 PM, John Morrison wrote:
> How did you build the files?
I built from the release branch, once I synced docs from head.
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 01:41 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
>
>> I'm adding notices at the top of any doc related to 2.1. It's the same
>> notice that appears in the WARNING note in the 2.1 branch.
>
> Ah, that makes a lot of sense, and should help keep track of new
> features
> etc for peopl
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:49 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
> Question: should the documentation on the site reflect HEAD, the stable
> development branch (2.0.3-dev), or the latest stable release? I'd
> suggest
> either of the latter two, as most people I assume will be using the
> stable
>
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:54 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
>
>>
>> isn't correct. This should have been replaced by the file
>> generated by check-jars...
>
> How is this generated?
It's not a build target for the release branch. Is it ok to include
docs within the release branch
xml-cocoon2 directory.
>
> isn't correct. This should have been replaced by the file
> generated by check-jars...
How is this generated?
Diana
>
> J.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
I just updated (with the help of Vadim on xml.apache.org) the live site.
It is now synced with the release and HEAD branch docs with the
exception of a few docs in src/documentation/xdoc/developing/. Carsten
(or someone else) will have to inform me about a few issues there.
One way to get some
On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 12:56 PM, Mikhail Fedotov wrote:
>
>> We are perfectly aware of the issues with documentation
>
> ...and I'm aware that you are aware of it, sorry for
> bothering. :) But...
>
>> and we are moving as fast as we can to improve things,
>> believe me, also along with th
On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 06:48 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
> Let this be another call for everybody having a really good look into
> it - I've generate the XMLSpy documentation out of it and put that live
> (http://outerthought.net/sitemap/sitemap.html), feel free to grab
> sources and put it in
On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 05:37 AM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> If we had something similar to BugZilla for documentation, that would
> accept emailed doc updates, then the work of the editor could take
> place on the servers set up by the users, and posted to the Doc
> BugZilla for checking and
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 03:53 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> This gives me wild thoughts, we could make an editor, included in the
> standard build, which provides a locally served form-based interface
> which allows cocoon users to submit documentation/doc-
> updates/doc-patches/recipes etc
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
