[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack resolved HADOOP-18365.
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Resolution: Fixed
PR merged to branch-3.3 and to trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack resolved HADOOP-18228.
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Resolution: Fixed
> Update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack updated HADOOP-17725:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.3.3
(was: 3.3.2)
> Improve error message for token
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17345908#comment-17345908
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17665:
Thank you [~weichiu]
> Ignore missing keystore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17342149#comment-17342149
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
I merged the sub-task PR to trunk and branch-3.3.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17342141#comment-17342141
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17665:
Merged to trunk and branch-3.3. It doesn't apply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17339100#comment-17339100
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
Thanks [~borislav.iordanov]. Is that ok by you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17339022#comment-17339022
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
Thanks for following up [~ayushtkn]. Lets see if Boris
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17326692#comment-17326692
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
bq. What I could do is create a PR with a more helpful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17320580#comment-17320580
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
ACK [~ayushtkn] Thanks for ping. Looking...
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack resolved HADOOP-16524.
Resolution: Fixed
Resolving again. Thanks for the feature [~borislav.iordanov] contrib.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17312594#comment-17312594
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
Pushed new PR that fixes yarn issue to branch-3.3 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack reopened HADOOP-16524:
Reopening to revert change until fix failing yarn test.
> Automatic keystore reloading for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17262785#comment-17262785
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
Reverted from trunk and branch-3.3.
> Automatic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17262777#comment-17262777
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
Sorry about that. Thanks for the ping. I applied
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack updated HADOOP-16524:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
3.3.1
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17261467#comment-17261467
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
Merged to trunk. Put up #2609 backport to branch-3.3.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246968#comment-17246968
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16524:
Attached PR LGTM. Would appreciate someone else taking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17231687#comment-17231687
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17288:
+1 on backport. Will ease move to 3.3.x\+
> Use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17209740#comment-17209740
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17288:
[~ayushtkn] talking out loud, 3.2.1 and 3.3.0 shipped
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17208255#comment-17208255
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17288:
Looking good [~ayushtkn] . You thinking that this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17205644#comment-17205644
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17288:
{quote}Ideally if the downstream has to upgrade guava,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack updated HADOOP-17288:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Use shaded guava from thirdparty
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17205329#comment-17205329
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17288:
{quote}but guava as of now would be still packaged as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17205259#comment-17205259
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17288:
[~ayushtkn] What is the approach here (big patch,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17193302#comment-17193302
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17254:
Yeah, upgrade if you can... 1.2.x, 1.3.x are EOL'd.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack resolved HADOOP-16598.
Resolution: Fixed
Reclosing after fixing branch-2 and branch-2.9 commits (revert and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack reopened HADOOP-16598:
Thanks for checking. Reopening while I fix.
> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack updated HADOOP-16598:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.11.0
2.10.1
3.2.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16954173#comment-16954173
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16598:
I tried the 3.2 patch by applying it, cleaning the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack updated HADOOP-16600:
---
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950207#comment-16950207
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16600:
+1
> StagingTestBase uses methods not available in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack updated HADOOP-16598:
---
Attachment: HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch
> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944166#comment-16944166
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16598:
Retry. Was going to commit this tomorrow unless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack updated HADOOP-16598:
---
Attachment: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch
> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16941228#comment-16941228
]
Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
bq. If we are passing protobuf types around, either as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928795#comment-16928795
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
One thought, just use the hbase-thirdparty jar? Shaded protobuf,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928784#comment-16928784
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
On your #1 and #2 choices above, #1 works for us. Cost is negligible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16924511#comment-16924511
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
Perhaps this pom helps?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16835080#comment-16835080
]
stack commented on HADOOP-15566:
Thanks for the pointer [~bogdandrutu]
> Support Opentracing
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16581273#comment-16581273
]
stack commented on HADOOP-15566:
[~elek] Thanks. Or we could just strip htrace. This would remove any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16562619#comment-16562619
]
stack commented on HADOOP-15566:
bq. I just think we're going to be hard-pressed to make an informed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16561007#comment-16561007
]
stack commented on HADOOP-15566:
Thanks for the input [~michaelsembwever].
bq. as the effort is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16553144#comment-16553144
]
stack commented on HADOOP-15566:
For me, the hard part is not which tracing lib to use -- if a tracing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16177943#comment-16177943
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13866:
This issue is no longer relevant. HBase shades its netty dependency.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167304#comment-16167304
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
I'd presume upgrade but run in pb2 mode, the default. That has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129662#comment-16129662
]
stack commented on HADOOP-14284:
The particular example you cite goes away if hadoop embeds hbase2 since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16126355#comment-16126355
]
stack commented on HADOOP-14284:
bq. Does HBase shade across all code base, instead of just in client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16126187#comment-16126187
]
stack commented on HADOOP-14284:
If it helps, here is what was done over in hbase to make it so we could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16001566#comment-16001566
]
stack commented on HADOOP-14284:
bq. ...get rid of it
This doesn't seem right either mighty [~djp].
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15996980#comment-15996980
]
stack commented on HADOOP-14284:
bq. However, I found one problem in this approach: shaded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969481#comment-15969481
]
stack commented on HADOOP-14284:
HBase cheats. It has an unofficial pre-build step, the product of which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15958358#comment-15958358
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
You can ask shading to only bundle required classes which should cut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15958253#comment-15958253
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
[~kihwal] Good point.
What we thinking for a shading approach?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15946364#comment-15946364
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
[~ozawa] Yes sir. Default mode is proto2. You have to explicitly ask
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15944328#comment-15944328
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
HBase uses pb3 internally because you can avoid having to copy all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15859123#comment-15859123
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13866:
+1 for master branch then (after update to latest 4.1.x). We'll need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15856940#comment-15856940
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13866:
Latest netty release on 4.1 is 4.1.8, not 4.1.1. Might want to go to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15851878#comment-15851878
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13866:
I tried the patch here against the hadoop 2.7 branch and it fixed my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15840614#comment-15840614
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13433:
Thanks [~steve_l] for taking care of the commit.
> Race in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15836380#comment-15836380
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13433:
So, patch is only suited to branch-3 [~Apache9]? Worth a version w/ UTs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15812310#comment-15812310
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13433:
Should the test case be integrated into the patch [~Apache9]?
Have you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15587093#comment-15587093
]
stack commented on HADOOP-13363:
Did a ML discussion happen?
pb3.1.0 is out. It runs in a 2.5.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323884#comment-15323884
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
bq. Chaining/callbacks are nonessential in the sense that they can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323118#comment-15323118
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
bq. No, they are the same API. Branch-2 is a simplified version of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318747#comment-15318747
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
Why the insistence on doing the async twice? Once for branch-2 and then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15317848#comment-15317848
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
bq. For branch-2, There are two possible ways to use Deferred (or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15314599#comment-15314599
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
Back now [~cnauroth]
bq. ...whereas the scope of this issue has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15306068#comment-15306068
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
OpenTSDB is LGPL but Deferred is not. It looks to be BSD. A jar that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15304159#comment-15304159
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
Copy/Paste of Deferred would work. It does callback, has a respectable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15303503#comment-15303503
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
bq. Why making the entire async feature unavailable in branch 2?
I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15302854#comment-15302854
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
Good suggestion. We'll be back.
> Add new FileSystem API to support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15301094#comment-15301094
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12910:
The patch here converts one method only? Is the intent to do all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935080#comment-14935080
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12447:
+1 from me. Cleans up doc so it refers to 4.0.1 htrace API. Fixes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14741083#comment-14741083
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12403:
bq. The latest HBase WAL write model (HBASE-8755) uses multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14619310#comment-14619310
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12201:
+1
I like the pretty picture [~cmccabe]
Add tracing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14610828#comment-14610828
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12171:
fullClassNameToTraceString looks like utility that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14611192#comment-14611192
]
stack commented on HADOOP-12171:
+1 on 002.
Shorten overly-long htrace span names for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14347234#comment-14347234
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11656:
bq. To add, I think we can and should strive for doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14238432#comment-14238432
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11363:
lgtm
Want to just go for 4G rather than 2G or you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14238652#comment-14238652
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11363:
+1
Hadoop maven surefire-plugin uses must set heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14231887#comment-14231887
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11301:
Just to say that this patch also fixes an issue in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HADOOP-11301:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.7.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14231091#comment-14231091
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11301:
Thanks [~ram_krish] Fixed.
[optionally] update jmx
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14226768#comment-14226768
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11301:
We cache jmx values for 10ms only. Too short. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14224164#comment-14224164
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11301:
I tried the patch and it seems like it is doing as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14221485#comment-14221485
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11301:
Looks much cleaner. Should these two statements be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14221610#comment-14221610
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11301:
Lets go with your conservative suggestion. It will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14220356#comment-14220356
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11301:
Agree with [~andrew.wang]. No need of a config. Can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14195829#comment-14195829
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10938:
I think this issue is going in the wrong direction.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14188803#comment-14188803
]
stack commented on HADOOP-11186:
+1 Small doc fix. Thanks [~cmccabe]
documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13943307#comment-13943307
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10410:
bq. I hope we can just do technical discussion in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13943894#comment-13943894
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10410:
bq. Why not get some experimental results, and then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13942738#comment-13942738
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10015:
I'd be +1 on DEBUG (Opening a new issue to discuss what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13939500#comment-13939500
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10410:
Yeah [~xieliang007]... offline Todd suggested trying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13939640#comment-13939640
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10410:
[~xieliang007] It'd be cool to try. One thought I had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HADOOP-10337:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.4.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13887263#comment-13887263
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10313:
Alejandro, you want to add a bit of a comment on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13887474#comment-13887474
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10313:
v2 lgtm
Script and jenkins job to produce Hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13884262#comment-13884262
]
stack commented on HADOOP-10255:
[~sureshms] Thanks for committing. On 'We need to
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
