Re: [VOTE] [codec] Release 1.3-RC1

2004-07-06 Thread Scott Sanders
On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: This vote is to approve the public release of commons codec 1.3-RC1. [X] +1 Go ahead and release 1.3-RC1 [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Don't release 1.3-RC1, because... -

Re: [codec] [proposal] Moving To Apache Commons

2003-12-20 Thread Scott Sanders
On Dec 20, 2003, at 2:47 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: To go to A-C means to have no supporting community other than codec developers. Will you ask for your own mailing list? I would not. or be on the same list as Serf? Or be here on the same list as jxpath, digester, io, etc? I do not see the

Re: Commons - TLP

2003-12-20 Thread Scott Sanders
I think that a lot of this can be taken care of in the join, should J-C join A-C in its entirety, since there will be a large group joining a smaller one. On Dec 20, 2003, at 5:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: The big difference is that, if J-C joins A-C, we don't necessarily maintain our current

Re: [codec] [proposal] Moving To Apache Commons

2003-12-19 Thread Scott Sanders
On Dec 19, 2003, at 6:56 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote: Codec, a small - probably the smallest - piece of code in Jakarta-land. Is well suited for inclusion in Apache Commons. I propose that Codec be used as a guinea pig of sorts to test the waters of Apache Commons. It is not language specific,

Re: [VOTE] Elect Simon Kitching As Jakarta Commons Committer

2003-11-12 Thread Scott Sanders
--- --- Vote: Elect Simon Kitching As Jakarta Commons Committer [X] +1 Yes let him commit! [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 I am against this (please include a reason). ---

Re: [digester] Feature addition to digester

2003-10-20 Thread Scott Sanders
I could see how it could be useful. If you are willing to commit and support it, and the code is backwards-compatible (should be), then I am +1. Go for it. Scott On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 08:13 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I'd like to add a feature to the digester, allowing property

Re: [VOTE] Serge Knystautas as a commons committer

2003-06-30 Thread Scott Sanders
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Martin Poeschl as commons committer

2003-06-30 Thread Scott Sanders
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:41:43AM -0700, David Graham wrote: Martin is currently a committer on Turbine, Torque, and OJB and has expressed an interest in maintaining the commons-dbcp project (which is in need of new developers). I suggest we add him as a commons committer. +1 -- Scott

Re: [digester] 1.4.1 release plan

2003-02-20 Thread Scott Sanders
- robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [codec] RE: more common classes need a home

2003-02-03 Thread Scott Sanders
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16440 So, I'll make a proposal and hope for lazy consensus: Let's replace Base64 in codec with the current HttpClient version. I believe that was actually Scott Sanders (sanders), not Sander Striker (striker) :) -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [digester] action items for 1.4 release

2003-01-30 Thread Scott Sanders
is long overdue. -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [digester] time for a 1.4 release?

2003-01-30 Thread Scott Sanders
to do it. -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [beanutils][digester] about time for a release?

2003-01-07 Thread Scott Sanders
not have the bandwidth to do the RM, or to fix the methodUtils caching thing. Anyone who wants to should go for the release. -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] commons-functor

2002-12-27 Thread Scott Sanders
Why couldn't this just be in the next version of lang? -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Commons is ready for mirroring

2002-12-27 Thread Scott Sanders
a directory for sub-sub projects. I did these lest the /dist/jakarta/commons directory be overrun with too many entries. Thanks, Scott Sanders Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. - Antoine de Saint-Exupery

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] commons-functor

2002-12-27 Thread Scott Sanders
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 01:27:01PM -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: Vote +1 to the vote for that and it could be ;) .. sorry. hard to resist :) +1 for functors in lang. I think this is part of the 'missing link' that got left out +of java.lang. -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [pattern] Proposed removal of project

2002-11-23 Thread Scott Sanders
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release

2002-10-31 Thread Scott Sanders
wanted to vote for Al Gore but couldn't find him on this ballot -1: I have a good reason to hold up the release. (Oh yah, +1 from me.) +1 -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [digester] bug fix release?

2002-10-31 Thread Scott Sanders
by writing my own rule that waited until end(). I would mark this as WONTFIX. -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] commons-launcher promotion

2002-10-24 Thread Scott Sanders
ballot +1 [x] Yes, move commons-launcher to Commons Proper -1 [ ] No, because: /ballot In addition, it is proposed that a first 0.9 beta release of commons-launcher be made available. ballot +1 [X] Yes. -0 [ ] No, because: /ballot -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

2002-10-24 Thread Scott Sanders
for you. Let's start it now. BeanUtils just released 1.5, and robert was talking about bringing over MethodUtils. Let's just fire it up :) -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons BeanUtils 1.5 released

2002-10-24 Thread Scott Sanders
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:39:31PM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: good work scott :) Thanks robert, shall we start clazz now? Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org

[clazz] Just a beginning...

2002-10-24 Thread Scott Sanders
in stone, feel free to change it all. Just wanted to get something started that wasn't reorg email :) -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Promote FileUpload from Commons Sandbox to CommonsPrope r

2002-10-23 Thread Scott Sanders
+1. Vote to promote the FileUpload component from Commons Sandbox to Commons Proper: [ ] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help [ ] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help [ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action [ ] -1 I am opposed to this action and here is why: - 8

RE: Proposal: httpd-like PMC organisation

2002-10-23 Thread Scott Sanders
I am +1 on this Costin, could you just patch the charter and then we vote on it? I would prefer to change the wording to use anything besides PMC though. IMO. Scott -Original Message- From: Costin Manolache [mailto:cmanolache;yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:45 PM

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.0 Release

2002-10-23 Thread Scott Sanders
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:22:30PM +0100, John Keyes wrote: [ ] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help [X] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help [ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action [ ] -1 I am opposed to this action and here is why: -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: monitoring the sandbox [WAS Re: License and copyright issues]

2002-10-22 Thread Scott Sanders
Big +1. Until the members to committers ratio can improve, the only way to pick up the slack is for EVERYONE to be watching out for this type of thing. +1 i think that we in the commons needs to take the supervision of the sandbox more seriously. since it's part of our

RE: License and copyright issues

2002-10-22 Thread Scott Sanders
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Michael A. Smith wrote: [snip] I don't think this should stop us from improving oversight in license compliance issues in jakarta-commons and jakarta-commons-sandbox. Big +1. Until the members to committers ratio can improve, the

RE: [apache-commons] Apache Commons info?

2002-10-18 Thread Scott Sanders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there another one? Scott -Original Message- From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:mas;apache.org] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:36 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [apache-commons] Apache Commons info? On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Henri Yandell

RE: [beanutils] ready for 1.5 release?

2002-10-18 Thread Scott Sanders
This is an area that I've often wondered about -- how do most people deal with writing unit tests for this sort of stuff? In this situation, I suppose you could do some classloader tricks to reload the same class with a different method signature, which would make the call fail the second

RE: [beanutils] ready for 1.5 release?

2002-10-18 Thread Scott Sanders
I would say patch 12728 and release. The sealed attribute might be nice though :) Scott -Original Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:rob;AlmostHuman.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:03 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [beanutils] ready for 1.5

RE: [joran] example (was Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a required dependency?)

2002-10-14 Thread Scott Sanders
Can you explain the property 0 thing a little more? I don't understand why Digester cannot handle it. Thanks, Scott -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:07 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Jakarta Commons

RE: [joran] example (was Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a required dependency?)

2002-10-14 Thread Scott Sanders
Property 0 says that parsing of appender tags are driven by logger tags. For example, the following config script does nothing. OK, I think I understand now. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? !DOCTYPE log4j:configuration SYSTEM log4j.dtd log4j:configuration

RE: [joran] a new project in the sandbox

2002-10-09 Thread Scott Sanders
Ceki, Karma is all you need. Go for it. -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:41 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [joran] a new project in the sandbox Could I please have karma?

RE: [logging] unit tests

2002-10-09 Thread Scott Sanders
That would be great. Just follow the directions on the website. Scott -Original Message- From: Sean C. Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:20 PM To: jakarta commons developers List Subject: [logging] unit tests I was browsing the source

RE: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release (Second Call)

2002-09-27 Thread Scott Sanders
You are volunteering to be the Release Manager? If so, I am +1, and willing the help with publishing if you don't have access. Scott -Original Message- From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE]

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging STATUS.html

2002-09-27 Thread Scott Sanders
Somebody want to patch the release HOWTO to reflect the need to update this type of thing? Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging

RE: [logging] VOTE for cutting release 1.0.2

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Sanders
Richard has volunteered, with the exception of daedalus issues, which I volunteered to help him with. Scott -Original Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:05 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re:

RE: [discovery]

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Sanders
Try it again :) -Original Message- From: Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [discovery] I went to find out more information about the discovery package, and the two links, best practices and the

RE: [discovery]

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Sanders
On a related note, how do you update a 'mavenized' site such as discovery? It looks like James Strachan built the last one for discovery, how do I go about updating it, or can someone else please update it? Scott -Original Message- From: Scott Sanders Sent: Thursday, September 26

RE: [logging] VOTE for cutting release 1.0.2

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Sanders
Steven, are you willing to either patch it to how you think it should work, or wait until a 1.1 release. The purpose of this release is to get another Apache product off of a nightly build before they ship. Are you still -1? Scott -Original Message- From: Steven Caswell

RE: [logging] VOTE for cutting release 1.0.2

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Sanders
volunteer to be the release manager. This is also my explicit vote for cutting 1.0.2: +1 By my count, current binding votes are at: +12 (scott sanders, richard sitze) +00 -10 *** Richard A. Sitze IBM WebSphere WebServices Development

RE: [discovery]

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Sanders
On a related note, how do you update a 'mavenized' site such as discovery? It looks like James Strachan built the last one for discovery, how do I go about updating it, or can someone else please update it? maven has a fancy goal that generates the site and updates cvs. of

RE: [VOTE] Commons Lang release 1.0

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Sanders
The only problem with that is that if the ant build does it, and the build is run on Windows, the tar files are not correct from a permissions viewpoint. Just my experience with tar files of late. Scott -Original Message- From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [logging] VOTE for cutting release 1.0.2

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Sanders
+1. I can double team on the RM stuff when you need help with daedalus. Scott -Original Message- From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [logging] VOTE for cutting release 1.0.2 There were some

RE: [lang] ready for a release

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Sanders
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:40 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] ready for a release Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Should we add JDK1.2 to the dependencies

RE: [lang] Builders complete?

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Sanders
In earlier discussions on this topic, I thought the conclusion was that [lang] would grab the MethodUtils class out of beanutils, and create a corresponding ConstructorUtils class for dynamically invoking constructors. At some appropriate time, [beanutils] could deprecate its

RE: [VOTE] Commons Lang release 1.0

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Sanders
The only problem with that is that if the ant build does it, and the build is run on Windows, the tar files are not correct from a permissions viewpoint. Just my experience with tar files of late. I build software on Windows only under the most dire of circumstances. ;) Point

RE: [logging] VOTE for cutting release 1.0.2

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Sanders
Or, since no one has disagreed with you, you could consider that lazy consensus and commit a patch for it :) Scott -Original Message- From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:15 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re:

RE: Design question on BeanUtils.populate()

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Sanders
Although jsp:setProperty was one of the inspirations that led to the creation of BeanUtils.populate(), I chose not to slavishly copy the JSP semantics -- in particular the very very wierd handling of zero-length Strings. I found it much more useful in typical form fill-in scenarios to

RE: VOTE: Release 1.0 of Validator

2002-09-24 Thread Scott Sanders
Taras, These are all excellent ideas. Would it be possible for you to submit a patch for one/all of these? You're input is very much welcomed and we would like to invite you to participate even more. Thanks, Scott Sanders -Original Message- From: Taras Tielkes [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [VOTE] Commons Lang release 1.0

2002-09-23 Thread Scott Sanders
+1. -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 8:08 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Commons Lang release 1.0 I'm proposing a vote for a 1.0 release of Commons Lang to be made. The difference

RE: Preparing a Release

2002-09-23 Thread Scott Sanders
The most relevant is: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases.html -Original Message- From: John Keyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: commons-dev Subject: Preparing a Release Hi all, I think the time is nearly prime for a CLI

RE: Preparing a Release

2002-09-23 Thread Scott Sanders
at the commons index as well as the jakarta index ;) I've just done a brief scource of that document and I notice that all references are to use ant. Should there be a separate page for maven based releases? -John K On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 21:43 Etc/GMT, Scott Sanders wrote

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-20 Thread Scott Sanders
[question] I'm considering the authors to be Colebourne and Downey. So I need some nods from Daniel and Caswell. Also Ola Berg and Scott Sanders if they've been focusing on them at all. I have taken a look, and I like what I see. Let's go with this. [question] Is there anything

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-18 Thread Scott Sanders
[question] Is there anything not in commons proper which people believe is highly important to get in there before a 1.0 release?? The most important thing that is missing for the 1.0 release is the 1.0 release. :) Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For

RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Scott Sanders
+1. The developer community issue is a concern, but as with BCEL, Lucene, PoolMan, the community as a whole is quite large, and not just developers make the community. Scott -Original Message- From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:48

RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Scott Sanders
This is very true. -Original Message- From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:34 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:

RE: [Digester] XML Pull

2002-09-17 Thread Scott Sanders
Would there be a good reason for it, other than because we can? Scott -Original Message- From: Tal Lev-Ami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:13 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List (E-mail) Subject: [Digester] XML Pull Anybody tried to adapt the

RE: Digester can retrieve CDDATA ?

2002-06-10 Thread Scott Sanders
Use the BeanPropertySetterRule. Digester.addBeanPropertySetter(script), or something similar. Scott -Original Message- From: emmanuel.boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:19 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Digester can retrieve CDDATA ?

RE: Digester - why is peekParams() package-protected?

2002-05-28 Thread Scott Sanders
Well, you _should_ start as protective as possible, and then open up from there. Sounds like you have a need for it to be public. I have no objections. Robert? Craig? Scott -Original Message- From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:39 PM To:

RE: [commons committer vote II]

2002-05-24 Thread Scott Sanders
+1 -Original Message- From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:13 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [commons committer vote II] costin nominated me a few days back, but not under a 'vote' subject line - so I'm hoping that the lack of

RE: [ committer vote ] - for an extra committer...

2002-05-23 Thread Scott Sanders
+1. -Original Message- From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:19 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: [ committer vote ] - for an extra committer... Already a committer on the Struts project, wodering if the committers of the commons would

RE: commons-logging fixes

2002-05-07 Thread Scott Sanders
I want to do a 1.0.1 ASAP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:35 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: commons-logging fixes Hi, I commited 2 small fixes - to report the right method/class if

RE: HttpClient development

2002-05-06 Thread Scott Sanders
Yes, this is the place. Ask away. Scott -Original Message- From: Donald Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HttpClient development is this the appropriate forum to ask questions about HttpClient development? is

Re: [VOTE] Release Vote for BeanUtils 1.3 and Digester 1.2

2002-04-30 Thread Scott Sanders
opposed to this release, and here is why: -- Cut Here -- -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] JXPath 1.0 Release Plan

2002-04-24 Thread Scott Sanders
+0. Sorry I can't help with it. Scott -Original Message- From: Dmitri Plotnikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] JXPath 1.0 Release Plan I am calling for a vote on the JXPath 1.0 Beta Release Plan

RE: commit karma for Jakarta commiters?

2002-04-24 Thread Scott Sanders
It is currently allowed in the sandbox only. -Original Message- From: otisg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: commit karma for Jakarta commiters? Hello, Did I just dream about this, or was there a long thread

[LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread Scott Sanders
Hi all, I am working on vindico, a replacement for Alexandria over in the Alexandria CVS, and I am using commons-digester, which in turn uses commons-logging. When running Vindico as an Ant task, it starts running and then says that it cannot find the LogFactoryImpl class. I have traced this

RE: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread Scott Sanders
-Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: The problem that I have is the LogFactoryImpl class is in the same class loader as LogFactory, so I am suggesting a change to LogFactory, such that the default

RE: [JJAR] Status? Jar Repository?

2002-04-16 Thread Scott Sanders
Gier is correct. In the end jjar gets jars. Maven is an entire build methodology. JJAR is a tool, with no meaning unless used in a larger context. Maven could be a consumer of JJAR's work. Scott (Waiting for those jjar commits ;-) -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr.

RE: [JJAR] Status? Jar Repository?

2002-04-16 Thread Scott Sanders
Repository? On 4/16/02 5:32 PM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gier is correct. In the end jjar gets jars. Maven is an entire build methodology. JJAR is a tool, with no meaning unless used in a larger context. Maven could be a consumer of JJAR's work. Scott (Waiting

RE: [JJAR] Status? Jar Repository?

2002-04-16 Thread Scott Sanders
Developers List Subject: Re: [JJAR] Status? Jar Repository? On 4/16/02 5:45 PM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's the second time I have done that. I must formally apologize now. Sorry G-E-I-R :) The apology wasn't necessary, of course. At all. I just have been waiting

RE: Latka site update

2002-04-09 Thread Scott Sanders
That is just beautiful! Perhaps we should think about moving all of Commons/Jakarta to this look and feel. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Latka site update In

RE: [pool] release - what needs to be done?

2002-04-05 Thread Scott Sanders
I think we should just vote for it and get it released. Scott -Original Message- From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pool] release - what needs to be done? Turbine has dropped usage of its own

BeanUtils and Digester Release?

2002-04-05 Thread Scott Sanders
Anyone hae any blockers that would stop the release of BeanUtils 1.3 or Digester 1.2? Digester has the XML rules stuff that I would like to get released, and both have had some good bugfixes. Opiniions, suggestions? Scott Sanders

RE: [logging] Need interface... VOTE

2002-04-05 Thread Scott Sanders
I am still +1 on adding the interface. Scott -Original Message- From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:26 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [logging] Need interface... VOTE -1 I see too much confusion for any

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Jakarta Commons Collections 2.0 Released

2002-04-05 Thread Scott Sanders
Godd work everyone. Kudos. Scott -Original Message- From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; General Jakarta Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Jakarta Commons Collections 2.0 Released

RE: PROPOSAL: new 'wrapper' commons component

2002-04-03 Thread Scott Sanders
Could we replace daemon with this if this is the case. Daemon is slightly more descriptive than wrapper IMHO. +1 either way. Scott -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:39 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List

RE: [logging] Need interface...

2002-04-03 Thread Scott Sanders
I am also +1, but thinking the names are fine for the reasons stated by Geir. It is just a marker interface, but if it was in commons-logging then Velocity/Struts/whatever wouldn't have to recreate it just to use it. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: PROPOSAL: new 'wrapper' commons component

2002-04-01 Thread Scott Sanders
Didn't get the attachment. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:24 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: PROPOSAL: new 'wrapper' commons component Hi, I would like to propose a new common

[VOTE] Update charter to allow any Apache committer into the sandbox

2002-03-29 Thread Scott Sanders
Below is a diff of the proposed change to charter.xml. Basically says any Apache committer is allowed to work in the sandbox, instead of any Jakarta committer. The intention of this is that other Apache subprojects (xml), also have some useful java code. Here is my +1. Scott Sanders Index

RE: [SCRATCHPAD PROPOSAL] Morphos

2002-03-28 Thread Scott Sanders
I personally believe the artificial barrier is just that, artificial. IMHO, an Apache committer is an Apache committer, and I think we should modify the charter. Shall I propose the vote on another thread? Scott -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Digester/BuanUtils Error trapping ...

2002-03-18 Thread Scott Sanders
. Scott Sanders -Original Message- From: Greg McCreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:05 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Digester/BuanUtils Error trapping ... Hi All, This is my first posting here. I'm looking at using the Digester class

RE: Logging promo action

2002-03-18 Thread Scott Sanders
It will happen :) Scott -Original Message- From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logging promo action Hi there, I have to use FOP and POI in one project. And I've found, that I have to include

RE: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructor...

2002-03-12 Thread Scott Sanders
I would think that it should be deprecated. Scott -Original Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:25 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructor... hi james i've

RE: Please Release commons logging --

2002-03-12 Thread Scott Sanders
Was the announcement made and I just missed it? Scott -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:02 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Please Release commons logging -- On 12 Mar 2002, Andrew C.

RE: [digester] lowering logging level of a couple of messages...

2002-02-26 Thread Scott Sanders
+1, although you could turn that off since it is on the sax log rather than the normal. Scott -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:08 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [digester] lowering

Re: A new contributor to Periodicity

2002-02-23 Thread Scott Sanders
Welcome Mike. Cheers, Scott Sanders On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 08:41:10AM -0600, Jeff Prickett wrote: Hello everyone: I would like to publicly recognize the first contributor besides me to the Periodicity commons component. His name is Mike George and we have been working offline

RE: [VOTE] New committers: Jean-Frederic Clere and Patrick Luby

2002-02-22 Thread Scott Sanders
+1 and +1 Welcome Scott -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:37 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [VOTE] New committers: Jean-Frederic Clere and Patrick Luby Hi, I'd like to propose

RE: Util Dispersion

2002-02-22 Thread Scott Sanders
Try again ;-) -Original Message- From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 8:26 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: FW: Util Dispersion Second attempt: some recipients didn't get the attachment on the first try. Steven

Proposal generator

2002-02-22 Thread Scott Sanders
Hey all, I just committed a proposal generator in the sandbox under the proposal directory. Just run ant -Dpackage=foo, and the foo proposal appears, complete with build file, PROPOSAL, etc. Cheers, Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/proposal .cvsignore MANIFEST.MF PROPOSAL.html RELEASE-NOTES.txt STATUS.html build.properties.sample build.xml sample.build.xml

2002-02-22 Thread Scott Sanders
Since I have now created just a few of these things, they do seem very redundant ;-) Scott -Original Message- From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:44 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit:

RE: [COLLECTIONS] [VOTE] Begin official preparation for Collections 2.0

2002-02-20 Thread Scott Sanders
+1 -Original Message- From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:28 AM To: Morgan Delagrange; Jakarta Commons Developers Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] [VOTE] Begin official preparation for Collections 2.0 So, since there appears to

RE: Digester parsing user question

2002-02-20 Thread Scott Sanders
; } } Scott Sanders wrote: As far as I know the code, all SAXExceptions are bubbled straight to the user (you), Digester 'swallows' nothing. Typically with a SAX parser, you get the first exception and then it fails. It is not like a compiler, which keeps reporting errors, so you should

RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1

2002-02-20 Thread Scott Sanders
On the commons web site, under the charter page: New packages may be proposed to the Jakarta Commons mailing list. To be accepted, a package proposal must receive majority approval of the subproject committers. Proposals are to identify the rationale for the package, its scope, its interaction

RE: Dependency question

2002-02-20 Thread Scott Sanders
Perhaps we should not name something so generic as util in commons proper. Perhaps we should have io, lang, text as Java does? Anyone? Utils could stay in the sandbox as the 'sorting' place? Scott -Original Message- From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Dependency question

2002-02-20 Thread Scott Sanders
2002, Scott Sanders wrote: Perhaps we should not name something so generic as util in commons proper. Perhaps we should have io, lang, text as Java does? Anyone? Utils could stay in the sandbox as the 'sorting' place? Scott -Original Message- From: Daniel Rall

RE: Dependency question

2002-02-20 Thread Scott Sanders
java.util style components. On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: Perhaps we should not name something so generic as util in commons proper. Perhaps we should have io, lang, text as Java does? Anyone? Utils could stay in the sandbox as the 'sorting' place? Scott

RE: [VOTE] Logging 1.0 Release (again)

2002-02-19 Thread Scott Sanders
*technical* reasoning) - Cut Here - Scott Sanders -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >