On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Change list settings (allow anyone to subscribe or post)
[X] -1 Keep the current settings
The ASF does not have public lists that are not backed by either a PMC
or a committee.
As long as the subscription
If are an ASF committer and use Freenode on IRC and want a username cloak,
please feel free to place a request in committers:docs/freenode-cloaks.txt.
More about cloaks: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#cloaks
Nick setups (required): http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#nicksetup
At this time, we'll only
--On Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:12 PM +0200 Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is Greg's SubWiki but I'm not sure how far/alive it is, seems to be
working though:
http://www.webdav.org/wiki/projects/SubWiki
http://subwiki.tigris.org/
I've setup Subwiki in the past to do exactly this: some
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:34 PM +0200 Santiago Gala
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can separate both functions, i.e. development or patching and code
review/quality control. The linux kernel is beginning to be a good
example, where you have:
- Linus (vanilla) tree as a reference value
--On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:21 AM +0800 Niclas Hedhman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure that the upper-tier of ASF would shiver at the thought that hordes
of people can gain direct access to the repositories. They/we will dust of
the same arguments of why Wiki won't work. But it does.
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:12 AM -0700 Tim Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My version of the idea is not to let random strangers manipulate the
branch that will be released with our brand, but rather to have a
version control system that allows random strangers to commit proposed
changes
[Completely off-topic, but this is community@ where nothing is ever on-topic.]
--On Friday, October 8, 2004 6:26 PM -0700 Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But you know what, on a night like tonight with the Sox moving on in the
playoffs, even an apparently bashing article like this doesn't
Hi everyone!
If you were using the 'site' or 'site-tools' CVS repositories, they are now
migrated to Subversion:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/
(As usual, if you are planning on committing, you need to
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:37 PM +1000 Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
mirror.au.apache.org or something which just does a round robin on available
mirrors in the 'au' region.. that the downloader only sees
a 'apache' domain. but this would should be a 'global' change.. not just
for
--On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:26 AM -0400 Daniel F. Savarese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclaimer: The presence of a mirror on this list does not
constitute an endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation
of the organization's business or other activities. The
Apache Software
--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:54 PM +1000 David Crossley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, i thought that Antonio's alert about another potential M$
attack was warranted. He seems to care for the ASF as a whole.
On which other list is he going to alert us all?
FWIW, the only sensible strategy to
--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 9:07 AM +0200 Henning Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or tell those others here on community@, what we can do to be considered
as junior infrastructure people to relief your burdens.
You could start off by not using community@ to discuss infrastructure
--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:07 PM +0200 Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do it yourself scales, and I would think that any ASF member should be
able to create a list, given evident consensus. We did the same for the
Incubator files, remember?
Uh, no. That's the argument here:
--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 1:20 PM -0400 Noel J. Bergman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He seems to feel that a Member can create a list and provide oversight.
FWIW, the 'official' policy is documented at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/list-setup.html
--
Creating the List
Ask your Project Management
--On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to discuss a topic via email, and think
a mailing list would help, there should be a mechanism to simply have it
created, bang. Just my 2 cents =)
Mailing lists without PMC
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:54 PM -0600 Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I might've missed a better place to post, I don't think so. I thought
about it for a while, and this was the best I came up with. So if you know
of one, then maybe I'm simply clueless, not lazy. Otherwise,
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:10 PM -0600 Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you keep assuming it is for chit chat? If it were [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it was clear (community imposed/whatever) to be about Java @ ASF,
wouldn't that make sense? Aren't there issues (i.e. supporting
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 5:40 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think one thing folks are asking for is an
[EMAIL PROTECTED], one where idle questions and chitchat
about cool solutions and code for our servers and sites would be shared.
I wouldn't see an issue with
--On Thursday, July 8, 2004 4:03 PM +0200 Gregor J. Rothfuss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fifteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia
University of California, Santa Cruz, August 9-13, 2004
http://www.ht04.org
is coming up. i was wondering if anyone is going to be there?
I'm likely to go -
--On Saturday, March 6, 2004 6:32 AM +0900 Tetsuya Kitahata
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to clean up the www.apache.org site module
What exactly are you going to be modifying? -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
--On Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:41 AM +0100 Jochen Wiedmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using the attached relicense.pl rather than the python script
in the committers directory, because it preserves the copyright years. It
does
even more, adding the year 2004 automatically.
The python
--On Friday, February 13, 2004 6:28 PM +1100 Conor MacNeill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is hard to see Ant being affected as its publication precedes the filing
date for the patent, if that is relevant. Not sure about the other projects.
FWIW, in the US, it is first to invent not first to file.
--On Sunday, January 25, 2004 1:49 PM -0600 Tim O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know where board resolutions are kept in CVS?
I'm wondering if there is any historical record of board resolutions
available to members of a PMC?
http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
HTH. --
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:39 PM +0100 Leo Simons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe many ASF projects are chronically late in sending in status
reports in time for the board meeting. That's bad and they should be
nagged about it. Since manual nagging is a chore, how about a small
script
--On Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:26 AM -0700 Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, now what? Do I just add it back, or what? Maybe Planet Apache needs
some PMC control...
This is *exactly* why Planet Apache isn't part of the ASF. The fact that
Thom exposes the RSS listing to the ASF
--On Thursday, January 8, 2004 3:36 PM -0500 Tim O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't to say that this is a bad idea. I think this is a **great**
idea, but this is also something that could be done on someone's personal
hardware resources.
+1. -- justin
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:52:29AM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
certain IP addresses that could send mail that claimed to be From: an
@apache.org address, in an attempt to prevent forged spam. But I'm sure
the infrastructure team would make a lot of noise before doing that.
As in noise
--On Wednesday, October 22, 2003 12:37 PM -0400 Noel J. Bergman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for internationalization, I don't see why it should not be part of Apache
Commons. I think that it is exactly the correct place for it. I don't know
that it needs a CVS module, but I'm not opposed to
--On Thursday, September 25, 2003 07:58:50 +0900 Tetsuya Kitahata
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. However, still I can not build relationship
with asf *members* ... dohhh...
I know Pier and Brian have been known to travel to Japan (for pleasure and
business). I'm sure others go to Japan
--On Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:09:14 +0100 Andrew Savory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose that we close (ie swap the front page for a
protest page) as many of the Apache web sites as possible.
Not to belittle this protest, but we do a good job of bringing our own
sites down
--On Tuesday, August 26, 2003 19:18:38 +0200 Gianugo Rabellino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an almost standard page at
http://swpat.ffii.org/group/demo/demo.en.html, so it would just be a
matter of downloading and setting an .htaccess rule. But I understand
that it might be pretty late to
If you are going to be attending OSCON 2003 next week, please add your
information to committers/docs/attendingoscon2003.txt.
Gracias and see ya'll there! -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:58 PM +0100 Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moving and re-naming files in an ssh terminal session is not crazily
graphical nor easy enough for a 4 year old, but I bet there are enough
people in Apache who can do it without sweating that it is, IMO, a poor
excuse
--On Saturday, June 7, 2003 9:14 AM -0700 Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looks like the Apache Web Server won a Webby Award. Check out:
http://www.webbyawards.com/main/webby_awards/nominees.html
Scroll down about 80%, or click 'Technical Achievement' in the column at the
right.
--On Wednesday, May 14, 2003 8:13 AM +0200 Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And given what he thinks about the publicity cause in the Apache License,
that makes it incompatible with GNU, it's really amusing.
At an academic workshop I was at last weekend on open source, someone brought
I'm not entirely sure party@ is the place for this since it's not quite a
'party,' but I've heard a rumor (from Duncan) that O'Reilly is hoping to
provide space at OSCON for interested parties to hold a hackathon for two days
(Sunday and Monday) before the actual conference in July.
I don't
--On Saturday, April 5, 2003 5:05 PM +0200 Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
NNTP makes more sense than SMTP for group discussions.
No, it doesn't necessarily. NNTP was based for transient discussions rather
than discussions that have lasting impact.
I read allmost all OSS mailing lists I
--On Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:15 PM +0100 Leo Simons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my take: keep everything. Again, policy should be the same as for
the contents of /dist/. I dunno if there is an asf-wide policy for
that...looking at http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/old/, those guys
don't share
--On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 4:08 PM -0800 Morgan Delagrange
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we talk about it now, I'm pretty sure people will
feel that it's been done to death and be fairly
intransigent.
+1. =) -- justin
-
To
--On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 21:25:47 -0800 Daniel Rall
dlr@finemaltcoding.com wrote:
can't change /opt/tomcat/webapps/eyebrowse/index/apche.org/community
Man, I hope our search engine doesn't index www.apche.org.
I actually encountered this site at ApacheCon while Brian and David were
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 19:15:16 + David Reid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have to be truthful and honest? :) Maybe we could have one that
shows where we'd *like* to be...
In your case, we could show where your plane is. 40,000ft above the
Atlantic Ocean in the middle of
--On Friday, January 10, 2003 6:44 AM -0800 Aaron Bannert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got it from fink, which gets it from this URL (part of netbsd?)
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/~checkout~/basesrc/games/wtf/
wtf?rev=%vcontent-type=text/plain
I tried to install it last night from fink and
--On Tuesday, January 07, 2003 14:48:18 -0800 Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
daedalus to support building Subversion. Next up is to try building it.
Assuming that works, then yes: we're going to enable a Subversion server
on icarus, and we'll have clients on icarus and daedalus.
Ah, heck, I
--On Wednesday, January 8, 2003 2:17 PM -0500 Noel J. Bergman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be curious to see how Subwiki works out -- if the
intent is to switch --- being in Python, not Perl, but still not in
Java. Are there more Python coders than Perl here?
Certainly more than Perl.
--On Monday, December 30, 2002 16:56:04 -0500 Andrew C. Oliver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this over. The point being, this technology will allow passive
notification based on topic selection in a way not found on mail lists.
And of course the sources to the wiki
I'd much prefer mailing list
--On Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:31 PM -0500 Vadim Gritsenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All:
In addition to web log statistics, I've created load average
graphs. Check them out at:
http://www.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/load.html
Feedback is very welcome.
Cool.
Quick question about the
--On Sunday, December 1, 2002 8:25 PM -0500 Andrew C. Oliver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Sam Ruby is the ECMA conveiner for the .NET CLI.. I propose
(since its well known) that he's an apache committer and the PMC
chair of Jakarta that he be told he can't do that anymore.
Ugh! No, you are
--On Sunday, December 1, 2002 7:23 PM -0800 Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 450 people with commit access. Each one of them can put
something in our servers that can screw the ASF, including web
sites.
Why is this any different?
Because of community oversight. There are no
--On Monday, December 2, 2002 10:56 AM -0500 Sam Ruby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin, if you would like to put forward a set of rules,
guidelines, and suggest an enforcement mechanism, I would be
inclined to endorse it if it would further consensus.
As I have said before, what I would prefer is
--On Sunday, December 1, 2002 1:53 PM -0500 Rodent of Unusual Size
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ick to what? its existence, or the format? :-)
Its existence and the fact that Andy is on a campaign to get Google
to pick up on it. -- justin
--On Sunday, December 1, 2002 6:01 PM -0500 Rodent of Unusual Size
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. is it an all-or-nothing proposition (everyone has them or no-one
does)?
-1. someone tries to force its opinion on me about how i may
choose to express myself and describe my participation in the asf,
--On Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:34:00 -0800 Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose the creation of the 'community.apache.org' web
site.
Currently, some people have their apache homepage on www.apache.org/~name
and some on cvs.apache.org/~name and some don't have
--On Friday, November 15, 2002 5:07 PM +0100 Ignacio J. Ortega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola a todos:
I'm curious bout why the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list has such a poor activity, i
know the quick response is it's simply not used but why?, and
there is a list outside asf new-httpd that is so active,
--On Monday, November 04, 2002 14:18:30 -0500 Rich Bowen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having not been to a hackathon before, I'm not sure how this all works,
but I wanted to mention some of the things that I was hoping to work on
there, so that people can be thinking about it. Likewise, it would be
54 matches
Mail list logo
