Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

Would you please announce these new criteria of "useful skills" for prospective candidates and community to know? I suspect you must have some that you are using to find the suitable female candidates from each of the six afrinic regions. How are you convincing people to nominate if they don't

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

> On 3 Oct 2016, at 22:48, Arnaud AMELINA wrote: > > Hi CEO, nomcom chair, > > We are reading the GC call for nominations and see a procedure for elections. > There is however no requirements, criteria or experience stated which is > surprising as this is to do with a

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

<community-discuss@afrinic.net<mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net>> Cc: "members-disc...@afrinic.net<mailto:members-disc...@afrinic.net>" <members-disc...@afrinic.net<mailto:members-disc...@afrinic.net>> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-disc

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment- bylaws changes

+1 Agree with Boubakar Lala From: Boubakar Barry Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 12:44 AM To: General Discussions of AFRINIC Cc: members-disc...@afrinic.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment- bylaws changes On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:05 PM,

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

> On 22 Sep 2016, at 16:27, Arnaud AMELINA wrote: > > Hi Mr. Alan > > IHO , While you may not see a problem others might; and it may be wiser to > ensure inclusion for transparency and accountability. Having 6 members of GC > to guarantee regional participation is a good

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

Hi Mr. Alan IHO , While you may not see a problem others might; and it may be wiser to ensure inclusion for transparency and accountability. Having 6 members of GC to guarantee regional participation is a good governance practice. Regards Arnaud Le 22 sept. 2016 08:52, "Alan Barrett"

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

On 22 Sep 2016 11:55, "Alan Barrett" wrote: > > > > On 22 Sep 2016, at 12:07, Benjamin Eshun wrote: > > > > Dear Alan, > > > > I have a question, will the GC be added to the bye-laws. > > There is no need to add the Governance Committee to the

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

> On 22 Sep 2016, at 12:07, Benjamin Eshun wrote: > > Dear Alan, > > I have a question, will the GC be added to the bye-laws. There is no need to add the Governance Committee to the bylaws. It is a committee created by the Board in terms of the Board’s general powers,

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

> On 21 Sep 2016, at 12:26, Omo Oaiya wrote: >> >>> - claims of off-list inputs >> >> Maybe some community members would like to submit input through means >> other than the mailing list. Should they be allowed to do so? >> I think Yes. >> Would you prefer to not

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

> On 21 Sep 2016, at 11:13, Frank Habicht wrote: > > Hi, > > On 9/21/2016 10:47 AM, Omo Oaiya wrote: >> This is what I see - >> >> - CEO alone ... > > I am sure that a committee would be a way to ensure that nothing gets > ready for voting in the next meeting. > If that's

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

ay, 19 September 2016 at 22:14 To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net <mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net> > Cc: "members-disc...@afrinic.net <mailto:members-disc...@afrinic.net> " <members-disc...@afrinic.net <mailto:members-disc..

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

gt;> > Date: Monday, 19 September 2016 at 22:14 > To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net > <mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net>> > Cc: "members-disc...@afrinic.net <mailto:members-disc...@afrinic.net>" > <members-d

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

men” – Anthony Trollope. >> >> (Btw, the second of those quotes – it may be true that people want the >> show of things – and if that is what this committee will be – a charade – >> so be it – but let’s not lose site of the fact that bylaw changes have to >> be

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

m> > Reply-To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net> > Date: Monday, 19 September 2016 at 22:14 > To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net> > Cc: "members-disc...@afrinic.net" <members-disc...@afrinic.net>

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

id a bylaws review in 2012 and the approach did work smoothly Hope this helps —Alain > > Andrew > > > > From: Arnaud AMELINA <ameln...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net> > Date: Monday, 19 September 201

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

FRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net> Date: Monday, 19 September 2016 at 22:14 To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net> Cc: "members-disc...@afrinic.net" <members-disc...@afrinic.net> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountab

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

+1 @Alain Regards Arnaud 2016-09-19 19:56 GMT+00:00 ALAIN AINA : > Hi, > > Let’s fix the process and better organise this critical review of the > bylawsl. I do support the idea of a committee . > > —Alain > > > On Sep 19, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Bope Domilongo Christian < >

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

Hi, Let’s fix the process and better organise this critical review of the bylawsl. I do support the idea of a committee . —Alain > On Sep 19, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Bope Domilongo Christian > wrote: > > Dear CEO, > > [speaking as a member of the community] > >

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

> On 17 Sep 2016, at 10:06, Christian Bope wrote: > What about my first question on > How the decisions was made for the “No consensus” / “no objections? I answered that already. I assessed the opinion of the community by reading or listening to discussion on

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

On 17 Sep 2016 12:58 a.m., "Jackson Muthili" wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Bope Domilongo Christian > wrote: > > Dear CEO, > > > > Thank you for sharing the Bylaws change working document with the > > community. > > > > After

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Bope Domilongo Christian wrote: > Dear CEO, > > Thank you for sharing the Bylaws change working document with the > community. > > After reading the document, I have two quick question before going to the > substance of the changes. > 1.

Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

I've taken a look at the suggested outcome (The proposed amendments) and generally I believe the suggested amendments to be very acceptable. Thank you for taking the time and doing this Alan. My only disappointment is the outcome regarding the non-voting status of Associate Members, whom I