I don't care what Gartner says if APPLE posts differently to the Feds (SEC)
and signs on that it is accurate. I doubt Apple execs want to go to jail.
Gartner will not go to jail if it provides wrong information.
Eschew Obfuscation
This is a reply from:
Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Tony Bton...@gmail.com wrote:
Glenn claims you better not visit cars.gov (Cash for Clunkers)
website, or the feds will own your computer. I am unable to reproduce
his claims.
Mr. Beck, and I am being kind here to refer to him so reverentially,
also said just
I don't care what Gartner says if APPLE posts differently to the Feds
(SEC)
and signs on that it is accurate. I doubt Apple execs want to go to jail.
Gartner will not go to jail if it provides wrong information.
Yeah, but Gartner will kick sand in their face and hide their sunscreen if
they
You are being too kind. Glenn Beck is about as bright as canned tuna.
-Original Message-
Mr. Beck, and I am being kind here to refer to him so reverentially,
also said just a few days ago, again on Fox, that President Obama is
most definitely a racist. A racist. He hates,
You are being too kind. Glenn Beck is about as bright as canned tuna.
Well, the posters on Fox Nation disagree. In their view he's some kind of a
god. Of course, Ann Coulter is too liberal for some of them (I am not making
this up).
On Aug 2, 2009, at 2:16 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
Yes, I'm sure the FCC is much more knowledgeable about running
Apple than
Apple is. The question is whether or not the FCC can squint its
way past
1934. I'm not holding my breath, since it still has commissioners
[cough]Copps[/cough] who think
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A. wrote:
I don't care what Gartner says if APPLE posts differently to the
Feds (SEC)
and signs on that it is accurate. I doubt Apple execs want to go
to jail.
Gartner will not go to jail if it provides wrong information.
Eschew
On Aug 2, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
And we know that Apple *never* lies to the gummint about its finances.
Correct. I guess you are not always wrong. Keep up the good work.
*
** List info, subscription
TPiwowar wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 2:16 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
Yes, I'm sure the FCC is much more knowledgeable about running Apple
than
Apple is. The question is whether or not the FCC can squint its way
past
1934. I'm not holding my breath, since it still has commissioners
On Aug 1, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Tony B wrote:
Glenn claims you better not visit cars.gov (Cash for Clunkers)
website, or the feds will own your computer.
Pretty typical con/neocon stuff. We see enough of that here. Some
people just prefer to live in lalaland.
Just imagine if John McCain had
About the only thing that can get a radical right-wing Mac hater to
spring to the defense of Apple is the prospect of the people having a
say in the way things run.
Radical right? Seriously? Oh right, that's to turn the mob against me, or
it's the product of your one-dimensional world-view.
Correct. I guess you are not always wrong. Keep up the good work.
*pt* Apple. Options. Restatement.
I'll presume you know how to google that.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,
On Aug 1, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Tony B wrote:
Glenn claims you better not visit cars.gov (Cash for Clunkers)
I have already been there and spent some time reviewing the code.
These new Obama web sires are really a joy technically.
Very sparse, clean, and well formatted code. Great use of CSS.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Tony Bton...@gmail.com wrote:
Glenn claims you better not visit cars.gov (Cash for Clunkers)
website, or the feds will own your computer. I am unable to reproduce
his claims.
(5 mins) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWs12ccbOiE
I also experimented by going
I'm looking for an all in one wireless keyboard with mouse or pointer
device that can be used for sitting back and working from your lap.
Can anyone recommend such?
db
*
** List info, subscription management, list
Very sparse, clean, and well formatted code. Great use of CSS. Great
to see the best open source frameworks, like JQuery, used to
implement interactivity. A model for how web sites ought to be coded.
Worth your time to study.
Shows us what can happen when you hire the very best.
Don't let
... Mac hater...
Yes, that must be why I want the FCC to piss off and Apple to do what it
chooses to do with its own products. Brilliant deduction, Sherlock.
And let's be perfectly clear about this: I don't hate Macs or Apple. Apple
fleeces its customers with its profit margins, but its
Imagine this:
1. We would not be looking at record deficits
2. We would not be elevating tax cheats to positions of power.
3. The president would not be calling police responding to 911 calls
stupid.
4. We would not be about to confirm a Supreme Court justice who does
not accept a right
Found this on an organization career interest site:
This application cannot be successfully completed with a Mac.
Must have some really sharp web designers there, eh?
Matthew
*
** List info, subscription management,
And spend millions for what should cost thousands. Their website
should be a little more then pretty for what we paid.
Sent from my iPod
On Aug 2, 2009, at 12:05 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Aug 1, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Tony B wrote:
Glenn claims you better not visit cars.gov (Cash
That neocon label you toss around is really a moving target, I can't get a
lock on who manages to become one of those except those who you don't agree
with and you don't want to actually debate and just start calling names.
BTW, the other boob that was elected is doing the same thing, he's just
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Matthew Taylortaylorsmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Found this on an organization career interest site:
This application cannot be successfully completed with a Mac.
Must have some really sharp web designers there, eh?
That is called pre-screening, somewhat akin
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Wrightjswri...@gmail.com wrote:
It's Apple's user base that sucks, not its products. An obnoxious, smug,
asinine, shun-worthy group if ever there was.
Ouch! That hurt. Do you always paint with such a wide brush? The
painter's union would not like that
BTW, the warning that Beck describes does come up, and it does come from a
.gov website but it's the esc.gov website. The page Beck was showing was
for dealers, LOGIN/PASS protected for dealers enrolled in the cash for
slaughtering pigs...I mean buying clunkers program. I keep confusing this
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Matthew Taylortaylorsmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
1. We would not be looking at record deficits
Who are you blaming for that?
2. We would not be elevating tax cheats to positions of power.
Is this something new?
3. The president would not be calling
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:07 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
We really don't need such a site, we just happen to have one. Ain't
America great? I'll take a VP who merely says some dumb things as
opposed to a VP, Cheney, who says and then actually does dumb things.
Is being a truth teller really
On Aug 2, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
Don't let this out, because the neocons will use it as proof that
Obama spent [insert arbitrary large figure, often $17 mil] on a web
site. It's not true, but that sort of thing doesn't get in the way
of the birther-types over at FoxNation.
On Aug 2, 2009, at 3:36 PM, db wrote:
wireless keyboard with mouse
http://www.google.com/products?rls=enq=wireless+keyboard+with+mouse
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
**
Come on, we're talking about Joe...he's far from silver tongued...
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:07 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
We really don't need such a site, we just happen to have one. Ain't
America great? I'll take a VP who
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, mikexha...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, the warning that Beck describes does come up, and it does come from a
.gov website but it's the esc.gov website. The page Beck was showing was
for dealers, LOGIN/PASS protected for dealers enrolled in the cash for
slaughtering
No, but a comment in general. We got a wireless mouse/keyboard combo
once a couple years back. Turns out it's not nearly as useful as it
seems at first. After the tenth time in an hour you rock forward to
read something on the screen, you end up just staying there. The
keyboard rarely leaves the
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Mikexha...@gmail.com wrote:
And spend millions for what should cost thousands. Their website should be a
little more then pretty for what we paid.
Apparently their website is quite a bit more than just pretty for
what we paid. According to Beck and the
I never said he was right. I just said the site exists.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:36 PM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, mikexha...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, the warning that Beck describes does come up, and it does come from
a
.gov website but
AWESOME! We're good then. WOOHOO.
Actually you don't need the NSA to take over your system, just an iPhone and
a couple of texts..
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:41 PM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Mikexha...@gmail.com wrote:
And spend millions
On Aug 2, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
Found this on an organization career interest site:
This application cannot be successfully completed with a Mac.
Must have some really sharp web designers there, eh?
This lets applicants know up front that it is an oppressive workplace
On Aug 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:
I do, however, long for the day when the FCC building is converted to
low-income housing. It'll at least do some good then.
Then Rupert Murdoch could do to us what Berlusconi did to the
Italians. You would love that.
FDR
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:36 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, who was this last President who totaled our economy?
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy,
On Aug 2, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:
Yes, that must be why I want the FCC to piss off and Apple to do
what it
chooses to do with its own products. Brilliant deduction, Sherlock.
Baseball without umpires. Makes a lot of sense. About the only thing
that could make it better would
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:51 PM, mike wrote:
I never said he was right. I just said the site exists.
I tracked it down. It is here...
http://maps.google.com/maps?latlng=5796664799538147458
*
** List info, subscription
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:53 PM, mike wrote:
Actually you don't need the NSA to take over your system, just an
iPhone and
a couple of texts..
You keep insisting on things that never happened while ignoring
things that happen all the time. You are definitely living in lalaland.
Are you sure? I think the FEMA camps are there...
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:51 PM, mike wrote:
I never said he was right. I just said the site exists.
I tracked it down. It is here...
LALALALALA
Make sure you tell everyone that was at blackhat that it didn't happen.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:18 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:53 PM, mike wrote:
Actually you don't need the NSA to take over your system, just an iPhone
and
a couple of texts..
You
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A. wrote:
Absolutely NOT, Tom. There just is no point in debating facts with
one who
only wants to employ facts that either are invented (Gartner clearly
contravenes Apple- and the penalties for lying- in spite of your coy,
smart-aleck
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Matthew Taylortaylorsmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
FDR
That's who I thought you meant. Hadda be a democrat, right? I was
thinkin' of someone else.
Steve
*
** List info, subscription
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:51 PM, mikexha...@gmail.com wrote:
I never said he was right. I just said the site exists.
Worse than not right. Call it outright fabrication.
Steve
*
** List info, subscription
It was never exploited out in the wild. The patch was out weeks after Apple
knew about it, not the next day. The patch was out the day after the
exploit was shown at the blackhat conference, Apple realized they couldn't
put it off anymore.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:29 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com
I didn't answer, so you don't know who I meant.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Matthew Taylortaylorsmatt...@gmail.com
wrote:
FDR
That's who I thought you meant. Hadda be a democrat, right? I was
thinkin' of
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:37 PM, mike wrote:
It was never exploited out in the wild. The patch was out weeks
after Apple
knew about it, not the next day. The patch was out the day after the
exploit was shown at the blackhat conference, Apple realized they
couldn't
put it off anymore.
It is
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Tony B wrote:
No, but a comment in general. We got a wireless mouse/keyboard combo
once a couple years back. Turns out it's not nearly as useful as it
seems at first.
Tony is correct.
Connection tends to wander off and on at times too. Not so good for
games.
That's true, I cling. I note you can't dispute the facts however.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:37 PM, mike wrote:
It was never exploited out in the wild. The patch was out weeks after
Apple
knew about it, not the next day. The patch
That's EXACTLY what I mean, Tom. FACTS!
Your example is what they prognosticate- so they can always beat the
numbers.
What they report- that's real.
Please keep to reality- and not like they do on reality TV.
Eschew Obfuscation
This is a reply from:
Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:45 PM, mikexha...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't answer, so you don't know who I meant.
Oh, yes I did.
Steve
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy,
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:52 PM, TPiwowart...@tjpa.com wrote:
Tony is correct.
Connection tends to wander off and on at times too. Not so good for games.
I also understand that the bluetooth connection, because it is
pulsed as opposed to continuous, presents problems as well.
Steve
You said totaled, not damaged. Lots of P's have damaged it, R D
both. Bush II, Clinton, Bush I, Carter, Nixon, Johnson.
FDR was the last one to do such serious, systemic, harm that it the
effects are still active today.
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:36 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun,
I have a wireless mouse with no issues. I don't game much...just URT URT.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:52 PM, TPiwowart...@tjpa.com wrote:
Tony is correct.
Connection tends to wander off and on at times too. Not
Yes, but those are all PC keyboards mostly with separate mice except for
the expensive ( $185 )one made by Apple and it has no integral pointer /
mousepad.
The reason I am looking for such is to turn a white Tiger macbook with a
broken unreadable screen into a multimedia center machine
db wrote:
Yes, but those are all PC keyboards mostly with separate mice except
for the expensive ( $185 )one made by Apple and it has no integral
pointer / mousepad.
The reason I am looking for such is to turn a white Tiger macbook with
a broken unreadable screen into a multimedia center
Baseball without umpires. Makes a lot of sense. About the only thing
that could make it better would be to let the players carry guns.
That certainly would eliminate the designated hitter rule once and for all.
*
** List
Ouch! That hurt. Do you always paint with such a wide brush? The
painter's union would not like that very much.
I make sure that I use painters tape and a tarp so I can afford to use a
wide brush.
There are some Mac users who aren't complete zealots, they're actually
decent to talk to,
Just imagine if John McCain had won the election boobs like this
would be running the country and we would be facing the prospect of
our grandchildren speaking Chinese instead of English.
Your grandchildren are going to be speaking Chinese no matter who gets
elected. Shiny.
Gao yang jong
To continue:
I use the Logitech cordless optical trackman on the iMac that I use for
EyeTV in the living room. I just checked it and with used batteries it
was still working from 8 feet away.
I could use one of the bluetooth keyboards, but I haven't sprung for that.
db wrote:
Yes, but those
Speaking of Logitech, since Tom sent the keyboard URL I have been doing
some more googling around and found some expensive wireless keyboards
with trackpads (in the $125 range) and one ... the Logitech MediaBoard
Pro Bluetooth Keyboard for $69 !! that is meant for use (30' range)
with the
As another alternative solution re: my previous post ( Wireless keyboard
w. built-in mouse/ pointer for mac?? ) about controlling a white tiger
laptop attached to a digital TV, I am researching remote control apps
for the iPhone.
I see ones that will let you control iTunes.
Does anyone
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A. wrote:
That's EXACTLY what I mean, Tom. FACTS!
I am not going to waste any more time on you Birthers. You just
ignore the facts and this goes around and around. Auditioning for Fox
News I guess.
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:49 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
FDR was the last one to do such serious, systemic, harm that it the
effects are still active today.
That's why a grateful nation built a huge monument to honor him.
I know, I know, there is no such monument in lalaland.
BTW, it really is a
Use a Wireless trackball.
On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:15 PM, db wrote:
(So would having a keyboard with a separate mouse as there is no
where to place the mouse but one's lap.)
*
** List info, subscription management, list
On Aug 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:
There are some Mac users who aren't complete zealots, they're actually
decent to talk to, but you start getting into measuring that
concentration
at parts per million.
The problem is really hugely insecure WFBs who are recently enflamed
as M$
The greatest challenges facing mankind is the challenge of
distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda.
Perceiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind, but in
the information age (or, as I think of it, the disinformation age) it
takes on a special urgency and
There were monuments to Lenin, Stalin, Hussein, Mao, et. al. Your
point?
On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:35 PM, TPiwowar wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:49 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
FDR was the last one to do such serious, systemic, harm that it the
effects are still active today.
That's why a
I know, I know, there is no such monument in lalaland.
It's behind the Juniors section.
http://tinyurl.com/kkpg6m
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member
Interesting you should choose the Late Mr. Crichton. Many in the AGW
Alarmist camp revile his heretical views that consensus != science.
Matthew
On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:44 PM, TPiwowar wrote:
The greatest challenges facing mankind is the challenge of
distinguishing reality from fantasy,
There are differences between shines and monuments/memorials.
One is for the purposes of remembrance one is for the purpose of worship.
Most of the ones you mentioned are no longer with us, having been
destroyed when the worship of those folks fell into abeyance.
Honestly I think a monument
I'm looking for an all in one wireless keyboard with mouse or
pointer device that can be used for sitting back and working from
your lap. Can anyone recommend such?
db
I use the DiNovo Edge with my Mac and love it! It's not cheap tho.
Paula Minor
raven880atindy.net
Even I felt sorry
No, but a comment in general. We got a wireless mouse/keyboard combo
once a couple years back. Turns out it's not nearly as useful as it
seems at first.
Tony is correct.
Connection tends to wander off and on at times too. Not so good for
games.
I think it depends what you want to do with
Wow- that's the kettle calling the pot black.
You are the Primary denier.
I have no axe to grind- you, on the other hand, have no axe but one with a
Mac imprint deeply engrained.
Eschew Obfuscation
This is a reply from:
Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A.
Financial,
Reverend;
If you don't think FDR is worshiped by many you are not paying
attention.
Matthew
On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:52 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
There are differences between shines and monuments/memorials.
One is for the purposes of remembrance one is for the purpose of
worship.
To amplify my point:
http://www.crichton-official.com/speech-ourenvironmentalfuture.html
On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:50 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
Interesting you should choose the Late Mr. Crichton. Many in the
AGW Alarmist camp revile his heretical views that consensus !=
science.
Matthew
On
I knew you were browncoat!
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Jeff Wright jswri...@gmail.com wrote:
Your grandchildren are going to be speaking Chinese no matter who gets
elected. Shiny.
Gao yang jong duh goo yang!
***
**
**
Anyone or anything can be and are worshipped.
Stewart
At 08:59 PM 8/2/2009, you wrote:
Reverend;
If you don't think FDR is worshiped by many you are not paying
attention.
Matthew
Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL
Need a keyboard too for logging into sites, typing URL's etc
db
Matthew Taylor wrote:
Use a Wireless trackball.
On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:15 PM, db wrote:
(So would having a keyboard with a separate mouse as there is no
where to place the mouse but one's lap.)
On Aug 2, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
To amplify my point:
http://www.crichton-official.com/speech-ourenvironmentalfuture.html
Reasonable and thoughtful. However, this speech was given over 4-1/2
years ago. Since then scientists have accumulated much additional
evidence. If he
Agreed. My point was that what some worship, others loathe. A
statue / monument does not make someone great, it only makes them
popular with those as had the pull to erect the monument.
Matthew
On Aug 2, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Anyone or anything can be and are
What makes you sure? Do you have any evidence to support that view?
Is there anything materially different about our understanding of
climate between then and now that is especially compelling?
Matthew
On Aug 2, 2009, at 10:35 PM, TPiwowar wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Matthew
Dinovo Edge Hmm $130 ... I see it has a track circle or something. Does
that work well?
Do you know if it will work from the couch 20 ft away or so?
db
Minor Paula wrote:
No, but a comment in general. We got a wireless mouse/keyboard combo
once a couple years back. Turns out it's not nearly
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Jeff Wrightjswri...@gmail.com wrote:
There are some Mac users who aren't complete zealots, they're actually
decent to talk to, but you start getting into measuring that concentration
at parts per million.
Kinda like all those Windows users who tell me that
On Aug 2, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
What makes you sure? Do you have any evidence to support that
view? Is there anything materially different about our
understanding of climate between then and now that is especially
compelling?
I'm sure that in lalaland nothing has
Kinda like all those Windows users who tell me that they would love
to switch to Macs but for the fact that they have too much money
already invested in Windows apps.
Sunk costs is a reasonable ...er... reason for not investing in a new
platform.
Unlike Uncle Moneybags Piwowar, some of us
87 matches
Mail list logo
