Yes it does.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Sue Cubic wrote:
I haven't really searched, but does T'Bird have the colored labels? I use
> that feature in Eudora quite often.
>
*
** List info, subscription management, l
-Original Message-
>From: Sue Cubic
>Sent: Nov 2, 2009 2:36 AM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>At 01:41 AM 11/2/2009 -0200, you wrote:
>>Sue you can still download Eudora 7 from the site www.eudora.com.
>>And
At 01:41 AM 11/2/2009 -0200, you wrote:
Sue you can still download Eudora 7 from the site www.eudora.com.
And if you have your serial number you can make it a "paid copy".
Marcio
Yes, I'm using 7.1.0.9, paid copy.
Sue
**
Is Eudora for Mac the same as for PC? Have you really used it?
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: tjpa
>Sent: Nov 1, 2009 9:07 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
>
Sue you can still download Eudora 7 from the site www.eudora.com. And if you
have your serial number you can make it a "paid copy".
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: Sue Cubic
>Sent: Nov 1, 2009 8:16 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eud
What you forgot to add was the GUI versions of Word, Excel etc.
I used Multiplan on my C64.
Mac came out before Windows I will give you that.
But do not attempt to rewrite history. many programs were out before
the Mac came about.
With the new Graphical interface it did require programming
Not sure how the zune is to a WFB, but to regular people it is better
hardware and geared more towards those who enjoy finding new music more
often then not. As an app platform? Not the way to go.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:20 PM, tjpa wrote:
>
>
> Of course with WFBs thinking the Zune is equiva
On Nov 1, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
1986 ATT IBM computer had MS Word. DOS version.
"Word for MS-DOS" used the word "Word" in its title, but that program
was nothing like what anyone would associate with M$ Word...
"in Word for MS-DOS, a file would be saved with the sequ
Au Contraire monime.
A little bit of rewriting history?
1986 ATT IBM computer had MS Word. DOS version.
Dad worked for ATT and they got all MS products at a deep discount
have a whole shelf full of them.
Multiplan was multi platform.
Used it on a different computer.
Stewart
At 06:40 PM
At 05:42 PM 11/1/2009, you wrote:
I used Eudora for some time on my mac, am I remembering correctly
that it
was mac only at one point?
Probably.
PowerPoint was first Mac only until M$ bought the company.
M$ first developed Excel for the Mac (calling it MultiPlan).
M$ first developed Word for
I have been using Eudora on a PC since my first real Internet
connection, and that was before Windows 95. Eudora 1.1?
I remember having to download Netscape. Configure the DNS servers
etc. plus my dial up connection.
Stewart
At 05:42 PM 11/1/2009, you wrote:
I used Eudora for some time on
I used Eudora for some time on my mac, am I remembering correctly that it
was mac only at one point?
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:07 PM, tjpa wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
>
>> Tom you keep trying to convince us that Apple is the way to go.
>>
>
> Incorrect. I am
My job is not convince you. My job is just to tell you enough that
you will do it on your own.
If I am not that good of persuader than my job is done.
Enjoy.
Stewart
At 05:07 PM 11/1/2009, you wrote:
On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Tom you keep trying to convince
Let us know when that time is. It has not come yet.
Stewart
At 05:01 PM 11/1/2009, you wrote:
On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Sue Cubic wrote:
The biggest reason for my sticking with it is that it does what I
want an email program to do. Why should I switch? I'm certainly
not interested in pin
On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Sue Cubic wrote:
I do have Thunderbird installed on a machine, mainly so that I can
guide others with its use. It appears to be a fine program too,
although it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of real Eudora.
I haven't really searched, but does T'Bird hav
On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Tom you keep trying to convince us that Apple is the way to go.
Incorrect. I am just comparing Eudora to the email client I use daily,
the one I know best. Don't forget that Eudora runs on Macs too. You
could convince me to switch, bu
On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Sue Cubic wrote:
The biggest reason for my sticking with it is that it does what I
want an email program to do. Why should I switch? I'm certainly
not interested in pink backgrounds with yellow writing
(stationeries) and animated smilies!
Pogue's got your numb
Sue you pretty well sum it up.
I don't use the colored labels, but It is just something that works
and works well.
Tom you keep trying to convince us that Apple is the way to go.
Well Eudora is one of those programs that just seems to work without
a lot of bugs, reboots or p[roblems, kind of
At 01:46 PM 11/1/2009 -0500, you wrote:
On Nov 1, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Marcio wrote:
I have asked and I repeat... what is a better alternative today? Or
at least comparable?... And mind you I do use web mail too...
Can't say because our EFBs have not articulated any serious reasons
for sticking w
On Nov 1, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Marcio wrote:
I have asked and I repeat... what is a better alternative today? Or
at least comparable?... And mind you I do use web mail too...
Can't say because our EFBs have not articulated any serious reasons
for sticking with Eudora.
I resisted switching awa
I have installed Eudora 7 (paid) on Windows 7 without any problems.
Installing on my D drive in the D:\eudora directory and the attachments
in the D:\eudora\attach sub directory. It is very configurable and
just works.
The main reason I installed it on my D drive is that has a lot more space
and
: Oct 31, 2009 5:04 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>Rules setting (for filters etc.) are very easy. Never changes always
>know where to find it. Rules are easily edited also.
>
>We have mentioned the fact about the attach
I have tried Tbird... not the same.
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: tjpa
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 7:30 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>On Oct 31, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
>> The times I tried
I have asked and I repeat... what is a better alternative today? Or at least
comparable?... And mind you I do use web mail too...
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: Tony B
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 3:56 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@listserv.aol.com
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta
Try it... you still can download Eudora 7.
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: tjpa
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 3:39 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>On Oct 31, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Marcio wrote:
>> Yes, but web mail does what
At 01:56 PM 10/31/2009 -0400, you wrote:
I was a huge Eudora fan in a different era. It did nothing but email,
but it did it very well, very intuitively. Certainly in the PC
software all time hall of fame. Remember, often the alternative was
Outlook.
What else do you want your email to do? I h
You are all convincing me to keep my Eudora 7
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: tjpa
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 3:09 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:59 AM, mike wrote:
>> I don't keep anything
These kinds of things make me love Eudora more...
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: Sue Cubic
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 1:53 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>At 09:43 AM 10/31/2009 -0500, you wrote:
>>I sometimes end up
What was the best part of Eudora Rev.?
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: "Rev. Stewart Marshall"
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 2:23 AM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>As far as I am concerned the best parts of Eudora they
On Oct 31, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
When I tried installing it, it did not allow itself to be installed
in a customer specified location or have attachments saved in a
customer specified location.
When using Windows I never install software in or alter the standard
lo
On Oct 31, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
We have mentioned the fact about the attachments.
What's wrong with the following (other than changing old habits)?
Q: Where are my Apple Mail attachments stored?
A: They are stored on the mail server and also cached on your computer
I'd stick with Eudora too then...if it isn't broke don't fix it. Now you
know you have an alternative if you need it.
On Oct 31, 2009 5:37 PM, "Rev. Stewart Marshall"
wrote:
Thank you for clarifying it, I might just try it again.
And yes it was one of the earlier ones.
I have a tendency not to
Thank you for clarifying it, I might just try it again.
And yes it was one of the earlier ones.
I have a tendency not to try it after a couple of times if my own
programs work and don't need to be fixed.
I am using WIN 7 and no problems with Eudora 7.
Stewart
At 07:14 PM 10/31/2009, you wr
Must have been a very early version or beta, I know very very few programs
that don't let themselves be installed where you want. As far as
attachments go, I also never used a version of tbird that didn't let me put
them wherever I wanted. Either way both these issues don't exist and
haven't for
Tom if they have changed it great.
When I tried installing it, it did not allow itself to be installed
in a customer specified location or have attachments saved in a
customer specified location.
I know you have a habit of gritching in situations like that and so do I.
Stewart
At 04:30 PM
On Oct 31, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
The times I tried installing Tbird I could not do that.
Not fair to blame TBird for that!
I have installed it many times for many clients on both Macs and
Windows. Never a problem.
**
On Oct 31, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
I do not trust their serves, I trust my servers better.'
Access it via any IMAP client and the files will reside in both places
-- twice as safe!
*
** List inf
If Eudora works for you that's great. I however do tire of the few who would
complain that Vista broke Eudora etc and not realize that sometimes ten year
old programs aren't going to keep working on new systems. If Eudora keeps
humming along good times.
On Oct 31, 2009 2:07 PM, "Rev. Stewart Marsh
The times I tried installing Tbird I could not do that.
Tbird manually installed itself into my documents and settings folder
and I would have to dig down deep to get at its contents.
I put Eudora into it's own folder on D: on my home setup or on C;\eudora.
No searching for it.
I will keep w
True but read your last sentence
Their servers.
I do not trust their serves, I trust my servers better.'
Call me Anal. Monk is my mentor.
Stewart
At 03:50 PM 10/31/2009, you wrote:
If you're arguing Eudora vs. Outlook I think you're preaching to the
choir. But none of these are good argume
It's not that you can install Eudora anywhere, you can do that with
Thunderbird, it is that you can move the install folder after its
installed. I manually moved the mbox files in tbird after a new install
from the old install, they just aren't in the same place as Eudora but in
the user data f
If you're arguing Eudora vs. Outlook I think you're preaching to the
choir. But none of these are good arguments against say, gmail via the
web interface.
*) No installation required
*) You can save attachments on all your machines, a year from now if you want
*) No need to keep track of mailfolde
OK two more.
Eudora allows you to install it wherever you want.
It also allows you to specify where you want attachments saved.
Plus each mailfolder, address book, filters etc. are saved in
separate files that are easily moved.
Stewart
At 02:27 PM 10/31/2009, you wrote:
Well Thunderbird
Well Thunderbird does everything you mention, so it isn't about what they
can do, just that some are very used to how Eudora does it.
On Oct 31, 2009 12:12 PM, "Rev. Stewart Marshall" <
revsamarsh...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Rules setting (for filters etc.) are very easy. Never changes always know
Rules setting (for filters etc.) are very easy. Never changes always
know where to find it. Rules are easily edited also.
We have mentioned the fact about the attachments.
It does not try and be your contact manager, your calendar keeper or
anything else, it is simply your email manager.
T
Neither does mine and I do a lot of what you are talking about.
My main computer is my desktop at home.
My work computer is my Dell laptop.
Both of them run Eudora and do the sorting I need.
The desktop at home only downloads when I want and I do it periodically.
Otherwise I read my email on
I was a huge Eudora fan in a different era. It did nothing but email,
but it did it very well, very intuitively. Certainly in the PC
software all time hall of fame. Remember, often the alternative was
Outlook.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:39 PM, tjpa wrote:
> What is it that only Eudora does that ke
On Oct 31, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Marcio wrote:
Yes, but web mail does what Eudora does?
What is it that only Eudora does that keeps its fans so devoted?
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
On Oct 31, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Tony B wrote:
Now, when you start talking about specific services such as gmail,
it's almost a different subject, because it does some things Eudora
can't do easily - like store all your stuff in the cloud. OTOH, gmail
still won't detach and delete attachments.
This
On Oct 31, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Webmail requires lots of up time and connectivity to read and then
save what is needed.
Eudora simply connects and then disconnects.
Maybe this is just a Mac thing, but my email client does not have to
be online when I'm reading and
On Oct 31, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Tony B wrote:
Right. The "correct" answer to everything in this whole thread is that
local email clients are yesterday's news.
OMG, sometimes Tony is right.
Well maybe just semi-right. I don't see the problem being the local
client, it is downloading the email. G
On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:59 AM, mike wrote:
I don't keep anything on flash I don't fully expect to lose.
OMG, sometimes Mike is right.
Although today's flash drives are less fragile than those of old, they
will from time to time lose all their contents. While all media will
eventually fail,
Either, both. I've had each happen multiple times.
On Oct 31, 2009 9:26 AM, "Sue Cubic" wrote:
At 08:59 AM 10/31/2009 -0700, you wrote: > > I don't keep anything on flash
I don't fully expect to ...
Define "lose". You fear the data disappearing, or you physically lose the
flash drive?
Sue
At 08:59 AM 10/31/2009 -0700, you wrote:
I don't keep anything on flash I don't fully expect to lose.
Define "lose". You fear the data disappearing, or you physically
lose the flash drive?
Sue
*
** List info, subsc
I don't keep anything on flash I don't fully expect to lose.
On Oct 31, 2009 8:56 AM, "Sue Cubic" wrote:
At 09:43 AM 10/31/2009 -0500, you wrote: > > I sometimes end up in places
and areas with no Internet...
I use a flash drive and a little program called EZ Back it Up to back up
certain files
At 09:43 AM 10/31/2009 -0500, you wrote:
I sometimes end up in places and areas with no Internet connection
(HORRORS? Yes Virginia there are still places like that)
In that case I do not need the net because I have my email messages
and can look one up if I need to.
Cloud storage might be g
Then we have two different needs.
I need to look up email all the time for info, or directions or
attachments whatever.
So local attachments make sense to me.
Printing up all the stuff I would need well, that would just kill way
too many forests for me, and I throw away a lot of paper to beg
It's not about being bright. Why is it devolved to not likes/dislikes but
right and stupid. I don't need my email when I can't connect, ever..never in
fact. So it works perfectly for me. The few emails I want to keep for
whatever reason I forward to another cloud email so they are on two...the
th
I sometimes end up in places and areas with no Internet connection
(HORRORS? Yes Virginia there are still places like that)
In that case I do not need the net because I have my email messages
and can look one up if I need to.
Cloud storage might be good and secure (?) But it is dependent on
The basic concept is sending and receiving email. And yes, nowadays
AJAX browser clients can do that as well as any local client like
Eudora.
Now, when you start talking about specific services such as gmail,
it's almost a different subject, because it does some things Eudora
can't do easily - lik
Yes, but web mail does what Eudora does?
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: mike
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 12:12 AM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@listserv.aol.com
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>I used it for years, switched to Thunderbird and then Outlook and now
>be
Yes, but they do what Eudora does?...
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: Tony B
>Sent: Oct 31, 2009 8:27 AM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@listserv.aol.com
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>Right. The "correct" answer to everything in this whole thread is t
Right. The "correct" answer to everything in this whole thread is that
local email clients are yesterday's news. Well, for anyone with
broadband anyway. Once browsers became capable of running email as
quickly as any other local client, there suddenly weren't too many
good reasons not to do it that
Uptime isn't the problem, it is speed of downloading the email. I found
when I went from cable to horrid dsl, it took longer to start an email
client, have it connect and download all the msgs then it did to just use
gmail. To top that off my dsl provider doesn't offer email so I would need
a we
That sounds counter productive.
Webmail requires lots of up time and connectivity to read and then
save what is needed.
Eudora simply connects and then disconnects.
Back in the day I used to have it dial and connect download mail and
disconnect.
Do you have such large attachments and such
As far as I am concerned the best parts of Eudora they stripped out
of it when it went 8 and I am still using 7.
Stewart
At 10:51 PM 10/30/2009, you wrote:
I have used Eudora for years and years. So far I have not crossed
anything like it. When I do I guess I will change. In my opinion
Mozil
I used it for years, switched to Thunderbird and then Outlook and now
because of crappy dsl I stick to web mail.
On Oct 30, 2009 8:55 PM, "Marcio" wrote:
Did you ever used it? What you would replace it with?
Marcio
-Original Message- >From: mike >Sent: Oct 30,
2009 6:45 PM >To: COMPU
Did you ever used it? What you would replace it with?
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: mike
>Sent: Oct 30, 2009 6:45 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>My feeling is someone should let Eudora die.
>
>On Oct 30, 2009
TERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>At 01:45 PM 10/30/2009 -0700, you wrote:
>>My feeling is someone should let Eudora die.
>
>Hush! We all know they're not developing or changing it anymore, but
>as long as it works, there are die-ha
I will. Was just curious. Still using 7 from QUalcomm.
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: tjpa
>Sent: Oct 30, 2009 11:08 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>On Oct 30, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Sue Cubic wrote:
>> You could a
I saw a lot of similarities with my old Eudora.
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: "Rev. Stewart Marshall"
>Sent: Oct 30, 2009 8:28 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Eudora 8, Beta 7
>
>It has this is as much Eudora as the modern AT
On Oct 30, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Sue Cubic wrote:
You could also try Thunderbird with the Penelope extension, which is
closer to the old Eudora than the newer Eudora8.
The current download of Eudora8 includes the Penelope extension.
Note that this is still a beta. Maybe you should wait for a fina
At 01:45 PM 10/30/2009 -0700, you wrote:
My feeling is someone should let Eudora die.
Hush! We all know they're not developing or changing it anymore, but
as long as it works, there are die-hard fans.
It is a GOOD email program. Personally I don't want all the html
junk that comes with mo
It has this is as much Eudora as the modern ATT is the old ATT.
Stewart
At 03:45 PM 10/30/2009, you wrote:
My feeling is someone should let Eudora die.
On Oct 30, 2009 1:43 PM, "Marcio" wrote:
I am trying Eudora 8m Beta 7 from Mozzila. It looks very good. Is this your
impression too?
Marci
My feeling is someone should let Eudora die.
On Oct 30, 2009 1:43 PM, "Marcio" wrote:
I am trying Eudora 8m Beta 7 from Mozzila. It looks very good. Is this your
impression too?
Marcio
*
** List info, subscription manage
I am trying Eudora 8m Beta 7 from Mozzila. It looks very good. Is this your
impression too?
Marcio
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at
76 matches
Mail list logo
