Hello,
*fingers crossed* The patch below should be the last change needed to
fully clear the JDK 9 jdk repo of serialization warnings.
Thanks,
-Joe
diff -r b6997dd0667e src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/snmp/Enumerated.java
--- a/src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/snmp/Enumerated.javaTue Apr 01
On 02/04/2014 00:20, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
The plague of serial warnings in the jdk repo is nearly eradicated.
Please review the fix below if address to a few of the holdouts.
This looks okay, assuming of course that none of these types leak into
the serialized form by some other means.
On 02/04/2014 02:20, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
With the serial warnings cleanup of the JDK drawing to completion,
please review the patch below which addresses some lingering issues in
jconsole and jstat.
This looks okay too.
-Alan
On 02/04/2014 07:39, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
*fingers crossed* The patch below should be the last change needed to
fully clear the JDK 9 jdk repo of serialization warnings.
Thanks,
-Joe
This looks okay too.
-Alan
On 01/04/2014 23:40, Martin Buchholz wrote:
So I rather like having different LaunchMechanisms available on different
platforms - just the default would be different. fork should work
everywhere.
I agree that is important to keep the ability to configure this, it was
particularly useful with
On 4/2/14 8:39 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
*fingers crossed* The patch below should be the last change needed to
fully clear the JDK 9 jdk repo of serialization warnings.
Looks good Joe!
best regards,
-- daniel
Thanks,
-Joe
diff -r b6997dd0667e
On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote:
What is the relationship between this naked dot proposal and the
chaining of void methods proposal? The reason for asking is not to be
negative, but rather to find out if these issues are best dealt with
together, or as independent proposals.
I
I'm looking to port this fix from JDK 8 to 9. Other changes were made
for JDK 9 given that we have access to the
javaAwtAccess.getAppletContext() method when using JDK 8 as the boot
strap JDK for CORBA. Direct access to the sun.awt.AppContect class has
been removed.
bug :
+1
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:39 AM, Joe Darcy joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
*fingers crossed* The patch below
On 04/01/2014 09:47 PM, roger riggs wrote:
Hi,
A minor point, but the Enum for LaunchMechanism can be simpler; the
defined enum values (1,2,3)
are never used and can be removed along with the extra constructor.
They are used for the mode parameter of forkAndExec() native method.
With the
Hello,
Can I have a review for the latest (2014b) TZ data integration to JDK9.
The webrev can be located here [1].
The following set of tests were executed without failures:
test/sun/util/calendar test/java/util/Calendar
test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone test/sun/util/calendar
Hi,
Am 02.04.2014 11:08, schrieb Andrew Haley:
On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote:
What is the relationship between this naked dot proposal and the
chaining of void methods proposal? The reason for asking is not to be
negative, but rather to find out if these issues are best dealt with
On 04/02/2014 11:58 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.04.2014 11:08, schrieb Andrew Haley:
On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote:
What is the relationship between this naked dot proposal and the
chaining of void methods proposal? The reason for asking is not to be
negative, but rather to
Looks fine to me.
regards,
Sean.
On 02/04/14 11:55, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hello,
Can I have a review for the latest (2014b) TZ data integration to
JDK9. The webrev can be located here [1].
The following set of tests were executed without failures:
test/sun/util/calendar
In my opinion Project Coin was meant only to push some earlier chosen
changes into language.
Naked dot in language where long name are preferred is pure evil:
I would have to look pairing ; for every dot ?
someVeryLongName()/* explanation*/.otherLongNameMethod();
someVeryLongName();/*
Hi,
On 4/2/2014 6:49 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/01/2014 09:47 PM, roger riggs wrote:
Hi,
A minor point, but the Enum for LaunchMechanism can be simpler; the
defined enum values (1,2,3)
are never used and can be removed along with the extra constructor.
They are used for the mode
In the test, I need to do following steps:
1. compile schema file using xjc tool
2. compile generated sources
3. load generated class and via reflection API verify generated methods
Although I know how to run tool directly from the test, it seems to me
not very elegant to run compiler directly
On 02/04/14 14:32, Miroslav Kos wrote:
In the test, I need to do following steps:
1. compile schema file using xjc tool
2. compile generated sources
3. load generated class and via reflection API verify generated methods
In which case, what you have is fine then.
Although I know how to run
Hi,
Just adding some perspective after following these language-feature
discussions for several years now.
In my opinion Project Coin was meant only to push some earlier chosen
changes into language.
The initial Project Coin process actually invited proposals from the
community. There were
On 02/04/2014 11:42, Seán Coffey wrote:
I'm looking to port this fix from JDK 8 to 9. Other changes were made
for JDK 9 given that we have access to the
javaAwtAccess.getAppletContext() method when using JDK 8 as the boot
strap JDK for CORBA. Direct access to the sun.awt.AppContect class has
On Apr 1, 2014, at 6:21 PM, Vladimir Ivanov vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com
wrote:
On 4/1/14 7:29 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Apr 1, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Vladimir Ivanov vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com
wrote:
Paul,
Unfortunately, additional profiling doesn't work for Accessor.checkCast
case.
On 04/02/2014 12:05 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/02/2014 11:58 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.04.2014 11:08, schrieb Andrew Haley:
On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote:
What is the relationship between this naked dot proposal and the
chaining of void methods proposal? The reason for
On 02/04/14 15:05, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/04/2014 11:42, Seán Coffey wrote:
I'm looking to port this fix from JDK 8 to 9. Other changes were made
for JDK 9 given that we have access to the
javaAwtAccess.getAppletContext() method when using JDK 8 as the boot
strap JDK for CORBA. Direct
Good morning,
Here is another trivial change to address some broken links
Best
Lance
ljanders-mac:sql ljanders$ hg diff
diff -r 31541b9a5a4a src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html
--- a/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html Wed Apr 02 10:20:14 2014 -0400
+++
Looks ok to me Lance.
-Chris.
On 02/04/14 15:53, Lance Andersen wrote:
Good morning,
Here is another trivial change to address some broken links
Best
Lance
ljanders-mac:sql ljanders$ hg diff
diff -r 31541b9a5a4a src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html
---
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for updating the change. Please find my comments inline:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Lu luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Volker, Masayoshi,
Thanks a lot for your review, here's the updated patch, could you pls take a
look?
looks fine.
On 4/2/14 3:55 AM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hello,
Can I have a review for the latest (2014b) TZ data integration to
JDK9. The webrev can be located here [1].
The following set of tests were executed without failures:
test/sun/util/calendar test/java/util/Calendar
On 01/04/2014 18:04, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Roger,
Well, it turns out the methods would like to stay in Os (renamed to
Platform), but there is no need for per-enum-instance subclasses.
Using enum constructor parameters and switch statements makes code
even more compact and easy to follow...
On 4/2/2014 7:44 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
On 02/04/14 15:05, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/04/2014 11:42, Seán Coffey wrote:
I'm looking to port this fix from JDK 8 to 9. Other changes were
made for JDK 9 given that we have access to the
javaAwtAccess.getAppletContext() method when using JDK 8 as
On 04/02/2014 03:17 PM, roger riggs wrote:
Hi,
On 4/2/2014 6:49 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/01/2014 09:47 PM, roger riggs wrote:
Hi,
A minor point, but the Enum for LaunchMechanism can be simpler; the
defined enum values (1,2,3)
are never used and can be removed along with the extra
Hi Volker,
On 2014年04月02日 23:07, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for updating the change. Please find my comments inline:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Lu
luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Volker, Masayoshi,
Thanks a lot for your review,
On Apr 2, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
Regarding redundant null check, do you have a test case so I can play with
it myself?
I will send something to you later today or tomorrow.
Still plan to send you something today :-) but later on...
See below
On 04/01/2014 11:28 AM, Bruce Chapman wrote:
Slightly preceding Ulf's coin proposal by a few hours was
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/coin-dev/2009-March/001134.html
Where I suggested the naked dot notation (coined in
33 matches
Mail list logo
