Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-28 Thread Timothy Pearson
On 02/27/2018 11:15 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > On 02/22/2018 04:36 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: > >> Actually, for OpenBMC work, hotplugging is often the only way to go. >> Just be very careful to align the pins correctly the first time; you >> don't have a second chance if you misalign the pins

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-27 Thread taii...@gmx.com
On 02/22/2018 04:36 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: Actually, for OpenBMC work, hotplugging is often the only way to go. Just be very careful to align the pins correctly the first time; you don't have a second chance if you misalign the pins and fry the module... I stand corrected, but I am nervous

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-26 Thread James Hebden
No problems. It took me several patches but I think I better understand the coding style and project layout now, and tests are passing after a rebase of the code and responding to review feedback. Thanks all for taking the time to review and for putting up with the spam :) James On Mon, Feb 26,

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-26 Thread Piotr Kubaj via coreboot
C & KGPE-D16 (Elisenda Cuadros) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 23:38:42 +0100 From: Elisenda Cuadros <li...@e4l.es> To: Timothy Pearson <tpear...@raptorengineering.com>, Coreboot <coreboot@coreboot.org> Subject: Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-26 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you! If you have questions during the process please feel free to ask. On 02/26/2018 04:53 AM, James Hebden wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 04:25:23AM -0600, Timothy Pearson wrote: >> On 02/25/2018 02:18 AM, Mike Banon wrote: Any

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-26 Thread James Hebden
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 04:25:23AM -0600, Timothy Pearson wrote: > On 02/25/2018 02:18 AM, Mike Banon wrote: > >> Any particular reason those patches were not upstreamed? > > > > Because a person who submitted these patches did not fix some problems, > > I'm aware of this. Upstreaming was never

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-25 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/25/2018 02:18 AM, Mike Banon wrote: >> Any particular reason those patches were not upstreamed? > > Because a person who submitted these patches did not fix some problems, I'm aware of this. Upstreaming was never part of the original funding

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-25 Thread Timothy Pearson
----- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 23:38:42 +0100 >> From: Elisenda Cuadros <li...@e4l.es> >> To: Timothy Pearson <tpear...@raptorengineering.com>, Coreboot >> <coreboot@coreboot.org> >> Subject: Re: [coreboo

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-25 Thread Piotr Kubaj via coreboot
ssage: 1 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 23:38:42 +0100 From: Elisenda Cuadros <li...@e4l.es> To: Timothy Pearson <tpear...@raptorengineering.com>, Coreboot <coreboot@coreboot.org> Subject: Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16 Message-ID: <024a1ee2-7edc-be52-f87d-3bfbf95aa..

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-25 Thread Mike Banon
> Any particular reason those patches were not upstreamed? Because a person who submitted these patches did not fix some problems, if you scroll down to comments at https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/19820/ Paul Menzel May 23, 2017 Patch Set 1: (2 comments)

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-24 Thread Thierry Laurion
Any particular reason those patches were not upstreamed? Le ven. 23 févr. 2018 21:40, Thierry Laurion a écrit : > Timothys patches were mot included un coreboot > https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/19822/ > > Le ven. 23 févr. 2018 17:40, Elisenda Cuadros

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-24 Thread Thierry Laurion
Timothys patches were mot included un coreboot https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/19822/ Le ven. 23 févr. 2018 17:40, Elisenda Cuadros a écrit : > Hello, > > Thank you for your reply. > > I reflashed (same build) the BMC module with a hotplug. Now it works > like a charm,

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-23 Thread Elisenda Cuadros
After applying these patches it works perfect. Thank you very much. Regards, - Eli On 24/02/18 00:01, Timothy Pearson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You need these patches: https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/19822/ This one in particular:

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-23 Thread Elisenda Cuadros
For me it's a pleasure using it. It is like magic to my eyes to see a Linux prompt in this tiny module. Thank you! On 24/02/18 00:09, Timothy Pearson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 No worries. I'm glad you were able to get the BMC running; it's great to see more users

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-23 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 No worries. I'm glad you were able to get the BMC running; it's great to see more users of this technology! On 02/23/2018 05:09 PM, Elisenda Cuadros wrote: > Sorry, I need to read better. > > Thank you. > > I am going to try the patches now. > >

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-23 Thread Elisenda Cuadros
Sorry, I need to read better. Thank you. I am going to try the patches now. Regards, - Eli On 24/02/18 00:01, Timothy Pearson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You need these patches: https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/19822/ This one in particular:

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-23 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You need these patches: https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/19822/ This one in particular: https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/19820/ This is noted on the Raptor status page:

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-23 Thread Elisenda Cuadros
Hello, Thank you for your reply. I reflashed (same build) the BMC module with a hotplug. Now it works like a charm, it got an ip, I can log through ssh, reboot, etc.. But now I have a new problem. If I try to boot from a halted system, with BMC module attached, the system fires up but

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-23 Thread Thierry Laurion
Better here, sorry. https://github.com/osresearch/heads/issues/134 Le ven. 23 févr. 2018 00:26, Thierry Laurion a écrit : > Actually if others of you want to contribute, there is this heads kgpe-d16 > port that permits to flash directly from the heads coreboot payload

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-22 Thread Thierry Laurion
Actually if others of you want to contribute, there is this heads kgpe-d16 port that permits to flash directly from the heads coreboot payload with Timothy's patches on the flashrom tools. You may want to take a look here : https://github.com/flammit/heads/pull/9#issuecomment-362022411 Le jeu. 22

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-22 Thread Timothy Pearson
Actually, for OpenBMC work, hotplugging is often the only way to go. Just be very careful to align the pins correctly the first time; you don't have a second chance if you misalign the pins and fry the module... On 02/22/2018 03:22 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > On 02/17/2018 09:46 AM, Elisenda

Re: [coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-22 Thread taii...@gmx.com
On 02/17/2018 09:46 AM, Elisenda Cuadros wrote: Hi, Now I trying to use your OpenBMC port. I followed the instructions and everything was fine (compiling, reading and flashing). I waited several minutes after flashing, but the module didn 't blinked like in the vendor rom, nor did it

[coreboot] OpenBMC & KGPE-D16

2018-02-17 Thread Elisenda Cuadros
Hi, Now I trying to use your OpenBMC port. I followed the instructions and everything was fine (compiling, reading and flashing). I waited several minutes after flashing, but the module didn 't blinked like in the vendor rom, nor did it receive an ip. I halted the system because I thought