On 8/20/2013 9:41 PM, John Saunders wrote:
For Android I have found that AquaMail is a very reliable IMAP client that
works perfectly well with my Courier install. I have SSL port 993 exposed on
my firewall and am able to access my email via the cellular network wherever
I am.
I tried a
On 2013-08-21 16:35, Bowie Bailey wrote:
K-9 Mail works well for me.
Is there a problem with the standard Email.apk that is usually included
in Android? A (less secure?) variant is available here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1965468
Anders wrote:
Is there a problem with the standard Email.apk that is usually included in
Android?
A (less secure?) variant is available here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1965468
I've had issues with it becoming very slow trying to deal with my INBOX.
Although haven't
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.comwrote:
I don't have any figures or stats. But everywhere I look, I see no signs
of life. On Usenet, comp.mail.imap used to carry respectable daily traffic
a while ago. It's a ghost town now, maybe a dozen posts a year, for
2013 9:25 PM
To: courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [courier-users] IMAP in general use
Am 16.08.2013 12:58, schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
As far as smartphones, the elephant in the room is Android, and
Android's gmail client uses who knows what to talk to Google. But
whatever
On Fri 16/Aug/2013 04:55:10 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 22:04 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I wish I could say otherwise, but that's what it is. The flip side of the
coin is that IMAP is a mature protocol. It does its job, and there is no
viable replacement for it.
Alessandro Vesely writes:
On Fri 16/Aug/2013 04:55:10 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 22:04 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I wish I could say otherwise, but that's what it is. The flip side of the
coin is that IMAP is a mature protocol. It does its job, and there is no
On 16/08/13 21:25, Manuel Schneider wrote:
The new way to go (IMHO) is to use an Exchange / ActiveSync interface.
People are used to sync contacts and calendars along with their mail.
Yes, most of our lost business clients have moved to Exchange servers.
Totally agree, generic
On 08/16/2013 04:25 AM, Manuel Schneider wrote:
On desktop platforms Thunderbird etc. are still the way to go (Lightning
can use Tine calendars via WebDAV / CalDAV, the SoGo Connector sync
Thunderbird addressbooks via WebDAV / CardDAV).
I've started deploying SOGo this year. I'm pretty happy
Gordon Messmer writes:
On 08/16/2013 04:25 AM, Manuel Schneider wrote:
On desktop platforms Thunderbird etc. are still the way to go (Lightning
can use Tine calendars via WebDAV / CalDAV, the SoGo Connector sync
Thunderbird addressbooks via WebDAV / CardDAV).
I've started deploying SOGo
Mark Constable writes:
On 16/08/13 11:18, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Anders writes: Perhaps IMAP will one day evolve a little :)
Overall, IMAP has been withering, and in decline, and I'd be surprised
if the trend reverses.
That's fascinating comment Sam, coming from someone who would have
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 22:04 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I don't have any figures or stats. But everywhere I look, I see no signs of
life. On Usenet, comp.mail.imap used to carry respectable daily traffic a
while ago. It's a ghost town now, maybe a dozen posts a year, for the last
4-5
On 16/08/13 12:04, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I wish I could say otherwise, but that's what it is. The flip side of the
coin is that IMAP is a mature protocol. It does its job, and there is no
viable replacement for it. As long as there's still a need for a standardized
client/server mail
Lindsay Haisley writes:
I'm really distressed to hear this. I run a small mail hosting service
and recommend IMAP to my customers over POP3 all the time. My server's
spam management system relies on special IMAP mail folders which are
dumped into or routed out of SpamAssassin with various
Mark Constable writes:
On 16/08/13 12:04, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I wish I could say otherwise, but that's what it is. The flip side of the
coin is that IMAP is a mature protocol. It does its job, and there is no
viable replacement for it. As long as there's still a need for a
15 matches
Mail list logo
