: +30 2810391488
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100,
lt directed. So, "we should
define inverse properties" is not the real question. It is only if the
inverse label is of any use in a semantic graph or query as starting point.
best,
Martin
On 2/8/2024 4:13 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear Eleni,
I'd suggest not to assig
Dear Christian-Emil,
I agree with all you write. The quantification should be (1,1:0,n) for
all subproperties you have listed.
Best,
Martin
On 3/19/2024 8:52 AM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore wrote:
Dear Martin,
I have read this issue a little late. I have no problem with your
argumentation
)*
P170(x,y) ⇒E61(x)
P170(x,y) ⇒E52(y)
P170(x, y) ⇒P81i(x, y) ∧P82i(x, y)
*P170(x,y) ⇒ **(¬∃z)[E2(z) **⋀ P4(z,y)] *Excluding an instance of
Temporal Entity to happen *at* this Time-Span
Best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head
acetime_Primitive
Range: SP7 <#_SP7_Declarative_Spacetime> Declarative Spacetime Volume
*to be suproperty of P169,
OR:
**P168(x,y) ⇒SP6(x) * (SP6_Declarative _Place)
*P169(x,y) ⇒SP7(y)
P170(x,y) **⇒SP10(y)
*All the best,
martin
On 2/25/2024 8:40 PM, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear All,
In the co
acetime_Primitive
Range: SP7 <#_SP7_Declarative_Spacetime> Declarative Spacetime Volume
*to be suproperty of P169,
OR:
**P168(x,y) ⇒SP6(x) * (SP6_Declarative _Place)
*P169(x,y) ⇒SP7(y)
P170(x,y) **⇒SP10(y)
*All the best,
martin
On 2/25/2024 8:40 PM, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear All,
In the co
-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation
that both places are at rest.
Best,
Martin
On 2/19/2024 9:56 AM, Eleni Tsouloucha via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,
maybe reconsider this piece of HW given the concerns voiced by Thanasis?
best
E
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 5:23 PM Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig
wrote:
In version 7.2.3 (if I have
Dear Eleni,
I'd suggest not to assign inverse labels, nevertheless. These primitive
values do not constitute particular objects of discourse, albeit that
there is a naming aspect.
P170, P168, P169 are different, they are epistemic constructs. Anyway,
to be discussed!
Best,
Martin
On 2/8
geometric reference systems can be mapped
(projected) to each other, with the precision the origin of the systems
is known. This mapping would be the base for comparing two places moving
relative to each other.
I remember we discussed that, but never spelled out.
Best,
Martin
On 2/2/2024 4:15
Place.
This property is transitive and reflexive.
in FOL:
P89(x,y) ⇒(∃u) [E18(u) ⋀P157(x,u) ⋀P157(y,u)]
Then we can simplify the FOL of P7, and add the above FOL to P121,122,189
Best,
Martin
On 2/2/2024 12:28 PM, Stephen Stead wrote:
The “However, ” implies that this is an exception to the stat
Dear All,
We just observed that the FOL statements of P89 should also contain the
formulation that both places need to be at rest to each other (i.e.,
fall into the same geometric system). This needs to be checked for all
place to place relations.
On 2/1/2024 9:04 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm
(E53) /falls
within/ the area of Salisbury Plain (E53). (Pryor, 2016)
In first-order logic:
P89(x,y) ⇒E53(x)
P89(x,y) ⇒E53(y)
[P89(x,y) ∧P89(y,z)] ⇒ P89(x,z)
P89(x,x)
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural
sigments for *ISSUE 602*, this *must *be
resolved.
best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foun
d not to
belong [20] to the same thing and in the same relation;
(Met.Г 4.3,1005b19-20)
Thus stated, users can make up their own mind about the common meaning
in this example, isn't it?
Would that find your agreement?
Best,
Martin
On 1/10/2024 8:30 AM, George Bruseker wrote:
Dear Martin
Dear All,
I suggest to create an example using Bekker numbers. They constitute
excellent examples of identifiers for propositional content.
See https://guides.library.duq.edu/c.php?g=1030408=7468217
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head
or overlap or inclusion. The current
city further covers completely previous up to the Roman settlement, and
was continuously inhabited.
Best,
Marin
Rgds
SdS
Stephen Stead
Mob: +44 (0)7802 755 013
ste...@paveprime.com
*From:*Crm-sig *On Behalf Of *Martin
Doerr via Crm-sig
*Sent:* Wednesday
frame".
It is very complicated to find these out by browsing!
I propose "[example connects to P146]" and vice versa "[example connects
to P145]"
Best,
Martin
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Info
Hierarchy and in the declaration of
E92 is obsolete.
To be corrected with that in the property declaration of P133.
No decision needed.
Best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information
). "Harry Benson's photos of the Beatles
sparked career"
<http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/harry-benson-s-photos-of-the-beatles-sparked-career-1.2428648>.
CBC News. Accessed 4 December 2023.
Best,
Martin
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Conceptual
Modeling — ER 2001
<https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/3-540-45581-7> pp 412–425
Best,
Martin
On 10/17/2023 10:33 AM, athinak wrote:
Dear Martin,
maybe I misunderstood, but how can we explicitly know thw
circumstances of leading to this state, described by the property?
Admittedly, it poses the question where to stop the non-existence, and
what missing parts would have a chance to be found.
Would a part lost by accident be a part removal? Would that be an
alternative way of documenting missing parts?
Opinions?
Best,
Martin
--
--
to a wider
audience.
Best,
Martin
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
in the Ottoman sphere of influence. For these uses, "about
instance of type" would again be under-specified.
Therefore, I vote to resolve the issue with a recommendation to make an
explicit URIs for isolated individuals, and further discuss "sets of
references with common characteri
n
general, e.g., for defining an "observable situation", we need a list of
possible properties.
Best,
Martin
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
I
On 10/5/2023 10:35 AM, George Bruseker wrote:
Hi Martin,
On this one continue to disagree. Yes the intention of the statement
is to say that the instances of this class and their construction are
meant to be formulated in data standards outside of CRM.
Yes, and we provide interfaces to them
ly.
Best,
Martin
On 10/3/2023 9:59 AM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
The duality of primitives as being in and out of of the universe of a
discourse is a problem
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:45 AM Schmidle, Wolfgang via Crm-sig
wrote:
Okay, last one. I had overlooked P82 "at s
a
fundamental good practice for CRMbase. No reason to repeat in CRMgeo
anything that is (now!) in CRMbase, isn't it?
Best,
Martin
On 10/1/2023 2:09 PM, Schmidle, Wolfgang via Crm-sig wrote:
Some additional questions:
P189 and P171:
E53 Place P171 at some place within E94 Space Primitive
Place Q11i is approximated by: SP6 Declarative
Place Q10i is defined by : SP5 Geometric Place Expression (= E94 Space
Primitive)"
I am not sure about the latest updated version of CRMgeo, because these
are the constructs we harmonized later in CRMbase.
Best,
Martin
On 9/26/2023 11:25 AM
se them. Making E94 being a subclass
of Appellation is a minimal statement about their role.
Best,
Martin
On 10/3/2023 9:41 AM, Schmidle, Wolfgang via Crm-sig wrote:
Okay, last one. I had overlooked P82 "at some time within", and of course there is also P172
"contains" and
Agreed with all!
Martin
On 10/4/2023 12:42 PM, Schmidle, Wolfgang via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear All,
P81 "ongoing throughout" and P82 "at some time within" are strong shortcuts,
but not yet marked as such:
E52 Time-Span P81 ongoing throughout E61 Time Primitive
E52 Time-Sp
selection of what we want to remember. This requires an understanding of
our cultures, do we have it?
Isn't it?
Best,
Martin
On 9/17/2023 9:42 AM, Гук Дарья Юрьевна wrote:
Dear all,
beeing out of discussion (too many reasons) I can add a metaphorical
opinion.
Poem about Gilgamesh is k
On 9/25/2023 12:28 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
Here some corrections:
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation
of the period. If you simply want to say the
Event "falls within" the Period, you only assign a timespan to the
Period, not the event, because this confuses your "provenance of
knowledge", is this clear?, Otherwise, we discuss it in more detail,
it is foundational to the CRM.
Dear All,
I propose a shortcut in CRMgeo for E53 Place P189i is approximated by:
E53 Place P168 place is defined by : E94 Space Primitive,
for obvious practical reasons. It can have the same label.
Best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
extension. It is used
in project work, and may become a potential part of CRMsoc or model on
its own. Too early to report. Similarly, activity model, business
provisions and obligations.
CRMsoc: no news. consolidation of conflicting proposals pending.
Please correct, enrich!
Best,
Martin
On 9/23/
te the FOL connection between single property assignment and I4.
Best,
Martin
On 9/10/2023 9:52 PM, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear All,
I suggest to discuss the meaning of I4 Proposition Set, also related
to issue 550, 510, 610
Two problems:
A) the content model. If we follow the *logic of P190*, an
se
identity or higher symbolic form.
Partners of this homework please comment if I have missed something!
Best,
Martin
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Issue 490: how to model a file [HW reminder]
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 18:35:38 +0300
From: Martin Doerr
To:
es
to it.
This is a task for an FOL or so, isn't it?
Otherwise, we would need to specialize E54 in CRMbase, not really nice.
Opinions?
Best,
Martin
Forwarded Message
Subject:Issue 635 (property quantifier mismatches)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0300
From:
!
Best,
Martin
On 8/18/2023 12:00 AM, Eleni Tsouloucha wrote:
Dear Martin, all,
According to the decision of the 53rd SIG meeting (May 2022), issue
579
<https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-579-new-issue-how-to-model-the-focus-or-view-of-an-observation>was
on hold until we had resolved 583
position Sets with a human
readable text, rather than a CRM compatible RDF model.
Best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Sci
; or "Rome" unambiguous. Therefore the above may
lead to a minimal vocabulary recommended by the CRM for E4 Period and
Spacetime Volume
I attach the Alexandria terms.
Best,
Martin
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for
ce of E15 Identifier Assignment.
The same identifier may be deassigned on more than one occasion.
Examples:
The identifier assignment on 31st July 2001 of the silver cup
OXCMS:2001.1.32 (E15) deassigned “232” (E42). (fictitious)
---
not specialized but should have been.
Best,
Martin
On 8/18/2023 12:00 AM, Eleni Tsouloucha wrote:
Dear all,
Back in Luxembourg, the SIG pondered on the lack of subproperty for
P140 assigned attribute tothat is specific to E15 Identifier
Assignment(unlike the situation with P141 assigned
YES!
Martin
On 7/13/2023 1:20 AM, Pat Riva via Crm-sig wrote:
Hello all,
I am calling for an e-vote relating to LRMoo. Please vote on the list
by *July 26th*.
Background: At the end of SIG meeting #55 in May 2023 in Heraklion,
the LRMoo WG presented a sketch of a new approach to R10 after
i/publications/2021/hyvonen-sampo-model-2021.bib>pdf
<https://seco.cs.aalto.fi/publications/2021/hyvonen-sampo-model-2021.pdf>link
<https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223034>
Many of the "Sampos" use CIDOC CRM -based data models.
All the best,
Martin
--
-
://enterprise-knowledge.com/rdf-what-is-it-and-why-do-i-need-it/
best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research
You are all welcome!
I'll send you soon an outline of what I have in mind.
All the best,
Martin
n 5/14/2023 10:55 PM, Dominic Oldman wrote:
Hi Martin,
I would like to be involved.
Thanks,
Dominic
On Sun, 14 May 2023 at 19:34, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear Dominic, all,
Yes, I
a document analyzing the alternatives.
Best,
Martin
On 5/11/2023 8:01 PM, Dominic Oldman wrote:
Hi
Just a quick question on this. We develop the model independently of
technology. I can see that this discussion is getting technical. I
currently implement propositions sets using RDF named gr
On 5/12/2023 7:53 AM, Wolfgang Schmidle wrote:
Dear Martin,
Thank you for your explanations, and sorry that I cannot join the discussion of
this issue today.
I think my point was that your formalisation is for "directly triggered", whereas the flood example
suggests that "trig
changing research
insights on 3D models. To be discussed!
We can extend E13 to Proposition Sets, which would be very important
to describe consistently CRMinf and generalized observations. That would
then be most effectively implementd via Named Graphs.
Opinions?
Best,
Martin
On 5
Dear George,
I agree with you below about the historical aspects. The annotation
model has the same historical aspect, but is not limited to a single link.
Let us discuss!
Best,
Martin
On 5/11/2023 12:41 PM, George Bruseker wrote:
Dear Francesco, Martin,
Again for the record since I
Dear Francesco,
This is an excellent paper.
I cite: "However, reification has no formal semantics, and leads to a
high increase in the number of triples, hence, it does not scale well. "
I agree with your proposals. Prov-O mapping is a must for CRM-SIG.
Best,
Martin
On 5/10/202
to denote
provenance generally and recommend a uniform use of Named Graphs. I am
aware that not all RDF encodings support the feature. I that case we
could resort to reification.
Opinions?
Best,
Martin
On 5/9/2023 10:37 PM, Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear Christian-Emil, All
Got it!
So, the specific problem is to enable E13 to point to .1 properties.
That appears to be a problem of E13, and possibly of 3M, isn't it? Could
be solved by a more specific construct.
Best,
Martin
On 5/8/2023 9:14 PM, George Bruseker wrote:
Hi Martin,
The problem to solve is, how
a Crm-sig
*Sent:* 08 May 2023 16:34
*To:* Robert Sanderson
*Cc:* crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
*Subject:* Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc
Hi Rob and Martin,
But the point is not to make assertions about the property class
itself but the instance of the property class.
The instance of PC14
Hi George,
On 5/8/2023 5:34 PM, George Bruseker wrote:
Hi Rob and Martin,
But the point is not to make assertions about the property class
itself but the instance of the property class.
of course
The instance of PC14 says Bob was the creator, Bob was a faker... it
is a regular abox
true sense. For
instance, I cannot imagine the "being part of" a Physical Object for
some time to become an entity, because it needs a timespan.
Best,
Martin
On 5/8/2023 12:54 PM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
Hi all,
I would argue that the safest thing to do is to make the P
bject, i.e., its truth or
not. As such, CRMinf is inconsistent. This is, I think, Issue 614.
Best,
Martin
On 5/6/2023 12:43 AM, Pavlos Fafalios via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear George,
An instance of a property class represents a statement / formal
proposition. Could we thus say that it is al
l procedures associated with the relationship between them".
This should also be a didactic goal.
Best,
Martin.
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Inst
has so far failed to
provide an effective mechanism to specialize models by replacing links
by paths, comparable to the IsA.
All the best,
Martin
On 5/3/2023 12:05 AM, Pavlos Fafalios via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear Francesco,
You have raised some interesting points which, I think, need
discussion
ntity.
With respect to the statigraphic relations below, I do not agree that
there are hidden entities. Simply, I regard this "directed
correspondence" construct to be of /epistemic /nature, and it is missing
as primitive in the KR languages we use.
All the best,
Martin
On 5/2/2023 3:08 P
Dear All,
By the way, I think I just made a statement below about principles.
Would you regard this as noteworthy as principles?
Best,
Martin
On 4/30/2023 6:36 PM, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
Your questions well-taken, but please do not seek a logical surrogate
of reality. It does
d recover landslide examples
from the European InGeoClouds project.
Good examples could also be some houses falling down at the seaside
around Santa Barbara coast in California, because of landing erosion
approaching them.
All the best,
Martin
Best,
Wolfgang
Am 20.04.2023 um 14:01 sch
t is aware of a good example.
Feedback welcome!
Martin
--
--------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas
t al., 2008).
The 1966 flood in Florence /triggered/ mould growth on books stored in
flooded library rooms (Rubinstein, N., 1966)
In First Order Logic:
O13(x,y) ⇒E5(x)
O13(x,y) ⇒E5(y)
**Best,
Martin*
*
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honor
lternative property or just the Truth
Value associated. Opinions?
Best,
Martin
On 4/11/2023 6:50 PM, Гук Дарья Юрьевна wrote:
Dear all, if somebody is agree with hypothesis or some thesis, it's
clear, but if thereis a reason to be against. How it will work?
Sincer
].]
See: https://www.britishmuseum.org/blog/who-was-nero, By Francesca
Bologna, Nero Project Curator, Publication date: 22 April 2021. accessed
4/10/2023
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Labora
, but the content has not yet been published. These uses of
Presence allow for collecting material from people around important
social developments.
I do not have access to such cases, and would need help to find them.
Best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
types, or "appearing within"
Groups.
The sense of "appears in" does not make claims that cannot be related to
evidence.
Opinions?
On 3/10/2023 9:47 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
I agree.
I think there is still an open discussion how to document such things,
but the r
ational
industry creating Tango apparel, training business etc.
Rembetiko is still quite confined, has musical rythmic and stylistic
characteristics and is not (much) commercialized.
Best,
Martin
On 3/10/2023 9:42 AM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:
It is as I wrote, an inte
a species surviving. I agree with Franco.
Best,
Martin
On 3/9/2023 8:00 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear All,
I think this is quite overstretching what an activity is. Of course we
can make quick and dirty use of any class. I cannot imagine, how an
"All Tango Performances"
challenge is, for me, not
to provide a place to say "Tango is here", but to relate individual
activities, performances, music, fashions, costumes etc along lines of
evolution, variation and cross-fertalization.
Best,
Martin
On 3/9/2023 6:33 PM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
I'm p
uot; Humboldt refers to the
measurement only like that "in this night I could observe some stars to
determine the position of..." and the position. He mentions how he was
maintaining his clock, one of the best of his time.
Best,
Martin
On 3/4/2023 8:13 PM, Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig wrote:
D
YES!
Martin
On 2/13/2023 8:19 PM, Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,
Many thanks to those who voted for the CRMsci examples. Also, many
thanks to Wolfgang who has flagged several inaccuracies with the
Titanic examples, done deeper research and has provided further
clarity
Dear All,
I think this should go for an e-vote, update to include future 7.1.3.
Best,
Martin
On 2/6/2023 12:41 PM, Wolfgang Schmidle via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear All,
There are some properties where the text version and the number version of
their property quantification do not match. Since
is, is that there is no possible
world in which they can both exist. On their own, they do not constitute
an impossible world.
Carlo Meghini has written about alternative and negative knowledge.
If you cannot find the respective references, I can search for them.
All the best,
Martin
On 1/13/2023 2:02 PM, Wolfgang
__
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Com
Dear All,
Best seasons greetings to all of you, and a Happy New Year, hopefully
with more peace, more human respect and more awareness of the cultural
values of all nations. I am hoping to see many of you in our next meetings.
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
.
That does not make sense.
best,
Martin
On 12/20/2022 6:49 PM, Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig wrote:
Indeed and the original questions raised were about the phrase in the
introduction "The association of the two events is based on their
temporal proximity, i.e. the triggering event ends
[E92(x) ∧ E92(y) ∧ E92(z) ∧ P132(x,y) ∧ P132(y,z) ∧ ¬P132(x,z)]
(∃x,y,z) [E92(x) ∧ E92(y) ∧ E92(z) ∧ P133(x,y) ∧ P133(y,z) ∧ ¬P133(x,z)]
P133(x,y) ⇒ P133(x,y)
This seems to be an oversight? (Also in P132.)
What is the oversight?
Best,
Martin
Best,
Wolfgang
_
I am working on that!
Best,
Martin
On 12/16/2022 11:27 AM, George Bruseker wrote:
Dear both,
I'm too covidy still to follow this in detail but I think the issue
was left, for the notes to show, for Martin to provide an example to
show the problem he sees that we cannot see.
Cheers
ere will be no abuse in the sense I, Francesco
and LRM propose?
Best,
Martin
So I believe that this does not solve the problem as stated - that
E33_E41_Linguistic_Appellation does not have a description outside of
the RDFS document.
Rob
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 3:54 PM Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
the TGN language attributes. For VIAF, we would need a "national"
context, i.e., the national library.
Best,
Martin
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, 2:43 pm Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig,
wrote:
Dear Martin, all
Sorry to intervene so late in this interesting exchange, I was
it creates non-sensical associations.
Which of all these do we want, and how to model the latter?
Best,
Martin
On 12/6/2022 2:11 PM, Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,
Reconsidering the whole exchanges in this issue, and the examples,
notably those by Martin on November 9th
and we add
P125(x,y,w) ⇐ (∃z) [E70(z) ∧ P16(x,z,w) ∧ P2(z,y)]
I hope this is correct.
Christian-Emil
*From:* Crm-sig on behalf of Martin
Doerr via Crm-sig
*Sent:* 30 November 2022 16:11
*To:* crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
*Subject
Dear Thanasis
Yes,it is about Issue 610, but it is also an epistemological background
for an interface to CRMinf (Issue 609), where we would need to study how
such arguments can be documented.
Best,
Martin
On 11/24/2022 3:17 PM, Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig wrote:
Thank you
z. Is that what you mean?
I'd support creating such a P125.1.
Best,
Martin
On 11/30/2022 3:57 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:
B:
Typo: P125 should be P125.1 in the bold phrase.
"The implication from the long path to the shortcut is ok since the
shortcut has no .1-prope
,
Martin
On 11/30/2022 3:02 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:
Under the discussion of issue 616 'shortcuts in P50 has current
keeper, P52 has current owner, P55 has current location' it became
clear to me that axioms of the form
'lefthandside(x,y)⇒ (∃z)[righthandside(x,y,z
=H4sIAONgFuLUz9U3MC1KKshT4tVP1zc0TM4uS8s2LrbUUspOttIvyywuTcyJTywqQWJmFpdYlecXZRcvYpXzKM3NzcxLT8osSlFIzEtRCEgsLs7Mz0vLyS9PLSoGAIh-wfhh=X=2ahUKEwiZlaabgNb7AhVJs6QKHUxQCjEQtq8DegQIGRAH=1637=989=1.82#imgrc=h3dJnCUjqXZDvM
On 11/30/2022 3:35 PM, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear Christian-Emil,
I agree with your precise analysis, except for:
A) I'd argue that P138.1 mode of representation is indeed identical
to P62.1
om would have to be added:
P125(x,y,w) ⇔ (∃z) [E70(z) ∧ P16(x,z,w) ∧ P2(z,y)]"
I have not understood why "the range instance of P16.1 and P125 must be
identical ".
E.g., used "passiflora racemosa flower", mode of use "as model", (Martin
Johnson Heade,
Dear All,
I would also suggest to deprecate them, if there is no community
actively using them. Alternatively, we may think of a general, efficient
mechanism to assert that a property is still valid? This may go into the
Situation discussion.
Best,
Martin
On 11/28/2022 2:58 PM, Detlev
e would need a double instantiation with E4, I
think. It's a bit like the chalk on the blackboard, getting smaller and
smaller. End of existence of the unit may be obvious or border line.
Opinions?
Best,
Martin
On 11/26/2022 12:35 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:
A problem i
model. This
case is a monotonic extension.
We may argue that AP5 is a modification in any case, even if it ends up
in complete destruction. Then, the end of existence is however not
implied. Otherwise, it is a Logical OR of modification and destruction.
Opinions?
Best,
Martin
On 11/25
practice will be to associate an observation with the
negative property.
So far my ideas.
Best,
Martin
--
----
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Sc
al
objects, in particular suspect items.
Expert opinions, if possible, from the British Museum about illicit
trafficking.
All partners on this mailing list are kindly invited to look for other
data that could be used.
Best wishes,
Martin
--
----
Dr. Ma
Dear All,
See Achille's and my homework for Issue 533, to be added to the
modelling principles as real life example from CRM SIG discussions.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JhXMH3z8FW55XcyQcQ-XNud1jctTQ-naOf6VJuNC70Y/edit?pli=1
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Dear All, am I correct that Issue 294,
"
* AP29 appears in
* AP30 restricted to
* AP31 typical for
was never entered into the CRMarcheo text?
Best,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Inform
e, and many European languages are not
so alien to each other.
All the best,
Martin
On 11/13/2022 11:11 AM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
Here is fun example of linguistic object which I guess challenges p72
but is still actually diaskedastic and perithoric to our enterprise,
brought to yo
ation-wise.
I asked for Farsi, because to my best knowledge, Iran uses the Arabic
script. Therefore a transcription of Douglas Adams to Arabic script
equally applies to Farsi and Arabic. As such, it would not be "Arabic".
I hope that makes my reasoning clearer.
All the best,
Martin
O
1 - 100 of 1405 matches
Mail list logo
