On 2/27/19 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Kipps wrote:
> Since there has not been much else mentioned in the last week, does
> anyone else have input, or should I take this as permission to
> resurrect the bridge this weekend? Direct responses from Leaf and ryo
> are below; mwedel and Partmedia have
Since there has not been much else mentioned in the last week, does
anyone else have input, or should I take this as permission to
resurrect the bridge this weekend? Direct responses from Leaf and ryo
are below; mwedel and Partmedia have commented, but have not directly
expressed their support.
Hello.
Seems fine to me.
For the archive history, 2 months seems ok to me. It won't be indexed,
apparently.
Besides, everyone knows (I hope :)) that chats on IRC that need to be
persisted should be sent to the mailing list :p
Best regards
Nicolas
Le lundi 18 février 2019 22:29:52,
the archive is not an issue at all. It is sending my communications tog
a privately owned communications server that is the problem. I charge
$20.00 USD per world for the use of anything I write or speak on any
privately owned commercial venture including, but not limited to Discord
On
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Mark Wedel wrote:
> On 02/18/2019 03:56 PM, bill billy wrote:
> > > Anyone else have any thoughts on the archive/history length?
> >
> >I personally think it should be unlimited. IMO to base a limit on
> >time would prevent long term threads and to base it
On 02/18/2019 03:56 PM, bill billy wrote:
> Anyone else have any thoughts on the archive/history length?
I personally think it should be unlimited. IMO to base a limit on time would
prevent long term threads and to base it on the number of posts (i.e delete
after 100 or even 1000) could
> Anyone else have any thoughts on the archive/history length?
I personally think it should be unlimited. IMO to base a limit on time would
prevent long term threads and to base it on the number of posts (i.e delete
after 100 or even 1000) could cause important conversations to be forgotten.
On 2/18/19 3:41 PM, Nathaniel Kipps wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:30 PM Rick Tanner wrote:
>> * Two month archive history in Discord
>
> Although I would personally prefer an unlimited history, I think two
> months is reasonable.
Anyone else have any thoughts on the archive/history length?
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:30 PM Rick Tanner wrote:
> * Two month archive history in Discord
Although I would personally prefer an unlimited history, I think two
months is reasonable.
> * Same guidance and recommendations on both channels in regards to
> civility (or right now - IRC channel
After discussion and raised concerns about privacy, questions answered, etc.
My thoughts:
* Proceed with the implementation of a IRC & Discord bridge
* Two month archive history in Discord
* Channel topic update on IRC to alert users that conversations are
logged in Discord for two months
*
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 3:50 PM Rick Tanner wrote:
> Are the chat archives in Discord only available to members logged in to
> the channel?
>
> Or are chat logs available for search engines to index, or outside
> entities to download, etc.?
Discord chat history is only available to current
Are the chat archives in Discord only available to members logged in to
the channel?
Or are chat logs available for search engines to index, or outside
entities to download, etc.?
___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
On 2/8/19 11:54 AM, greenscene8 wrote:
> the i tended purpose
the intended purpose is to make money for venture capital
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
On 2/8/19 7:01 PM, Nathaniel Kipps wrote:
> I think the two mentioned were Discord and Slack. I think that both of
> them are great choices,
they are both propreitary systems and non-starters
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches
On 2/8/19 5:16 PM, Rick Tanner wrote:
> I appear to be overlooking something.. Where is the "ownership" of
> Crossfire shown or listed?
A better question is who is the ownership of Discourse?
It sure isn't anyone that can be trust for say, most of our lifetime
From the FSF site:
Antifeature:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:24 PM Rick Tanner wrote:
> What are the options or choices for the bridge services that you mention?
I think the two mentioned were Discord and Slack. I think that both of
them are great choices, due to their familiarity among large groups of
people. There are also
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:16 PM Rick Tanner wrote:
> I appear to be overlooking something.. Where is the "ownership" of
> Crossfire shown or listed?
I was operating under the assumption that it was a "benevolent
dictatorship", consisting primarily of the original author (who I
understand to be
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:24 PM Rick Tanner wrote:
> I am not sure how the messages from IRC appeared in the discord
> channel/server. I was not logged in there at the time.
They appeared in a similar fashion, e.g., with the bot sending a
message, but prefixing it with the original IRC nick. An
On 1/30/19 2:10 PM, DraugTheWhopper wrote:
>
>
> * Which bridge services should be acceptable
> * Chat history retention time
> * Either querying or notifying the "active people" on IRC to ensure they
> consent
> * Moderation and regulating access to the Discord (will there be a
> need to
On 1/31/19 11:47 PM, Mark Wedel wrote:
>
> I should probably transfer ownership of crossfire to someone else - I
> haven't had much time to work on it lately, and seems unlikely that I'll
> find time anytime soon. But that wasn't really the question here.
I appear to be overlooking
On 1/31/19 11:47 PM, Mark Wedel wrote:
>
> - Set up a gateway. As noted, this could have issues related to
> freenode policy. One thought there is to change the topic to clear
> state that there is a gateway being used. I'm not actually sure how
> messages would get attributed when moved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Looking like this discussion has taken a direction unrelated to
Crossfire and using Discord in conjunction with the existing FreeNode
IRC channel.
Please move the corporate data mining, privacy, historical discussion
off the mailing list.
Thank
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:23:49PM +, bill billy wrote:
> You can't be serious.
>
> So just to recap: You object to Discord because it is in cahoots with IBM to
> sell data to the Nazis in preparation of some imminent fourth reich?
>
> Can we just have the bridge set up and move on from
You can't be serious.
So just to recap: You object to Discord because it is in cahoots with IBM to
sell data to the Nazis in preparation of some imminent fourth reich?
Can we just have the bridge set up and move on from this ridiculousness.
PS.
Nobody is tracking you, 1984 really got in your
On 2/8/19 11:54 AM, greenscene8 wrote:
> I agree... Discord helps keep gaming communities together. Not worth arguing
> about. It's an excellent forum to discuss program ideas, the i tended
> purpose. If youre worried about the spy state- keep the bomb discussions to
> minimal and we should
On 2/8/19 11:54 AM, greenscene8 wrote:
> I agree... Discord helps keep gaming communities together. Not worth arguing
> about. It's an excellent forum to discuss program ideas, the i tended
> purpose. If youre worried about the spy state- keep the bomb discussions to
> minimal and we should
On 2/8/19 11:54 AM, greenscene8 wrote:
> I agree... Discord helps keep gaming communities together. Not worth arguing
> about. It's an excellent forum to discuss program ideas, the i tended
> purpose. If youre worried about the spy state- keep the bomb discussions to
> minimal and we should
.
Original message From: Ruben Safir Date:
2/7/19 2:09 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Crossfire Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability
with a chat bridge On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:43:50PM +, bill billy wrote:>
> A. Discord does not data-mine.
If you're going to call people who don't subscribe to your particular brand of
paranoia 'idiots' you should probably be up for a debate (and know how to
spell incite).
Time after time you suggest new people coming in learn Linux or use IRC all the
while it would be far more intelligent to
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:34:34PM +, bill billy wrote:
> I suggest you start citing your sources or stop being a stick in the mud.
This is not a debate.
> On Thursday, February 7, 2019, 3:28:50 PM EST, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:15:42PM +, bill
I suggest you start citing your sources or stop being a stick in the mud.
On Thursday, February 7, 2019, 3:28:50 PM EST, Ruben Safir
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:15:42PM +, bill billy wrote:
>
>
>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:15:42PM +, bill billy wrote:
>
>
> https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/discord/investors/investors_list#section-investors
>
> Researching these topics takes only slightly more effort than it takes to
> imagine some conspiracy scenario.
There is no
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/discord/investors/investors_list#section-investors
Researching these topics takes only slightly more effort than it takes to
imagine some conspiracy scenario.
On Sunday, February 3, 2019, 4:48:09 PM EST, Nathaniel Kipps
wrote:
On Sat,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:43:50PM +, bill billy wrote:
>
> A. Discord does not data-mine. That's not how VC-funded startups work. At the
> moment Discord isn't concerned about finding a main source of revenue.
> They're funded by several investors, which wouldn't be funding Discord if it
A. Discord does not data-mine. That's not how VC-funded startups work. At the
moment Discord isn't concerned about finding a main source of revenue. They're
funded by several investors, which wouldn't be funding Discord if it sold user
data. Yes, it does share aggregate user data with
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 04:47:43PM -0500, Nathaniel Kipps wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 9:21 PM Ruben Safir wrote:
> > > > I see great reasons to end web based forums..
> > >
> > > Can you give some of these reasons? I'd love to hear them.
> >
> > They depend on a browser, they spy on you,
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 9:21 PM Ruben Safir wrote:
> > > I see great reasons to end web based forums..
> >
> > Can you give some of these reasons? I'd love to hear them.
>
> They depend on a browser, they spy on you, they are not quick, they
> don't integrate with my email client, I can't run
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 10:04:30PM -0500, Nathaniel Kipps wrote:
> > There is zero reason to move from IRC... thank you.
>
> Absolutely, we are not proposing to replace the IRC in any way, just
> extend it to improve the accessibility.
>
> > I see great reasons to end web based forums..
>
> Can
> There is zero reason to move from IRC... thank you.
Absolutely, we are not proposing to replace the IRC in any way, just
extend it to improve the accessibility.
> I see great reasons to end web based forums..
Can you give some of these reasons? I'd love to hear them.
On a related note, I
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 12:17:08PM -0800, Kevin Zheng wrote:
> On 1/31/19 9:47 PM, Mark Wedel wrote:
> > I should probably transfer ownership of crossfire to someone
> >else - I haven't had much time to work on it lately, and seems
> >unlikely that I'll find time anytime soon. But that wasn't
On 1/31/19 9:47 PM, Mark Wedel wrote:
I should probably transfer ownership of crossfire to someone else - I
haven't had much time to work on it lately, and seems unlikely that I'll
find time anytime soon. But that wasn't really the question here.
I nominate Rick, who has been a pretty
I should probably transfer ownership of crossfire to someone else - I haven't
had much time to work on it lately, and seems unlikely that I'll find time
anytime soon. But that wasn't really the question here.
It is hard to argue about making the game (or chat channels) more accessible
Not forming an opinion yet, giving guidance, etc. - just sharing
feedback and comments.
This link was shared on the IRC channel by a user in regards to Discord.
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/help-me-toms-guide-discord-permissions,review-5104.html
43 matches
Mail list logo
