hi all, i'm a new member and like to share my problem and hope that
someone could help me out, cause i'm stuck here for days ;(
http://www.caparuni.or.id/konsulat_philipines/main5.htm
http://www.caparuni.or.id/konsulat_philipines/main6.htm
i've made those 2 layout and have some problem with
hi, maybe you can use the faux columsn method
http://www.communitymx.com/abstract.cfm?cid=AFC58
Quoting caparuni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi all, i'm a new member and like to share my problem and hope that
someone could help me out, cause i'm stuck here for days ;(
On 2006-03-12 at 05:24:17 [+0100], Roger Roelofs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The css validator is your friend. Fix the errors and it will likely
work just fine. Actually removing the style tags from the css files
might be all you need to to, but fixing the other errors would be good.
caparuni wrote:
hi all, i'm a new member and like to share my problem and hope that
someone could help me out, cause i'm stuck here for days ;(
http://www.caparuni.or.id/konsulat_philipines/main5.htm
http://www.caparuni.or.id/konsulat_philipines/main6.htm
i've made those 2 layout and have
Christian Montoya wrote:
On 3/12/06, Tracy Shorrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I don't imagine many users will browse the site without CSS, but for
the odd chance that it happens, you could put a skip to content
on-page link that is hidden by the CSS in the stylesheet. This has
it's own
Hi folks
I am really stumped by a validation error I am getting on my CSS;
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://
djrobgilbert.com/
Line: 830 Context : .linkbox dl
Invalid number : display inline-block is not a display value :
inline-block
Where in
Peter Dominic Ryan wrote:
Hi folks
Hello :-)
I am really stumped by a validation error I am getting on my
CSS;
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://djrobgilbert.com/
Line: 830 Context : .linkbox dl
Invalid number : display inline-block is not a display value :
On 3/13/06, Peter Dominic Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am really stumped. Whilst I can understand some browsers not
supporting this declaration, I cannot work out why the W3 validator
fails.
Any advice would be most appreciated.
Display:inline-block was added to CSS2.1 while the
On 13/03/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CSS3 should be the default instead of CSS2 as it seems to be now, but
that's not up to us, I guess.
CSS 2 is the most recent (finished) version of CSS.
2.1 is currently a working draft.
3 is currently a large collection of different modules
I have used the 'hasLayout'[1] trigger below:
@media screen {
* html #contentcontainer {height: 0;}
}
to help IE6 display content that disappears in a layout containing a wide
data table. The table is contained in a series of 3 nested divs:
#contentcontainer {position: relative; margin: 0 0 0
Hello,
I have a new challenge for those willing to help:
How to provide users with the ability to create a web page that looks
exactly like a paper form without using the Adobe toolkit. The main focus
is on the print preview function (i.e., allowing users to print a record
of what they
On 3/11/06, David McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to find CSS tools that help you determine the results of
inheritance and the cascade for elements on a Web page.
Are there any other tools out there that you're using (besides your
brains) that help you figure out the results of
On 3/13/06, cj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you have firefox? if so, this extension is invaluable to me:
useless link deleted
it doesn't compute em values in a cascade, but it shows you the order
of the css getting applied.
sorry about that everyone; i posted the wrong link.
one more try...
On 3/13/06, Mitko Gerensky-Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
How to provide users with the ability to create a web page that looks
exactly like a paper form without using the Adobe toolkit. The main focus
is on the print preview function (i.e., allowing users to print a record
of what they
Hi, me again, still struggling with the finer points of CSS!
Except I think this one should be simple...
My client has a logo kFA in which she has the body of the k as
tall as the FA part. This is in some font which naturally achieves
this. She wants the same effect throughout her website.
So
The k looks pretty good to me. It doesn't really look bold. To me it
looks a little thicker because it is bigger but it doesn't look bold.
(Mac OS X Firefox and Safari)
I was playing with bold and bolder font weights a couple days ago.
Made no difference since the font on my computer only had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I created a class and put a SPAN around the k, which has
font-size: 1.3em and font-weight: 100 (although I have also tried
font-weight: lighter).
It doesn't seem any different!
Please have a look and tell me if you see the same thing, especially
in larger
Ann Adamcik wrote:
I'm sure this must be an faq, but I searched and didn't find
anything. If someone can point me in the right direction, I'd
really appreciate it!
I'm trying to implement the Son of Suckerfish dropdowns, and in IE
my second-level menu disappears if I mouse past the
Stuck.
I have created a monster in ie.http://www.dlaakso.com/chelsea.html.
Works as intended in Opera and the Gecko's
http://www.dlaakso.com/positioning.jpg.
The relevant code(embedded hidden from mac/ie5.2) is: div#content div
div div#thumbanchor
Fair warning: the code is not for the faint of
Hi all,
I'm usually good at working around bugs in IE's rendering engine, but this
one's got me stumped.
I've put up a simplified test case here: http://lyxus.net/cox [1]
I've got a dl element. Each of it's dt elements is floated left, while each
of the dd elements is floated right. The dt is
Oliver Hodgson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm usually good at working around bugs in IE's rendering engine, but
this one's got me stumped.
I've put up a simplified test case here: http://lyxus.net/cox [1]
I've got a dl element. Each of it's dt elements is floated left,
while each of the dd elements
Is there away to wrap an image in a container (span or div) without
having to give the span or div an explicit size?
DIVs by default, of course, are wrapping the height of the image just
fine, but want to take up the full horizontal space of the parent
container.
SPANs seem to be doing the
David Dorward wrote:
CSS 2 is the most recent (finished) version of CSS.
2.1 is currently a working draft.
3 is currently a large collection of different modules at different
stanges in development, but only four seem to have reached Candidate
Recomendation status (which I believe means
David Dorward wrote:
CSS 2 is the most recent (finished) version of CSS.
2.1 is currently a working draft.
3 is currently a large collection of different modules at different
stanges in development, but only four seem to have reached Candidate
Recomendation status (which I believe means
Zoe,
I agree that's the way it should work, but in reality it does not. In
FF and IE6, the select and input do not inherit:
http://www.msu.edu/~maziak/umg/selectInput3.html (I used a base of 10px,
and then a class of font-size:3em and color:red to be obvious.)
I'll stick with adding
Hello -
I am new to the list and a relative newbie to CSS - I'm at the tail end of
my first paid gig for the layout of a site and would appreciate feedback.
There are 3 stylesheets involved.
The big problem(s) I had (and still have) regard tables and form elements. I
wanted to avoid tables for
I'm trying to implement the Son of Suckerfish dropdowns, and in IE
my second-level menu disappears if I mouse past the first menu item.
The page is here:
http://indigopear.com/Clients/CollabMed/template.html css is here:
http://indigopear.com/Clients/CollabMed/style.css
You may want
Dartel,
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:16 PM, Austin, Darrel wrote:
Is there away to wrap an image in a container (span or div) without
having to give the span or div an explicit size?
...
SPANs seem to be doing the opposite...wrapping the width, but not the
height.
I would expect spans to wrap
Hi,
Looked for the list owner's address on the website and the joining
email but can't see it.
I am getting two copies of everything, a few minutes apart, but
I should only be signed up once.
Also, I got a mail sometime after my last posting, telling me
which addresses had not received it - I
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Koblentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've put up a simplified test case here: http://lyxus.net/cox [1]
I believe you'll get better results across browsers by
floating the DDs *left* as well.
I thought that had fixed it but alas not. While that works
I would expect spans to wrap with and height as long as you
count the
space for the tails of p and y as images sit in the text baseline.
Do you have a test page or other url we can play with?
http://www.darrelaustin.com/stuff/spanTest/
I have an image surrounded by 3 spans all with
Oliver Hodgson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Koblentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've put up a simplified test case here: http://lyxus.net/cox [1]
I believe you'll get better results across browsers by
floating the DDs *left* as well.
I thought that had fixed it but alas
Oliver Hodgson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Koblentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've put up a simplified test case here: http://lyxus.net/cox [1]
I believe you'll get better results across browsers by
floating the DDs *left* as well.
I thought that had fixed it but
Darrel,
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Austin, Darrel wrote:
I would expect spans to wrap with and height as long as you
count the
space for the tails of p and y as images sit in the text baseline.
Do you have a test page or other url we can play with?
on 3/13/2006 10:16 AM Austin, Darrel said the following:
Is there away to wrap an image in a container (span or div) without
having to give the span or div an explicit size?
What if you floated the div? That will shrink wrap the div to content.
--
Brian Funk
on 3/10/2006 4:47 PM Keith Cox said the following:
Would appreciate any comments or suggestions on
http://website1.keithcoxdesign.com
Site looks great in FF1.5 on Win2K until any kind of text size increase
is applied. Then the text breaks out all over
See screenshots below(only one ctr +
I have the following;
#footer a:link {
background-color : transparent;
color : #ff;
}
I use the W3C CSS Validation and it gives the warning;
Line : 211 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color :
#footer a:link
And yet there is a background-color, it's just
On 3/9/06, Christian Heilmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you nest a full menu in an inline element like span? Even more
interesting, how do you nest a lot of other links inside a link?
This solution helps for tooltips, not for menus...
Bury an ul inside it. Or rather: replace the span
On 13/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yet there is a background-color, it's just transparent. I understand
that it is only a warning, but does the validator not recognize
transparent as a color? I have several of the background-color warnings,
but I am supposing that the
Tony Crockford wrote:
As a side issue, why declare it as transparent when transparent is the
default? (topstyle user? - BTDT ;o) )
My guess would be that it overrides the normal a:link setting which might
indeed have a background color?
Hi I have a three column layout where I am placing two or three column
text in the main (center) column. These text areas floated left. It
works fine on all browsers except IE. I am trying to clear the float with
div style=clear: left/div
following each two or three column text area but it
Hi all...
After much hair-pulling I can't seem to find a fix for this...
www.ceridian.co.uk -
In the latest version of Opera I have overlapping problems on the images
contained inside the blue boxes which are on each of the top-level pages (and
the home page). I have tried adding
David Pratt wrote:
Hi I have a three column layout where I am placing two or
three column text in the main (center) column. These text
areas floated left. It works fine on all browsers except IE. I
am trying to clear the float with
div style=clear: left/div
following each two or three
On 13/03/06, Maziak, Peter (Tek Systems) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Older posts (circa 2002*) indicate there is no way to style border,
padding, z-index, etc on a SELECT in IE (because it is an active-x
control). Has anyone seen different since?
Not as far as I am aware, although there are
James Smith wrote:
www.ceridian.co.uk -
In the latest version of Opera I have overlapping problems on the
images contained inside the blue boxes...
The site works great in FF and IE (with hacks of course)
Sorry, but am I missing something here, or are you in the middle of a
live
Hi Els. I have tried both clear:left and clear:both. I will put
something up on a server shortly so you can see this. It is strictly an
IE Windows problem. The layout works properly on Safari, Netscape Win,
Firefox Win, Firefox Mac, Opera Win and Mac, and IE Mac. It works fine
on Windows
What if you floated the div? That will shrink wrap the div to content.
Yep. That did it. Thanks!
-Darrel
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub --
http://www.ceridian.co.uk
Georg wrote:
Sorry, but am I missing something here, or are you in the middle of alive
debugging-process?Opera 8.5 ( 9tp2) looks fine.IE6 looks fine - apart from
being given unreadable small text.Firefox 1.5.0.1. not good - image covers
text and menu drop-downs.Hi
James Smith wrote:
www.ceridian.co.uk -
I doubt that this problem is within CSS. Does Flash work with
wmode=transparent on Opera?
Don't know where to search for information.
MM website? Opera Forums?
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
James Smith wrote:www.ceridian.co.uk - I doubt that this problem is
within CSS. Does Flash work with wmode=transparent on Opera? Don't know
where to search for information. MM website? Opera Forums? Ingo
Hi Ingo, thanks for the idea, but I think the problem is with the CSS, because
Ingo Chao wrote:
I doubt that this problem is within CSS. Does Flash work with
wmode=transparent on Opera?
Sorry. Should read Does the Flash plugin work with wmode=transparent on
Opera for Mac 8.51/9TP2?. Can't check in PC for the moment.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
Are there any other tools out there that you're using (besides your
brains) that help you figure out the results of the cascade for
elements on a Web page?
do you have firefox? if so, this extension is invaluable to me:
http://forums.asp.net/1224049/ShowPost.aspx
Apparently this post has
On 13/03/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So currently it makes sense for CSS 2 to be the default profile.
Not so sure about that, as support by browsers is no good if designers
are thrown off by being told it isn't valid.
OTOH is it such a good idea to encourage the use of new
On 13/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#footer a:link {
background-color : transparent;
color : #ff;
}
I use the W3C CSS Validation and it gives the warning;
Line : 211 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color :
#footer a:link
And yet there is
James Smith wrote:
Hi Ingo, thanks for the idea, but I think the problem is with the
CSS, because it occurs on the other top-level pages which contain
images instead of flash - for example:
http://www.ceridian.co.uk/hr/nav/1,4102,108,00.html
You are right.
http://www.ceridian.co.uk/
Els wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
Stuck.
I have created a monster in
ie.http://www.dlaakso.com/chelsea.html. Works as intended in
Opera and the Gecko's http://www.dlaakso.com/positioning.jpg.
The relevant code(embedded hidden from mac/ie5.2) is: div#content
div div div#thumbanchor
AFAICS,
James Smith wrote:
I only just discovered that problem with Opera. I am using v.8.53 and
there is definitely a problem with the images overlapping the text.
Well, I never took Opera 8 (pre 9) seriously, but I could not see the
problem in my Opera 8.50 on win2K-pro. Looks and works the same as
David Dorward wrote:
OTOH is it such a good idea to encourage the use of new features
which aren't yet stable in the spec?
For commercial sites... maybe not. However, if we look at how much of
the 'stable css', that's in normal use, that's handled pretty unstable
by some browsers, then early
Hi Els. I put the file up at:
http://ce12566576.17.psi.zettai.net/test.html
I included the css in the html file to keep things as simple as possible
and included a three column text block. This layout only fails under IE
Windows. I am hoping this float issue is something that won't be too
Hi again,
Can anyone please help me solve the problem I'm seeing in Firefox -
it's got to be something to do with padding, margin, or border. I've
was up all last night trying to solve the @!*! thing, but just don't
seem to be able to find the root of the problem.
Screenshot from Firefox on
From: David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ce12566576.17.psi.zettai.net/test.html
included a three column text block. This layout only fails under IE
Windows. I am hoping this float issue is something that won't be too
difficult to resolve. I have tried the things I know to clear the left
On Monday, March 13, 2006, at 04:32 am, Felix Miata wrote:
Dropping Verdana and Helvetica from your styles would also be
excellent:
Hi Felix,
That's a shame... I use Verdana a lot. Although I have used Trebuchet
MS for the main text in this case, and Arial for the links. Verdana is
only
On 06/03/13 21:30 Tracy Shorrock apparently typed:
On Monday, March 13, 2006, at 04:32 am, Felix Miata wrote:
Dropping Verdana and Helvetica from your styles would also be
excellent:
That's a shame... I use Verdana a lot. Although I have used Trebuchet
MS for the main text in this case,
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Els. I put the file up at:
http://ce12566576.17.psi.zettai.net/test.html
I included the css in the html file to keep things as simple as possible
and included a three column text block. This layout only fails under IE
Windows. I am hoping this float issue is
Tracy Shorrock wrote:
Screenshot from Firefox on Mac:
http://www.freelancealot.co.uk/test/bleeding.jpg
http://www.freelancealot.co.uk/test/layout_2col.html.
http://www.freelancealot.co.uk/test/css/menuh.css.
If you look at the menu closely in Firefox as you move your mouse along
the ul ul
David Pratt wrote:
Holly Bergevin wrote:
From: David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ce12566576.17.psi.zettai.net/test.html
Hi Holly. This is really great! It is hard to see the forrest from the
trees at times. I guess I was too focused on believing it was a float
issue. This
Please remove me from the list.
Thanks,
Cory Perry
9mmCreative
http://www.9mmcreative.com/
864.905.4749
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub --
David Pratt wrote:
Holly Bergevin wrote:
From: David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ce12566576.17.psi.zettai.net/test.html
included a three column text block. This layout only fails under IE
Windows. I am hoping this float issue is something that won't be too
difficult to resolve. I have
From: David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. Just a note to say I have reposted the updated the page at:
http://ce12566576.17.psi.zettai.net/test.html
with the changes you have suggested. I have validated it for xhtml in
the meantime. There are still a couple of quirks in IE. I have not got
the
Are there any other tools out there that you're using (besides your
brains) that help you figure out the results of the cascade for
elements on a Web page?
do you have firefox? if so, this extension is invaluable to me:
http://forums.asp.net/1224049/ShowPost.aspx
Apparently this post
70 matches
Mail list logo
