);
} )
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 4 February 2015 at 00:10, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Philippe
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:05 PM Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com
wrote:
Le 4 févr. 2015 à 05:58, Tom Livingston
/cvys8e4n/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 13 January 2015 at 15:44, Tedd Sperling t...@sperling.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
I want to create an animated:hover with @keyframe
I'm amazed it took this long for a link to the W3 validator to creep into
the conversation. Maybe if we keep at it the list archives will trump
w3schools in search results?
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 11 January 2015 at 16:22, Tom
The email digest isn't overly intelligible, but from looking at the last
posts on the linked threads it seems 1049436 was closed as a duplicate
of 977063.
Couldn't find your name in either thread from a text search, so I don't
know which one is yours…
Salut Faramineux,
You can use display inline-block, left 50% (relative to offset parent) and
transform translateX( -50% ) (relative to self) to achieve this effect with
variable width: http://jsbin.com/ruwada/1/edit?css,output
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
to most description. BTW to avoid laborious load copy
pasting into validation services, you can get a direct HTTP reference to
jsbin markup via http://jsbin.com/{bin#}/{revision#}
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 17 December 2014 at 14:21
byte-saving – it's easier for most people to rationalise and
express a scale or a translation than it is to mentally model a matrix.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 27 November 2014 at 03:38, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote
://www.npmjs.org/package/gulp-css-validator
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 25 November 2014 at 15:50, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
As I often feel inclined to use vendor-prefixes in order to meet business
requirements, my CSS
I only run stylesheets through the validator when: 1) I can not find one
of my own disable this declaration markers, 2) I can not manage to debug
a problem in browsers locally, and/or 3) I have to share my CSS code with a
developer who is paranoid when it comes to validity -- something I am
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
…HTML 5, but ONLY if new elements such as audio, video or canvas are
required.
That's an interesting approach. Any particular reason not to use HTML5 at
all times?
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
collapses to linear, they look like calls to action to indicate
nested content (subsections, or something). Might be worth hiding them on
the smaller media queries?
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 30 October 2014 15:29, David Laakso
Because they are inline-block, they adopt some of the properties of inline
text: since there is white space between the divs in the HTML, it's also
appearing in the rendered document. You could edit the HTML to remove the
space (as seen here: http://jsfiddle.net/barney/d2zh48cy/) or use some of
,
Karl
Sent from losPhone
On Oct 6, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
CSS discuss often reminds me of my doctor, to whom I'll often go with
queries about an acute injury and come away with advice to stop smoking
– wise well
Yeah, the impression I get it is that they're not really concerned about
CSS validity. They do care about HTML validity, though – they use an
automated validation reporter (no more having to open email, scan email for
URL, paste URL into validator, copy link into email reply, hit send) for
their
a sucker for punishment ;)
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 7 October 2014 12:48, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
This begs the question: how much should one expound on browsers that one
is unfamiliar
and business-critical that the client will
happily use a specific browser version in order to guarantee expected
behaviour.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 7 October 2014 13:53, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
I'm
prefixed properties from the application lifecycle altogether.
Thanks for prompting!
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0313.html
On 7 Oct 2014 14:52, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/07/2014 03:23 PM, Barney Carroll wrote
on `.hover` panels. Remove
the `e.preventDefault()` invocation on line 22 and the links are functional.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 6 October 2014 09:44, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Bob Schwartz wrote:
I’m going slightly mad
losPhone
On Oct 6, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
CSS discuss often reminds me of my doctor, to whom I'll often go with
queries about an acute injury and come away with advice to stop smoking
– wise well-intentioned, but somewhat
. But that's true of anything: pre-processors are definitely not
scornful of this attitude; they offer a way to sustematise it.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
x x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x;
}
}
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
Please forgive the impertinent lurker here, but could somebody weigh in
with why relative measures are necessary when the desired outcome is
pixel-level accuracy?
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
Put display: block and text-align: center back on .progress-gallery-images
and display: inline-block back on .progress-gallery-image (and removed
their float: left), and it just worked!
http://jsfiddle.net/barney/Uuw29/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
Take any one of those results. Copy the code that rotates the image (it
will have the 'rotate' keyword in it). Leave out the code that animates the
rotation (it will have the keywords 'animation' or 'transition' in it).
__
While bikeshedding around 'how semantic' people feel any given element to
be is a great laugh (although definitely off-topic for this list), I would
highly recommend the HTML specification for insight into the purpose of any
HTML element, especially when confusion arises over the possibility of
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
Confirmed: /div closing tags aren't optional:
http://meiert.com/en/blog/20080601/optional-tags-in-html-4/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
tl;dr: David has discovered a bug in Chrome 31 whereby rules featuring
concurrent positioning pseudo-classes on the same element are removed from
the DOM when the affected element is hovered. In his example, you can see
this happen by hovering over the second list item and watching the caret
On 19 November 2013 14:01, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't vouch for hover as I don't see this element to begin with in
Chrome 31.
That's very interesting. This is what I get:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNyGy47YNHc
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429
,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 19 November 2013 15:40, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/19/13, 6:01 AM, MiB wrote:
nov 19 2013 14.55 Barney Carroll:
David has discovered a bug in Chrome 31 whereby rules featuring
concurrent
wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
: 999em (or something
equally large), then using transitions on that property? Chuck opacity in
and you've basically retired jQuery ;)
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss
/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
://www.campaignmonitor.com/guides/mobile/
[2] http://stylecampaign.com/
[3] http://htmlemailboilerplate.com/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
beginning with variable numbers of '', with hard returns all over the
place.
Ironically I wasn't all that interested in this thread until it became
completely unreadable to me.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
it
start to take effect.
Remove `clear: both` from the footer or `float: left` from the section and
the problem is resolved.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 20 September 2013 15:16, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On the page below
--
http://www.evolt.org/help_**support_evolt/http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
A portrait-oriented iPhone viewport is 320 (CSS) pixels wide, but the view
on the right is 480 wide (the same as a landscape-oriented iPhone
viewport). I don't know where the 530 came from.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 3 September 2013
to test :P
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
that some kind of hack (involving a hidden duplicate with relative
positioning above the real content div, then animating its max-height,
maybe?) involving max-height might come in handy?
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 28 August 2013 08:33
barneycarroll.comwith a web inspector for a live example — and resize
your browser a bit to
see it in action.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
table-cell display:
position: relative;
_left: 3px;
_margin-right: 3px;
Hope this helps!
[1] Documentation: https://github.com/stubbornella/oocss/wiki/Grids; Demo
(without IE-specific code): http://jsfiddle.net/barney/7Bd8V/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
The # symbol in a URL indicates content within a resource - it is most
often used to jump to content.
For example, the following link will take you to the wikipedia page
URI_scheme and scroll down to focus on the element with an ID of
Generic_syntax:
This is one of those cases where the syntax is so convoluted and forked I
can never remember it myself — but when I don't have SASS at my disposal I
always go to this tool:
www.colorzilla.com/gradient-editor/
It even throws in IE filter and svg data-uri polyfills!
On Jun 5, 2013 10:58 PM, Angela
/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 8 May 2013 03:44, Anna Gav agav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Re: http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/703/sdfdsf.png
I need to reproduce the functionality demonstrated in this image. The
requirements
://www.apple.com/uk/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 23 April 2013 11:13, Anton Steiner oe2...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hello
CSS3 transitions are very amazing and i would try it for a
search-bar. But the bar shoud expand to left. Is this possible
Sadly, IE will need Javascript to achieve this, in the form of listening
for the `focus` event for each such element and triggering `blur` on it.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
'
is.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 5 March 2013 13:10, David grovesda...@linkhomes2000.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
Files is here: http://www.linkhomes2000.co.**uk/main/calculators/**
linkmortgagecalcstart_005.phphttp://www.linkhomes2000.co.uk
is to reply to all and not to top-post (as I
mistakenly did), and only to include past messages as part of your own
unless you're replying inline (like this). Official list policies are here
FYI:
http://www.css-discuss.org/policies.html
Barney Carroll Wrote : I'm sure what you're trying to do can be done
On Feb 22, 2013 8:36 PM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
Apart from the issue whether it is a good ideas to size fonts in pixels,
the question arises why one would use fractions of a pixel, in 24.5px,
which might get rounded to 24px or 25px (or dealt with in some other way).
One
I believe you'd need to use IE's own transformation filters.
Because there's a slight difference in implementation as regards assumed
transformation point-of-origin, this tool comes in incredibly handy for
doing the maths:
http://www.useragentman.com/IETransformsTranslator/
Regards,
Barney
Thierry wrote up an excellent technique for this that is incidentally very
useful when scaling embedded media. The linked article frames it in that
context, but the principles are the same: a padding property percentage
will take relative width as its reference:
Ah no. This is the crux of it: you need additional markup for the scaffold.
A parent with relativity and containment, a semantically useless child with
the padding, and your second child taking advantage of the resulting shape
to hold the genuine contents. I was thinking of adding the disclaimer:
:47, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
More colourful demo:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/bc_table-form.html
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
The CSS needs to be contained in a style element.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
-- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
What do you want them to line up with? It's all relative…
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies --
would allow normal line breaking and restore normal
table layout.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 14 December 2012 14:18, Dana B designdeli...@gmail.com wrote:
each other... like usual in left-justified text...
thanks
typos via my
Table layouts are really tough like that. You never know what's going to
work!
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 14 December 2012 16:00, Dana B designdeli...@gmail.com wrote:
I was mistaken -- Barney was correct. No more problem!
Thanks
-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
don't give two hoots about specification-validity
but live and die by the pragmatism of their junk ;), you're looking in the
wrong place.
You may find what you're looking for here, though:
http://csslint.net/
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
Nope!
The position was relative anyway — a new rule matching a selector does not
override all previous rules: it extends them (individual properties will be
over-written).
The W3C validator takes the sum of all things and statically analyses to
see if there’s anything invalid in there at all.
at the
bottom.
And when it comes to inheriting code that doesn't match my own style, my
rule of thumb is to leave it be unless it causes problems and I feel
confident I understand and can circumvent the underlying reasons behind it.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
.
Better the devil you know, in any case — at the moment I'm wrestling with
buggy Android WebKit box model issues relating to transform, and it's not
pretty — neither is it documented. Here again, W3C validity is little
comfort.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
On 1 November 2012 01:08, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
If I understand correctly (no Android based device to test over here),
Android default browser treats the inner width of .tabs as the total of
your 3 ‘columns’ for the purpose of the translate3d transform ?
Yes, that's
great example of Opera bringing huge
unasked-for gifts to the table.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
not
mentioned in the afore-linked specification.
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
by evolt.org --
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
://www.zeldman.com/2012/03/01/replacing-the-px-hack-new-image-replacement/)
— what do you reckon to the HTML5 boilerplate method Snook came up
with? (http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/hiding-content-for-accessibility)
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
Hi Gabriele,
This question has been much on my mind – I've experimented with a lot
of methods and to be perfectly honest I'm still experimenting project
by project. Pertinently, an interesting article recently appeared on
the Opera development blog about just this subject [1].
Generally what I
to express the numeric character with
unicode escaping (rather than simply preceding with an escape
character), but otherwise it is likely no!
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css
://jsfiddle.net/barney/BHWYP/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
Felix, this is the reason I subscribe to the list. Thanks for such a
comprehensive answer – there's loads here I didn't know. It's amazing how
much bizarre standard practice comes from a perceived need for retroactive
continuity with a minority of sites that make terrible mistakes.
Break the
http://ripple.tinyhippos.com/
For Webkit-based Blackberrys, at least, Ripple is officially supported by
RIM, who manufacture Blackberries. Which is a good start.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
Hey W,
Stylesheets are often unreliable in email clients. For many things,
you have to bring the styles inline – img style=display:block
src=blah alt=blah /
There's a handy guide to various cross-client compatibility over here:
http://htmlemailboilerplate.com/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
of the same name, whereas -webkit-border-radius implies
partial or buggy support and/or an implementation based on an
unfinished specification – so you would want the former to take
precedence if available.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
to be
abreast of latest implementations, I highly recommend
http://css3please.com.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
So effectively, you wish to make #fixed variable? ;)
The trick to this is to set a max-width in combination with margin-left and
-right set to auto. See barneycarroll.com for a working example: the content is
never wider than the viewport, but remains centred on wider screens.
Regards,
Barney
Is this normal behaviour?
Yes. The fact that div displays block and span displays inline by
default is down to browser stylesheet defaults. head and its
contents display none by default.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
Hi Philip,
1) The odd word grouping is down to whitespace rules on links. I've always
found it disconcerting reading when links run across a line break, but
perhaps I need to take care to keep them short if I'm going to force
continuity.
2) The experience is a far longer section than the
Hiya Micky,
I always forget that a reply on this list won't reply to the list. Sorry.
As for margins with columns, I think the best idea is to create children
wrappers within the columns and give them margins — the parent wrapper has
the proportional width relative to the parent, while the child
Every now and then, when I'm reading other peoples'/companies' css code,
i see this !important thing added to the end of some of the lines in css.
What does it do/change?
Hiya David,
The !important flag, when appended to a CSS property, makes the declaration
take precedence over all
arbitrary classnames? .guerrilla
sounds pretty cool to me.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 19 February 2012 08:45, Graham Hays
graham.h...@visualcomputing.co.uk wrote:
Hi all
Can anyone advise if there is a master list somewhere of id
and hinders the user.
But these are ultimately kill-joy arguments rooted in vague
unsubstantiated opinions on minor usability concerns.
[1] http://elliotjaystocks.com/blog/css-transitions-media-queries/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 19 February
Hiya Ellen,
Google search for html5shiv print revealed this:
https://github.com/aFarkas/html5shiv/blob/master/src/html5shiv-printshiv.js
Don't have a printer at hand to test but by all accounts it seems vetted by the
experts…
Regards,
Barney Carroll
(+44) 742 9177 278
On 18 Feb 2012, at 08
don't want to continuously add and
remove markup. Would the style snippet article{visibility:hidden}
article.active{visibility:visible} be effective enough to restrict
keyboard access as I've described? Are there any other accessiblity
caveats with this method that anyone can think of?
Regards,
Barney
,
Barney Carroll
(+44) 742 9177 278
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
Secondly, if you guys, who wish to drop IE6, wish to work with APAC
customers, that might be a tad problematic to have both wishes granted at
the same time. Last week I was able to see what browsers several large
Asian companies tend to use. IE6 - IE8. 20% IE6, 20% IE7, 30% IE8, rest -
other
That's odd. Confirming Chrome bugs is a bit of a pain because of the incredibly
regular silent updates. Getting the particular versions necessary to isolate
what the bug affects would be difficult — but on the plus side you can usually
wait a week and have it resolve itself ;)
The misleading implication with this news from MS is that users who have been
inexplicably stuck on IE6 will all be moved forward by this. The sad fact is a
lot of IE6 is intentional lock in. Here in the UK almost all government
employees have it as their only browser — and that's a matter of
Does it mean that, after MS takes these steps, we can basically forget about
hacking and kudging our sites to work with IE 6?
No.
Microsoft have yet to explain exactly how these updates will be
introduced (particularly for XP users). The idea is that Internet
Explorer updates, including whole
Sounds from your comments that some/many companies feel that IE6 usage is so
insignificant as to make accommodating it to be more costly than any benefit
gotten from the accommodation.
Is that the feeling?
I work for a digital marketing agency that churns out a fairly large number of
.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported
of the cascade.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
on
alistapart.com. Responsive Web Design and the earlier Fluid Grids articles show
a huge experience and massive insight on these matters.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
(+44) 742 9177 278
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
Hiya John,
My tentative answer to that question would be 'yes' ;)
Can you be a bit more specific about your particular intentions and concerns?
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
07594 506 381
__
css-discuss
://bostonglobe.com/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
(+44) 742 9177 278
On 7 Nov 2011, at 15:34, e...@copywritecolombia.com wrote:
Basically don't resize images it is a waste of bandwidth just download the
image once in the right size for your design and be done with it
--Mensaje original
Hiya Jon, currently only possible in iOS5 Safari with
-webkit-overflow-scrolling: bounce;
This needs to be on top of overflow: scroll.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
(+44) 742 9177 278
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
the
presence of mind to change it, it prevents the list archives getting bogged
down with complaints at other defaults, like all my software's top-posting and
my awful sense of humour ;)
Regards,
Barney Carroll
(+44) 742 9177 278
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
