Jeralyn Merideth wrote:
I have tested on IE 5.5, 6, and 7...the current versions of Firefox and
Opera. Could someone please test on older browsers and the Mac please?
http://www.servcon.net/new/index.htm
TIA,
Jeralyn
27 screen captures
On 23-Mar-07, at 10:53 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
Both Opera and IE increase em-based font sizes by 25%,...
Hello,
Is that a generally true statement? Or was it in reference only to
the site under discussion?
I ask because I'm having a problem with button text sliding out to
the right of
Rob Stevenson wrote:
On 23-Mar-07, at 10:53 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
Both Opera and IE increase em-based font sizes by 25%,...
Hello,
Is that a generally true statement? Or was it in reference only to
the site under discussion?
I ask because I'm having a problem with button
On 3/23/07, David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
I took a look at your page on my laptop with IE7 and Opera 9:
http://www.melissagerstein.com/tests/akon/akon.htm
Because I have a high-definition screen, Windows is set to 120 DPI.
Both Opera and IE increase em-based font
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:04:34 -0300, Rob Stevenson wrote:
On 23-Mar-07, at 10:53 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
Both Opera and IE increase em-based font sizes by 25%,...
Hello,
Is that a generally true statement? Or was it in reference only to the site
under
discussion?
That is universally
On 24-Mar-07, at 10:36 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
PS Thou shalt not steal the thread :-) .
Sorry! Enthusiasm made me do it.
Back to your regularly scheduled programming
Rob
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jeffrey,
I took a look at your page on my laptop with IE7 and Opera 9:
http://www.melissagerstein.com/tests/akon/akon.htm
Because I have a high-definition screen, Windows is set to 120 DPI.
Both Opera and IE increase em-based font sizes by 25%, so the alphabet
spills onto two lines. Worse,
hi everyone,
i'm working on this page
http://www.melissagerstein.com/tests/akon/akon.htm
and when i switch back and forth with the ff extension ie tab i see a
problem with the top navigation. (alphabet)
the problem is the spacing between the alphabet links varies between ie and
ff. i switched
I recently converted a website I use from tables to CSS to improve the code
mess that was on the page and try to get it more search engine friendly.
Actually I have just the template done and will begin a change over as soon
as I get a few checks and recommendations.
Erik Visser wrote:
This might be a slow road for really mastering webdevelopment (xhtml
/ css / etc.). But it makes it possible (in the time available to me)
to better myself while developing websites for customers.
Any thoughts from the gurus on this appproach?
I'm no guru, but I think
Hi All
I thought I had this site finished but it seems there might be some
problems with it.
This is what it should look like:
http://woodland.lostwithiel.org.uk/Picture1.jpg
Can you tell me if you are seeing this please and if not any ideas why please?
http://woodland.lostwithiel.org.uk/
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
http://24-10reading.nl/
Too many back and forth corrections between browsers for my taste, so
I leave the rest to others.
Georg,
what do you mean exactly with this?
Erik
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
~davidLaakso wrote:
Erik Visser wrote:
A site check please for anoter site i recently finished:
http://24-10reading.nl/
Any remarks, also on the design are very welcome.
Thanks, Erik Visser
She did well on my end (xp) in ie/7., opera/9.1, and ff (version
whatever it is). In ie/6.0
Daniel Beardsmore wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
However, with both of your sites (and this is a personal opinion that is
not shared by all on this or any other list), I find sites that require
both horizontal and vertical scrolling when the fonts are scaled to be
bothersome.
Not just font
Erik Visser wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
http://24-10reading.nl/
Too many back and forth corrections between browsers for my taste, so
I leave the rest to others.
what do you mean exactly with this?
Only that I personally found it hard to keep track of what was targeting
which browser where
bill scheider wrote:
I really like the design of the site; it has a nice, open feel that I like.
That's exactly what my cliennt was after. But it takes a lot of space as
you noticed.
The same as David noted, in IE6 on xp on my machine, the left side logo
starts to disappear at text-size
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Erik Visser wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
http://24-10reading.nl/
Too many back and forth corrections between browsers for my taste, so
I leave the rest to others.
what do you mean exactly with this?
Only that I personally found it hard to keep track of what was
Daniel Beardsmore wrote:
Hm ... I am no expert, but the design seems simple enough to me that it
should reduce in width quite a bit more.
agreed
lots of whitespace everywhere to reduce
I don't know why it stops at ~850px.
me neither, but i should look into that later.
Personally I
sorry, this mail was meant to be sent offlist
Erik Visser wrote:
Daniel Beardsmore wrote:
Hm ... I am no expert, but the design seems simple enough to me that it
should reduce in width quite a bit more.
agreed
lots of whitespace everywhere to reduce
I don't know why it stops at
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi All
I thought I had this site finished but it seems there might be some
problems with it.
This is what it should look like:
http://woodland.lostwithiel.org.uk/Picture1.jpg
Can you tell me if you are seeing this please and if not any ideas why please?
OK, three
Hello dear members,
A site check please for anoter site i recently finished:
http://24-10reading.nl/
http://24-10reading.nl/css/style.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/makeup.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/menu.css
!--[if lt IE 7]
http://24-10reading.nl/css/ie.css
Any remarks, also on the design
Erik Visser wrote:
Hello dear members,
A site check please for anoter site i recently finished:
http://24-10reading.nl/
http://24-10reading.nl/css/style.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/makeup.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/menu.css
!--[if lt IE 7]
http://24-10reading.nl/css/ie.css
Erik Visser wrote:
A site check please for anoter site i recently finished:
http://24-10reading.nl/
Any remarks, also on the design are very welcome.
Thanks, Erik Visser
She did well on my end (xp) in ie/7., opera/9.1, and ff (version
whatever it is). In ie/6.0 at /text-size largest/,
~davidLaakso wrote:
However, with both of your sites (and this is a personal opinion that is
not shared by all on this or any other list), I find sites that require
both horizontal and vertical scrolling when the fonts are scaled to be
bothersome.
Not just font size but window size. I
A site check please for anoter site i recently finished:
http://24-10reading.nl/
http://24-10reading.nl/css/style.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/makeup.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/menu.css
!--[if lt IE 7]
http://24-10reading.nl/css/ie.css
Any remarks, also on the design are very welcome.
A site check please for anoter site i recently finished:
http://24-10reading.nl/
http://24-10reading.nl/css/style.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/makeup.css
http://24-10reading.nl/css/menu.css
!--[if lt IE 7]
http://24-10reading.nl/css/ie.css
I forgot to add: In IE6 at all text sizes, I'm
bill scheider wrote:
I forgot to add: In IE6 at all text sizes, I'm getting a vertical scroll bar
that runs down 60 pages (hit page-down 60 times!). I expected that I'd find
a footer down there at the end, but no-go. So besides the lo-o-o-o-ong page,
in IE6 xp, there is no footer.
Hm, so
A PostScript of my own:
http://24-10reading.nl/wordpr/
This page works in IE 6. The blue bar works, the footer appears, and you don't
get 50-60 empty pages.
You might want to use this as a reference page.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
http://24-10reading.nl/
bill scheider wrote:
I forgot to add: In IE6 at all text sizes, I'm getting a vertical
scroll bar that runs down 60 pages (hit page-down 60 times!). I
expected that I'd find a footer down there at the end, but no-go. So
besides the lo-o-o-o-ong page, in IE6 xp, there
Erik Visser wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
Erik Visser wrote:
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl
Nice job, Erik.
thanks
There is a minor issue (if you even want to call it that) with a
sidebar in place in viewing some pages with images in ie/7.0.
some?
not
~davidLaakso wrote:
As of this writing, I no longer see that problem in ie/7.0 on any page.
i did not change anything
my ultimate dream (as a developer): self correcting code
and thus:
css Pro 2001.0
and XHTML 2000.0
compliant code
wow ;-)
thanks Erik
Hello dear members,
A site check please for this site that i finished:
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl/css/style.css
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl/css/makeup.css
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl/css/menu.css
!--[if lt IE 8]
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl/css/ie.css
Any
Erik Visser wrote:
A site check please for this site that i finished:
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl
Thanks, Erik Visser
Nice job, Erik.
It does well in XP :: ie/7.0, ie/6.0, opera/9.1, and ff; and, read well
in Lynx.
There is a minor issue (if you even want to call it that) with a
~davidLaakso wrote:
Erik Visser wrote:
http://www.ottermeerhoeve.nl
Nice job, Erik.
thanks
There is a minor issue (if you even want to call it that) with a
sidebar in place in viewing some pages with images in ie/7.0.
some?
not all pages with photos you viewed?
if so, strange...
if
I am trying my first go at a completely tableless standards based design
and I think that overall it's worked out pretty good despite some of my
inexperience with this new way of thinking. Now I am struggling with my
hover background images on rollover disappearing when they are not
active in
On 2/21/07, Nic Pulford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the comments.
The top header is a fixed and the text is meant to scroll under it. That
it has a transparent edge is what is meant to make it different.
Font size changes are targeted at the different sizes screens rather than
Can someone check this site template out please.
http://www.lasadev.com/NewLasa/
I have looked at IE 7.0 Opera and Firefox on PC's the Mac is where it needs
checking. Sorry it has a lot of java in it, it is supposed to change size as
you reduce screen size. It does not go down to PDA screen
On 2/20/07, Nic Pulford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone check this site template out please.
http://www.lasadev.com/NewLasa/
[...]
The top image gets in the way of the text when I scroll down on Firefox
2.0.0.1. This is quite an annoyance! Is this intended behavior? The rest
of the
Hi,
All looks fine on IE6/Win. Nice site!
Kind Regards
Robin
On 2/14/07, Jehangir Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parag Jagdale wrote:
I dont think your css is linked right - the styles are not applied at
all.
Parag
No stylesheet is fine...please recheck?
Thanks
_j[_
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
Problem:
FF2 on XP SP2 throws the google search box up towards the header;
instead of below the navigation menu in left sidebar, as intended.
IE7 shows it fine!
The styles were not loaded at all because of a server
Ingo Chao wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
Problem:
FF2 on XP SP2 throws the google search box up towards the header;
instead of below the navigation menu in left sidebar, as intended.
IE7 shows it fine!
The styles were not loaded at all
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
Problem:
FF2 on XP SP2 throws the google search box up towards the header;
instead of below the navigation menu in left sidebar, as intended.
IE7 shows it fine!
Many TIA
-
_j[_
Larry
The search
~davidLaakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
Problem:
FF2 on XP SP2 throws the google search box up towards the header;
instead of below the navigation menu in left sidebar, as intended.
IE7 shows it fine!
Many TIA
-
_j[_
Jehangir Larry wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
The footer is the one that is not working for me but thats purely
subjective.
Regards.
_j[_
Then one or both of us has made a mistake somewhere along the line.
I think
~davidLaakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
The footer is the one that is not working for me but thats purely
subjective.
Regards.
_j[_
Then one or both of us has made a mistake somewhere
Jehangir Larry wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
J
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
The footer is the one that is not working for me but thats purely
subjective.
Regards.
_j[_
Then one or both of us has made a mistake somewhere along the line.
I think the footer is
~davidLaakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
J
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
The footer is the one that is not working for me but thats purely
subjective.
Regards.
_j[_
Then one or both of us has made a mistake somewhere along the line.
I
Grateful for a site check http://www.teerthyatri.com
Problem:
FF2 on XP SP2 throws the google search box up towards the header;
instead of below the navigation menu in left sidebar, as intended.
IE7 shows it fine!
Many TIA
-
_j[_
Larry
I dont think your css is linked right - the styles are not applied at all.
Parag
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List
Parag Jagdale wrote:
I dont think your css is linked right - the styles are not applied at
all.
Parag
No stylesheet is fine...please recheck?
Thanks
_j[_
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/10/07, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#mainrightcol {margin: 0; overflow: hidden; padding-left: 20px; height: 1%;}
* html #mainrightcol {overflow: visible;}
#menu a {height: 1%;}
- The first line simply isolates the #mainrightcol and adjust its
spacing. This affects all
Robin Fisher wrote:
Do you know why there is a couple of extra pixels under the header
image? Firefox is respecting a max-height declaration of 150px but
IE seems to be adding 3 pixels.
Depending on font-size...
An image is 'inline' by default, and that is the space reserved for
Hi all
We have just completed a redesign/redevelopment of the
www.amplify.com.auwebsite, and would appreciate any feedback,
especially from Mac users.
Many thanks
--
Scott Swabey
www.lafinboy.com
www.thought-after.com
__
Scott Swabey wrote:
We have just completed a redesign/redevelopment of the
www.amplify.com.auwebsite, and would appreciate any feedback,
especially from Mac users.
IE5/Mac = totally broken - unusable.
IE6 = not lining up correctly in the top part, and dropping main parts
on narrow windows -
Hi All,
This is my first proper project and would like a quick check just on
the homepage particularly in relation to IE 6 7.
I've been using Browsercam to check and I've noted some problems
particularly with regards to the right column and the navigation menu.
Any advice in this regard would
Robin Fisher wrote:
This is my first proper project and would like a quick check just
on the homepage particularly in relation to IE 6 7.
Nice project.
I've been using Browsercam to check and I've noted some problems
particularly with regards to the right column and the navigation
menu.
I'm going to release this site in a few months when I get more content
on it, can you all take a look? ANY suggestions will be appreciated
(design, code, features, etc)
I am going to have multiple stylesheets for this page (one will be
liquid, one will be 3 column, etc) This is the first design.
Hi everyone-
Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
Especially on a mac and IE 7.
Thanks.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information --
Hi everyone-
Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
Especially on a mac and IE 7.
Thanks.
No problems in Safari, Camino and FF on Mac.
Cheers
George
www.shapeshed.com | Web and Graphic Design
__
Seems fine in IE7
On 1/26/07, Taryn Regish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone-
Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
Especially on a mac and IE 7.
--
Chris Ovenden
http://thepeer.blogspot.com
Imagine all the people / Sharing all the world
Taryn Regish wrote:
Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
Especially on a mac and IE 7.
re: xp
Performed well for me in ie/7.0 through ie/5.01. FWIW, there are
vertical gaps between the menu items in ie/5.01, but the menu and pages
are perfectly usable. There is an interesting
Hello Taryn,
Friday, January 26, 2007, 1:33:55 PM, you wrote:
Hi everyone-
Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
Especially on a mac and IE 7.
using:
Laptop 1680x1050 132% normal Size (127 dpi)Windows XP SP2
IE7
Note I'm using a laptop contrast light Grey/white for reading
Hi Rich
Could you please do a site check on this site please:
http://www.efe-gbnets.com/
Css is contained in the header. Sources are:
http://blog.html.it/layoutgala/
for the layout.
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/
for the menus.
The issues relating to the css are the space
Hello Richard,
Friday, January 5, 2007, 10:32:12 AM, you wrote:
Hi All
Could you please do a site check on this site please:
http://www.efe-gbnets.com/
Css is contained in the header. Sources are:
http://blog.html.it/layoutgala/
for the layout.
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/
Richard Brown wrote:
Could you please do a site check on this site please:
http://www.efe-gbnets.com/
The issues relating to the css are the space above the first nav box
should not be there.
I guess you mean in ie?
Add this ruleset to kill the ie margin:
form { margin: 0; } add to close gap
Mary Ellen Curtin wrote:
Yes! that works. I still don't understand why the login box's
position:absolute caused the problem -- I mean, pos:abs is supposed
to take it right out of the document flow, right?
Yes, but absolute positioned elements are positioned relative to
something, and the
Please take a look at:
http://csufresno.edu/friendsforce/layout.php
In Firefox it looks good (except for the bottom right columns). In IE
6 the background on the #content-home div is not showing.
I tried overflow:auto on the content-home div which has two floating
divs nested inside it, but it
On 20/12/06, Kenny Meyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm having significant issues with IE6 and have looked through the
archives and maybe I'm not seeing it but I can't find a solution to the
problem.
www.realestatejourney.com
The content area moves to the bottom of the page.
Kenny Meyers wrote:
I'm having significant issues with IE6 and have looked through the
archives and maybe I'm not seeing it but I can't find a solution to the
problem.
www.realestatejourney.com
The content area moves to the bottom of the page.
Kenny Meyers
I regret is not only an
~davidLaakso wrote:
www.realestatejourney.com
The content area moves to the bottom of the page.
I regret is not only an ie/6.0 problem. This happens on most all of
your pages in compliant browsers with font-scaling, too. You may need
to re-think the structure of the page layout(s).
Hi Giovanni
Good effort!
In Firefox 2 on Mac the two boxes with titles In Rilievo. Not sure if this
is deliberate?
There is also an error in your javascript:
elt.ownerDocument.defaultView has no properties (lib.js line 951)
Cheers
George
Shape Shed | http://www.shapeshed.com
Giovanni Intini wrote:
Hi all, I need some suggestions for this page I designed:
http://adriaticamalagoli.it/cerco
1) Do you think I implemented the form correctly? I used a lot of css and
the end result is a table. Maybe I could use a table there?
2) What do you think of the overall design?
Giovanni,
Hi all, I need some suggestions for this page I designed:
http://adriaticamalagoli.it/cerco
1) Do you think I implemented the form correctly? I used a lot of css and
the end result is a table. Maybe I could use a table there?
The form looks great on XP/FF2. However as I don't
I need checks on Macs and in IE7 mainly, but I would love as many checks as
possible. Our CMS software adds some tables and extra code that I am wading
through, but I think it's only affecting styling, hopefully the main layout
is stable. Screenshots would be helpful if you notice any problems.
Chris Broadfoot wrote:
David
Thanks for the site check.
and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS valid.
Valid, yes, but why are there so many empty spans in there?
Image replacement, mostly.
OK.
I'd suggest turning of the full justification on the text in your
Wonderbaby Designs wrote:
I need checks on Macs and in IE7 mainly, but I would love as many checks as
possible. Our CMS software adds some tables and extra code that I am wading
through, but I think it's only affecting styling, hopefully the main layout
is stable. Screenshots would be helpful
http://209.59.136.73/
As for the border extending down try placing the overflow: hidden;
rule on #SOWrap and see if that helps. I notice that in IE6 also
while the page doesn't scroll as far as in IE7 the border still
extends to the bottom of the body, hopefully whatever fixes IE7 will
Yikes - my mistake!
My pocket dictionary didn't have that alternate spelling, but you're right,
the full-size version does.
Thanks for the site check.
Your menu button for ENROLLMENTS has a typo.
I'm sorry, where is this typo?
Enrolments is the correct spelling and as far as I can see,
Rob O'Rourke wrote:
Wonderbaby Designs wrote:
I need checks on Macs and in IE7 mainly, but I would love as many checks as
possible. Our CMS software adds some tables and extra code that I am wading
through, but I think it's only affecting styling, hopefully the main layout
is stable.
Robin,
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:04 AM, Wonderbaby Designs wrote:
I need checks on Macs and in IE7 mainly, but I would love as many
checks as
possible. Our CMS software adds some tables and extra code that I
am wading
through, but I think it's only affecting styling, hopefully the
main
-Original Message-
From: Roger Roelofs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:07 PM
http://209.59.136.73/
Mac checks in Safari2, ff2, Opera9, all match. ICab displays well
except that the columns/footer stuff are _way_ down the page.
Do you mean that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've just finished this website, and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS valid.
I've tried to make the site as accessible as I can, but I'm requesting a
site check just in case I've missed anything.
Regards
Chris
Hi Chris,
General
Wonderbaby Designs wrote:
I need checks on Macs and in IE7...]
http://209.59.136.73/
Robin~
She's fine in ie/6.0. But I regret the right column text is not
appearing in ie/7.0.
captures: http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=308005
Regards,
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've just finished this website,
I suggest putting the site link in the email body, some mail clients may
not readily allow copying and pasting from the subject line!
http://www.nsbhs.nsw.edu.au
and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS
I've just finished this website, and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS valid.
Your menu button for ENROLLMENTS has a typo.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, I need some suggestions for this page I designed:
http://adriaticamalagoli.it/cerco
1) Do you think I implemented the form correctly? I used a lot of css and
the end result is a table. Maybe I could use a table there?
2) What do you think of the overall design?
Thanks everyone for giving feedback!
A.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ --
Using Safari Version 2.0.4 (419.3) on my Mac, the only problem I see
is the Access the Intranet at home box on the index page. The header
wraps and actually the word home obscures Username.
Otherwise, it looks good. Nice and clean.
--
Bill Napier
http://www.billnapierdesign.com
David
Thanks for the site check.
and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS valid.
Valid, yes, but why are there so many empty spans in there?
Image replacement, mostly.
I'd suggest turning of the full justification on the text in your
column. You don't have enough
www.arnoenzerink.com
Mainly in MAC environment.
TIA,
M.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ --
On 12/11/06, Fora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
www.arnoenzerink.com
Mainly in MAC environment.
TIA,
M.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information --
Fora wrote:
www.arnoenzerink.com
Mainly in MAC environment.
TIA,
M.
Can't speak for Mac users.
xp: ie/7, ff/2, opera/9.02.
No flash installed and no-pops allowed on any browsers on this end.
Worked fine.
Best, ~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Only the front page is flash. There's a link on the bottom of the page to
skip the flash.
I'm really wondering about the pop up It doesn't show on my end here,
nor in my code...
No flash installed and no-pops allowed on any browsers on this end.
Worked fine.
No, it's not the hosting company.
I have webstats running invisibly in a hidden div. I think that's what
triggers the pop-up.
It's taken away now.
If someone can check again?
snip
When I checked it tried to pop two adds up. Could be the hosting company
doing it?
/snip
Hi Fora
On 11/12/06, Fora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's not the hosting company.
I have webstats running invisibly in a hidden div. I think that's what
triggers the pop-up.
It's taken away now.
If someone can check again?
snip
When I checked it tried to pop two adds up. Could be the
Hi all,
I've just finished this website, and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS valid.
I've tried to make the site as accessible as I can, but I'm requesting a
site check just in case I've missed anything.
Regards
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've just finished this website, and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS valid.
I've tried to make the site as accessible as I can, but I'm requesting a
site check just in case I've missed anything.
Regards
Chris
Works for me Chris,
Please, would you take a look at www.zangthal.co.uk any comments/suggestions
would be of interest.
BTW the styling of the contact page's script hasn't been finished yet.
Maybe off-topic but one possible problem is for the line in .htaccess
RewriteRule .*\.(gif|jpg|pdf)$
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi All
On 29/11/06, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://alexander.cregy.net/
http://alexander.cregy.net/wp-content/themes/ThirdSite/style.css
Thanks to all who responded.
I feel like the last man standing: :-)
Some folks are going to have
Hello,
I think everything validate as XHTML 1.0 Strict .
Could you please tell whats wrong and how to fix it and where I need to
improve ? http://home.comcast.net/%7Es.oravec/example.html
or
At least point me in the right direction.
501 - 600 of 1438 matches
Mail list logo
