René Berber wrote:
Scott Fordin wrote: [snip]
Strange thing though is that it does work on another machine.
Very strange, the differences you sent don't show an invalid script
at all. One of the 2 files has \r\n endings (that's the reason for
the first 2 differences) but as long as they are b
Scott Fordin wrote:
[snip]
> Strange thing though is that it does work on another machine.
Very strange, the differences you sent don't show an invalid script at all.
One of the 2 files has \r\n endings (that's the reason for the first 2
differences) but as long as they are being executed by co
René Berber wrote:
Scott Fordin wrote:
Thanks again for replying, René. Sorry it took me a couple of
days to get back to you. My responses are embedded below.
OK, it seems that the startxserver is not even a valid script (I
haven't tested, I don't have Singular, I'm saying that from the
resul
Scott Fordin wrote:
> Thanks for replying, René. My responses are embedded inline.
>
> René Berber wrote:
>>> When I tried running the C:\cygwin\lib\Singular\startxserver.bat
>> -^
>> That is not from the Cygwin distribution.
>
> Du
Thanks for replying, René. My responses are embedded inline.
René Berber wrote:
When I tried running the C:\cygwin\lib\Singular\startxserver.bat
-^
That is not from the Cygwin distribution.
Dunno. I ran the latest official Cygwin
Scott Fordin wrote:
> I just rebuilt my Win2K machine and did a fresh install of all
> packages in the Cygwin and Cygwin-X 1.5.21 distributions.
>
> When I tried running the C:\cygwin\lib\Singular\startxserver.bat
-^
That is not from