Le sam. 4 janv. 2020 à 09:53, Timur Irikovich Davletshin <
timur.davlets...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Wow, I'm not used to this approach in darktable.
>
lot of surprises !
>
> Best wishes for this year!
>
The same for you ;)
__
Hi,
Because you can now adjust it from the gui by grabbing the limit and move
it around...
J-L
Le sam. 4 janv. 2020 à 09:19, Timur Irikovich Davletshin <
timur.davlets...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Good Saturday morning dear developers!
>
> What is the reason of removing adjustable panel width in re
Hello,
It's a java issue.I'm also on Manjaro, latest version.Which jdk are you
running ?To know it :$ archlinux-java statusAvailable Java
environments: java-10-openjdk java-11-openjdk (default) java-8-
openjdk
I have no issue, neither with java 8 nor with java 11
To switch the default jdk :
on uppercase
letters.
So, maybe there is this kind of a *rule* in other languages also.
Regards
Jean-Luc
Le mer. 11 déc. 2019 à 11:25, Pascal Obry a écrit :
> Hi Pierre,
>
> > I will update the German translation accordingly in the next few days.
>
> Note that this rule i
colour "ribbon" use very subdued colours and the
picked value is marked with a thin white vertical bar.
This does not give enough contrast for this value to be easily seen.
Is it possible to change the colour of this bar in this case (blank would
be nice) and/or increase the line
gt;name));
with give the following in the pot file:
#. TRANSLATORS: this applies to CIRCLE#:
src/develop/masks/mask.c:293msgid "[CIRCLE] change size"msgstr ""
Regards
Jean-Luc
Le dim. 3 nov. 2019 à 01:04, Pascal Obry a écrit :
>
> Hello Pierre,
>
> > I ha
Hi,
I also experienced this.
The workaround is to open a second instance of the module.
Regards
Jean-Luc
Le jeu. 29 août 2019 à 06:44, August Schwerdfeger
a écrit :
> Recently when editing a dusty film scan I tried to use the "spot removal"
> module to take care of the dust.
Git master, from the "about": 2.7.0+1113~g248fbccd6-dirty
J-L
Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 21:42, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
> * Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [05-04-19 15:25]:
> > OK, so :
> > 1 - if I left the default scale value to 1.028 and vignetting only and I
> > swi
00, the field
"correction done" is empty always but the first time I switch the module
on/off (while the correction is applied).
BTW, I forgot to tell I use the git version of darktable.
J-L
Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 20:41, Torsten Bronger
a écrit :
> Hallöchen!
>
> Jean-
Hi,
When I apply the correction it is set automatically to 1.028.
I can manually set it to 1.000.
Then It stay adjusted to this value.
(I'm not sure I've understood the question correctly).
J-L
Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 12:51, Torsten Bronger
a écrit :
> Hallöchen!
>
> Jea
Hi,
Ah yes... well no, it is at 1.028.
This is the default value it gets everytime if I click the "default
parameters" icon or double click the scale.
J-L
Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 08:36, Torsten Bronger
a écrit :
> Hallöchen!
>
> Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) writes:
>
> >
rsions are set to
"none", I get "something".
Regards
Jean-Luc
___
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
onts but I find that I do not
> > have a/.config/darktable/themes directory at all not sure why
> > this is notbeing placed during the install. The above changes so
> > far are not effectinghow dt displays fonts but does of course
> > change other programs.
> > David
h is used
> in
> modules.
>
>
> Le 19-04-15 à 03 h 59, Jean-Luc a
> écrit :
>
>
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I
Hi,
I got the same kind of issue (manjaro gnome, roboto font used) :
To get something satisfying without enlarging the panels I just
generalized "condensed fonts" (css file, line 211)
Note : to tweak the css copy the darktable.css with a customized name
to your .config/darkable/themes direct
e in something like .local/share as usual fot this kind of data?
Regards
Jean-Luc
___
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
I get the problem but only when the image is rotated according to the exif
(orientation module).
A normal lanscape image is displayed normally.
A portrait image is rotated 180°
J-L
Le sam. 30 mars 2019 à 00:53, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
> * Patrick Shanahan [03-29-19 19:36]:
> > * Pascal Obr
Anyone with a fix or a workaround for that please?
Thanks
Jean-Luc
-- Forwarded message -
From: Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Date: mer. 6 mars 2019 à 18:16
Subject: lens correction and shape of the masks
To: darktable forum
Hi
I've used a 14 mm Samyang lens on a Canon E
In the database (in liblensfun-data package, file slr-canon.xml for Canon),
you will find the various bodies / lenses.
For each lens, there is a comment like:
This allows you to know how the lens was calibrated.
J-L
Le sam. 23 févr. 2019 à 19:31, David Vincent-Jones a
écrit :
> On my system t
ned
in the manual.
Orientation is for portrait / landscape orientation of the picture (or
upside-down), it rotates the image by 90° steps.
Jean-Luc
Le mer. 26 déc. 2018 à 15:33, DavidJr. a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I just installed the new 2.6 version of darktable and was curious as to
> why
sample square (patch) from a target
(color checker).
Regards
Jean-Luc
___
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Hi,
The Canon EOS 760D is supported by the latest version of DT (v 2.4.1).
Probably you are using an old version.
Jean-Luc
2018-02-15 16:47 GMT+01:00 Andreas Klemmed :
> Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, seid langer Zeit benutze ich Darktable um
> meine Bilder von meiner Nikon Kam
2 along with it.
>
> I am using 7.3 at the moment, but I am fairly certain that I used 7.2
> before.
>
I have used 7.2 and I use 7.3 from debian
>
> > BR
> > Jørn
>
> Tobias
Jean-Luc
__
:
- Debian (the only real distribution
- Ubuntu
- Gentoo
- Fedora
- Mageia
- ArchLinux
- [add many]
And it is quite easy to build your own from source.
Regards
Jean-Luc
2018-01-24 20:24 GMT+01:00 steve :
> Thanks so much for the latest 2.4.1 release, which I am enjoying on my
> Mac book and
on a voluntary basis, there is never any
warranty, even... well... you know.
Regards
Jean-Luc
2018-01-16 19:39 GMT+01:00 Neil Schemenauer :
> Any ideas why there is no current build for MacOS? If you go to the
> home page and follow the install link, you get 2.2.5. If you go to
> the
.LensModel Ascii 74 18-300mm
Exif.Photo.LensSpecification Rational4 18/1 300/1 0/1
0/1
Exif.Photo.LensModel Ascii 9 18-300mm
Exif.Photo.LensSerialNumber Ascii 11 00
And it works also in darktable.
Regards
Hi,
I've reported a bug for this problem to exiv2.
See: http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/1328
Regards
Jean-Luc
2017-12-05 22:12 GMT+01:00 Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) <
jean.luc.cou...@gmail.com>:
> Well, with exiftool, I get :
> Lens Type : Canon EF 75-300mm
ble is the latest git/trunk version
Jean-Luc
2017-12-05 20:40 GMT+01:00 Marc Mascré :
> I don't know.
>
> To confirm that the problem come from the file and not my system, if you
> whant, you can download the file here :
> http://documents.mascre.fr/IMG_4575.CR2
> It could be
ate it but I became to ask
> myself if the wrong lens type is not write in the .CR2 by the camera.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> Le 04/12/2017 à 16:36, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit :
>
> Can you try:
>
> exiv2 -pt IMG_.cr2 | grep Lens
>
> I got that on an other lens:
&
70 EF24-70mm f/4L
IS USM
Maybe you can try also to update your exiftool-version (I've 10.67 here)
Jean-Luc
2017-12-04 0:29 GMT+01:00 Marc Mascré :
> Hi
>
> It seem to be exactly this model for my lens. But when I use exiftool on a
> .CR2 file from my camera, it detect my lens
your home directory:
.local/share/lensfun/updates/version_1/
And then the lens will be in the file: slr-sigma.xml
Jean-Luc
2017-12-03 18:07 GMT+01:00 Marc Mascré :
> Hello
>
> I have a lens, the sigma 18-300 f3.5-6.3
>
> The problem is, it is detect by darktable as a can
7-11-15 13:51 GMT+01:00 Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) <
jean.luc.cou...@gmail.com>:
> I'm getting some raw+jpeg from a Canon 5D MK IV. I will tell you when I
> will have looking in them.
>
> You *suppose* that "in-camera lens correction in Canon cameras doubles the
> RAW f
I'm getting some raw+jpeg from a Canon 5D MK IV. I will tell you when I
will have looking in them.
You *suppose* that "in-camera lens correction in Canon cameras doubles the
RAW file size".
In fact in the 5D Mk IV, the raw is the same size. It double when you use
the "dual pixel raw" which contain
This is because in the past there was too many "fake" photographies.
And they have tools to say if the picture has been retouched in
Photoshp/what_you_want. All is allowed is crop / Brightness / Saturation /
Contrast.
I can be wrong about these camera but I will get some raw from
a bit later.
Jean-Luc
2017-11-15 10:44 GMT+01:00 Heiko Bauke :
> Hi,
>
> Am 14.11.2017 um 20:39 schrieb bigmack...@mail.com:
>
>> New user here, so apologies if I'm posting to the wrong list!
>> I've just switched fully from Lightroom 6 to Darktable 2.2.5 under
> but those "challenges" would only affect a small sub-set of dt users
*every* "challenge affect only a small subset of dt users…
Only base curve, demosaicing, light-contrast-saturation affect everybody ;)
2017-10-11 17:34 GMT+02:00 Patrick Shanahan :
> * Jørn Villesen Christensen [10-11-17 11:2
normal and desirable. This way, there is a mean to
undo the actions or to revert to a specific point.
Jean-Luc
2017-02-11 9:54 GMT+01:00 Pascal Obry :
>
> I have seen this from time to time. I thought it was because of some
> module version diff when editing an old picture... Not sure.
>
where capture one was available. I asked to see how
it really works.
The local white balance is really a nice tool.
Regards
Jean-Luc
2017-02-07 20:49 GMT+01:00 J. Liles :
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Werzmirzowsky
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I
This is a bit different but some time ago, I failed to build darktable with
git version of lensfun.
I've opened a bug on lensfun (#72).
I received the following reply:
As a quick workaround, you may use the environment variable
CFLAGS=-Wno-error=deprecated-declarations
Regards
Jea
I had reported a bug about that sometimes ago on BTS.
It seems that binutils 2.27.51.2016 (uploaded on november 24th) solve this
problem.
Regards
Jean-Luc
2016-11-26 12:59 GMT+01:00 Roman Lebedev :
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Matthias Bodenbinder
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
So, I've added this information to my bug report...
J-L
2016-11-09 10:07 GMT+01:00 Pascal Obry :
>
> Jean-Luc,
>
> > Unfortunately there was a new upgrade of binutils today on debian
> > sid.
> >
> > It is from 2.51.20161105-2 -> 2.51.201611
to a new
upsteam trunk snapshot... Dangerous way to manage a so important package.
But it is sid ;)
Jean-Luc
2016-11-07 17:03 GMT+01:00 Pascal Obry :
>
> Jean-Luc,
>
> > There is a new version of binutils this morning (morning for me) on
> > debian sid : 2.27.51.20161105-2
Bonjour Pascal, hi everybody,
There is a new version of binutils this morning (morning for me) on debian
sid : 2.27.51.20161105-2 .
This version fixes the ld problem for me.
Regards
Jean-Luc
2016-11-05 22:21 GMT+01:00 Pascal Obry :
>
> Thanks Tobias and Jean-Luc, I'm not alone :)
Hi,
I got the same on debian/sid with the update of binutils package from
2.27-9+b1 to 2.27.51.20161102-1.
I've opened a bug (#843164) for that.
Reverting to 2.27-9 probably needs also to revert gcc/cpp/g++ and Co as
well.
Regards
Jea
What I see:
1 - The exposure level is not the same on both the pictures - there is
about 1 EV difference
2 - The silkypix.jpg is noise processed while the darktable.jpg is not.
Regards
Jean-Luc
2016-10-24 16:14 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew :
> J-L.C.> Is there something wrong as I don't S
e something wrong as I don't SEE anything wrong (my monitor is
calibrated).
Regards
Jean-Luc
2016-10-23 20:45 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew :
> https://www.sendspace.com/file/dskpng
>
> Pay attention to NE corner again; the black car, of course. Zoom to 100%,
> and try pushing - you'
;ve never "seen" (this means it can exists) this
magenta cast on shadows (I've more the problem when trying to recover
hightlights), noise is... noise and pretty random.
And about pushing a RAW +5EV, I've never done that, I try to have a better
exposure...
Jean-Luc
2016-10-23 19:59
Do you mean that you HAVE HAD the problem you report or is it simply "to
know if" ?
Jean-Luc
2016-10-23 4:05 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew :
> Sorry, if it's silly question - but I noticed the problem only recently,
> and
> after digging around found these threads explain
I've already reported that problem some time ago. Maybe it was related to
the manual translation.
When there is a %, it MUST be doubled.
But it must be doubled both in msgid and msgstr.
This way, the checks (msgfmt -c --statistics) are happy.
But anyway, I think we can survive with this error an
Hi,
Please send both msgid and msgstr for the offending template
Regards
Jean-Luc
2016-03-20 21:26 GMT+01:00 Ger Siemerink :
> Hello,
>
> Saving my translated nl.po file gives me an error.
>
> String 831:the level of lens dependent correction, 100% for full
> dependency,
Hi
Le 13/02/2016 09:11, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus
> slider with a logarithmic scale?
What is the meaning of "bauhaus" in "bauhaus slider" ?
Jean-Luc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
As everything is based on grey scales, the way the monitor is
calibrated has a big impact on the various shades used in dt.
But anyway, there is a nice .css file (darktable.css), probably, in
/usr/share/darktable, it is possible to copy it into the personnal
configuration directory (maybe .co
splayed for a very short time and then appears zoomed
in. The preview in the upper left corner doesnt display the zoom
outlines. I can zoom 100%, 200% but "to fit" is not working.
If I go to the lighttable and bck to the darkroom, it is fine.
All that is done in the monochrome module.
> Does "focal range:%s" stand for "focal length"?
This is in lens correction.
And this describes the combination camera-lens used to shot the picture.
The definition of the lens is correct with the focal range.
i.e. SIgma 17-70mm f2.8 [etc.]
if focal range, appears; 17-70mm (it appears as a
54 matches
Mail list logo
