Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee ⇒ 2016.02.17 18:30

Hi all, Le mercredi, 10 février 2016, 13.42:35 Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > Holger Levsen dijo [Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:01:47AM +0100]: > > So far, February 17th looks like a date I would pick. > > The meeting shall take plae on Wednesday 17, 18:30. > > People from both bidding teams, *please

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee ⇒ 2016.02.17 18:30

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:47:07PM +0100]: > > The meeting shall take plae on Wednesday 17, 18:30. > > > > People from both bidding teams, *please confirm* you can attend at > > that time. If you cannot, please state if you can attend 1hr later > > (19:30). If that's not

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee ⇒ 2016.02.17 18:30

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:42:35PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > - The meeting is not supposed to be long, but a scheme limited to 1hr > can be less than ideal (as Neil cannot attend Thursday >19:30) If it's better, I can re-arrange some stuff for the Thursday, but that may just be complicating

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee ⇒ 2016.02.17 18:30

Holger Levsen dijo [Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:01:47AM +0100]: > so far only 6 people have voted in this dudle poll - so if you haven't please > vote now. > > That said, I'm a bit unsure about the timing, as I think such a meeting needs > at least 7 days warning in advance, which already

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee ⇒ 2016.02.17 18:30

Sorry for the noise - 18:30UTC. 12:30 Mexico, 13:30 Montreal, 14:30 Nova Scotia, 18:30 UK, 19:30 most of Europe (including Prague), 20:30 South Africa. Did I miss any of you? :) ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee ⇒ 2016.02.17 18:30

On 2016-02-10 14:42, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > People from both bidding teams, *please confirm* you can attend at > that time. We just talked about it on our IRC channel and a few of us can make it so it should be fine for us. > > Of course, both bidding teams: Please do confirm whether you are

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee ⇒ 2016.02.17 18:30

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > One more person voted. And yes, time is passing by quickly. And > whatever we choose, only the Committee has voted — we have not heard a > word from either the Prague or the Montreal groups. Ugh, I didn't put in any time...

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Hi, On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Dear DebConf Team, dear DebConf Committee, dear DPL, > > I consider the DebConf Committee to be validly formed, with this page as > reference: > https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf_Committee > > The 7 persons from the

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 05:13:46PM +0100]: > Dear DebConf Team, dear DebConf Committee, dear DPL, > > I consider the DebConf Committee to be validly formed, with this page as > reference: > https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf_Committee > > The 7 persons from the

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

martin f krafft dijo [Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:48:26AM +1300]: > also sprach Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [2016-01-27 03:56 +1300]: > > > I was trying to not diverge too much away from the process. But > > > if there's no strong objection to skipping directly to the Bid > > > Decision

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

On 2016-01-24 17:23, martin f krafft wrote: The wiki lists three purposes for this meeting: 1. Introductions from teams and their members. 2. Questions from teams about the process, and about what others suggest they try to do on any uncertain aspects or potential problems. 3.

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Hi, On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:02:24PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi Martin, hi all, > > > > Are there any reasons for why we couldn't all read the wiki pages > > (again), engage in a bit more dialogue on the list and simply call > > for a final decision meeting in the near future,

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:02:24PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Hi Martin, hi all, >> > >> > Are there any reasons for why we couldn't all read the wiki pages >> > (again), engage in a bit more dialogue on the list and simply

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:02:24PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Hi Martin, hi all, >> > >> > Are there any reasons for why we couldn't all read the wiki pages >> > (again), engage in a bit more dialogue on the list and simply

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

also sprach Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [2016-01-27 03:56 +1300]: > > I was trying to not diverge too much away from the process. But > > if there's no strong objection to skipping directly to the Bid > > Decision Meeting, that works for me too! > > As far as I can remember this was a

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:48:26AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [2016-01-27 03:56 +1300]: > > > I was trying to not diverge too much away from the process. But > > > if there's no strong objection to skipping directly to the Bid > > > Decision

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Dear DebConf Team, dear DebConf Committee, dear DPL, I consider the DebConf Committee to be validly formed, with this page as reference: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf_Committee The 7 persons from the 'Confirmed for the DC17 decision' list have acknowledged my request for

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Hi Didier, I know how busy you are with the other new responsibilities you've recently took on. Thanks a lot for taking on this onorous task and re-forming the committee. As you know, I am not involved in the DC17 decision process, even though I sent the reminder to the teams in November. But I

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Hi Martin, hi all, Le lundi, 25 janvier 2016, 06.23:44 martin f krafft a écrit : > As you know, I am not involved in the DC17 decision process, even > though I sent the reminder to the teams in November. But I am > obviously following closely and with great interest, and I do wonder > about the

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Daniel Pocock dijo [Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 06:29:51PM +0100]: > On 20/12/15 18:18, Allison Randal wrote: > > On 12/19/2015 01:09 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > >>(...) > >> Freezing the decision process may also be a practical way of emphasizing > >>

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

On 12/19/2015 01:09 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> >> Given the general "DebConf Team" situation, I would really like us to >> focus on using the existing structures for what they got built, rather >> than having meta-discussions, which will only

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

On 20/12/15 18:18, Allison Randal wrote: > On 12/19/2015 01:09 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >>> Given the general "DebConf Team" situation, I would really like us to >>> focus on using the existing structures for what they got built, rather >>> than

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le jeudi, 17 décembre 2015, 12.49:32 Gunnar Wolf a écrit : >> As Didier said already replying to Steve, I am among the people >> responding "yes" to the call. There is one bit that I do feel >> important: We can reach a consensus as to which bid

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Le jeudi, 17 décembre 2015, 12.49:32 Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > As Didier said already replying to Steve, I am among the people > responding "yes" to the call. There is one bit that I do feel > important: We can reach a consensus as to which bid is more apt in our > eyes, but formally, we don't have

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Le mercredi, 16 décembre 2015, 13.45:15 Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > As announced in [1], I have now contacted all "Current members" from > > [0] to check whether they would keep serving on the DebConf > > Committee. I hope to

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100]: > Dear DebConf Team, > > Please be aware that the DebConf17 bids deadline has now passed and that > there are two bidders: > (...) > I suggest to proceed this way: if there are blockers, for the two Bid > teams or some DebConf

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Quoting in full on purpose. Can DPL just tell the committee to do this on its own this once? Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity. On Dec 17, 2015 19:49, "Gunnar Wolf" wrote: > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100]: > > Dear DebConf Team, > >

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

Richard Hartmann dijo [Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 07:57:01PM +0100]: > Quoting in full on purpose. > > Can DPL just tell the committee to do this on its own this once? That, or put a delegation in place before mid January. Or come up with a different, sustainable scheme.

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > As announced in [1], I have now contacted all "Current members" from [0] > to check whether they would keep serving on the DebConf Committee. I > hope to hear from them all before the end of the year [2]. > [0]