Bug#1064346: Source is missing errors on HTML source files

is okay to have the package > depend on itself for building. Yes and no. Best use the built package to generate the file Other way is staged build Bastien > > On 21/02/24 11:20 pm, roucaries bastien wrote: > > You should rebuilt from source also... See for instance how I do with

Bug#1064346: Source is missing errors on HTML source files

Le mer. 21 févr. 2024 à 15:38, Soren Stoutner a écrit : > > Shriram, > > On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 8:30:54 AM MST Shriram Ravindranathan wrote: > > Upon inspecting the embedded font, It seems to be a bespoke icon-font > > generated using a tool called "Fontello" from one of the icons of the

Bug#1042532: mediawiki: Vendoring a few javascript library without source

Le lun. 14 août 2023 à 08:57, Kunal Mehta a écrit : > severity 1042532 normal > tags 1042532 wontfix > thanks > > Hi, > > On 7/31/23 07:23, roucaries bastien wrote: > > hi, > > Le lun. 31 juil. 2023 à 08:27, Kunal Mehta a écrit > : > >> These ar

Bug#1042532: mediawiki: Vendoring a few javascript library without source

hi, Le lun. 31 juil. 2023 à 08:27, Kunal Mehta a écrit : > > Hi, > > On 7/29/23 16:44, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > resources/lib/ > > (https://sources.debian.org/src/mediawiki/1:1.39.4-2/resources/lib/) > > > > include a few library already packaged for debian. > > > >

Bug#1041471: src:isa-support: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new autopkgtest fails on armel

Hi Paul, It is a regression on qemu. I will disable the test but I will prefer qemu fixed. I could not reproduce on porter box, I get another qemu bug... Who is the specialist of qemu ? Bastien Le mer. 19 juil. 2023 à 10:45, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > Source: isa-support > Version: 15.1 >

Bug#1039119: darktable: use packaged lua

Le lun. 26 juin 2023 à 14:16, David Bremner a écrit : > > roucaries bastien writes: > > > > Yes in your case i cheched by grepping thé build log. Lua ils compiléd what > > why i set rc severity. > > I suspect that you saw a different package with Lua in the name, na

Bug#1039119: darktable: use packaged lua

Le lun. 26 juin 2023 à 06:45, David Bremner a écrit : > Bastien Roucariès writes: > > > Source: darktable > > Version: Use packaged lua > > Severity: serious > > Justification: embded code copy > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > It appear that your package embded and compile lua > > > > Could

Bug#984748: gettext is wrongly marked Multi-Arch: foreign

Hi, Time to get to unstable post release Bastien Le dim. 26 févr. 2023 à 14:44, Bastien Roucariès a écrit : > > Source: gettext > Followup-For: Bug #984748 > Control: tags -1 + patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > I havve done a few patches for improving the situation. Patch 2 may be > reported >

Bug#1017446: debian-policy: stress that preinst script that install by using base64 decode on self an elf binary is not a good stuff

Le mar. 16 août 2022 à 13:22, Sam Hartman a écrit : > > > "Bastien" == Bastien Roucariès writes: > Bastien> I will like to stress that this kind of stuff is bad: > Bastien> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/isa-support/-/blob/master/debian/altivec- > Bastien>

Bug#998476: autoconf-archive: AX_PYTHON_DEVEL version checks fail with Python 3.10

Hi, Can I have the debdiff ? I can do the upload Bastien (ro...@debian.org) Le jeu. 11 nov. 2021 à 11:48, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > uploaded to the delayed queue to prepare for Python 3.10.

Bug#981171: [PATCH 6/6] Use subsection for environment

From: Bastien Roucariès In order to improve readability create four subsections: - POSIX defined core environment variables, for variables defined by POSIX that modify the general behavior of a program - Internationalization environment variables for variables related to internationalization -

Bug#981171: [PATCH 5/6] Create a section ENVIRONMENT

From: Bastien Roucariès According to man-page (7): ENVIRONMENT A list of all environment variables that affect the program or function and how they affect it. Therefore push the list of variables to an ENVIRONMENT section. Reorder also how to set environment variables to

Bug#981171: [PATCH 4/6] Better documentation of the environment mechanism

From: Bastien Roucariès Document the purpose of the envirment mechanism, compared to the command line argument of a program. Document particularly that the environment is shared by many programs and is inherited. Define also the so called process environment and "the environment" concept that

Bug#981171: [PATCH 2/6] Document PATH resolution

From: Bastien Roucariès Document PATH resolution, particularly null sequence and empty PATH Document also that since POSIX.1-2001 null sequence for . are deprecated. Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 26 +++--- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3

Bug#981171: [PATCH 3/6] Improve pager section by pointing to more

From: Bastien Roucariès More is the default pager according to mailx manual page of POSIX.1-2001 to POSIX.1-2017. Mention it. --- man7/environ.7 | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index 9ac86f357..3c2769bfb 100644 ---

Bug#981171: [PATCH 0/6][V2] environement (7)

Please review and apply [PATCH 1/6] Document that means at login time for HOME, LOGNAME, [PATCH 2/6] Document PATH resolution [PATCH 3/6] Improve pager section by pointing to more [PATCH 4/6] Better documentation of the environment mechanism [PATCH 5/6] Create a section ENVIRONMENT [PATCH 6/6]

Bug#981171: [PATCH 1/6] Document that means at login time for HOME, LOGNAME, SHELL, USER

From: Bastien Roucariès Clearly document that HOME, LOGNAME, SHELL and USER are set at login time by program like login (1). Document also that using su could result in a mixed environment, and point to su manual. Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 34

Bug#981171: [PATCH 13/13] Document LINES and COLUMNS

From: Bastien Roucariès Document the variable LINES and COLUMN Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 45 ++--- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index b461e93df..5665ac4d2

Bug#981171: [PATCH 12/13] Introduce the user custumization section

From: Bastien Roucariès Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 74 ++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index 236025035..b461e93df 100644 --- a/man7/environ.7 +++

Bug#981171: [PATCH 10/13] Introduce ENVIRONMENT section

From: Bastien Roucariès Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 92 +++--- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index f2786fa09..96d47be9f 100644 --- a/man7/environ.7 +++

Bug#981171: [PATCH 11/13] Reorganize the different environment section

From: Bastien Roucariès Introduce a Posix defined environment, other and internalization Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 69 +- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7

Bug#981171: [PATCH 09/13] Document convention of string in environ

From: Bastien Roucariès Document the name=value system and that nul byte is forbidden Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index f9e49a572..f2786fa09 100644 ---

Bug#981171: [PATCH 08/13] Better documentation of the environment mechanism

From: Bastien Roucariès Compare with argc/argv and describe the purpose of environment --- man7/environ.7 | 24 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index 7eeb1fe0e..f9e49a572 100644 --- a/man7/environ.7 +++ b/man7/environ.7 @@

Bug#981171: [PATCH 07/13] Better documentation of _GNU_SOURCE for environment

From: Bastien Roucariès Use feature_test_macros and document that historically you should manually declare it. --- man7/environ.7 | 24 +--- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index 981038ea1..7eeb1fe0e 100644 ---

Bug#981171: [PATCH 06/13] Improve pager section by pointing to more

From: Bastien Roucariès More is the default pager in a lot of system mention it --- man7/environ.7 | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index 81932d894..981038ea1 100644 --- a/man7/environ.7 +++ b/man7/environ.7 @@ -132,7

Bug#981171: [PATCH 05/13] Add see also ld.so (8) for LD_ variables

From: Bastien Roucariès Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index 11f30c332..81932d894 100644 --- a/man7/environ.7 +++ b/man7/environ.7 @@ -212,7 +212,8 @@ and other programs.

Bug#981171: [PATCH 04/13] Document PATH resolution

From: Bastien Roucariès Document PATH resolution, particularly null sequence and empty PATH Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 42 ++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index

Bug#981171: [PATCH 03/13] Document that means at login time for HOME, LOGNAME, SHELL, USER

From: Bastien Roucariès Clearly document that su by default does not change this variables. Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 41 + 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index

Bug#981171: [PATCH 02/13] Add a note about portability of environment variable

From: Bastien Roucariès Some variables are portable at least under UNIX Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index d889310d6..ec886d83d 100644 --- a/man7/environ.7 +++

Bug#981171: Environment 7 improvments

Hi, Could you find a serie for better documenting environment [PATCH 01/13] Do not document mktemp (3) [PATCH 02/13] Add a note about portability of environment variable [PATCH 03/13] Document that means at login time for HOME, LOGNAME, [PATCH 04/13] Document PATH resolution [PATCH 05/13] Add

Bug#981171: [PATCH 01/13] Do not document mktemp (3)

From: Bastien Roucariès Do not use for documentation purposes the unsecure mktemp function Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès --- man7/environ.7 | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 index 182d823d2..d889310d6 100644 ---

Bug#964198: hylafax: diff for NMU version 3:6.0.7-3.1

Control: tags 964198 + patch Control: tags 964198 + pending Control: tags 978220 + patch Control: tags 978220 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for hylafax (versioned as 3:6.0.7-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards.

Bug#905769: node-toidentifier: Unnecessary $(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES) check?

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:36 AM Chris Lamb wrote: > > Source: node-toidentifier > Version: 1.0.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: Bastien Roucaris , > ftpmas...@debian.org > > Hi, > > I just ACCEPTed node-toidentifier from NEW but was wondering if: > >ifeq (,$(filter

Bug#904852: lintian: package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc far too overzealous

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 3:54 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > Chris Lamb wrote: > > > > the phrase "Please move this files to /usr/share/doc/ or remove it." > > > sounds very final, but completely ignores that there are quite a lot of > > > files (often named README or so) documenting the purpose or

Bug#905746: node-code: Please clarify/tidy original origin of module

Ok will clarifiy. It is inpired by node chai but it is a full rewrite On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:57 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > Source: node-code > Version: 5.2.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: Bastien Roucaris , > ftpmas...@debian.org > > Hi, > > I just ACCEPTed node-code from NEW but was

Bug#901931: the soundsystem still breaks after todays timidity and timidity-daemon upgrade to 2.14.0-8

please do an apt-get remove timidity-daemon if you do not need it Bastien On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Markus Steinko wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > sadly the bug still appears after todays system upgrade, which also upgraded > timidity and timidity-daemon to version 2.14.0-8. > > What kind

Bug#902448: timidity: Breaks: timidity-daemon (>= 2.14.0-1~) but 2.14.0-5 is to be installed

Fixed uploaded. BTW this package is a security trap. I plan to open a few CVEs. Did you have wrd karaoke file ? I plan to drop this feature if i could not test bastien On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53:05PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: >>

Bug#898273: [lintian] Detect conflict between package.json version and debian control version

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bastien, > >> - for every depends in package.json check debian control depends > ^^^ > Do you mean in the "devDependencies" key? no the Dependencies key, the devDependencies should be checked against

Bug#898273: [lintian] Detect conflict between package.json version and debian control version

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bastien, > >> If package is section javascript search all file named package.json, parse it >> and control against control depends (including optional that go to recommand >

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed Done waiting from your side > > On 16/02/18 14:30, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien >> <roucaries.b

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > <po...@debian.org> wrote: >> Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick >> Control: severity -1 normal &g

Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick > Control: severity -1 normal > > On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: important >> >> Hi, >> >> I have just landed an

Bug#873744: RFS: liboauth/1.0.3-1 [QA-upload]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 03:23:46PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: >> I can sponsor but I will need to be the maintainer of this package not >> debian-qa > > ? > *you* will need to be the

Bug#873744: RFS: liboauth/1.0.3-1 [QA-upload]

I can sponsor but I will need to be the maintainer of this package not debian-qa On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Carlos Maddela wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liboauth" > > *

Bug#862930: RFS: node-big-integer/1.6.22-1 [ITP]

> Regards, > > > > Le 26/08/2017 à 16:38, roucaries bastien a écrit : >> >> Does node-bn does the same ? >> >> Thanks >> >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna >> <locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote: >>> >

Bug#862930: RFS: node-big-integer/1.6.22-1 [ITP]

Does node-bn does the same ? Thanks On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:04:49 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: >> >> >> >I'm not sure what you mean. >> >These are dev dependencies,

Bug#873001: [debian-policy] get-orig-source documentation should include a pointer to devref and a minimal example

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bastien ROUCARIÈS writes: > >> get-orig-source should include an example. > >> If you use uscan this is safe and policy compliant (maybe opening a bug >> against dpkg-dev to get this rule

Bug#872996: RFS: node-unicode-tr51/9.0.0-1 ITP

control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:55 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org > > I take it > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> > wrote: &g

Bug#872996: RFS: node-unicode-tr51/9.0.0-1 ITP

control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org I take it On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-unicode-tr51" > > * Package name:

Bug#872753: RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1-1 ITP

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Le 21/08/2017 à 22:44, roucaries bastien a écrit : >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:33 PM, roucaries bastien >> <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: >&

Bug#872753: RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1-1 ITP

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:33 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org > > Will sponsor this one. Will review > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote: >> Control:

Bug#872753: RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1-1 ITP

control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org Will sponsor this one. Will review On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Control: retitle -1 RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1-1 [ITP] > > -- > WBR, wRAR

Bug#872808: [debian-policy] nocheck DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > >> I think the following patch is needed even if profiles are not fully >> specified. >> Maybe an example about nodoc and help2man will also help. The nocheck should >> check

Bug#849853: [debian-policy] Document source-is-missing lintian kind of problems

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Bastien, > > On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:45:34PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> I get some problems when reporting bug detected by source-is-missing >> tag in lintian. >> >> The main problems are: >> *

Bug#849851: [debian-policy] Document that rules clean target is not sufficient for removing dfsg problems

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org > control: usertag -1 +discussion > > Hello Bastien, > > On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:37:25PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Following #849830 and generally

Bug#868184: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#868184: CVE-2017-11141 CVE-2017-11166 CVE-2017-11170 CVE-2017-11188

I suppose I have already fille bug and are under TEMP under tracker Bastien On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: imagemagick > Severity: important > Tags: security > > Please see: > > CVE-2017-11188: >

Bug#864151: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#864151: imagemagick: Typo in debian/changelog for CVE identifier

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: imagemagick > Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11 > Severity: minor > > Hi > > There is a small typo in one of the CVE identifiers for the > 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11: > >* Fix minor security bugs: > + CVE-2017-9409:

Bug#863481: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#863481: [node-concat-stream] Uninitialized Memory Exposure

I can do it but I do not know that is the best: - let 1.6 go to unstable - patch old version Could you ask release team. The debdiff between the two version is so small that I have doubt On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > If you would like

Bug#860939: node-diffie-hellman: Please clarify security concerns

control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/crypto-browserify/diffie-hellman/issues/22 On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: node-diffie-hellman > Version: 5.0.2-1 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-CC: Bastien Roucariès > > Hi, > > I just

Bug#860238: [dpkg] Improve debugging experience for piupart

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > Control: forcemerge 813454 -1 > > Hi! > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 12:02:07 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Package: dpkg >> Version: 1.18.23 >> Severity: important >> affects: piuparts.debian.org >> affects:

Bug#860237: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#860237: [piuparts.debian.org] Improve debugging experience in case of dpkg failure

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2017-04-13 12:03, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote: >>> On 2017-04-13 11:44, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >>>&g

Bug#860237: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#860237: [piuparts.debian.org] Improve debugging experience in case of dpkg failure

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2017-04-13 11:44, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Actually dpkg try to recover from error state in order to get something safe. >> >> it is not really needed for piupart and moreover it detroy bug evidence. >> >> Safer

Bug#849831: Evil licence

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1334543 > Control: forwarded 849832 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1334543 > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:52:08 +0100 Bastien ROUCARIES >

Bug#849830: [src:digikam] Some sources are not included in your package

On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Steve Robbins wrote: > On Saturday, December 31, 2016 10:06:37 PM CST you wrote: > >> your package includes some files that seem to lack sources >> in preferred forms of modification (even if removed during clean target). > > No part of the

Bug#848894: Cannot reproduce on sbuild; thoughts on architecture=amd64

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Hilko Bengen wrote: > control: tag -1 unreproducible > > Good evening. > > In my linux/amd64 sbuild setup, dx builds just fine. > > What had me puzzled, though, is how the message "checking architecture > type... amd64" came to be. If uname

Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

BTW feel free to NMU imagemagick during a short break I take in the next two days. Bastien

Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:22 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM, roucaries bastien > <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien >> <roucarie

Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien > <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> <po...@d

Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote: >> control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/320 >> >> Dear realease team, >> >> What is the next

Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > <po...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote: >>> control: forwarded -1 https://g

Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

s, this is clearly an ABI break. > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 at 15:55:02 +0100, roucaries bastien wrote: >> * struct _DrawInfo (1) is not a problem from a C point of view because >> it should be set and destry by API function. It is a opaque object. So >> no need to so bump fo

Bug#846385: Fwd: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

-- Forwarded message -- From: Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> Date: Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:08 AM Subject: Re: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change) To: roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com>

Bug#846385: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Package: imagemagick > Version: 6.9.9.6+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > We recently merged imagemagick 6.9.9.6+dfsg-1 in Ubuntu 17.04; however > we see autopkgtest failures in

Bug#843362: RFS: wand/0.4.4-1

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Changwoo Ryu wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wand": > > * Package name: wand > Version : 0.4.4-1 > Section : python > > It builds

Bug#842597: RFS: [RC] pythonmagick/0.9.14-1

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:11:01PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pythonmagick" > > o/ > >> Alternatively, one can

Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On 13/10/16 09:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 12/10/16 17:13, roucaries bastien wrote: >>> Uploaded new version waiting for green light >> >> Go ahead. > > Can

Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick

Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:14 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > <po...@debian.org> wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 07/10/16 17:

Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick

Hi, On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 07/10/16 17:15, roucaries bastien wrote: >> I have tried and it seems so. >> >> Due to perl transition I get some transient problem but it

Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick

I have tried and it seems so. Due to perl transition I get some transient problem but it seems ok, except package only available under unstable On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org > usertags 838242

Bug#829292: autoconf-archive: new upstream version 2016.03.20

Uploaded to mentors. I you want you could sponsor Bastien On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> Will do please reprod in end of august if not done > > Hi, it's September now. The new autoconf-archive is being used by > several GNOME 3.22 modules. Since

Bug#835488: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#835488: imagemagick: Regression after security update to 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4, unable to convert PDF files in PHP

Yes with next security update On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Tommie Van Mechgelen <m...@tommie.it> wrote: > Hi, > > will there be an update available? > > Thanks > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 09:14 CEST, roucaries bastien > <roucaries.bastien+deb

Bug#835488: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#835488: imagemagick: Regression after security update to 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4, unable to convert PDF files in PHP

control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream control: tags -1 + patch On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:19 AM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fixed upstream by > https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f6242e725c819a69bee2a444f8e4a3c7718b2b3f > > On Wed,

Bug#835488: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#835488: imagemagick: Regression after security update to 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4, unable to convert PDF files in PHP

Fixed upstream by https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f6242e725c819a69bee2a444f8e4a3c7718b2b3f On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:14 AM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bad pach is : > commit 26d910675e0cd1b62e988139dba8eb11931260ac > Author

Bug#835488: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#835488: imagemagick: Regression after security update to 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4, unable to convert PDF files in PHP

Bad pach is : commit 26d910675e0cd1b62e988139dba8eb11931260ac Author: Cristy Date: Sat Jan 30 09:37:10 2016 -0500 Fix out of bound in quantum handling Bug: https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/105 bug-ubuntu:

Bug#835488: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#835488: Bug#835488: imagemagick: Regression after security update to 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4, unable to convert PDF files in PHP

I tried convert rose: pdf:rose.pdf identify rose.pdf work as expected. Seems to crash on multiple page pdf On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:08 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Udo Pütz <udo.pu...@muon.de> wrote: >>

Bug#835488: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#835488: Bug#835488: imagemagick: Regression after security update to 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4, unable to convert PDF files in PHP

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Udo Pütz wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:31:22 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?VWRvIFDDvHR6?= > wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 21:41:26 +0200 "Tommie Van Mechgelen" >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> >> Hi, >> >> > The issue exists

Bug#835488: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#835488: imagemagick: Regression after security update to 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4, unable to convert PDF files in PHP

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Tommie Van Mechgelen wrote: > Package: imagemagick > Version: 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u4 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > After the upgrade to this version, converting PDF-files in PHP stopped > working. > > A small PHP test application

Bug#827643: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#827643: other bug reports

control: tags -1 + security control: severity -1 serious On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 8:22 PM, David Lechner wrote: > Here are some related bug reports: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1594060 > https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/pull/223 >

Bug#823750: [imagemagick] Multiple security problems

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > I'm unsure this makes sense to have a big bugreport collecting > various issues. Can this be split in the various isolated issues? > Otherwise it is untrackable. > > I for now have removed the entry

Bug#829292: autoconf-archive: new upstream version 2016.03.20

Will do please reprod in end of august if not done On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > Package: autoconf-archive > Version: 20150925-1 > Severity: wishlist > > The latest upstream version 2016.03.20 has some changes to AX_CHECK_GL > that would appear to fix macOS

Bug#817842: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#817842: imagemagick & imagemagick-6.q16 packages have the same binary

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: >>Whilst debugging the two desktop menu items in imagemagick (separate bug), it >> was noticed that the two packages (imagemagick &

Bug#808775: CKeditor: outstanding issues and maintenance; build system

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Guys, we have a problem with CKeditor. > As I've recently realised, in its current source form CKeditor can't be > loaded dynamically which breaks one of my packages after update. Therefore > CKeditor badly needs

Bug#813426: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#813426: warning: /etc/alternatives/compare is dangling; it will be updated with best choice

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > control: severity -1 serious > > Hello, > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:52 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: >> >> What a mess. > > I can only agree... > >> Preparing to unpack

Bug#813426: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#813426: warning: /etc/alternatives/compare is dangling; it will be updated with best choice

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > control: severity -1 serious > > Hello, > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:52 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: >> >> What a mess. > > I can only agree... It is experimental > >> Preparing

Bug#809768: RFS: kbibtex/0.6+git7fdc0cd97c093f-1

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:26:26PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kbibtex" > > sure. > >> More information about hello can

Bug#788729: closed by Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> (Re: [src:libgda5] Some sources are not included in your package)

control: reopen -1 On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the src:libgda5 package: > > #788729: [src:libgda5] Some sources are not included in your package

Bug#788729: closed by Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> (Re: [src:libgda5] Some sources are not included in your package)

control: found -1 4.0.2-1. On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM, roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > control: reopen -1 > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System > <ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote: >> This is an automatic n

Bug#809691: Would you volunteer to take over the maintenance under my sponsorship

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > it seems Bastien has lost interest in this package. It just popped up > in my sentinel of packages that are in the focus of Debian Med but not > uploaded for a long time. If you have no idea how to maintain

Bug#798215: RFS: node-typedarray/0.0.6-1 [ITP]

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Ross, > 1) control: "priority: extra" > > as said before on debian-mentors the priority should be optional, unless you > have good reason to > have

Bug#770009: convert(1) very slow on mips with no FPU

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 1:36 AM, James Cowgill james...@cowgill.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 23:18 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:30 PM, roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:16 PM, roucaries bastien

  1   2   3   >